{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,14]],"date-time":"2026-05-14T23:27:07Z","timestamp":1778801227982,"version":"3.51.4"},"reference-count":33,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,5,26]],"date-time":"2021-05-26T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1621987200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,5,26]],"date-time":"2021-05-26T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1621987200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100015631","name":"Merck Canada","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100015631","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"crossref"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Neurol Sci"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,1]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s10072-021-05318-8","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,5,26]],"date-time":"2021-05-26T20:02:37Z","timestamp":1622059357000},"page":"615-623","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":6,"title":["Effect of reversal of residual neuromuscular blockade on the amplitude of motor evoked potentials: a randomized controlled crossover study comparing sugammadex and placebo"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"43","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-1506-7000","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Lashmi","family":"Venkatraghavan","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Nathan","family":"Royan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Sarah L.","family":"Boyle","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Michael","family":"Dinsmore","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Nancy","family":"Lu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Kristina","family":"Cushman","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Eric M.","family":"Massicotte","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Atul","family":"Prabhu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,5,26]]},"reference":[{"issue":"13","key":"5318_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1046","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e3181ecbe77","volume":"36","author":"DM Schwartz","year":"2011","unstructured":"Schwartz DM, Sestokas AK, Dormans JP, Vaccaro AR, Hilibrand AS, Flynn JM, Li PM, Shah SA, Welch W, Drummond DS, Albert TJ (2011) Transcranial electric motor evoked potential monitoring during spine surgery: is it safe? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 36(13):1046\u20131049","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"issue":"9 Suppl","key":"5318_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"S37","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e3181d8338e","volume":"35","author":"MG Fehlings","year":"2010","unstructured":"Fehlings MG, Brodke DS, Norvell DC, Dettori JR (2010) The evidence for intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in spine surgery: does it make a difference? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35(9 Suppl):S37\u2013S46","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"key":"5318_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"215","DOI":"10.3171\/SPI\/2008\/8\/3\/215","volume":"8","author":"MO Kelleher","year":"2008","unstructured":"Kelleher MO, Tan G, Sarjeant R, Fehlings MG (2008) Predictive value of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during cervical spine surgery: a prospective analysis of 1055 consecutive patients. J Neurosurg Spine 8:215\u2013221","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"},{"key":"5318_CR4","first-page":"175","volume-title":"Neurophysiology in Neurosurgery: A Modern Intraoperative Approach","author":"TB Sloan","year":"2002","unstructured":"Sloan TB (2002) Anesthesia and motor evoked-potentials monitoring. In: Deletis V, Shils J (eds) Neurophysiology in Neurosurgery: A Modern Intraoperative Approach. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 175\u2013181"},{"key":"5318_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"430","DOI":"10.1097\/00004691-200210000-00006","volume":"19","author":"TB Sloan","year":"2002","unstructured":"Sloan TB, Heyer EJ (2002) Anesthesia for intraoperative neurophysiologicmonitoring of the spinal cord. J Clin Neurophysiol 19:430\u2013443","journal-title":"J Clin Neurophysiol"},{"issue":"2","key":"5318_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"106","DOI":"10.1097\/00008506-200604000-00003","volume":"18","author":"K Sekimoto","year":"2006","unstructured":"Sekimoto K, Nishikawa K, Ishizeki J, Kubo K, Saito S, Goto F (2006) The effects of volatile anesthetics on intraoperative monitoring of myogenic motor-evoked potentials to transcranial electrical stimulation and on partial neuromuscular blockade during propofol\/fentanyl\/nitrous oxide anesthesia in humans. