{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,10]],"date-time":"2026-09-10T18:10:14Z","timestamp":1789063814264,"version":"build-2803163510"},"reference-count":36,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"8","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,9]],"date-time":"2025-07-09T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1752019200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,9]],"date-time":"2025-07-09T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1752019200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100002957","name":"Technische Universit\u00e4t Dresden","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100002957","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"crossref"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Clin Oral Invest"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n          <jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>Objectives<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>This in vivo study evaluated the reliability of digital impressions from intraoral scans compared to digital scans of plaster casts of the edentulous maxilla of infants with cleft lip and palate (CLP).<\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>\n          <jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>Materials and methods<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>To compare and evaluate the dimensional accuracy of digital and conventional impressions, 52 infants with CLP were selected. Conventional plaster and digital impressions were taken from each patient before surgical closure of the lips and\/or palate. Plaster casts were digitized using the intraoral scanner. Eight linear distances were measured and 3D superimpositions were performed. Pearson\u2019s correlation, mean difference and root mean square were calculated to compare the two impression methods.<\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>\n          <jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>Regardless of the form of CLP, the IOS and the plaster casts correlated very well. The measured linear dimensions of the IOS were greater than those of the digitized plaster casts. Although the linear measurements showed differences of up to 0.89\u00a0mm, superimpositions showed that the two impression methods did not differ in a clinically relevant way.<\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>\n          <jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>No clinically relevant difference in accuracy was found between IOS and the plaster casts. When investigating the accuracy, 3D analysis should always be preferred to 2D analysis.<\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>\n          <jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>Clinical relevance<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>This study confirms that IOS is a reliable and clinical valuable alternative for infants with CLP. IOS eliminates risks associated with traditional methods, providing a safer and more efficient workflow for PSIO. Despite minor differences in dimensional accuracy, these variations are clinically negligible and do not impact treatment planning or appliance fabrication.<\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1007\/s00784-025-06444-9","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,10]],"date-time":"2025-07-10T09:27:20Z","timestamp":1752139640000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":5,"title":["Applicability of intraoral scans for presurgical orthopedic treatment of cleft lip and palate in infants: a prospective non-randomized comparative study"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"29","author":[{"given":"Christiane","family":"Keil","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Michaela","family":"Buckova","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Sheila","family":"Keil","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Louis","family":"Hartmann","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Wilhelm","family":"Schlupp","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Thomas","family":"Zerjatke","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Theodosia","family":"Bartzela","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"G\u00fcnter","family":"Lauer","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,9]]},"reference":[{"key":"6444_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1773","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(09)60695-4","volume":"374","author":"PA Mossey","year":"2009","unstructured":"Mossey PA, Little J, Munger RG, Dixon MJ, Shaw WC (2009) Cleft lip and palate. Lancet 374:1773\u20131785. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S0140-6736(09)60695-4","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"6444_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"126","DOI":"10.1002\/(SICI)1096-8628(19980113)75:2<126::AID-AJMG2>3.0.CO;2-R","volume":"75","author":"MM Tolarova","year":"1998","unstructured":"Tolarova MM, Cervenka J (1998) Classification and birth prevalence of orofacial clefts. Am J Med Genet 75:126\u2013137","journal-title":"Am J Med Genet"},{"key":"6444_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"241","DOI":"10.1007\/s00292-017-0313-x","volume":"38","author":"A Voigt","year":"2017","unstructured":"Voigt A, Radlanski RJ, Sarioglu N, Schmidt G (2017) [Cleft lip and palate]. Pathologe 38:241\u2013247. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00292-017-0313-x","journal-title":"Pathologe"},{"key":"6444_CR4","first-page":"126","volume":"70","author":"CK McNeil","year":"1950","unstructured":"McNeil CK (1950) Orthodontic procedures in the treatment of congenital cleft palate. Dent Rec (London) 70:126\u2013132","journal-title":"Dent Rec (London)"},{"key":"6444_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"337","DOI":"10.1597\/1545-1569_2003_040_0337_arpcto_2.0.co_2","volume":"40","author":"C Prahl","year":"2003","unstructured":"Prahl C, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM, Van \u2018t Hof MA, Prahl-Andersen B (2003) A randomized prospective clinical trial of the effect of infant orthopedics in unilateral cleft lip and palate: prevention of collapse of the alveolar segments (Dutchcleft). Cleft Palate Craniofac J 40:337\u2013342. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1597\/1545-1569_2003_040_0337_arpcto_2.0.co_2","journal-title":"Cleft Palate Craniofac J"},{"key":"6444_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Zarean P, Zarean P, Thieringer FM, Mueller AA, Kressmann S, Erismann M, Sharma N, Benitez BK (2022) A Point-of-Care digital workflow for 3D printed passive presurgical orthopedic plates in cleft care. Child (Basel) 9. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/children9081261","DOI":"10.3390\/children9081261"},{"key":"6444_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"299","DOI":"10.1179\/bjo.22.4.299","volume":"22","author":"RA Chate","year":"1995","unstructured":"Chate RA (1995) A report on the hazards encountered when taking neonatal cleft palate impressions (1983\u20131992). Br J Orthod 22:299\u2013307. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1179\/bjo.22.4.299","journal-title":"Br J Orthod"},{"key":"6444_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"E58","DOI":"10.1002\/ppul.23710","volume":"52","author":"F Reichert","year":"2017","unstructured":"Reichert F, Amrhein P, Uhlemann F (2017) Unnoticed aspiration of palate plate impression material in a neonate: diagnosis, therapy, outcome. Pediatr Pulmonol 52:E58\u2013E60. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/ppul.23710","journal-title":"Pediatr Pulmonol"},{"key":"6444_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"20","DOI":"10.1186\/s12903-020-1001-4","volume":"20","author":"AB Xepapadeas","year":"2020","unstructured":"Xepapadeas AB, Weise C, Frank K, Spintzyk S, Poets CF, Wiechers C, Arand J, Koos B (2020) Technical note on introducing a digital workflow for newborns with craniofacial anomalies based on intraoral scans - part I: 3D printed and milled palatal stimulation plate for trisomy 21. BMC Oral Health 20:20. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12903-020-1001-4","journal-title":"BMC Oral Health"},{"key":"6444_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"20160455","DOI":"10.1259\/dmfr.20160455","volume":"46","author":"JB Ferreira","year":"2017","unstructured":"Ferreira JB, Christovam IO, Alencar DS, da Motta AFJ, Mattos CT, Cury-Saramago A (2017) Accuracy and reproducibility of dental measurements on tomographic digital models: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 46:20160455. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1259\/dmfr.20160455","journal-title":"Dentomaxillofac Radiol"},{"key":"6444_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"149","DOI":"10.1186\/s12903-017-0442-x","volume":"17","author":"F Mangano","year":"2017","unstructured":"Mangano F, Gandolfi A, Luongo G, Logozzo S (2017) Intraoral scanners in dentistry: a review of the current literature. BMC Oral Health 17:149. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12903-017-0442-x","journal-title":"BMC Oral Health"},{"key":"6444_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"226","DOI":"10.1053\/j.sodo.2004.05.007","volume":"10","author":"MJ Peluso","year":"2004","unstructured":"Peluso MJ, Josell SD, Levine SW, Lorei BJ (2004) Digital models: an introduction. Semin Orthod 10:226\u2013238","journal-title":"Semin Orthod"},{"key":"6444_CR13","first-page":"337","volume":"48","author":"ND Kravitz","year":"2014","unstructured":"Kravitz ND, Groth C, Jones PE, Graham JW, Redmond WR (2014) Intraoral digital scanners. J Clin Orthod 48:337\u2013347","journal-title":"J Clin Orthod"},{"key":"6444_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"11","DOI":"10.1186\/s13005-020-00222-6","volume":"16","author":"K Liczmanski","year":"2020","unstructured":"Liczmanski K, Stamm T, Sauerland C, Blanck-Lubarsch M (2020) Accuracy of intraoral scans in the mixed dentition: a prospective non-randomized comparative clinical trial. Head Face Med 16:11. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s13005-020-00222-6","journal-title":"Head Face Med"},{"key":"6444_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"27","DOI":"10.4103\/jips.jips_327_19","volume":"20","author":"K Aswani","year":"2020","unstructured":"Aswani K, Wankhade S, Khalikar A, Deogade S (2020) Accuracy of an intraoral digital impression: A review. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 20:27\u201337. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4103\/jips.jips_327_19","journal-title":"J Indian Prosthodont Soc"},{"key":"6444_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"35","DOI":"10.1111\/jopr.12527","volume":"27","author":"P Ahlholm","year":"2018","unstructured":"Ahlholm P, Sipila K, Vallittu P, Jakonen M, Kotiranta U (2018) Digital versus conventional impressions in fixed prosthodontics: A review. J Prosthodont 27:35\u201341. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/jopr.12527","journal-title":"J Prosthodont"},{"key":"6444_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"5625","DOI":"10.1007\/s00784-022-04607-6","volume":"26","author":"L Kong","year":"2022","unstructured":"Kong L, Li Y, Liu Z (2022) Digital versus conventional full-arch impressions in linear and 3D accuracy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of in vivo studies. Clin Oral Investig 26:5625\u20135642. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00784-022-04607-6","journal-title":"Clin Oral Investig"},{"key":"6444_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"660","DOI":"10.1111\/jopr.13211","volume":"29","author":"P Papaspyridakos","year":"2020","unstructured":"Papaspyridakos P, Vazouras K, Chen YW, Kotina E, Natto Z, Kang K, Chochlidakis K (2020) Digital vs conventional implant impressions: A systematic review and Meta-Analysis. J Prosthodont 29:660\u2013678. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/jopr.13211","journal-title":"J Prosthodont"},{"key":"6444_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"568","DOI":"10.1597\/15-036","volume":"53","author":"EV Chalmers","year":"2016","unstructured":"Chalmers EV, McIntyre GT, Wang W, Gillgrass T, Martin CB, Mossey PA (2016) Intraoral 3D scanning or dental impressions for the assessment of dental arch relationships in cleft care: which is superior?? Cleft Palate Craniofac J 53:568\u2013577. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1597\/15-036","journal-title":"Cleft Palate Craniofac J"},{"key":"6444_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"367","DOI":"10.1097\/SCS.0000000000006258","volume":"31","author":"X Gong","year":"2020","unstructured":"Gong X, Dang R, Xu T, Yu Q, Zheng J (2020) Full digital workflow of Nasoalveolar molding treatment in infants with cleft lip and palate. J Craniofac Surg 31:367\u2013371. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/SCS.0000000000006258","journal-title":"J Craniofac Surg"},{"key":"6444_CR21","first-page":"251","volume":"21","author":"KF Krey","year":"2018","unstructured":"Krey KF, Ratzmann A, Metelmann PH, Hartmann M, Ruge S, Kordass B (2018) Fully digital workflow for presurgical orthodontic plate in cleft lip and palate patients. Int J Comput Dent 21:251\u2013259","journal-title":"Int J Comput Dent"},{"key":"6444_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1120","DOI":"10.1177\/1055665619835082","volume":"56","author":"J Patel","year":"2019","unstructured":"Patel J, Winters J, Walters M (2019) Intraoral digital impression technique for a neonate with bilateral cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 56:1120\u20131123. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1055665619835082","journal-title":"Cleft Palate Craniofac J"},{"key":"6444_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"279","DOI":"10.1093\/ejo\/cjab068","volume":"44","author":"C Weise","year":"2022","unstructured":"Weise C, Frank K, Wiechers C, Weise H, Reinert S, Koos B, Xepapadeas AB (2022) Intraoral scanning of neonates and infants with craniofacial disorders: feasibility, scanning duration, and clinical experience. Eur J Orthod 44:279\u2013286. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/ejo\/cjab068","journal-title":"Eur J Orthod"},{"key":"6444_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Carter CB, Gallardo FF Jr., Colburn HE, Schlieder DW (2022) Novel digital workflow for Nasoalveolar molding and postoperative nasal stent for infants with cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 10556656221095393. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/10556656221095393","DOI":"10.1177\/10556656221095393"},{"key":"6444_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"245","DOI":"10.4047\/jap.2018.10.3.245","volume":"10","author":"YG Jeong","year":"2018","unstructured":"Jeong YG, Lee WS, Lee KB (2018) Accuracy evaluation of dental models manufactured by CAD\/CAM milling method and 3D printing method. J Adv Prosthodont 10:245\u2013251. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4047\/jap.2018.10.3.245","journal-title":"J Adv Prosthodont"},{"key":"6444_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Aretxabaleta M, Unkovskiy A, Koos B, Spintzyk S, Xepapadeas AB (2021) Accuracy evaluation of additively and subtractively fabricated palatal plate orthodontic appliances for newborns and infants-An in vitro study. Mater (Basel) 14. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/ma14154103","DOI":"10.3390\/ma14154103"},{"key":"6444_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"379","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jtumed.2024.01.005","volume":"19","author":"R Oday","year":"2024","unstructured":"Oday R, Abid M, Dziedzic A (2024) The accuracy and retention of presurgical infant orthopaedics constructed from different polymer materials: A comparative study. J Taibah Univ Med Sci 19:379\u2013389. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jtumed.2024.01.005","journal-title":"J Taibah Univ Med Sci"},{"key":"6444_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1601-6343.2010.01503.x","volume":"14","author":"PS Fleming","year":"2011","unstructured":"Fleming PS, Marinho V, Johal A (2011) Orthodontic measurements on digital study models compared with plaster models: a systematic review. Orthod Craniofac Res 14:1\u201316. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1601-6343.2010.01503.x","journal-title":"Orthod Craniofac Res"},{"key":"6444_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"300","DOI":"10.1043\/0003-3219(2005","volume":"75","author":"B Rheude","year":"2005","unstructured":"Rheude B, Sadowsky PL, Ferriera A, Jacobson A (2005) An evaluation of the use of digital study models in orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. Angle Orthod 75:300\u2013304. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1043\/0003-3219(2005)75[300:AEOTUO]2.0.CO;2","journal-title":"Angle Orthod"},{"key":"6444_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e0157713","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0157713","volume":"11","author":"F Zhang","year":"2016","unstructured":"Zhang F, Suh KJ, Lee KM (2016) Validity of intraoral scans compared with plaster models: an In-Vivo comparison of dental measurements and 3D surface analysis. PLoS ONE 11:e0157713. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0157713","journal-title":"PLoS ONE"},{"key":"6444_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"165","DOI":"10.1007\/s10266-022-00736-2","volume":"111","author":"J Ye","year":"2023","unstructured":"Ye J, Wang S, Wang Z, Liu Y, Sun Y, Ye H, Zhou Y (2023) Comparison of the dimensional and morphological accuracy of three-dimensional digital dental casts digitized using different methods. Odontology 111:165\u2013171. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10266-022-00736-2","journal-title":"Odontology"},{"key":"6444_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"171","DOI":"10.1186\/s12903-020-01159-7","volume":"20","author":"AB Xepapadeas","year":"2020","unstructured":"Xepapadeas AB, Weise C, Frank K, Spintzyk S, Poets CF, Wiechers C, Arand J, Koos B (2020) Technical note on introducing a digital workflow for newborns with craniofacial anomalies based on intraoral scans - part II: 3D printed Tubingen palatal plate prototype for newborns with robin sequence. BMC Oral Health 20:171. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12903-020-01159-7","journal-title":"BMC Oral Health"},{"key":"6444_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Dalessandri D, Tonni I, Laffranchi L, Migliorati M, Isola G, Bonetti S, Visconti L, Paganelli C (2019) Evaluation of a digital protocol for Pre-Surgical orthopedic treatment of cleft lip and palate in newborn patients: A pilot study. Dent J (Basel) 7. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/dj7040111","DOI":"10.3390\/dj7040111"},{"key":"6444_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"403","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajodo.2021.09.015","volume":"162","author":"R ElNaghy","year":"2022","unstructured":"ElNaghy R, Amin SA, Hasanin M (2022) Evaluating the accuracy of intraoral direct digital impressions in 2 infants with unilateral cleft lip and palate compared with digitized conventional impression. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 162:403\u2013409. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajodo.2021.09.015","journal-title":"Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop"},{"key":"6444_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1597\/1545-1569_2002_039_0001_tdaomc_2.0.co_2","volume":"39","author":"B Braumann","year":"2002","unstructured":"Braumann B, Keilig L, Bourauel C, Jager A (2002) Three-dimensional analysis of morphological changes in the maxilla of patients with cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 39:1\u201311. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1597\/1545-1569_2002_039_0001_tdaomc_2.0.co_2","journal-title":"Cleft Palate Craniofac J"},{"key":"6444_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"343","DOI":"10.3290\/j.qi.a35524","volume":"47","author":"P Muller","year":"2016","unstructured":"Muller P, Ender A, Joda T, Katsoulis J (2016) Impact of digital intraoral scan strategies on the impression accuracy using the TRIOS pod scanner. Quintessence Int 47:343\u2013349. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3290\/j.qi.a35524","journal-title":"Quintessence Int"}],"container-title":["Clinical Oral Investigations"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00784-025-06444-9.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00784-025-06444-9\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00784-025-06444-9.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,7]],"date-time":"2025-09-07T01:42:09Z","timestamp":1757209329000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00784-025-06444-9"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,9]]},"references-count":36,"journal-issue":{"issue":"8","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,8]]}},"alternative-id":["6444"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00784-025-06444-9","relation":{},"ISSN":["1436-3771"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1436-3771","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,9]]},"assertion":[{"value":"15 January 2025","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"19 June 2025","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"9 July 2025","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"This study was approved by the local Ethics Committee (SR\u2009+\u2009BO-EK-43012020), Department of Oral Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universit\u00e4t Dresden, Germany. The written informed consent was obtained from each legal guardian of participating CLP patients prior to the start of the study.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethics approval and consent to participate"}},{"value":"The written informed consent was obtained from each legal guardian of participating CLP patients prior to the start of the study.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Informed consent"}},{"value":"The authors declare no conflict of interest.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}}],"article-number":"378"}}