{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,21]],"date-time":"2026-05-21T21:44:36Z","timestamp":1779399876397,"version":"3.53.1"},"reference-count":32,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"5","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,4,20]],"date-time":"2024-04-20T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1713571200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,4,20]],"date-time":"2024-04-20T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1713571200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100005378","name":"Hacettepe University","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100005378","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"crossref"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Clin Oral Invest"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Objectives<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The aim of this study was to evaluate the stress distributions and possible amount of movement in the maxillofacial region resulting from different maxillary advancement protocols in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Materials and methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>A unilateral cleft lip and palate model (CLP model) with Goslon score 4 was created for finite element analysis. Three different protocols were compared: Group 1: usage of a face mask with elastics placed at a 30? angle to the occlusal plane over a conventional acrylic plate; Group 2: usage of a face mask with elastics placed at a 30? angle to the occlusal plane over miniplates placed in the infrazygomatic crest region; Group 3: usage of elastic from the menton plate placed in the mandible to the infrazygomatic plates in the maxilla.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Dental effects were greater in the maxillary protraction protocol with a face mask over a conventional acrylic plate (Von Misses Stress Values; Group 1?=?cleft side:0.076, non-cleft side:0.077; Group 2?=?cleft side:0.004, non-cleft side: 0.003; Group 3?=?cleft side:0.0025; non-cleft side:0.0015), whereas skeletal effects were greater in maxillary protraction protocols with face mask using skeletal anchorage (Von Misses Stress Values; Group 1:0.008; Group 2:0.02; Group 3:0.0025). The maximum amount of counterclockwise rotation of the maxilla as a result of protraction was observed in traditional acrylic plate face mask protocol, and the minimum amount was observed by using elastics between infrazygomatic plates and menton plate.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>In individuals with unilateral cleft lip and palate with Goslon score 4, it was observed that the skeletally anchored face mask caused more skeletal impact and displacement than both the traditional acrylic plate face mask model and the pure skeletally supported maxillary protraction model.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Clinical relevance<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>When planning maxillary protraction treatment in patients with cleft lip and palate, it should be considered that more movement in the sagittal plane might be expected on the cleft side than the non-cleft side, and miniplate and screws on the cleft side are exposed to more stress when using infrazygomatic plates as skeletal anchorage.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1007\/s00784-024-05633-2","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,4,20]],"date-time":"2024-04-20T01:01:25Z","timestamp":1713574885000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":3,"title":["Comparison of different maxillary advancement protocols in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate: a finite element analysis"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"28","author":[{"given":"Guleser","family":"Akdemir","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Hande","family":"Gorucu-Coskuner","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,4,20]]},"reference":[{"issue":"1","key":"5633_CR1","first-page":"7","volume":"27","author":"M Mars","year":"1990","unstructured":"Mars M, Houston WJ (1990) A preliminary study of facial growth and morphology in unoperated male unilateral cleft lip and palate subjects over 13 years of age. Cleft Palate J 27(1):7?10","journal-title":"Cleft Palate J"},{"issue":"3","key":"5633_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"327","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajodo.2016.12.024","volume":"152","author":"M Yatabe","year":"2017","unstructured":"Yatabe M et al (2017) Bone-anchored maxillary protraction therapy in patients with unilateral complete cleft lip and palate: 3-dimensional assessment of maxillary effects. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 152(3):327?335","journal-title":"Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop"},{"issue":"2","key":"5633_CR3","first-page":"145","volume":"64","author":"PH Buschang","year":"1994","unstructured":"Buschang PH et al (1994) Face mask therapy of preadolescents with unilateral cleft lip and palate. Angle Orthod 64(2):145?150","journal-title":"Angle Orthod"},{"issue":"Suppl 1","key":"5633_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"20","DOI":"10.1016\/S1010-5182(89)80033-2","volume":"17","author":"R Ranta","year":"1989","unstructured":"Ranta R (1989) Forward traction of the maxilla with cleft lip and palate in mixed and permanent dentitions. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 17(Suppl 1):20?22","journal-title":"J Craniomaxillofac Surg"},{"issue":"2","key":"5633_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"208","DOI":"10.1597\/1545-1569_1993_030_0208_mpdeof_2.3.co_2","volume":"30","author":"RS Tindlund","year":"1993","unstructured":"Tindlund RS, Rygh P (1993) Maxillary protraction: different effects on facial morphology in unilateral and bilateral cleft lip and palate patients. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 30(2):208?221","journal-title":"Cleft Palate Craniofac J"},{"issue":"1","key":"5633_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"9","DOI":"10.1590\/S1678-77572012000100003","volume":"20","author":"JA Freitas","year":"2012","unstructured":"Freitas JA et al (2012) Rehabilitative treatment of cleft lip and palate: experience of the Hospital for Rehabilitation of Craniofacial Anomalies\/USP (HRAC\/USP)--Part 1: overall aspects. J Appl Oral Sci 20(1):9?15","journal-title":"J Appl Oral Sci"},{"issue":"5","key":"5633_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"734","DOI":"10.2319\/121219-795.1","volume":"90","author":"D Garib","year":"2020","unstructured":"Garib D et al (2020) Bone-anchored maxillary protraction long-term outcomes in UCLP. Angle Orthod 90(5):734?741","journal-title":"Angle Orthod"},{"issue":"3","key":"5633_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"440","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajodo.2007.06.011","volume":"133","author":"BH Kircelli","year":"2008","unstructured":"Kircelli BH, Pektas ZO (2008) Midfacial protraction with skeletally anchored face mask therapy: a novel approach and preliminary results. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 133(3):440?449","journal-title":"Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop"},{"issue":"1","key":"5633_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"99","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajodo.2009.06.025","volume":"139","author":"BK Cha","year":"2011","unstructured":"Cha BK et al (2011) Maxillary protraction with miniplates providing skeletal anchorage in a growing class III patient. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 139(1):99?112","journal-title":"Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop"},{"issue":"5","key":"5633_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"636","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajodo.2009.06.039","volume":"139","author":"C Sar","year":"2011","unstructured":"Sar C et al (2011) Comparative evaluation of maxillary protraction with or without skeletal anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 139(5):636?649","journal-title":"Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop"},{"issue":"5","key":"5633_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"577","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajodo.2009.10.037","volume":"138","author":"H De Clerck","year":"2010","unstructured":"De Clerck H, Cevidanes L, Baccetti T (2010) Dentofacial effects of bone-anchored maxillary protraction: a controlled study of consecutively treated Class III patients. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 138(5):577?581","journal-title":"Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop"},{"issue":"6","key":"5633_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"790","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajodo.2011.04.025","volume":"140","author":"T Nguyen","year":"2011","unstructured":"Nguyen T et al (2011) Three-dimensional assessment of maxillary changes associated with bone anchored maxillary protraction. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 140(6):790?798","journal-title":"Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop"},{"issue":"4","key":"5633_CR13","first-page":"314","volume":"24","author":"M Mars","year":"1987","unstructured":"Mars M et al (1987) The Goslon Yardstick: a new system of assessing dental arch relationships in children with unilateral clefts of the lip and palate. Cleft Palate J 24(4):314?322","journal-title":"Cleft Palate J"},{"issue":"2","key":"5633_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"221","DOI":"10.1597\/10-265","volume":"49","author":"IH Yang","year":"2012","unstructured":"Yang IH et al (2012) Effects of cleft type, facemask anchorage method, and alveolar bone graft on maxillary protraction: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 49(2):221?229","journal-title":"Cleft Palate Craniofac J"},{"issue":"16","key":"5633_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1360","DOI":"10.1080\/10255842.2020.1803844","volume":"23","author":"S Parveen","year":"2020","unstructured":"Parveen S et al (2020) Three-dimensional finite element analysis of initial displacement and stress on the craniofacial structures of unilateral cleft lip and palate model during protraction therapy with variable forces and directions. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin 23(16):1360?1376","journal-title":"Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin"},{"issue":"2","key":"5633_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"166","DOI":"10.1177\/10556656211000968","volume":"59","author":"S Singh","year":"2022","unstructured":"Singh S et al (2022) Evaluation of Alt-RAMEC with Facemask in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) using cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) and finite element Modeling-A clinical prospective study. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 59(2):166?176","journal-title":"Cleft Palate Craniofac J"},{"key":"5633_CR17","unstructured":"Geetanjali S (2020) Orthodontic Management of Cleft Lip and Palate Patients, in Current Treatment of Cleft Lip and Palate, G. Ay?e, Editor. IntechOpen: Rijeka. p. Ch. 2"},{"issue":"1","key":"5633_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"10","DOI":"10.1093\/ejo\/cjm098","volume":"30","author":"SH Baek","year":"2008","unstructured":"Baek SH et al (2008) Initial effect of multiloop edgewise archwire on the mandibular dentition in Class III malocclusion subjects. A three-dimensional finite element study. Eur J Orthod 30(1):10?15","journal-title":"Eur J Orthod"},{"issue":"6","key":"5633_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"943","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajodo.2015.10.002","volume":"148","author":"WE Roberts","year":"2015","unstructured":"Roberts WE et al (2015) Biology of biomechanics: Finite element analysis of a statically determinate system to rotate the occlusal plane for correction of a skeletal class III open-bite malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 148(6):943?955","journal-title":"Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop"},{"issue":"3","key":"5633_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"361","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajodo.2008.02.021","volume":"136","author":"P Gautam","year":"2009","unstructured":"Gautam P, Valiathan A, Adhikari R (2009) Maxillary protraction with and without maxillary expansion: a finite element analysis of sutural stresses. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 136(3):361?366","journal-title":"Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop"},{"issue":"5","key":"5633_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"751","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajodo.2016.04.025","volume":"150","author":"MH Elnagar","year":"2016","unstructured":"Elnagar MH et al (2016) Comparative evaluation of 2 skeletally anchored maxillary protraction protocols. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 150(5):751?762","journal-title":"Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop"},{"issue":"4","key":"5633_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"542","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajodo.2017.07.024","volume":"153","author":"Y Zhang","year":"2018","unstructured":"Zhang Y et al (2018) Dentoskeletal effects of facemask therapy in skeletal class III cleft patients with or without bone graft. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 153(4):542?549","journal-title":"Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop"},{"issue":"1","key":"5633_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"25","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajodo.2012.01.017","volume":"142","author":"H De Clerck","year":"2012","unstructured":"De Clerck H et al (2012) Three-dimensional assessment of mandibular and glenoid fossa changes after bone-anchored class III intermaxillary traction. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 142(1):25?31","journal-title":"Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop"},{"key":"5633_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"8","DOI":"10.4103\/jos.jos_153_21","volume":"11","author":"A Kamath","year":"2022","unstructured":"Kamath A et al (2022) Bone-anchored maxillary protraction (BAMP): a review. J Orthod Sci 11:8","journal-title":"J Orthod Sci"},{"issue":"3","key":"5633_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"345","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajodo.2011.07.021","volume":"141","author":"NK Lee","year":"2012","unstructured":"Lee NK, Baek SH (2012) Stress and displacement between maxillary protraction with miniplates placed at the infrazygomatic crest and the lateral nasal wall: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 141(3):345?351","journal-title":"Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop"},{"issue":"1","key":"5633_CR26","first-page":"e37","volume":"13","author":"A Jamilian","year":"2012","unstructured":"Jamilian A, Showkatbakhsh R, Taban T (2012) The effects of fixed and removable face masks on maxillary deficiencies in growing patients. Orthod (Chic) 13(1):e37?43","journal-title":"Orthod (Chic)"},{"issue":"2","key":"5633_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"102","DOI":"10.1080\/14653125.2016.1155334","volume":"43","author":"A Jamilian","year":"2016","unstructured":"Jamilian A et al (2016) Methodological quality and outcome of systematic reviews reporting on orthopaedic treatment for class III malocclusion: overview of systematic reviews. J Orthod 43(2):102?120","journal-title":"J Orthod"},{"issue":"3","key":"5633_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"275","DOI":"10.1093\/ejo\/cju039","volume":"37","author":"KY Kim","year":"2015","unstructured":"Kim KY et al (2015) Displacement and stress distribution of the maxillofacial complex during maxillary protraction with buccal versus palatal plates: finite element analysis. Eur J Orthod 37(3):275?283","journal-title":"Eur J Orthod"},{"issue":"3","key":"5633_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"875","DOI":"10.1097\/SCS.0000000000008972","volume":"34","author":"A Jahanbin","year":"2023","unstructured":"Jahanbin A et al (2023) Efficacy of different methods of bone-anchored Maxillary Protraction in Cleft Lip and Palate children: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. J Craniofac Surg 34(3):875?880","journal-title":"J Craniofac Surg"},{"issue":"2","key":"5633_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"197","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajodo.2012.09.019","volume":"143","author":"X Yan","year":"2013","unstructured":"Yan X et al (2013) Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the craniomaxillary complex during maxillary protraction with bone anchorage vs conventional dental anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 143(2):197?205","journal-title":"Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop"},{"issue":"6","key":"5633_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1010","DOI":"10.2319\/012311-47.1","volume":"81","author":"EE De Clerck","year":"2011","unstructured":"De Clerck EE, Swennen GR (2011) Success rate of miniplate anchorage for bone anchored maxillary protraction. Angle Orthod 81(6):1010?1013","journal-title":"Angle Orthod"},{"key":"5633_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"128","DOI":"10.5005\/jp-journals-10015-1721","volume":"11","author":"S Mathew","year":"2020","unstructured":"Mathew S et al (2020) A 3D finite element analysis of stress on Temporomandibular Joint due to Maxillary Protraction Appliances with Varied Force levels and Angulations. World J Dentistry 11:128?133","journal-title":"World J Dentistry"}],"container-title":["Clinical Oral Investigations"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00784-024-05633-2.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00784-024-05633-2\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00784-024-05633-2.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,5,27]],"date-time":"2024-05-27T06:05:58Z","timestamp":1716789958000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00784-024-05633-2"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024,4,20]]},"references-count":32,"journal-issue":{"issue":"5","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,5]]}},"alternative-id":["5633"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00784-024-05633-2","relation":{"has-preprint":[{"id-type":"doi","id":"10.21203\/rs.3.rs-3328860\/v1","asserted-by":"object"}]},"ISSN":["1436-3771"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1436-3771","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2024,4,20]]},"assertion":[{"value":"5 September 2023","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"23 March 2024","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"20 April 2024","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing interests.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}}],"article-number":"260"}}