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 18(2):106\u2013111","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Anesthesiol"},{"issue":"Suppl. 2","key":"5318_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"S115","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-007-0419-6","volume":"16","author":"TN Pajewski","year":"2007","unstructured":"Pajewski TN, Arlet V, Phillips LH (2007) Current approach on spinal cord monitoring: the point of view of the neurologist, the anesthesiologist and the spine surgeon. Eur Spine J 16(Suppl. 2):S115\u2013S129","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"key":"5318_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"E7","DOI":"10.3171\/2009.8.FOCUS09145","volume":"27","author":"AC Wang","year":"2009","unstructured":"Wang AC, Than KD, Etame AB, La Marca F, Park P (2009) Impact of anesthesia on transcranial electric motor evoked potential monitoring during spine surgery: a review of the literature. Neurosurg Focus 27:E7","journal-title":"Neurosurg Focus"},{"key":"5318_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e646","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2018.11.244","volume":"123","author":"S Appel","year":"2019","unstructured":"Appel S, Biron T, Goldstein K, Ashkenazi E (2019) Effect of intra- and extraoperative factors on the efficacy of intraoperative neuromonitoring during cervical spine surgery. World Neurosurg 123:e646\u2013e651","journal-title":"World Neurosurg"},{"issue":"6","key":"5318_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1264","DOI":"10.1016\/j.clinph.2014.09.020","volume":"126","author":"J Plata Bello","year":"2015","unstructured":"Plata Bello J, P\u00e9rez-Lorensu PJ, Rold\u00e1n-Delgado H, Brage L, Rocha V, Hern\u00e1ndez-Hern\u00e1ndez V, D\u00f3niz A, Garc\u00eda-Mar\u00edn V (2015) Role of multimodal intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during positioning of patient prior to cervical spine surgery. Clin Neurophysiol 126(6):1264\u20131270","journal-title":"Clin Neurophysiol"},{"issue":"11","key":"5318_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2276","DOI":"10.1016\/j.clinph.2018.08.001","volume":"129","author":"JS Kim","year":"2018","unstructured":"Kim JS, Jang MJ, Hyun SJ, Kim KJ, Jahng TA, Kim HJ, Kim SM, Park KS (2018) Failure to generate baseline muscle motor evoked potentials during spine surgery: risk factors and association with the postoperative outcomes. Clin Neurophysiol 129(11):2276\u20132283","journal-title":"Clin Neurophysiol"},{"issue":"2","key":"5318_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"203","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bpa.2018.06.004","volume":"32","author":"Z Zafirova","year":"2018","unstructured":"Zafirova Z, Dalton A (2018) Neuromuscular blockers and reversal agents and their impact on anesthesia practice. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 32(2):203\u2013211","journal-title":"Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol"},{"issue":"5","key":"5318_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"716","DOI":"10.1007\/s00540-011-1209-1","volume":"25","author":"M Adamus","year":"2011","unstructured":"Adamus M, Hrabalek L, Wanek T, Gabrhelik T, Zapletalova J (2011) Intraoperative reversal of neuromuscular block with sugammadex or neostigmine during extreme lateral interbody fusion, a novel technique for spine surgery. J Anesth 25(5):716\u2013720","journal-title":"J Anesth"},{"issue":"4","key":"5318_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1014","DOI":"10.1002\/lary.25577","volume":"126","author":"IC Lu","year":"2016","unstructured":"Lu IC, Wu CW, Chang PY, Chen HY, Tseng KY, Randolph GW, Cheng KI, Chiang FY (2016) Reversal of rocuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade by sugammadex allows for optimization of neural monitoring of the recurrent laryngeal nerve. Laryngoscope. 126(4):1014\u20131019","journal-title":"Laryngoscope."},{"issue":"8","key":"5318_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"465","DOI":"10.1016\/j.redar.2012.12.005","volume":"60","author":"J Fabregat L\u00f3pez","year":"2013","unstructured":"Fabregat L\u00f3pez J, Porta Vila G, Martin-Flores M (2013) Reversal of moderate and intense neuromuscular block induced by rocuronium with low doses of sugammadex for intraoperative facial nerve monitoring. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim 60(8):465\u2013468","journal-title":"Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim"},{"issue":"6","key":"5318_CR16","first-page":"1073","volume":"40","author":"C Batistaki","year":"2012","unstructured":"Batistaki C, Papadopoulos K, Kalimeris KA, Soultanis K, Alevizou A, Pantazi M, Kostopanagiotou GG (2012) Sugammadex to reverse rocuronium and facilitate intraoperative motor evoked potentials monitoring during spinal surgery. Anaesth Intensive Care 40(6):1073\u20131074","journal-title":"Anaesth Intensive Care"},{"issue":"8","key":"5318_CR17","first-page":"968","volume":"60","author":"Y Hashimoto","year":"2011","unstructured":"Hashimoto Y, Gotanda Y, Ito T, Ushijima K (2011) Recovery from rocuronium by sugammadex does not affect motor evoked potentials. Masui 60(8):968\u2013971 Japanese","journal-title":"Masui"},{"issue":"9","key":"5318_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"533","DOI":"10.1016\/j.redar.2016.03.008","volume":"63","author":"CL Errando","year":"2016","unstructured":"Errando CL, Blanco T, D\u00edaz-Cambronero \u00d3 (2016) Repeated sugammadex reversal of muscle relaxation during lumbar spine surgery with intraoperative neurophysiological multimodal monitoring. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim 63(9):533\u2013538","journal-title":"Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim"},{"issue":"5","key":"5318_CR19","first-page":"542","volume":"78","author":"V Pavoni","year":"2012","unstructured":"Pavoni V, Gianesello L, De Scisciolo G, Provvedi E, Horton D, Barbagli R, Conti P, Conti R, Giunta F (2012) Reversal of profound and \u201cdeep\u201d residual rocuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade by sugammadex: a neurophysiological study. Minerva Anestesiol 78(5):542\u2013549","journal-title":"Minerva Anestesiol"},{"issue":"2","key":"5318_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"219","DOI":"10.4103\/1658-354X.203024","volume":"11","author":"M Trifa","year":"2017","unstructured":"Trifa M, Krishna S, D'Mello A, Hakim M, Tobias JD (2017) Sugammadex to reverse neuromuscular blockade and provide optimal conditions for motor-evoked potential monitoring. Saudi J Anaesth 11(2):219\u2013221","journal-title":"Saudi J Anaesth"},{"issue":"4","key":"5318_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"306","DOI":"10.1097\/ANA.0000000000000041","volume":"26","author":"CT Chong","year":"2014","unstructured":"Chong CT, Manninen P, Sivanaser V, Subramanyam R, Lu N, Venkatraghavan L (2014) Direct comparison of the effect of desflurane and sevoflurane on intraoperative motor-evoked potentials monitoring. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 26(4):306\u2013312","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Anesthesiol"},{"issue":"2","key":"5318_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"E101","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e31827aafb9","volume":"38","author":"BL Raynor","year":"2013","unstructured":"Raynor BL, Bright JD, Lenke LG, Rahman RK, Bridwell KH, Riew KD, Buchowski JM, Luhmann SJ, Padberg AM (2013) Significant change or loss of intraoperative monitoring data: a 25-year experience in 12,375 spinal surgeries. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38(2):E101\u2013E108","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"issue":"14","key":"5318_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1676","DOI":"10.1097\/00007632-199607150-00013","volume":"21","author":"EW Lang","year":"1996","unstructured":"Lang EW, Beutler AS, Chesnut RM, Patel PM, Kennelly NA, Kalkman CJ, Drummond JC, Garfin SR (1996) Myogenic motor-evoked potential monitoring using partial neuromuscular blockade in surgery of the spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 21(14):1676\u20131686","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"key":"5318_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"913","DOI":"10.1213\/00000539-199311000-00007","volume":"77","author":"DC Adams","year":"1993","unstructured":"Adams DC, Emerson RG, Heyer EJ, McCormick PC, Carmel PW, Stein BM, Farcy JP, Gallo EJ (1993) Monitoring of intraoperative motor-evoked potentials under conditions of controlled neuromuscular blockade. Anesth Analg 77:913\u2013918","journal-title":"Anesth Analg"},{"key":"5318_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"584","DOI":"10.1213\/00000539-199210000-00021","volume":"75","author":"CJ Kalkman","year":"1992","unstructured":"Kalkman CJ, Drummond JC, Kennelly NA, Patel PM, Partridge BL (1992) Intraoperative monitoring of tibialis anterior muscle motor evoked responses to transcranial electrical stimulation during partial neuromuscular blockade. Anesth Analg 75:584\u2013589","journal-title":"Anesth Analg"},{"key":"5318_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"567","DOI":"10.1093\/bja\/aes395","volume":"110","author":"WH Kim","year":"2013","unstructured":"Kim WH, Lee JJ, Lee S, Park MN, Seo DW, Chung IS (2013) Comparison of motor evoked potentials monitoring in response to transcranial electrical stimulation in subjects undergoing neurosurgery with partial vs no neuromuscular bloc. Br J Anaesth 110:567\u2013576","journal-title":"Br J Anaesth"},{"issue":"34","key":"5318_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e4725","DOI":"10.1097\/MD.0000000000004725","volume":"95","author":"SH