{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,30]],"date-time":"2026-09-30T00:43:50Z","timestamp":1790729030389,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":37,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"10","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,8,23]],"date-time":"2023-08-23T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1692748800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,8,23]],"date-time":"2023-08-23T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1692748800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"name":"Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universit\u00e4t, Frankfurt am Main"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Clin Oral Invest"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Objectives<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>Bone resorption around implants could influence the resistance of the implant abutment complex (IAC). The present in vitro study aimed to assess the stability to static fatigue of implants presenting different levels of bone losses and diameters.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Materials and methods<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>Ninety implants with an internal conical connection with 3 different implant diameters (3.3\u00a0mm (I33), 3.8\u00a0mm (I38), and 4.3\u00a0mm (I43)) and 3 simulated bone loss settings (1.5\u00a0mm (I<jats:bold>_<\/jats:bold>15), 3.0\u00a0mm (I<jats:bold>_<\/jats:bold>30), and 4.5\u00a0mm (I_45) (<jats:italic>n<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u200910)) were embedded and standard abutments were mounted. All specimens were artificially aged (1,200,000 cycles, 50 N, simultaneous thermocycling) and underwent subsequently load-to-fracture test. For statistical analysis, Kolmogorov\u2013Smirnov test, Kruskal\u2013Wallis test, and Mann\u2013Whitney <jats:italic>U<\/jats:italic> test (<jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\u2009&lt;\u20090.05) were applied.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>All test specimens withstood the artificial aging without damage. The mean failure values were 382.1 (\u00b1\u200959.2) <jats:italic>N<\/jats:italic> (I3315), 347.0 (\u00b1\u200935.7) <jats:italic>N<\/jats:italic> (I3330), 315.9 <jats:italic>N<\/jats:italic> (\u00b1\u200930.9) (I3345), 531.4 (\u00b1\u200936.2) <jats:italic>N<\/jats:italic> (I3815), 514.5 (\u00b1\u200940.8) <jats:italic>N<\/jats:italic> (I3830), 477.9 (\u00b1\u200926.3) <jats:italic>N<\/jats:italic> (I3845), 710.1 (\u00b1\u200938.2) <jats:italic>N<\/jats:italic> (I4315), 697.9 (\u00b1\u200965.2) <jats:italic>N<\/jats:italic> (I4330), and 662.2 <jats:italic>N<\/jats:italic> (\u00b1\u200945.9) (I4345). The stability of the IACs decreased in all groups when bone loss inclined. Merely, the failure load values did not significantly differ among subgroups of I43.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>Larger implant diameters and minor circular bone loss around the implant lead to a higher stability of the IAC. The smaller the implant diameter was, the more the stability was affected by the circumferential bone level.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Clinical relevance<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>Preserving crestal bone level is important to ensure biomechanical sustainability at implant systems with a conical interface. It seems sensible to take\u00a0the effect of eventual\u00a0bone loss around implants into account during implant planning processes and restorative considerations.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1007\/s00784-023-05199-5","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2023,8,23]],"date-time":"2023-08-23T03:21:57Z","timestamp":1692760917000},"page":"5887-5894","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":8,"title":["Biomechanical behavior of implants with different diameters in relation to simulated bone loss\u2014 an in vitro study"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"27","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-2391-5399","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Tobias","family":"Graf","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jan-Frederik","family":"G\u00fcth","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Josef","family":"Schweiger","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Kurt-J\u00fcrgen","family":"Erdelt","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Daniel","family":"Edelhoff","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Michael","family":"Stimmelmayr","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023,8,23]]},"reference":[{"key":"5199_CR1","unstructured":"Jordan AR, Micheelis W (2016) F\u00fcnfte Deutsche Mundgesundheitsstudie-(DMS V). Deutscher Zahn\u00e4rzte Verlag D\u00c4V, Cologne"},{"key":"5199_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"662","DOI":"10.1111\/jerd.12625","volume":"32","author":"RS Ramani","year":"2020","unstructured":"Ramani RS, Bennani V, Aarts JM et al (2020) Patient satisfaction with esthetics, phonetics, and function following implant-supported fixed restorative treatment in the esthetic zone: A systematic review. J Esthet Restor Dent 32:662\u2013672. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/jerd.12625","journal-title":"J Esthet Restor Dent"},{"key":"5199_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/cre2.521","author":"ON Bandiaky","year":"2022","unstructured":"Bandiaky ON, Lokossou DL, Soueidan A et al (2022) Implant-supported removable partial dentures compared to conventional dentures: a systematic review and meta-analysis of quality of life, patient satisfaction, and biomechanical complications. Clin Exp Dent Res. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/cre2.521","journal-title":"Clin Exp Dent Res"},{"key":"5199_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"252","DOI":"10.1111\/jopr.12517","volume":"26","author":"SS Al-Johany","year":"2017","unstructured":"Al-Johany SS, Al Amri MD, Alsaeed S et al (2017) Dental implant length and diameter: a proposed classification scheme. J Prosthodont: Off J Am Coll Prosthodontists 26:252\u2013260. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/jopr.12517","journal-title":"J Prosthodont: Off J Am Coll Prosthodontists"},{"key":"5199_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Gonz\u00e1lez-Valls G, Roca-Millan E, C\u00e9spedes-S\u00e1nchez JM et al (2021) Narrow diameter dental implants as an alternative treatment for atrophic alveolar ridges. Systematic review and meta-analysis. Materials (Basel, Switzerland) 14. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/ma14123234","DOI":"10.3390\/ma14123234"},{"key":"5199_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"636","DOI":"10.3290\/j.qi.a42948","volume":"50","author":"FH Altaib","year":"2019","unstructured":"Altaib FH, Alqutaibi AY, Al-Fahd A et al (2019) Short dental implant as alternative to long implant with bone augmentation of the atrophic posterior ridge: a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs. Quintessence Int 50:636\u2013650. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3290\/j.qi.a42948","journal-title":"Quintessence Int"},{"key":"5199_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"69","DOI":"10.1007\/s00784-017-2205-0","volume":"22","author":"JAV Palacios","year":"2018","unstructured":"Palacios JAV, Garcia JJ, Caram\u00eas JMM et al (2018) Short implants versus bone grafting and standard-length implants placement: a systematic review. Clin Oral Investig 22:69\u201380. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00784-017-2205-0","journal-title":"Clin Oral Investig"},{"issue":"Suppl 16","key":"5199_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"21","DOI":"10.1111\/clr.13272","volume":"29","author":"E Schiegnitz","year":"2018","unstructured":"Schiegnitz E, Al-Nawas B (2018) Narrow-diameter implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Implant Res 29(Suppl 16):21\u201340. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/clr.13272","journal-title":"Clin Oral Implant Res"},{"key":"5199_CR9","first-page":"92","volume":"19","author":"B Zinsli","year":"2004","unstructured":"Zinsli B, S\u00e4gesser T, Mericske E et al (2004) Clinical evaluation of small-diameter ITI implants: a prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 19:92\u201399","journal-title":"Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants"},{"key":"5199_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1648","DOI":"10.47391\/jpma.1040","volume":"71","author":"MT Hamed","year":"2021","unstructured":"Hamed MT, Mously HA, Ghulman MM et al (2021) Impact of dental implant diameter on the efficiency of fatigue: a systematic review analysis. JPMA J Pak Med Assoc 71:1648\u20131654. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.47391\/jpma.1040","journal-title":"JPMA J Pak Med Assoc"},{"key":"5199_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"499","DOI":"10.1563\/AAID-JOI-D-09-00135.1","volume":"37","author":"WC Gealh","year":"2011","unstructured":"Gealh WC, Mazzo V, Barbi F et al (2011) Osseointegrated implant fracture: causes and treatment. J Oral Implantol 37:499\u2013503","journal-title":"J Oral Implantol"},{"key":"5199_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1117\/1.Jbo.22.10.107002","volume":"22","author":"S Padma","year":"2017","unstructured":"Padma S, Umesh S, Asokan S et al (2017) Bite force measurement based on fiber Bragg grating sensor. J Biomed Opt 22:1\u20136. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1117\/1.Jbo.22.10.107002","journal-title":"J Biomed Opt"},{"key":"5199_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"529","DOI":"10.1111\/joa.13218","volume":"237","author":"HM Edmonds","year":"2020","unstructured":"Edmonds HM, Glowacka H (2020) The ontogeny of maximum bite force in humans. J Anat 237:529\u2013542. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/joa.13218","journal-title":"J Anat"},{"key":"5199_CR14","first-page":"44","volume":"25","author":"K Tokmakidis","year":"2009","unstructured":"Tokmakidis K, Wessing B, Papoulia K et al (2009) Load distribution and loading concepts on teeth and implants. J Dental Implantol 25:44\u201352","journal-title":"J Dental Implantol"},{"key":"5199_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"553","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0501.2007.01395.x","volume":"19","author":"SR Allum","year":"2008","unstructured":"Allum SR, Tomlinson RA, Joshi R (2008) The impact of loads on standard diameter, small diameter and mini implants: a comparative laboratory study. Clin Oral Implant Res 19:553\u2013559. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1600-0501.2007.01395.x","journal-title":"Clin Oral Implant Res"},{"key":"5199_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"59","DOI":"10.1097\/id.0000000000000502","volume":"26","author":"SY Song","year":"2017","unstructured":"Song SY, Lee JY, Shin SW (2017) Effect of implant diameter on fatigue strength. Implant Dent 26:59\u201365. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/id.0000000000000502","journal-title":"Implant Dent"},{"key":"5199_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.prosdent.2020.08.042","author":"H Lee","year":"2021","unstructured":"Lee H, Jo M, Sailer I et al (2021) Effects of implant diameter, implant-abutment connection type, and bone density on the biomechanical stability of implant components and bone: a finite element analysis study. J Prosthet Dent. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.prosdent.2020.08.042","journal-title":"J Prosthet Dent"},{"key":"5199_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1276","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0501.2008.01581.x","volume":"19","author":"L Steinebrunner","year":"2008","unstructured":"Steinebrunner L, Wolfart S, Ludwig K et al (2008) Implant-abutment interface design affects fatigue and fracture strength of implants. Clin Oral Implant Res 19:1276\u20131284. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1600-0501.2008.01581.x","journal-title":"Clin Oral Implant Res"},{"key":"5199_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"510","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1532-849X.2011.00758.x","volume":"20","author":"S Dittmer","year":"2011","unstructured":"Dittmer S, Dittmer MP, Kohorst P et al (2011) Effect of implant-abutment connection design on load bearing capacity and failure mode of implants. J Prosthodont: Off J Am Coll Prosthodontists 20:510\u2013516. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1532-849X.2011.00758.x","journal-title":"J Prosthodont: Off J Am Coll Prosthodontists"},{"key":"5199_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2186\/jpr.JPR_D_20_00036","author":"T Graf","year":"2021","unstructured":"Graf T, G\u00fcth JF, Edelhoff D et al (2021) Influence of butt joint connections with long guiding areas on the stability of single crowns and 3-unit bridges - an in-vitro-study. J Prosthodont Res. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2186\/jpr.JPR_D_20_00036","journal-title":"J Prosthodont Res"},{"key":"5199_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"715","DOI":"10.1007\/s00784-013-1039-7","volume":"18","author":"SA Gehrke","year":"2014","unstructured":"Gehrke SA, Dos Santos S, Vianna M, Dedavid BA (2014) Influence of bone insertion level of the implant on the fracture strength of different connection designs: an in vitro study. Clin Oral Investig 18:715\u2013720. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00784-013-1039-7","journal-title":"Clin Oral Investig"},{"key":"5199_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"729","DOI":"10.11607\/jomi.2819","volume":"28","author":"B Manzoor","year":"2013","unstructured":"Manzoor B, Suleiman M, Palmer RM (2013) The effects of simulated bone loss on the implant-abutment assembly and likelihood of fracture: an in vitro study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 28:729\u201338. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.11607\/jomi.2819","journal-title":"Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants"},{"key":"5199_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e691","DOI":"10.4317\/medoral.23700","volume":"25","author":"O Camps-Font","year":"2020","unstructured":"Camps-Font O, Gonz\u00e1lez-Barnadas A, Mir-Mari J et al (2020) Fracture resistance after implantoplasty in three implant-abutment connection designs. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 25:e691\u2013e699. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4317\/medoral.23700","journal-title":"Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal"},{"key":"5199_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1530","DOI":"10.11607\/jomi.3227","volume":"28","author":"HL Chan","year":"2013","unstructured":"Chan HL, Oh WS, Ong HS et al (2013) Impact of implantoplasty on strength of the implant-abutment complex. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 28:1530\u20135. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.11607\/jomi.3227","journal-title":"Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants"},{"key":"5199_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e611","DOI":"10.4317\/medoral.24624","volume":"26","author":"B Leit\u00e3o-Almeida","year":"2021","unstructured":"Leit\u00e3o-Almeida B, Camps-Font O, Correia A et al (2021) Effect of bone loss on the fracture resistance of narrow dental implants after implantoplasty. An in vitro study. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 26:e611\u2013e618. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4317\/medoral.24624","journal-title":"Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal"},{"key":"5199_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1563\/aaid-joi-D-19-00365.1","author":"J Angermair","year":"2020","unstructured":"Angermair J, Wiest W, Rack A et al (2020) Synchrotron-based radiography of conical- vs. butt-joint implant abutment connections. J Oral Implantol. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1563\/aaid-joi-D-19-00365.1","journal-title":"J Oral Implantol"},{"key":"5199_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"453","DOI":"10.1097\/ID.0b013e31829b1777","volume":"22","author":"R Singh","year":"2013","unstructured":"Singh R, Singh SV, Arora V (2013) Platform switching: a narrative review. Implant Dent 22:453\u2013459. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/ID.0b013e31829b1777","journal-title":"Implant Dent"},{"key":"5199_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.11138\/orl\/2016.9.1S.001","volume":"9","author":"M Di Girolamo","year":"2016","unstructured":"Di Girolamo M, Calcaterra R, Di Gianfilippo R et al (2016) Bone level changes around platform switching and platform matching implants: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Oral Implantol 9:1","journal-title":"Oral Implantol"},{"key":"5199_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"233","DOI":"10.1016\/S0300-5712(96)00029-2","volume":"25","author":"PS Hull","year":"1997","unstructured":"Hull PS, Worthington HV, Clerehugh V et al (1997) The reasons for tooth extractions in adults and their validation. J Dent 25:233\u2013237","journal-title":"J Dent"},{"key":"5199_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"110","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1365-2842.2003.00981.x","volume":"30","author":"DS Quteish Taani","year":"2003","unstructured":"Quteish Taani DS (2003) Periodontal reasons for tooth extraction in an adult population in Jordan. J Oral Rehabil 30:110\u2013112","journal-title":"J Oral Rehabil"},{"key":"5199_CR31","first-page":"409","volume":"8","author":"MJ Morgan","year":"1993","unstructured":"Morgan MJ, James DF, Pilliar RM (1993) Fractures of the fixture component of an osseointegrated implant. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 8:409\u2013414","journal-title":"Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants"},{"issue":"Suppl 1","key":"5199_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"S267","DOI":"10.1002\/jper.16-0350","volume":"89","author":"F Schwarz","year":"2018","unstructured":"Schwarz F, Derks J, Monje A et al (2018) Peri-implantitis. J Periodontol 89(Suppl 1):S267-s290. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/jper.16-0350","journal-title":"J Periodontol"},{"key":"5199_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1388","DOI":"10.1902\/jop.2009.090115","volume":"80","author":"TG Wilson Jr","year":"2009","unstructured":"Wilson TG Jr (2009) The positive relationship between excess cement and peri-implant disease: a prospective clinical endoscopic study. J Periodontol 80:1388\u20131392. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1902\/jop.2009.090115","journal-title":"J Periodontol"},{"key":"5199_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"153","DOI":"10.1016\/j.archoralbio.2017.07.022","volume":"83","author":"Y Liu","year":"2017","unstructured":"Liu Y, Wang J (2017) Influences of microgap and micromotion of implant-abutment interface on marginal bone loss around implant neck. Arch Oral Biol 83:153\u2013160. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.archoralbio.2017.07.022","journal-title":"Arch Oral Biol"},{"key":"5199_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"218","DOI":"10.1111\/jcpe.13041","volume":"46","author":"CA Ramseier","year":"2019","unstructured":"Ramseier CA, Nydegger M, Walter C et al (2019) Time between recall visits and residual probing depths predict long-term stability in patients enrolled in supportive periodontal therapy. J Clin Periodontol 46:218\u2013230. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/jcpe.13041","journal-title":"J Clin Periodontol"},{"key":"5199_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"124","DOI":"10.1111\/prd.12340","volume":"84","author":"L Trombelli","year":"2000","unstructured":"Trombelli L, Simonelli A, Franceschetti G et al (2000) (2020) What periodontal recall interval is supported by evidence? Periodontol 84:124\u2013133. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/prd.12340","journal-title":"Periodontol"},{"key":"5199_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"238","DOI":"10.1016\/s0109-5641(85)80050-6","volume":"1","author":"R DeLong","year":"1985","unstructured":"DeLong R, Sakaguchi RL, Douglas WH et al (1985) The wear of dental amalgam in an artificial mouth: a clinical correlation. Dent Mater: Off Publ Acad Dent Mater 1:238\u2013242. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/s0109-5641(85)80050-6","journal-title":"Dent Mater: Off Publ Acad Dent Mater"}],"container-title":["Clinical Oral Investigations"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00784-023-05199-5.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00784-023-05199-5\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00784-023-05199-5.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,7]],"date-time":"2023-10-07T08:13:32Z","timestamp":1696666412000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00784-023-05199-5"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2023,8,23]]},"references-count":37,"journal-issue":{"issue":"10","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023,10]]}},"alternative-id":["5199"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00784-023-05199-5","relation":{},"ISSN":["1436-3771"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1436-3771","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2023,8,23]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2 October 2022","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"3 August 2023","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"23 August 2023","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"Not applicable.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethics approval and consent to participate"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing interests.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}}]}}