{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,26]],"date-time":"2026-06-26T06:46:27Z","timestamp":1782456387610,"version":"3.54.5"},"reference-count":37,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"6","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,3]],"date-time":"2026-06-03T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1780444800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,3]],"date-time":"2026-06-03T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1780444800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"name":"Universidade Estadual Paulista J\u00falio De Mesquita Filho"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Clin Oral Invest"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Objectives<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>This randomized clinical trial evaluated the six-year clinical performance of the ethanol-wet bonding technique (EWBT) combined with different adhesive protocols in non-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs). The research question was whether EWBT improves long-term restoration retention compared with conventional water-wet bonding.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Material and methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Patients presenting at least one NCCL, regardless of lesion etiology (abrasion, erosion, abfraction, or mixed), were included. A total of 148 NCCLs were randomized at the restoration level into four groups: [NE] water-wet bonding with a three-step etch-and-rinse adhesive (Adper Scotchbond Multi-Purpose, 3M ESPE); [EMP] EWBT + Adper Scotchbond Multi-Purpose (3M ESPE); [EB] EWBT + hydrophobic bonding resin (Adper Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Bond, 3M ESPE); and [EU] EWBT + universal adhesive (Single Bond Universal, 3M ESPE). EWBT consisted of applying 100% ethanol actively for 60 s to dentin prior to adhesive application. All restorations were placed using a nanohybrid composite resin (Filtek Z350 XT, 3M ESPE). Clinical evaluations were performed at baseline, 6, 18 months and after six years using modified USPHS criteria. The unit of analysis was the restoration. Intergroup comparisons at each time point were performed using Fisher\u2019s exact test, and survival analysis was conducted using Kaplan\u2013Meier estimates and log-rank tests (\u03b1 = 0.05).<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      After six years, 42 patients (108 restorations) were clinically evaluated (72.9% recall), while all 148 restorations were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. Survival rates were 88.9% (NE), 81.1% (EU), 77.8% (EMP), and 48.7% (EB). The EB group showed significantly lower survival than all other groups (log-rank,\n                      <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                      = 0.008). No significant differences were observed among the hydrophilic protocols (\n                      <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                      &gt; 0.05).\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The effectiveness of EWBT is influenced by the hydrophilicity of the adhesive system. Hydrophilic adhesives showed stable long-term performance regardless of ethanol pretreatment, whereas the use of EWBT with a purely hydrophobic bonding resin resulted in significantly reduced retention.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Clinical relevance<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>EWBT does not improve longevity when used with hydrophilic adhesives but may compromise performance when associated with simplified hydrophobic bonding strategies.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1007\/s00784-026-06930-8","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,3]],"date-time":"2026-06-03T07:42:39Z","timestamp":1780472559000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Clinical performance of the ethanol-wet bonding technique with different adhesive systems in noncarious cervical lesion restorations: a 6-year randomized clinical trial"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"30","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-3173-8422","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Luana dos Santos","family":"Souza","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-5979-8975","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Maria Fernanda","family":"Monnerat","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-0366-5361","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Maur\u00edcio Yugo","family":"Souza","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-8371-6850","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Marcella