{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,29]],"date-time":"2026-10-29T00:44:48Z","timestamp":1793234688707,"version":"4.5.0"},"reference-count":24,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"12","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,11,15]],"date-time":"2024-11-15T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1731628800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,11,15]],"date-time":"2024-11-15T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1731628800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100005760","name":"University of Gothenburg","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100005760","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"crossref"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Clin Oral Invest"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Objectives<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>To evaluate at which thickness marginal bone becomes visible to the observer on cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images and how reconstruction technique and viewing mode affect assessment.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Materials and methods<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>Fourteen anterior teeth from six human mandibles were examined with two CBCT resolution protocols: standard- and high-resolution. Distance from the cementoenamel junction to the visible marginal bone level (MBL) was measured in three groups of reconstructed CBCT images: multiplanar reformation (MPR) with grey scale, MPR with inverted grey scale, and 3D rendering. These measurements were used to identify the bone level where marginal bone width should be measured on histological photographs of sliced teeth. Gold standards comprised measurements of bone thickness at the superior MBL on histological photographs.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>MPR grey scale images exposed at high-resolution settings yielded highest validity: bone widths of 0.173\u00a0mm (buccal) and 0.356\u00a0mm (lingual) were necessary for visibility on a CBCT image. 3D-rendered lingual surfaces exposed with high-resolution settings had lowest validity. Intra-observer agreement for all CBCT and histological measurements was high.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>The best CBCT resolution protocol, reconstruction technique, and viewing mode for analyzing buccal and lingual surfaces of the alveolar bone margin are images exposed with a high-resolution protocol, reconstructed using MPR, and viewed in grey scale. Bone thickness required to be visualized was twice lingually compared to buccally.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Clinical relevance<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>The visualization of bone thickness in CBCT requires a greater thickness on the lingual side compared to the buccal side. 3D-rendered reconstructions should be avoided when evaluating thin bony structures.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1007\/s00784-024-06034-1","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,11,15]],"date-time":"2024-11-15T03:52:46Z","timestamp":1731642766000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":8,"title":["Visibility of alveolar bone thicknesses on CBCT images\u2013a study on minimum bone requirements using various reconstruction techniques, viewing modes, and resolutions"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"28","author":[{"given":"Camilla","family":"Lennholm","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Hanna","family":"Andreasen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Anna","family":"Westerlund","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Henrik","family":"Lund","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,11,15]]},"reference":[{"issue":"4","key":"6034_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"731","DOI":"10.11607\/jomi.8669","volume":"36","author":"AWK Yeung","year":"2021","unstructured":"Yeung AWK (2021) Seminal works and Historical Roots of Dental Implant Research with the Use of CBCT. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 36(4):731\u2013736","journal-title":"Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants"},{"key":"6034_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Yeung AWK, Hung KF, Li DTS, Leung YY (2022) The Use of CBCT in evaluating the Health and Pathology of the Maxillary Sinus. Diagnostics (Basel).;12(11)","DOI":"10.3390\/diagnostics12112819"},{"issue":"4","key":"6034_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"543","DOI":"10.2319\/040815-235.1","volume":"86","author":"LO Castro","year":"2016","unstructured":"Castro LO, Castro IO, de Alencar AH, Valladares-Neto J, Estrela C (2016) Cone beam computed tomography evaluation of distance from cementoenamel junction to alveolar crest before and after nonextraction orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod 86(4):543\u2013549","journal-title":"Angle Orthod"},{"issue":"1","key":"6034_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"74","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajodo.2016.06.029","volume":"151","author":"A Westerlund","year":"2017","unstructured":"Westerlund A, Oikonomou C, Ransj\u00f6 M, Ekestubbe A, Bresin A, Lund H (2017) Cone-beam computed tomographic evaluation of the long-term effects of orthodontic retainers on marginal bone levels. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 151(1):74\u201381","journal-title":"Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop"},{"issue":"Suppl 1","key":"6034_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"46","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1834-7819.2011.01657.x","volume":"57","author":"WC Scarfe","year":"2012","unstructured":"Scarfe WC, Li Z, Aboelmaaty W, Scott SA, Farman AG (2012) Maxillofacial cone beam computed tomography: essence, elements and steps to interpretation. Aust Dent J 57(Suppl 1):46\u201360","journal-title":"Aust Dent J"},{"issue":"1","key":"6034_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"20140204","DOI":"10.1259\/dmfr.20140204","volume":"44","author":"D Br\u00fcllmann","year":"2015","unstructured":"Br\u00fcllmann D, Schulze RK (2015) Spatial resolution in CBCT machines for dental\/maxillofacial applications-what do we know today? Dentomaxillofac Radiol 44(1):20140204","journal-title":"Dentomaxillofac Radiol"},{"key":"6034_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Schulze R, Couso-Queiruga E, Katsaros C (2000) Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography in imaging the components of the periodontal phenotype. Periodontol. 2024","DOI":"10.1111\/prd.12556"},{"issue":"5","key":"6034_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"265","DOI":"10.1259\/dmfr\/30642039","volume":"40","author":"R Schulze","year":"2011","unstructured":"Schulze R, Heil U, Gross D, Bruellmann DD, Dranischnikow E, Schwanecke U et al (2011) Artefacts in CBCT: a review. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 40(5):265\u2013273","journal-title":"Dentomaxillofac Radiol"},{"issue":"7","key":"6034_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"793","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0501.2012.02459.x","volume":"24","author":"NL Gerlach","year":"2013","unstructured":"Gerlach NL, Meijer GJ, Borstlap WA, Bronkhorst EM, Berg\u00e9 SJ, Maal TJ (2013) Accuracy of bone surface size and cortical layer thickness measurements using cone beam computerized tomography. Clin Oral Implants Res 24(7):793\u2013797","journal-title":"Clin Oral Implants Res"},{"issue":"7","key":"6034_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1284","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcms.2015.05.002","volume":"43","author":"P Th\u00f6nissen","year":"2015","unstructured":"Th\u00f6nissen P, Ermer MA, Schmelzeisen R, Gutwald R, Metzger MC, Bittermann G (2015) Sensitivity and specificity of cone beam computed tomography in thin bony structures in maxillofacial surgery\u2013 a clinical trial. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 43(7):1284\u20131288","journal-title":"J Craniomaxillofac Surg"},{"issue":"1","key":"6034_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"41","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajodo.2011.06.034","volume":"141","author":"R Patcas","year":"2012","unstructured":"Patcas R, M\u00fcller L, Ullrich O, Peltom\u00e4ki T (2012) Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography at different resolutions assessed on the bony covering of the mandibular anterior teeth. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 141(1):41\u201350","journal-title":"Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop"},{"key":"6034_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lennholm C, Westerlund A, Lund H (2023) Assessment of thin bony structures using cone-beam computed tomography. Angle Orthod 93(3):328\u2013334","DOI":"10.2319\/090922-633.1"},{"key":"6034_CR13","unstructured":"Donath K (1988) Die trenn-d\u00fcnnschliff-Technik Zur Herstellung Histologischer Pr\u00e4parate Von Nicht Schneidbaren Geweben Und Materialien. Der Pr\u00e4parator 34:197\u2013206"},{"issue":"2","key":"6034_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e117","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajodo.2010.08.016","volume":"139","author":"Z Sun","year":"2011","unstructured":"Sun Z, Smith T, Kortam S, Kim DG, Tee BC, Fields H (2011) Effect of bone thickness on alveolar bone-height measurements from cone-beam computed tomography images. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 139(2):e117\u2013e127","journal-title":"Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop"},{"issue":"Suppl 1","key":"6034_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"127","DOI":"10.1111\/ocr.12072","volume":"18","author":"VC Cook","year":"2015","unstructured":"Cook VC, Timock AM, Crowe JJ, Wang M, Covell DA (2015) Jr. Accuracy of alveolar bone measurements from cone beam computed tomography acquired using varying settings. Orthod Craniofac Res 18(Suppl 1):127\u2013136","journal-title":"Orthod Craniofac Res"},{"issue":"4 Suppl","key":"6034_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"S130","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajodo.2010.01.015","volume":"137","author":"AD Molen","year":"2010","unstructured":"Molen AD (2010) Considerations in the use of cone-beam computed tomography for buccal bone measurements. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 137(4 Suppl):S130\u2013S135","journal-title":"Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop"},{"issue":"1","key":"6034_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"127","DOI":"10.1016\/j.oooo.2012.01.020","volume":"114","author":"R Pauwels","year":"2012","unstructured":"Pauwels R, Beinsberger J, Stamatakis H, Tsiklakis K, Walker A, Bosmans H et al (2012) Comparison of spatial and contrast resolution for cone-beam computed tomography scanners. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 114(1):127\u2013135","journal-title":"Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol"},{"issue":"1","key":"6034_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"56","DOI":"10.1590\/1678-775720130445","volume":"23","author":"TM Fernandes","year":"2015","unstructured":"Fernandes TM, Adamczyk J, Poleti ML, Henriques JF, Friedland B, Garib DG (2015) Comparison between 3D volumetric rendering and multiplanar slices on the reliability of linear measurements on CBCT images: an in vitro study. J Appl Oral Sci 23(1):56\u201363","journal-title":"J Appl Oral Sci"},{"issue":"5","key":"6034_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"136","DOI":"10.1590\/2176-9451.19.5.136-149.sar","volume":"19","author":"DG Garib","year":"2014","unstructured":"Garib DG, Calil LR, Leal CR, Janson G (2014) Is there a consensus for CBCT use in Orthodontics? Dent Press J Orthod 19(5):136\u2013149","journal-title":"Dent Press J Orthod"},{"issue":"1","key":"6034_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"20210233","DOI":"10.1259\/dmfr.20210233","volume":"51","author":"M Ruetters","year":"2022","unstructured":"Ruetters M, Gehrig H, Kronsteiner D, Weyer V, Kim TS, Lux CJ et al (2022) Ex-vivo imaging of buccal and oral periodontal bone with low-dose CBCT in porcine jaws. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 51(1):20210233","journal-title":"Dentomaxillofac Radiol"},{"issue":"9","key":"6034_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"583","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-051X.1984.tb00911.x","volume":"11","author":"C L\u00f6st","year":"1984","unstructured":"L\u00f6st C (1984) Depth of alveolar bone dehiscences in relation to gingival recessions. J Clin Periodontol 11(9):583\u2013589","journal-title":"J Clin Periodontol"},{"issue":"5","key":"6034_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"341","DOI":"10.1038\/s41415-024-7781-1","volume":"237","author":"PS Fleming","year":"2024","unstructured":"Fleming PS, Andrews J (2024) The role of orthodontics in the prevention and management of gingival recession. Br Dent J 237(5):341\u2013347","journal-title":"Br Dent J"},{"issue":"4","key":"6034_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"425","DOI":"10.1016\/j.oooo.2015.11.019","volume":"121","author":"R Spin-Neto","year":"2016","unstructured":"Spin-Neto R, Wenzel A (2016) Patient movement and motion artefacts in cone beam computed tomography of the dentomaxillofacial region: a systematic literature review. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 121(4):425\u2013433","journal-title":"Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol"},{"issue":"3","key":"6034_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"20200445","DOI":"10.1259\/dmfr.20200445","volume":"50","author":"R Spin-Neto","year":"2021","unstructured":"Spin-Neto R, Hauge Matzen L, Hermann L, Fuglsig J, Wenzel A (2021) Head motion and perception of discomfort by young children during simulated CBCT examinations. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 50(3):20200445","journal-title":"Dentomaxillofac Radiol"}],"container-title":["Clinical Oral Investigations"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00784-024-06034-1.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00784-024-06034-1\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00784-024-06034-1.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,12,19]],"date-time":"2024-12-19T10:04:23Z","timestamp":1734602663000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00784-024-06034-1"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024,11,15]]},"references-count":24,"journal-issue":{"issue":"12","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,12]]}},"alternative-id":["6034"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00784-024-06034-1","relation":{},"ISSN":["1436-3771"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1436-3771","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2024,11,15]]},"assertion":[{"value":"23 August 2024","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"3 November 2024","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"15 November 2024","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"This study was approved by The Ethics Review Committee at Uppsala (Daybook no. [Dnr]: 2019\u2009\u2212\u200901582). The study was carried out according to guidelines and regulations of the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethical approval"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing interests.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}}],"article-number":"641"}}