Kim","year":"2016","unstructured":"Kim SH, Jin SJ, Karm MH, Moon YJ, Jeong HW, Kim JW, Ha SI, Kim JU (2016) Comparison of false-negative\/positive results of intraoperative evoked potential monitoring between no and partial neuromuscular blockade in patients receiving propofol\/remifentanil-based anesthesia during cerebral aneurysm clipping surgery: a retrospective analysis of 685 patients. Medicine (Baltimore) 95(34):e4725","journal-title":"Medicine (Baltimore)"},{"key":"5318_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"416","DOI":"10.1097\/00004691-200210000-00005","volume":"19","author":"DB MacDonald","year":"2002","unstructured":"MacDonald DB (2002) Safety of intraoperative transcranial electrical stimulation motor evoked potential monitoring. J Clin Neurophysiol 19:416\u2013429","journal-title":"J Clin Neurophysiol"},{"issue":"5","key":"5318_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"816","DOI":"10.1097\/ALN.0b013e31818a3fee","volume":"109","author":"RK Jones","year":"2008","unstructured":"Jones RK, Caldwell JE, Brull SJ, Soto RG (2008) Reversal of profound rocuronium-induced blockade with sugammadex: a randomized comparison with neostigmine. Anesthesiology. 109(5):816\u2013824","journal-title":"Anesthesiology."},{"issue":"6","key":"5318_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"914","DOI":"10.1093\/bja\/aer142","volume":"106","author":"T Chazot","year":"2011","unstructured":"Chazot T, Dumont G, Le Guen M, Hausser-Hauw C, Liu N, Fischler M (2011) Sugammadex administration results in arousal from intravenous anaesthesia: a clinical and electroencephalographic observation. Br J Anaesth 106(6):914\u2013916","journal-title":"Br J Anaesth"},{"key":"5318_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"239","DOI":"10.1097\/01.anes.0000270722.95764.37","volume":"107","author":"HD de Boer","year":"2007","unstructured":"de Boer HD, Driessen JJ, Marcus MA, Kerkkamp H, Heeringa M, Klimek M (2007) Reversal of rocuronium-induced (1.2 mg\/kg) profound neuromuscular block by sugammadex: a multicenter, dose finding and safety study. Anesthesiology 107:239\u2013244","journal-title":"Anesthesiology"},{"key":"5318_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"392","DOI":"10.1097\/00000542-199402000-00019","volume":"80","author":"WL Lanier","year":"1994","unstructured":"Lanier WL, Iaizzo PA, Milde JH, Sharbrough FW (1994) The cerebral and systemic effects of movement in response to a noxious stimulus in lightly anesthetized dogs. Possible modulation of cerebral function by muscle afferents. Anesthesiology 80:392\u2013401","journal-title":"Anesthesiology"},{"issue":"7","key":"5318_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"658","DOI":"10.1007\/s12630-011-9499-1","volume":"58","author":"J Fabregat-L\u00f3pez","year":"2011","unstructured":"Fabregat-L\u00f3pez J, Veiga-Ruiz G, Dominguez-Serrano N, Garc\u00eda-Martinez (2011) Re-establishment of neuromuscular block by rocuronium after sugammadex administration. Can J Anaesth 58(7):658","journal-title":"Can J Anaesth"}],"container-title":["Neurological Sciences"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10072-021-05318-8.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s10072-021-05318-8\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10072-021-05318-8.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,1,3]],"date-time":"2022-01-03T18:31:58Z","timestamp":1641234718000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s10072-021-05318-8"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,5,26]]},"references-count":33,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,1]]}},"alternative-id":["5318"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10072-021-05318-8","relation":{},"ISSN":["1590-1874","1590-3478"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1590-1874","type":"print"},{"value":"1590-3478","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,5,26]]},"assertion":[{"value":"3 February 2021","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"8 May 2021","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"26 May 2021","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"This study was approved by the Research Ethics board of University Health Network, Toronto (UHN REB#: 16-5926-B).","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethics approval"}},{"value":"Written informed consent was obtained from all patients.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent to participate"}},{"value":"Obtained","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent for publication"}},{"value":"None","order":5,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}},{"value":"This study was supported by the Supported in part by a research grant from Investigator-initiated program of Merck Canada Inc.","order":6,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Financial Support"}}]}}