Batista","family":"Rocha","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-0521-7922","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Taciana Marco Ferraz","family":"Caneppele","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-9299-8792","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Eduardo","family":"Bresciani","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,3]]},"reference":[{"key":"6930_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e30","DOI":"10.5395\/rde.2021.46.e30","volume":"46","author":"XV Tran","year":"2021","unstructured":"Tran XV, Tran KQ (2021) Microleakage and characteristics of resin-tooth tissues interface of a self-etch and an etch-and-rinse adhesive systems. Restor Dentistry Endodontics 46:e30. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5395\/rde.2021.46.e30","journal-title":"Restor Dentistry Endodontics"},{"key":"6930_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"78","DOI":"10.1016\/j.dental.2017.11.005","volume":"34","author":"L Breschi","year":"2018","unstructured":"Breschi L, Maravic T, Cunha SR, Comba A, Cadenaro M, Tjaderhane L, Pashley DH, Tay FR, Mazzoni A (2018) Dentin bonding systems From dentin collagen structure to bond preservation and clinical applications. Dent Mater 34:78\u201396. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.dental.2017.11.005","journal-title":"Dent Mater"},{"key":"6930_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1391","DOI":"10.1007\/s10103-019-02739-y","volume":"34","author":"LT Trevelin","year":"2019","unstructured":"Trevelin LT, da Silva BTF, De Freitas PM, Matos AB (2019) Influence of Er:YAG laser pulse duration on the long-term stability of organic matrix and resin-dentin interface. Lasers Med Sci 34:1391\u20131399. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10103-019-02739-y","journal-title":"Lasers Med Sci"},{"key":"6930_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"103207","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jdent.2019.103207","volume":"90","author":"L Yi","year":"2019","unstructured":"Yi L, Yu J, Han L, Li T, Yang H, Huang C (2019) Combination of baicalein and ethanol-wet-bonding improves dentin bonding durability. J Dent 90:103207. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jdent.2019.103207","journal-title":"J Dent"},{"key":"6930_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"182","DOI":"10.1016\/j.prosdent.2019.07.012","volume":"125","author":"M Maassen","year":"2021","unstructured":"Maassen M, Wille S, Kern M (2021) Bond strength of adhesive luting systems to human dentin and their durability. J Prosthet Dent 125:182\u2013188. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.prosdent.2019.07.012","journal-title":"J Prosthet Dent"},{"issue":"2","key":"6930_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"141","DOI":"10.1016\/j.dental.2024.11.011","volume":"41","author":"L Breschi","year":"2025","unstructured":"Breschi L, Maravic T, Mazzitelli C, Josic U, Mancuso E, Cadenaro M, Pfeifer CS, Mazzoni A (2025) The evolution of adhesive dentistry: From etch-and-rinse to universal bonding systems. Dent Mater 41(2):141\u2013158. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.dental.2024.11.011","journal-title":"Dent Mater"},{"key":"6930_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"5268342","DOI":"10.1155\/2019\/5268342","volume":"2019","author":"DE Betancourt","year":"2019","unstructured":"Betancourt DE, Baldion PA, Castellanos JE (2019) Resin-Dentin Bonding Interface: Mechanisms of Degradation and Strategies for Stabilization of the Hybrid Layer. Int J Biomater 2019:5268342. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1155\/2019\/5268342","journal-title":"Int J Biomater"},{"key":"6930_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"7","DOI":"10.3290\/j.jad.a43994","volume":"22","author":"B Van Meerbeek","year":"2020","unstructured":"Van Meerbeek B, Yoshihara K, Van Landuyt K, Yoshida Y, Peumans M (2020) From Buonocore\u2019s Pioneering Acid-Etch Technique to Self-Adhering Restoratives. A Status Perspective of Rapidly Advancing Dental Adhesive Technology. J Adhes Dent 22:7\u201334. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3290\/j.jad.a43994","journal-title":"J Adhes Dent"},{"key":"6930_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e102","DOI":"10.1590\/1807-3107bor-2018.vol32.0102","volume":"32","author":"MY Souza","year":"2018","unstructured":"Souza MY, DI Nicol\u00f3 R, Bresciani E (2018) Influence of ethanol-wet dentin, adhesive mode of application, and aging on bond strength of universal adhesive. Braz Oral Res 32:e102. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1590\/1807-3107bor-2018.vol32.0102","journal-title":"Braz Oral Res"},{"issue":"1","key":"6930_CR10","first-page":"7","volume":"20","author":"DH Pashley","year":"2007","unstructured":"Pashley DH, Tay FR, Carvalho RM, Rueggeberg FA, Agee KA, Carrilho M, Donnelly A, Garc\u00eda-Godoy F (2007) From dry bonding to water-wet bonding to ethanol-wet bonding. A review of the interactions between dentin matrix and solvated resins using a macromodel of the hybrid layer. Am J Dent 20(1):7\u201320","journal-title":"Am J Dent"},{"issue":"2","key":"6930_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"146","DOI":"10.1177\/0022034508328910","volume":"88","author":"K Hosaka","year":"2009","unstructured":"Hosaka K, Nishitani Y, Tagami J, Yoshiyama M, Brackett WW, Agee KA, Tay FR, Pashley DH (2009) Durability of resin-dentin bonds to water- vs. ethanol-saturated dentin. J Dent Res 88(2):146\u2013151","journal-title":"J Dent Res"},{"key":"6930_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"926","DOI":"10.1016\/j.dental.2011.05.004","volume":"27","author":"A Tezvergil-Mutluay","year":"2011","unstructured":"Tezvergil-Mutluay A, Agee KA, Hoshika T, Uchiyama T, Tj\u00e4rdene L, Breschi L (2011) Inhibition of MMPs by alcohols. Dent Mater 27:926\u2013933. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.dental.2011.05.004","journal-title":"Dent Mater"},{"key":"6930_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"537","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jdent.2015.02.014","volume":"43","author":"DL Scheffel","year":"2015","unstructured":"Scheffel DL, Sacono NT, Ribeiro AP, Soares DG, Basso FG, Pashley D et al (2015) Immediate human pulp response to ethanol-wet bonding technique. J Dent 43:537\u2013545. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jdent.2015.02.014","journal-title":"J Dent"},{"issue":"1","key":"6930_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"575","DOI":"10.1007\/s00784-021-04036-x","volume":"26","author":"M Hayashi","year":"2022","unstructured":"Hayashi M, Kubo S, Pereira PNR, Ikeda M, Takagaki T, Nikaido T, Tagami J (2022) Progression of non-carious cervical lesions: 3D morphological analysis. Clin Oral Investig 26(1):575\u2013583. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00784-021-04036-x","journal-title":"Clin Oral Investig"},{"issue":"1","key":"6930_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"10","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1708-8240.2011.00487.x","volume":"24","author":"JO Grippo","year":"2012","unstructured":"Grippo JO, Simring M, Coleman TA (2012) Abfraction, abrasion, biocorrosion, and the enigma of noncarious cervical lesions: a 20-year perspective. J Esthet Restor Dent 24(1):10\u201323. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1708-8240.2011.00487.x","journal-title":"J Esthet Restor Dent"},{"issue":"12","key":"6930_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1845","DOI":"10.1016\/j.dental.2021.09.014","volume":"37","author":"A Wiegand","year":"2021","unstructured":"Wiegand A, Lechte C, Kanzow P (2021) Adhesion to eroded enamel and dentin: systematic review and meta-analysis. Dent Mater 37(12):1845\u20131853. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.dental.2021.09.014","journal-title":"Dent Mater"},{"key":"6930_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1427","DOI":"10.1007\/s00784-013-1123-z","volume":"18","author":"E Say","year":"2014","unstructured":"Say E, \u00d6zel E, Yurdag\u00fcven H et al (2014) Three-year clinical evaluation of a two-step self-etch adhesive with or without selective enamel etching in non-carious cervical sclerotic lesions. Clin Oral Investig 18:1427\u20131433. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00784-013-1123-z","journal-title":"Clin Oral Investig"},{"key":"6930_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Nakabayashi N, Kojima K, Masuhara E (1982) The promotion of adhesion by the infiltration of monomers into tooth substrates. J Biomed Mater Res 16(3):265\u2009\u2013\u200973. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/jbm.820160307","DOI":"10.1002\/jbm.820160307"},{"key":"6930_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Souza MY, Jurema ALB, Caneppele TMF, Bresciani E (2019) Six-month performance of restorations produced with the ethanol-wet-bonding technique: a randomized trial. Braz Oral Res 33:e052. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1590\/1807-3107bor-2019.vol33.0052","DOI":"10.1590\/1807-3107bor-2019.vol33.0052"},{"issue":"5","key":"6930_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"588","DOI":"10.4103\/1735-3327.104878","volume":"9","author":"V Mortazavi","year":"2012","unstructured":"Mortazavi V, Samimi P, Rafizadeh M, Kazemi S (2012) A randomized clinical trial evaluating the success rate of ethanol wet bonding technique and two adhesives. Dent Res J (Isfahan) 9(5):588\u2013594. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4103\/1735-3327.104878","journal-title":"Dent Res J (Isfahan)"},{"key":"6930_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Ara\u00fajo JF, Barros TA, Braga EM, Loretto SC, Silva e Souza Pde A, Silva e Souza MH (2013) One-year evaluation of a simplified ethanol-wet bonding technique: a randomized clinical trial. Braz Dent J 24(3):267\u2009\u2013\u200972. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1590\/0103-6440201302128","DOI":"10.1590\/0103-6440201302128"},{"issue":"8","key":"6930_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"953","DOI":"10.1177\/0022034510391799","volume":"90","author":"Y Liu","year":"2011","unstructured":"Liu Y, Tj\u00e4derhane L, Breschi L, Mazzoni A, Li N, Mao J, Pashley DH, Tay FR (2011) Limitations in bonding to dentin and experimental strategies to prevent bond degradation. J Dent Res 90(8):953\u2013968. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0022034510391799","journal-title":"J Dent Res"},{"key":"6930_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"215","DOI":"10.1007\/s00784-005-0018-z","volume":"9","author":"JF Cvar","year":"2005","unstructured":"Cvar JF, Ryge G (2005) Reprint of criteria for the clinical evalu ation of dental restorative materials. 1971. Clin Oral Investig 9:215\u2013232. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00784-005-0018-z","journal-title":"Clin Oral Investig"},{"issue":"8","key":"6930_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"672","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijsu.2011.09.004","volume":"9","author":"KF Schulz","year":"2011","unstructured":"Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D, CONSORT Group (2011) CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting par allel group randomised trials. Int J Surg 9(8):672\u2013677. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ijsu.2011.09.004","journal-title":"Int J Surg"},{"key":"6930_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"9949699","DOI":"10.1155\/2021\/9949699","volume":"2021","author":"O Kiuru","year":"2021","unstructured":"Kiuru O, Sinervo J, V\u00e4h\u00e4nikkil\u00e4 H, Anttonen V, Tj\u00e4derhane L (2021) MMP Inhibitors and Dentin Bonding: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Int J Dent 2021:9949699. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1155\/2021\/9949699","journal-title":"Int J Dent"},{"key":"6930_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"676","DOI":"10.1016\/j.dental.2015.03.008","volume":"31","author":"TH Stape","year":"2015","unstructured":"Stape TH, Tj\u00e4derhane L, Marques MR, Aguiar FH, Martins LR (2015) Effect of dimethyl sulfoxide wet-bonding technique on hybrid layer quality and dentin bond strength. Dent Mater 31:676\u2013683. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.dental.2015.03.008","journal-title":"Dent Mater"},{"key":"6930_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Osorio E, Toledano M, Aguilera FS, Tay FR, Osorio R (2010) Ethanol wet-bonding technique sensitivity assessed by AFM. J Dent Res 89(11):1264-9. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0022034510376403","DOI":"10.1177\/0022034510376403"},{"issue":"8","key":"6930_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1050","DOI":"10.1016\/j.dental.2009.03.006","volume":"25","author":"TP Shin","year":"2009","unstructured":"Shin TP, Yao X, Huenergardt R, Walker MP, Wang Y (2009) Morphological and chemical characterization of bonding hydrophobic adhesive to dentin using ethanol wet bonding technique. Dent Mater 25(8):1050\u20131057. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.dental.2009.03.006","journal-title":"Dent Mater"},{"key":"6930_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"29.\tReisA, Loguercio AD (2009) A 36-month clinical evaluation of ethanol\/water and acetone-based etch-and-rinse adhesives in non-carious cervical lesions. Oper Dent 34(4):384-91. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2341\/08-117","DOI":"10.2341\/08-117"},{"issue":"4","key":"6930_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"380","DOI":"10.1016\/j.dental.2009.12.009","volume":"26","author":"FT Sadek","year":"2010","unstructured":"Sadek FT, Castellan CS, Braga RR, Mai S, Tj\u00e4derhane L, Pashley DH, Tay FR (2010) One-year stability of resin-dentin bonds created with a hydrophobic ethanol-wet bonding technique. Dent Mater 26(4):380\u2013386. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.dental.2009.12.009","journal-title":"Dent Mater"},{"issue":"1","key":"6930_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"17","DOI":"10.1016\/j.dental.2010.10.023","volume":"27","author":"B Van Meerbeek","year":"2011","unstructured":"Van Meerbeek B, Yoshihara K, Yoshida Y, Mine A, De Munck J, Van Landuyt KL (2011) State of the art of self-etch adhesives. Dent Mater 27(1):17\u201328","journal-title":"Dent Mater"},{"key":"6930_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Yokota Y, Fujita KN, Uchida R, Aida E, Aoki NT, Aida M, Nishiyama N (2016) Quantitative evaluation of MDP-Ca salt and DCPD after application of an MDP-based one-step self-etching adhesive on enamel and dentin. J Adhes Dent 18(3):205\u201313. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3290\/j.jad.a36133","DOI":"10.3290\/j.jad.a36133"},{"issue":"4","key":"6930_CR33","first-page":"271","volume":"11","author":"S Sauro","year":"2009","unstructured":"Sauro S, Watson TF, Mannocci F, Tay FR, Pashley DH (2009) Prevention of water contamination of ethanol-saturated dentin and hydrophobic hybrid layers. J Adhes Dent 11(4):271\u2013278","journal-title":"J Adhes Dent"},{"issue":"10","key":"6930_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"999","DOI":"10.1016\/j.dental.2013.07.016","volume":"29","author":"L Tj\u00e4derhane","year":"2013","unstructured":"Tj\u00e4derhane L, Nascimento FD, Breschi L, Mazzoni A, Tersariol IL, Geraldeli S, Tezvergil-Mutluay A, Carrilho M, Carvalho RM, Tay FR, Pashley DH (2013) Strategies to prevent hydrolytic degradation of the hybrid layer-A review. Dent Mater 29(10):999\u20131011","journal-title":"Dent Mater"},{"issue":"2","key":"6930_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e17","DOI":"10.1016\/j.dental.2009.11.154","volume":"26","author":"L Mair","year":"2010","unstructured":"Mair L, Padipatvuthikul P (2010) Variables related to materials and preparing for bond strength testing irrespective of the test protocol. Dent Mater 26(2):e17\u201323. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.dental.2009.11.154","journal-title":"Dent Mater"},{"key":"6930_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Angelo E, Guerra A, Vitti R, Martins LRM (2023) The effect of ethanol associated with universal adhesive on resin composite adhesion to different dentin depths: a long-term in vitro study. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 31(3):254\u2013261. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1922\/EJPRD_2474Angelo08","DOI":"10.1922\/EJPRD_2474Angelo08"},{"key":"6930_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"97","DOI":"10.4103\/1735-3327.330878","volume":"18","author":"A Boruziniat","year":"2021","unstructured":"Boruziniat A, Alizadeh S, Gifani M, Cehreli ZC, Khazaei Y (2021) The effect of ethanol wet bonding technique on postoperative hypersensitivity of Class II composite restorations: A randomized trial. Dent Res J (Isfahan) 18:97. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4103\/1735-3327.330878","journal-title":"Dent Res J (Isfahan)"}],"container-title":["Clinical Oral Investigations"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00784-026-06930-8.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00784-026-06930-8","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00784-026-06930-8.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,26]],"date-time":"2026-06-26T05:52:42Z","timestamp":1782453162000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00784-026-06930-8"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,3]]},"references-count":37,"journal-issue":{"issue":"6","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,6]]}},"alternative-id":["6930"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00784-026-06930-8","relation":{},"ISSN":["1436-3771"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1436-3771","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,3]]},"assertion":[{"value":"4 February 2026","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"14 May 2026","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"3 June 2026","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The local Institutional Review Board approved the present study (protocol number: 2.022.383). The study was also registered in the clinical trials registry database Registro Brasileiro de Ensaios Cl\u00ednicos (ReBEC; RBR-5hncr3). All participants signed informed consent before enrollment. The present six-year evaluation followed the same ethical approval and adhered to the CONSORT guidelines and the principles of Helsinki's Declaration.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethics declaration"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing interests.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}}],"article-number":"268"}}