{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,16]],"date-time":"2025-10-16T07:04:27Z","timestamp":1760598267693},"reference-count":50,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,1,15]],"date-time":"2024-01-15T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1705276800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,1,15]],"date-time":"2024-01-15T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1705276800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"name":"Medizinische Fakult\u00e4t Heidelberg der Universit\u00e4t Heidelberg"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Clin Oral Invest"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Objectives<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>The aim of this study was to compare failure load and initial damage in monolithic, partially veneered, and completely veneered (translucent) zirconia cantilevered fixed partial dentures (CFPDs), as well as completely veneered metal-ceramic CFPDs under different support and loading configurations.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Materials and methods<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>Eight test groups with anatomically congruent CFPDs (<jats:italic>n<\/jats:italic> = 8\/group) were fabricated, differing in CFPD material\/support structure\/loading direction (load applied via steel ball (\u00d8 6 mm) 3 mm from the distal end of the pontic for axial loading with a 2-point contact on the inner cusp ridges of the buccal and oral cusps and 1.3 mm below the oral cusp tip for 30\u00b0 oblique loading): (1) monolithic zirconia\/CoCr abutment teeth\/axial, (2) monolithic zirconia\/CoCr abutment teeth\/oblique, (3) partially veneered zirconia\/CoCr abutment teeth\/axial, (4) partially veneered zirconia\/CoCr abutment teeth\/oblique, (5) completely veneered zirconia\/CoCr abutment teeth\/axial, (6) completely veneered CoCr\/CoCr abutment teeth\/axial (control group), (7) partially veneered zirconia\/implants\/axial, and (8) partially veneered zirconia\/natural teeth\/axial. Restorations were artificially aged before failure testing. Statistical analysis was conducted using one-way ANOVA and Tukey post hoc tests.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>Mean failure loads ranged from 392 N (group 8) to 1181 N (group 1). Axially loaded monolithic zirconia CFPDs (group 1) and controls (group 6) showed significantly higher failure loads. Oblique loading significantly reduced failure loads for monolithic zirconia CFPDs (group 2). Initial damage was observed in all groups except monolithic zirconia groups, and fractography revealed design flaws (sharp edges at the occlusal boundary of the veneering window) in partially veneered zirconia CFPDs.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>Monolithic zirconia CFPDs might be a viable alternative to completely veneered CoCr CFPDs in terms of fracture load. However, oblique loading of monolithic zirconia CFPDs should be avoided in clinical scenarios. Design improvements are required for partially veneered zirconia CFPDs to enhance their load-bearing capacity.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Clinical relevance<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>Monolithic zirconia may represent a viable all-ceramic alternative to the established metal-ceramic option for CFPD fabrication. However, in daily clinical practice, careful occlusal adjustment and regular monitoring should ensure that oblique loading of the cantilever is avoided.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1007\/s00784-024-05501-z","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,1,15]],"date-time":"2024-01-15T02:02:15Z","timestamp":1705284135000},"update-policy":"http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":3,"title":["Initial damage and failure load of zirconia-ceramic and metal-ceramic posterior cantilever fixed partial dentures"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"28","author":[{"given":"Wolfgang","family":"B\u00f6micke","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Philipp","family":"Boisser\u00e9e","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Peter","family":"Rammelsberg","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Stefan","family":"Rues","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,1,15]]},"reference":[{"key":"5501_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"259891","DOI":"10.5402\/2012\/259891","volume":"2012","author":"A Sharma","year":"2012","unstructured":"Sharma A, Rahul GR, Poduval ST, Shetty K (2012) Assessment of various factors for feasibility of fixed cantilever bridge: a review study. ISRN Dent 2012:259891. