{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,29]],"date-time":"2026-10-29T10:59:50Z","timestamp":1793271590854,"version":"4.5.0"},"reference-count":42,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,12,7]],"date-time":"2024-12-07T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1733529600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,12,7]],"date-time":"2024-12-07T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1733529600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100005296","name":"Universit\u00e4tsklinikum Regensburg","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100005296","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"crossref"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Clin Oral Invest"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n          <jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>Objectives<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>To investigate the survival rates and fracture resistance of dentures made from different teeth (milled, 3D-printed, fabricated), bases (milled, 3D-printed, pressed) and bonding combinations.<\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>\n          <jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>Materials and methods<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>Specimens (11 groups, <jats:italic>n<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u20098 per group) were fabricated from combinations with a denture tooth (anterior tooth 21) and a denture base material. The groups consisted of combinations of teeth (6x), denture base materials (5x) and adhesive bonding options (4x). The teeth were printed, milled or prefabricated. The denture base was produced conventionally or was milled or 3D-printed. Two dentures were milled from one industrially produced block. The dentures were subjected to thermal and mechanical loading (TCML) and subsequent fracture test. Statistics: ANOVA, Bonferroni-test, Kaplan-Meier survival, Pearson correlation; \u03b1\u2009=\u20090.05.<\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>\n          <jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>Mean loading cycles varied between 221,869 (8), 367,610 (11), 513,616 (6) 875,371 (3) and 9,000,030 (4). ANOVA revealed significant (<jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\u2009\u2264\u20090.001) different surviving cycles. Log Rank test showed significantly (<jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\u2009&lt;\u20090.001) different loading cycles. Fracture force after TCML varied between 129.8 +\/- 97.1\u00a0N (3) and 780.8 +\/- 62.5\u00a0N (9). ANOVA comparison revealed significant (<jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\u2009&lt;\u20090.001) different fracture loadings between the individual systems. Correlation was found between fracture force and loading cycles (0.587, <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\u2009&lt;\u20090.001).<\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>\n          <jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>Different survival rates and fracture forces were found for dentures made of different teeth (milled, 3D-printed, prefabricated), bases (milled, 3D-printed, pressed) and bonding combinations. Milled, pressed and prefabricated systems provided longer survival and fracture force than the other tested systems.<\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>\n          <jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>Clinical relevance<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>\u00a0Optimal tooth-base combinations can help to produce a denture that is stable and resistant during clinical application.<\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1007\/s00784-024-06099-y","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,12,7]],"date-time":"2024-12-07T00:51:28Z","timestamp":1733532688000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":7,"title":["In vitro bonding strength of denture teeth to denture base in CAD\/CAM-milled, 3D-printed and conventional manufacturing processes"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"29","author":[{"given":"Marcel","family":"L\u00f6scher","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Sebastian","family":"Hahnel","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Reinhold","family":"Lang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Martin","family":"Rosentritt","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,12,7]]},"reference":[{"key":"6099_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Carlsson GE, Omar R (2010) The future of complete dentures in oral rehabilitation. A critical review J Oral Rehabil 37(2):143\u2009\u2013\u200956.\u00a0https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1365-2842.2009.02039.x","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2842.2009.02039.x"},{"key":"6099_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Kattadiyil MT, Jekki R, Goodacre CJ, Baba NZ Comparison of treatment outcomes in digital and conventional complete removable dental prosthesis fabrications in a predoctoral setting. J Prosthet Dent 114(6).\u00a0https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.prosdent.2015.08.001.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.prosdent.2015.08.001"},{"key":"6099_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"103681","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jdent.2021.103681","volume":"110","author":"C Herpel","year":"2021","unstructured":"Herpel C et al (2021) Accuracy of 3D printing compared with milling - A multi-center analysis of try-in dentures. J Dent 110:103681. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jdent.2021.103681","journal-title":"J Dent"},{"issue":"5","key":"6099_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"406","DOI":"10.1111\/joor.12621","volume":"45","author":"O Steinmassl","year":"2018","unstructured":"Steinmassl O, Dumfahrt H, Grunert I, Steinmassl PA Influence of CAD\/CAM fabrication on denture surface properties. J Oral Rehabil 45(5):406\u2013413. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/joor.12621","journal-title":"J Oral Rehabil"},{"issue":"5","key":"6099_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1697","DOI":"10.1007\/s00784-016-1961-6","volume":"21","author":"PA Steinmassl","year":"2017","unstructured":"Steinmassl PA et al (2017) Do CAD\/CAM dentures really release less monomer than conventional dentures? Clin Oral Investig 21(5):1697\u20131705. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00784-016-1961-6","journal-title":"Clin Oral Investig"},{"key":"6099_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Steinmassl O, Dumfahrt H, Grunert I, Steinmassl PA (2018) CAD\/CAM produces dentures with improved fit. Clin Oral Investig\u00a022(8):2829\u20132835\u00a0https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00784-018-2369-2","DOI":"10.1007\/s00784-018-2369-2"},{"issue":"4","key":"6099_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"524","DOI":"10.1016\/j.prosdent.2016.01.034","volume":"116","author":"PC Saponaro","year":"2016","unstructured":"Saponaro PC, Yilmaz B, Johnston W, Heshmati RH, McGlumphy EA Evaluation of patient experience and satisfaction with CAD-CAM-fabricated complete dentures: A retrospective survey study. J Prosthet Dent 116(4):524\u2013528. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.prosdent.2016.01.034","journal-title":"J Prosthet Dent"},{"key":"6099_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"103777","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jdent.2021.103777","volume":"113","author":"M Srinivasan","year":"2021","unstructured":"Srinivasan M et al CAD-CAM removable complete dentures: A systematic review and meta-analysis of trueness of fit, biocompatibility, mechanical properties, surface characteristics, color stability, time-cost analysis, clinical and patient-reported outcomes. J Dent 113:103777. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jdent.2021.103777","journal-title":"J Dent"},{"key":"6099_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Prpic V, Schauperl Z, Catic A, Dulcic N, Cimic S Comparison of Mechanical Properties of 3D-Printed, CAD\/CAM, and Conventional Denture Base Materials. J Prosthodont 29(6):524\u2013528. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/jopr.13175","DOI":"10.1111\/jopr.13175"},{"key":"6099_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Infante L, Yilmaz B, McGlumphy E, Finger I Fabricating complete dentures with CAD\/CAM technology. J Prosthet Dent 111(5):351\u2013355. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.prosdent.2013.10.014","DOI":"10.1016\/j.prosdent.2013.10.014"},{"key":"6099_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Barazanchi A, Li KC, Al-Amleh B, Lyons K, Waddell JN Additive Technology: Update on Current Materials and Applications in Dentistry. J Prosthodont 26(2):156\u2013163. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/jopr.12510","DOI":"10.1111\/jopr.12510"},{"key":"6099_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Baba NZ, Goodacre BJ, Goodacre CJ, Muller F, Wagner S CAD\/CAM Complete Denture Systems and Physical Properties: A Review of the Literature. J Prosthodont 30:113\u2013124. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/jopr.13243","DOI":"10.1111\/jopr.13243"},{"key":"6099_CR13","unstructured":"Dorner S, Zeman F, Koller M, Lang R, Handel G, Behr M Clinical performance of complete dentures: a retrospective study. Int J Prosthodont\u00a023(5):410-7.\u00a0https:\/\/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/pubmed\/20859555"},{"key":"6099_CR14","unstructured":"Rosentritt M, Strasser T, Behr M, Schmid A (2021) In vitro performance of CAD\/CAM and conventional removable dentures, (in en). Int J Comput Dent 24(4):385\u2013392"},{"issue":"9","key":"6099_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"706","DOI":"10.3290\/j.qi.a42778","volume":"50","author":"MA Schlenz","year":"2019","unstructured":"Schlenz MA, Schmidt A, Wostmann B, Rehmann P (2019) Clinical performance of computer-engineered complete dentures: a retrospective pilot study. Quintessence Int 50(9):706\u2013711. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3290\/j.qi.a42778","journal-title":"Quintessence Int"},{"key":"6099_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Choi JJE, Uy CE, Plaksina P, Ramani RS, Ganjigatti R, Waddell JN (2020) Bond Strength of Denture Teeth to Heat-Cured, CAD\/CAM and 3D Printed Denture Acrylics. J Prosthodont 29(5):415\u2013421. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/jopr.13125","DOI":"10.1111\/jopr.13125"},{"key":"6099_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Srinivasan M et al CAD-CAM complete denture resins: an evaluation of biocompatibility, mechanical properties, and surface characteristics. J Dent 114:103785. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jdent.2021.103785","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jdent.2021.103785"},{"key":"6099_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Tashiro S, Kawaguchi T, Hamanaka I, Takahashi Y Bond strength of artificial teeth to thermoplastic denture base resin for injection molding. Dent Mater J 40(3):657\u2013663. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4012\/dmj.2020-183. (May 29 2021)","DOI":"10.4012\/dmj.2020-183"},{"key":"6099_CR19","unstructured":"Arslan M, Murat S, Alp G, Zaimoglu A (2018) Evaluation of flexural strength and surface properties of prepolymerized CAD\/CAM PMMA-based polymers used for digital 3D complete dentures\u00a0Int J Comput Dent\u00a021(1):31\u201340.\u00a0https:\/\/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/pubmed\/29610779"},{"key":"6099_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Alp G, Murat S, Yilmaz B (2019) Comparison of Flexural Strength of Different CAD\/CAM PMMA-Based Polymers\u00a0J Prosthodont\u00a028(2):e491-e495.\u00a0https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/jopr.12755","DOI":"10.1111\/jopr.12755"},{"key":"6099_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Perea-Lowery L, Minja IK, Lassila L, Ramakrishnaiah R, Vallittu PK Assessment of CAD-CAM polymers for digitally fabricated complete dentures. J Prosthet Dent 125(1):175\u2013181. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.prosdent.2019.12.008","DOI":"10.1016\/j.prosdent.2019.12.008"},{"key":"6099_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Inokoshi M, Kanazawa M, Minakuchi S (2012) Evaluation of a complete denture trial method applying rapid prototyping.\u00a0Dent MaterJ\u00a031(1):40\u2009\u2013\u20096.\u00a0https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4012\/dmj.2011-113","DOI":"10.4012\/dmj.2011-113"},{"key":"6099_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Valenti C et al (2022) Mechanical properties of 3D-printed prosthetic materials compared with milled and conventional processing: A systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies. J Prosthet Dent Aug 5. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.prosdent.2022.06.008","DOI":"10.1016\/j.prosdent.2022.06.008"},{"key":"6099_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Anadioti E, Musharbash L, Blatz MB, Papavasiliou G, Kamposiora P 3D printed complete removable dental prostheses: a narrative review. BMC Oral Health 20(1):343. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12903-020-01328-8","DOI":"10.1186\/s12903-020-01328-8"},{"key":"6099_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Gao H, Yang Z, Lin WS, Tan J, Chen L The Effect of Build Orientation on the Dimensional Accuracy of 3D-Printed Mandibular Complete Dentures Manufactured with a Multijet 3D Printer. J Prosthodont 30(8):684\u2013689. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/jopr.13330","DOI":"10.1111\/jopr.13330"},{"key":"6099_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Hada T et al Effect of Printing Direction on the Accuracy of 3D-Printed Dentures Using Stereolithography Technology. Mater (Basel) 13(15). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/ma13153405","DOI":"10.3390\/ma13153405"},{"key":"6099_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Katheng A, Kanazawa M, Iwaki M, Arakida T, Hada T, Minakuchi S Evaluation of trueness and precision of stereolithography-fabricated photopolymer-resin dentures under different postpolymerization conditions: An in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 128(3):514\u2013520. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.prosdent.2020.07.028","DOI":"10.1016\/j.prosdent.2020.07.028"},{"key":"6099_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Goodacre BJ, Goodacre CJ, Baba NZ, Kattadiyil MT (2016) Comparison of denture base adaptation between CAD-CAM and conventional fabrication techniques.\u00a0J Prosthet Dent\u00a0116(2):249\u2009\u2013\u200956.\u00a0https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.prosdent.2016.02.017","DOI":"10.1016\/j.prosdent.2016.02.017"},{"key":"6099_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Srinivasan M, Schimmel M, Naharro M, C ON, McKenna G, Muller F CAD\/CAM milled removable complete dentures: time and cost estimation study. J Dent 80:75\u201379. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jdent.2018.09.003","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jdent.2018.09.003"},{"key":"6099_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Alhallak K, Hagi-Pavli E, Nankali A (2023) A review on clinical use of CAD\/CAM and 3D printed dentures. Br Dent J Jan 9. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41415-022-5401-5","DOI":"10.1038\/s41415-022-5401-5"},{"key":"6099_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Tzanakakis EG, Pandoleon P, Sarafianou A, Kontonasaki E Adhesion of Conventional, 3D-Printed and Milled Artificial Teeth to Resin Substrates for Complete Dentures: A Narrative Review. Polym (Basel) 15(11). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/polym15112488","DOI":"10.3390\/polym15112488"},{"key":"6099_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Klaiber D, Spintzyk S, Geis-Gerstorfer J, Klink A, Unkovskiy A, Huettig F Bonding Behavior of Conventional PMMA towards Industrial CAD\/CAM PMMA and Artificial Resin Teeth for Complete Denture Manufacturing in a Digital Workflow. Mater (Basel) 14(14). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/ma14143822","DOI":"10.3390\/ma14143822"},{"key":"6099_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"You SM, You SG, Kang SY, Bae SY, Kim JH Evaluation of the accuracy (trueness and precision) of a maxillary trial denture according to the layer thickness: An in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 125(1):139\u2013145. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.prosdent.2019.12.014","DOI":"10.1016\/j.prosdent.2019.12.014"},{"key":"6099_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Tieh MT, Waddell JN, Choi JJE Optical and mechanical properties of conventional, milled and 3D-printed denture teeth. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 126:105061. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jmbbm.2021.105061","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmbbm.2021.105061"},{"key":"6099_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Gad MM et al Strength and Wear Behavior of Three-Dimensional Printed and Prefabricated Denture Teeth: An In Vitro Comparative Analysis. Eur J Dent 17(4):1248\u20131256. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1055\/s-0042-1759885","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0042-1759885"},{"key":"6099_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Chung YJ, Park JM, Kim TH, Ahn JS, Cha HS, Lee JH (2018) 3D Printing of Resin Material for Denture Artificial Teeth: Chipping and Indirect Tensile Fracture Resistance.\u00a0Materials (Basel)\u00a011(10):21.\u00a0https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/ma11101798","DOI":"10.3390\/ma11101798"},{"key":"6099_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Dimitrova M, Vlahova A, Hristov I, Kazakova R Bonding Efficiency between Artificial Teeth and Denture Base in CAD\/CAM and Conventional Complete Removable Dentures. Mater (Basel) 17(13). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/ma17133138","DOI":"10.3390\/ma17133138"},{"key":"6099_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"29","DOI":"10.1111\/jopr.13552","volume":"32","author":"B Kane","year":"2023","unstructured":"Kane B, Shah KC (2023) In Vitro Analysis of Shear Stress: CAD Milled vs Printed Denture Base Resins with Bonded Denture Tooth. J Prosthodont 32:29\u201337. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/jopr.13552","journal-title":"J Prosthodont"},{"key":"6099_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Barbosa DB, Monteiro DR, Barao VA, Pero AC, Compagnoni MA (2009) Effect of monomer treatment and polymerisation methods on the bond strength of resin teeth to denture base material. Gerodontology\u00a026(3):225\u2009\u2013\u200931.\u00a0https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1741-2358.2008.00262.x","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1741-2358.2008.00262.x"},{"key":"6099_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Palitsch A, Hannig M, Ferger P, Balkenhol M (2012) Bonding of acrylic denture teeth to MMA\/PMMA and light-curing denture base materials: the role of conditioning liquids. J Dent\u00a040(3):210\u2009\u2013\u200921.\u00a0https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jdent.2011.12.010","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jdent.2011.12.010"},{"issue":"9","key":"6099_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"799","DOI":"10.1111\/jopr.13486","volume":"31","author":"N Alaseef","year":"2022","unstructured":"Alaseef N et al (2022) CAD-CAM Fabricated Denture Base Resins: In Vitro Investigation of the Minimum Acceptable Denture Base Thickness. J Prosthodont 31(9):799\u2013805. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/jopr.13486","journal-title":"J Prosthodont"},{"issue":"1","key":"6099_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"122","DOI":"10.1016\/j.prosdent.2014.11.011","volume":"114","author":"T Sekinishi","year":"2015","unstructured":"Sekinishi T, Inukai S, Murakami N, Wakabayashi N (2015) Influence of denture tooth thickness on fracture mode of thin acrylic resin bases: An experimental and finite element analysis. J Prosthet Dent 114(1):122\u2013129. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.prosdent.2014.11.011","journal-title":"J Prosthet Dent"}],"container-title":["Clinical Oral Investigations"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00784-024-06099-y.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00784-024-06099-y\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00784-024-06099-y.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,6]],"date-time":"2025-02-06T08:01:56Z","timestamp":1738828916000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00784-024-06099-y"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024,12,7]]},"references-count":42,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,1]]}},"alternative-id":["6099"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00784-024-06099-y","relation":{},"ISSN":["1436-3771"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1436-3771","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2024,12,7]]},"assertion":[{"value":"30 October 2024","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"3 December 2024","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"7 December 2024","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"Not Applicable.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethical approval"}},{"value":"Not Applicable.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Informed consent"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing interests.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}}],"article-number":"4"}}