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5402\/2012\/259891","journal-title":"ISRN Dent"},{"key":"5501_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"484","DOI":"10.1016\/0022-3913(92)90077-n","volume":"67","author":"R Himmel","year":"1992","unstructured":"Himmel R, Pilo R, Assif D, Aviv I (1992) The cantilever fixed partial denture\u2013a literature review. J Prosthet Dent 67:484\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/0022-3913(92)90077-n","journal-title":"J Prosthet Dent"},{"key":"5501_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"373","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jdent.2013.12.013","volume":"42","author":"M Sasse","year":"2014","unstructured":"Sasse M, Kern M, Marre B, Walter MH (2014) Clinical performance of cantilevered fixed dental prostheses abutments in the shortened dental arch. J Dent 42:373\u20136. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jdent.2013.12.013","journal-title":"J Dent"},{"key":"5501_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"411","DOI":"10.1016\/0022-3913(79)90142-2","volume":"42","author":"KW Wright","year":"1979","unstructured":"Wright KW, Yettram AL (1979) Reactive force distributions for teeth when loaded singly and when used as fixed partial denture abutments. J Prosthet Dent 42:411\u20136. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/0022-3913(79)90142-2","journal-title":"J Prosthet Dent"},{"key":"5501_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"90","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1532-849X.2004.04004.x","volume":"13","author":"SA Romeed","year":"2004","unstructured":"Romeed SA, Fok SL, Wilson NH (2004) Biomechanics of cantilever fixed partial dentures in shortened dental arch therapy. J Prosthodont 13:90\u2013100. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1532-849X.2004.04004.x","journal-title":"J Prosthodont"},{"key":"5501_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Rehmann P, Podhorsky A, Wostmann B (2015) Treatment outcomes of cantilever fixed partial dentures on vital abutment teeth: a retrospective analysis. Int J Prosthodont 28:577-82. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.11607\/ijp.4114","DOI":"10.11607\/ijp.4114"},{"key":"5501_CR7","first-page":"331","volume":"9","author":"V Decock","year":"1996","unstructured":"Decock V, De Nayer K, De Boever JA, Dent M (1996) 18-year longitudinal study of cantilevered fixed restorations. Int J Prosthodont 9:331\u201340","journal-title":"Int J Prosthodont"},{"key":"5501_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1278","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0501.2009.01766.x","volume":"20","author":"E Romeo","year":"2009","unstructured":"Romeo E, Tomasi C, Finini I, Casentini P, Lops D (2009) Implant-supported fixed cantilever prosthesis in partially edentulous jaws: a cohort prospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res 20:1278\u201385. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1600-0501.2009.01766.x","journal-title":"Clin Oral Implants Res"},{"key":"5501_CR9","first-page":"1131","volume":"27","author":"GE Romanos","year":"2012","unstructured":"Romanos GE, Gupta B, Eckert SE (2012) Distal cantilevers and implant dentistry. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 27:1131\u20136","journal-title":"Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants"},{"issue":"Suppl 6","key":"5501_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"39","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0501.2012.02551.x","volume":"23","author":"E Romeo","year":"2012","unstructured":"Romeo E, Storelli S (2012) Systematic review of the survival rate and the biological, technical, and aesthetic complications of fixed dental prostheses with cantilevers on implants reported in longitudinal studies with a mean of 5 years follow-up. Clin Oral Implants Res 23(Suppl 6):39\u201349. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1600-0501.2012.02551.x","journal-title":"Clin Oral Implants Res"},{"key":"5501_CR11","first-page":"13","volume":"16","author":"A Roccuzzo","year":"2023","unstructured":"Roccuzzo A, Fanti R, Mancini L, Imber JC, Stahli A, Molinero-Mourelle P, Schimmel M, Sculean A, Salvi GE (2023) Implant-supported fixed dental prostheses with cantilever extensions: state of the art and future perspectives. Int J Oral Implantol (Berl) 16:13\u201328","journal-title":"Int J Oral Implantol (Berl)"},{"key":"5501_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Freitas da Silva EV, Dos Santos DM, Sonego MV, de Luna Gomes JM, Pellizzer EP and Goiato MC (2018) Does the presence of a cantilever influence the survival and success of partial implant-supported dental prostheses? Systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 33:815-823. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.11607\/jomi.6413","DOI":"10.11607\/jomi.6413"},{"key":"5501_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"334","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jpor.2019.01.007","volume":"63","author":"W B\u00f6micke","year":"2019","unstructured":"B\u00f6micke W, Rammelsberg P, Zenth\u00f6fer A, Ohlmann B (2019) Clinical performance of zirconia-ceramic cantilever fixed partial dentures-longitudinal nine-year results from a prospective, randomized, controlled pilot study. J Prosthodont Res 63:334\u2013339. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jpor.2019.01.007","journal-title":"J Prosthodont Res"},{"key":"5501_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"621","DOI":"10.1111\/cid.13125","volume":"24","author":"L Horsch","year":"2022","unstructured":"Horsch L, Kronsteiner D, Rammelsberg P (2022) Survival and complications of implant-supported cantilever fixed dental prostheses with zirconia and metal frameworks: a retrospective cohort study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 24:621\u2013629. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/cid.13125","journal-title":"Clin Implant Dent Relat Res"},{"key":"5501_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"62","DOI":"10.1922\/EJPRD_01759Ghodsi13","volume":"26","author":"S Ghodsi","year":"2018","unstructured":"Ghodsi S, Jafarian Z (2018) A review on translucent zirconia. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 26:62\u201374. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1922\/EJPRD_01759Ghodsi13","journal-title":"Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent"},{"key":"5501_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"126","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jdent.2019.05.032","volume":"86","author":"N Passia","year":"2019","unstructured":"Passia N, Chaar MS, Kern M (2019) Outcome of posterior fixed dental prostheses made from veneered zirconia over an observation period of up to 13 years. J Dent 86:126\u2013129. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jdent.2019.05.032","journal-title":"J Dent"},{"key":"5501_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"201","DOI":"10.1111\/cid.12889","volume":"22","author":"BR Chrcanovic","year":"2020","unstructured":"Chrcanovic BR, Kisch J, Larsson C (2020) Retrospective clinical evaluation of 2- to 6-unit implant-supported fixed partial dentures: mean follow-up of 9 years. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 22:201\u2013212. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/cid.12889","journal-title":"Clin Implant Dent Relat Res"},{"key":"5501_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"121","DOI":"10.1111\/jopr.13388","volume":"31","author":"F Tirone","year":"2022","unstructured":"Tirone F, Salzano S, Rolando E, Pozzatti L, Rodi D (2022) Framework fracture of zirconia supported full arch implant rehabilitation: a retrospective evaluation of cantilever length and distal cross-sectional connection area in 140 patients over an up-to-7 year follow-up period. J Prosthodont 31:121\u2013129. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/jopr.13388","journal-title":"J Prosthodont"},{"key":"5501_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"459","DOI":"10.3290\/j.qi.a38138","volume":"48","author":"A Worni","year":"2017","unstructured":"Worni A, Katsoulis J, Kolgeci L, Worni M, Mericske-Stern R (2017) Monolithic zirconia reconstructions supported by teeth and implants: 1- to 3-year results of a case series. Quintessence Int 48:459\u2013467. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3290\/j.qi.a38138","journal-title":"Quintessence Int"},{"key":"5501_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"200","DOI":"10.1080\/00016350802241555","volume":"66","author":"O Gabbert","year":"2008","unstructured":"Gabbert O, Ohlmann B, Schmitter M, Gilde H, Ruef T, Rammelsberg P (2008) Fracture behaviour of zirconia ceramic cantilever fixed dental prostheses in vitro. Acta Odontol Scand 66:200\u20136. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/00016350802241555","journal-title":"Acta Odontol Scand"},{"key":"5501_CR21","first-page":"49","volume":"22","author":"B Ohlmann","year":"2009","unstructured":"Ohlmann B, Marienburg K, Gabbert O, Hassel A, Gilde H, Rammelsberg P (2009) Fracture-load values of all-ceramic cantilevered FPDs with different framework designs. Int J Prosthodont 22:49\u201352","journal-title":"Int J Prosthodont"},{"key":"5501_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"584","DOI":"10.3109\/00016357.2012.700061","volume":"71","author":"B Ohlmann","year":"2013","unstructured":"Ohlmann B, Dittmar A, Rues S, Rammelsberg P (2013) Comparison of fracture-load values of cantilevered FDPs. Acta Odontol Scand 71:584\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3109\/00016357.2012.700061","journal-title":"Acta Odontol Scand"},{"key":"5501_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2799","DOI":"10.1007\/s00784-018-2366-5","volume":"22","author":"M Naumann","year":"2018","unstructured":"Naumann M, von Stein-Lausnitz M, Rosentritt M, Walter C, Meyer-Luckel H, Sterzenbach G (2018) Impact of simulated reduced alveolar bone support, increased tooth mobility, and distal post-supported, root-treated abutment tooth on load capability of all-ceramic zirconia-supported cantilever FDP. Clin Oral Investig 22:2799\u20132807. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00784-018-2366-5","journal-title":"Clin Oral Investig"},{"key":"5501_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"132","DOI":"10.1177\/0022034517729134","volume":"97","author":"MB Blatz","year":"2018","unstructured":"Blatz MB, Vonderheide M, Conejo J (2018) The effect of resin bonding on long-term success of high-strength ceramics. J Dent Res 97:132\u2013139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0022034517729134","journal-title":"J Dent Res"},{"key":"5501_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"414","DOI":"10.3290\/j.qi.b2793243","volume":"53","author":"MB Schmidt","year":"2022","unstructured":"Schmidt MB, Rosentritt M, Hahnel S, Wertz M, Hoelzig H, Kloess G, Koenig A (2022) Fracture behavior of cantilever fixed dental prostheses fabricated from different zirconia generations. Quintessence Int 53:414\u2013422. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3290\/j.qi.b2793243","journal-title":"Quintessence Int"},{"key":"5501_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"921","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jdent.2012.07.010","volume":"40","author":"V Preis","year":"2012","unstructured":"Preis V, Behr M, Hahnel S, Handel G, Rosentritt M (2012) In vitro failure and fracture resistance of veneered and full-contour zirconia restorations. J Dent 40:921\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jdent.2012.07.010","journal-title":"J Dent"},{"key":"5501_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"367","DOI":"10.1111\/jerd.12242","volume":"28","author":"W B\u00f6micke","year":"2016","unstructured":"B\u00f6micke W, Rues S, Hlavacek V, Rammelsberg P, Schmitter M (2016) Fracture behavior of minimally invasive, posterior, and fixed dental prostheses manufactured from monolithic zirconia. J Esthet Restor Dent 28:367\u2013381. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/jerd.12242","journal-title":"J Esthet Restor Dent"},{"key":"5501_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"339","DOI":"10.2186\/jpr.JPR_D_21_00024","volume":"66","author":"M Waldecker","year":"2022","unstructured":"Waldecker M, Behnisch R, Rammelsberg P, B\u00f6micke W (2022) Five-year clinical performance of monolithic and partially veneered zirconia single crowns-a prospective observational study. J Prosthodont Res 66:339\u2013345. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2186\/jpr.JPR_D_21_00024","journal-title":"J Prosthodont Res"},{"issue":"Suppl 1","key":"5501_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"S19","DOI":"10.3233\/BME-151285","volume":"26","author":"Z Zhang","year":"2015","unstructured":"Zhang Z, Zhou S, Li E, Li W, Swain MV, Li Q (2015) Design for minimizing fracture risk of all-ceramic cantilever dental bridge. Biomed Mater Eng 26(Suppl 1):S19-25. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3233\/BME-151285","journal-title":"Biomed Mater Eng"},{"key":"5501_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"140","DOI":"10.1177\/0022034517737483","volume":"97","author":"Y Zhang","year":"2018","unstructured":"Zhang Y, Lawn BR (2018) Novel zirconia materials in dentistry. J Dent Res 97:140\u2013147. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0022034517737483","journal-title":"J Dent Res"},{"key":"5501_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"430","DOI":"10.1016\/j.dental.2023.03.015","volume":"39","author":"M Inokoshi","year":"2023","unstructured":"Inokoshi M, Liu H, Yoshihara K, Yamamoto M, Tonprasong W, Benino Y, Minakuchi S, Vleugels J, Van Meerbeek B, Zhang F (2023) Layer characteristics in strength-gradient multilayered yttria-stabilized zirconia. Dent Mater 39:430\u2013441. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.dental.2023.03.015","journal-title":"Dent Mater"},{"key":"5501_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"395","DOI":"10.1111\/jerd.12568","volume":"32","author":"Y Habibi","year":"2020","unstructured":"Habibi Y, Dawid MT, Waldecker M, Rammelsberg P, B\u00f6micke W (2020) Three-year clinical performance of monolithic and partially veneered zirconia ceramic fixed partial dentures. J Esthet Restor Dent 32:395\u2013402. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/jerd.12568","journal-title":"J Esthet Restor Dent"},{"key":"5501_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"208","DOI":"10.1111\/eos.12342","volume":"125","author":"S Miura","year":"2017","unstructured":"Miura S, Kasahara S, Yamauchi S, Egusa H (2017) Three-dimensional finite element analysis of zirconia all-ceramic cantilevered fixed partial dentures with different framework designs. Eur J Oral Sci 125:208\u2013214. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/eos.12342","journal-title":"Eur J Oral Sci"},{"key":"5501_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"93","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmbbm.2014.03.014","volume":"35","author":"T Sun","year":"2014","unstructured":"Sun T, Zhou S, Lai R, Liu R, Ma S, Zhou Z, Longquan S (2014) Load-bearing capacity and the recommended thickness of dental monolithic zirconia single crowns. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 35:93\u2013101. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jmbbm.2014.03.014","journal-title":"J Mech Behav Biomed Mater"},{"key":"5501_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"606","DOI":"10.1111\/jopr.13458","volume":"31","author":"C Tobar","year":"2022","unstructured":"Tobar C, Rodriguez V, Lopez-Suarez C, Pelaez J, Suarez MJ (2022) Influence of digital technologies and framework design on the load to fracture of Co-Cr posterior fixed partial denture frameworks. J Prosthodont 31:606\u2013613. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/jopr.13458","journal-title":"J Prosthodont"},{"issue":"Suppl 3","key":"5501_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"97","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0501.2007.01439.x","volume":"18","author":"BE Pjetursson","year":"2007","unstructured":"Pjetursson BE, Br\u00e4gger U, Lang NP, Zwahlen M (2007) Comparison of survival and complication rates of tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) and implant-supported FDPs and single crowns (SCs). Clin Oral Implants Res 18(Suppl 3):97\u2013113. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1600-0501.2007.01439.x","journal-title":"Clin Oral Implants Res"},{"key":"5501_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"26","DOI":"10.1034\/j.1600-0501.2001.012001026.x","volume":"12","author":"U Br\u00e4gger","year":"2001","unstructured":"Br\u00e4gger U, Aeschlimann S, B\u00fcrgin W, H\u00e4mmerle CH, Lang NP (2001) Biological and technical complications and failures with fixed partial dentures (FPD) on implants and teeth after four to five years of function. Clin Oral Implants Res 12:26\u201334. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1034\/j.1600-0501.2001.012001026.x","journal-title":"Clin Oral Implants Res"},{"key":"5501_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"326","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0501.2005.01105.x","volume":"16","author":"U Br\u00e4gger","year":"2005","unstructured":"Br\u00e4gger U, Karoussis I, Persson R, Pjetursson B, Salvi G, Lang N (2005) Technical and biological complications\/failures with single crowns and fixed partial dentures on implants: a 10-year prospective cohort study. Clin Oral Implants Res 16:326\u201334. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1600-0501.2005.01105.x","journal-title":"Clin Oral Implants Res"},{"key":"5501_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"563","DOI":"10.1111\/joor.12068","volume":"40","author":"CM Serra","year":"2013","unstructured":"Serra CM, Manns AE (2013) Bite force measurements with hard and soft bite surfaces. J Oral Rehabil 40:563\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/joor.12068","journal-title":"J Oral Rehabil"},{"key":"5501_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"443","DOI":"10.1016\/0022-3913(81)90455-8","volume":"46","author":"CH Gibbs","year":"1981","unstructured":"Gibbs CH, Mahan PE, Lundeen HC, Brehnan K, Walsh EK, Holbrook WB (1981) Occlusal forces during chewing and swallowing as measured by sound transmission. J Prosthet Dent 46:443\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/0022-3913(81)90455-8","journal-title":"J Prosthet Dent"},{"key":"5501_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Schimmel M, Memedi K, Parga T, Katsoulis J and M\u00fcller F (2017) Masticatory performance and maximum bite and lip force depend on the type of prosthesis. Int J Prosthodont 30:565\u2013572. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.11607\/ijp.5289","DOI":"10.11607\/ijp.5289"},{"key":"5501_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"191","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2842.1986.tb00651.x","volume":"13","author":"D Lundgren","year":"1986","unstructured":"Lundgren D, Laurell L (1986) Occlusal force pattern during chewing and biting in dentitions restored with fixed bridges of cross-arch extension. II. Unilateral posterior two-unit cantilevers. J Oral Rehabil 13:191\u2013203. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1365-2842.1986.tb00651.x","journal-title":"J Oral Rehabil"},{"key":"5501_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"623","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmbbm.2010.07.004","volume":"3","author":"U Lohbauer","year":"2010","unstructured":"Lohbauer U, Amberger G, Quinn GD, Scherrer SS (2010) Fractographic analysis of a dental zirconia framework: a case study on design issues. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 3:623\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jmbbm.2010.07.004","journal-title":"J Mech Behav Biomed Mater"},{"key":"5501_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jdent.2022.104271","volume":"125","author":"A Skjold","year":"2022","unstructured":"Skjold A, Schriwer C, Gjerdet NR, \u00d8ilo M (2022) Fractographic analysis of 35 clinically fractured bi-layered and monolithic zirconia crowns. J Dent 125:104271. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jdent.2022.104271","journal-title":"J Dent"},{"key":"5501_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1198","DOI":"10.1016\/j.dental.2015.07.003","volume":"31","author":"Z Pang","year":"2015","unstructured":"Pang Z, Chughtai A, Sailer I, Zhang Y (2015) A fractographic study of clinically retrieved zirconia-ceramic and metal-ceramic fixed dental prostheses. Dent Mater 31:1198\u2013206. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.dental.2015.07.003","journal-title":"Dent Mater"},{"key":"5501_CR46","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Rues S, Kappel S, Ruckes D, Rammelsberg P and Zenth\u00f6fer A (2020) Resistance to fracture in fixed dental prostheses over cemented and screw-retained implant-supported zirconia cantilevers in the anterior region: an in vitro study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 35:521-529. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.11607\/jomi.7899","DOI":"10.11607\/jomi.7899"},{"key":"5501_CR47","first-page":"409","volume":"13","author":"CH H\u00e4mmerle","year":"2000","unstructured":"H\u00e4mmerle CH, Ungerer MC, Fantoni PC, Br\u00e4gger U, Burgin W, Lang NP (2000) Long-term analysis of biologic and technical aspects of fixed partial dentures with cantilevers. Int J Prosthodont 13:409\u201315","journal-title":"Int J Prosthodont"},{"key":"5501_CR48","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"222","DOI":"10.1557\/JMR.2003.0031","volume":"18","author":"JH Kim","year":"2003","unstructured":"Kim JH, Miranda P, Kim DK, Lawn BR (2003) Effect of an adhesive interlayer on the fracture of a brittle coating on a supporting substrate. J Materials Res 18:222\u2013227. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1557\/JMR.2003.0031","journal-title":"J Materials Res"},{"key":"5501_CR49","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e53","DOI":"10.1016\/j.dental.2019.01.017","volume":"35","author":"M Waldecker","year":"2019","unstructured":"Waldecker M, Rues S, Rammelsberg P, B\u00f6micke W (2019) Validation of in-vitro tests of zirconia-ceramic inlay-retained fixed partial dentures: a finite element analysis. Dent Mater 35:e53\u2013e62. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.dental.2019.01.017","journal-title":"Dent Mater"},{"key":"5501_CR50","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"445","DOI":"10.1111\/jopr.12130","volume":"23","author":"B Kanat","year":"2014","unstructured":"Kanat B, C\u00f6mleko\u011flu EM, D\u00fcndar-\u00c7\u00f6mleko\u011flu M, Hakan Sen B, Ozcan M, Ali G\u00fcng\u00f6r M (2014) Effect of various veneering techniques on mechanical strength of computer-controlled zirconia framework designs. J Prosthodont 23:445\u201355. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/jopr.12130","journal-title":"J Prosthodont"}],"container-title":["Clinical Oral Investigations"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00784-024-05501-z.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00784-024-05501-z\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00784-024-05501-z.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,2,8]],"date-time":"2024-02-08T08:16:16Z","timestamp":1707380176000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00784-024-05501-z"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024,1,15]]},"references-count":50,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,1]]}},"alternative-id":["5501"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00784-024-05501-z","relation":{},"ISSN":["1436-3771"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1436-3771","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2024,1,15]]},"assertion":[{"value":"16 October 2023","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"7 January 2024","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"15 January 2024","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing interests.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}},{"value":"The use of human teeth for in vitro testing in this study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Medical Faculty of the University of Heidelberg (S-034\/2010), and tooth donors provided written informed consent.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethics approval and consent to participate"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing interests.<i>CoCr<\/i> Cobalt-chromium, <i>SD<\/i> standard deviation, <i>Min<\/i> minimum, <i>Max<\/i> maximumDifferent superscript letters in the same column indicate statistically significant results between the test groups separately for the test forces at initial damage (lower case letters) and failure (upper case letters)","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}}],"article-number":"94"}}