{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,2]],"date-time":"2026-10-02T07:55:33Z","timestamp":1790927733493,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":17,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"5","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,14]],"date-time":"2026-08-14T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1786665600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,14]],"date-time":"2026-08-14T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1786665600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"name":"Alfred Health"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Emerg Radiol"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Purpose<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>To evaluate contemporary computed tomography (CT) imaging pathways for Emergency Department (ED) patients with suspected oesophageal perforation or leak, with a particular focus on oral contrast utilisation, radiologic findings and downstream investigations following the index CT examination.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>We performed a single-centre retrospective observational study of all adult ED patients who underwent CT imaging including the chest for suspected oesophageal perforation or leak between January 2015 and March 2026. Patients were identified through radiology database search. Demographics, clinical indications, oral contrast use, radiologic findings and investigations performed within five days of the index CT were recorded.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>A total of 107 patients were included, with six (5.6%) confirmed oesophageal perforations. Oral contrast was administered in 62 (57.9%) CT examinations. Overall, 45 patients (42.1%) underwent downstream investigations, with similar rates regardless of oral contrast administration (43.5% vs. 40.0%). However, repeat CT was less frequent following oral contrast-enhanced CT (3.2% vs. 17.8%). Among patients with confirmed perforation, direct signs including oesophageal wall defect and extraluminal contrast leak were common (66.7% each), whilst indirect signs were also frequent present, including pneumomediastinum and pleural effusion (83.3% each). Pneumomediastinum was also frequently observed in patients without perforation.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Rates of downstream investigation were similar regardless of oral contrast administration, however, repeat CT was less frequently performed following oral contrast-enhanced examinations. These findings suggest that oral contrast may influence subsequent imaging pathways. Prospective studies are warranted to determine whether selective oral contrast administration can improve diagnostic confidence while reducing unnecessary CT examinations.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1007\/s10140-026-02532-9","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,14]],"date-time":"2026-08-14T06:56:51Z","timestamp":1786690611000},"page":"1047-1056","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["CT oral contrast and contemporary imaging pathways for suspected oesophageal perforation in the emergency department: a retrospective observational study"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"33","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0004-2824-0740","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Samyak","family":"Shah","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Adil","family":"Zia","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Bruno","family":"Di Muzio","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,14]]},"reference":[{"issue":"3","key":"2532_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"631","DOI":"10.2214\/ajr.19.22166","volume":"215","author":"CJ Wei","year":"2020","unstructured":"Wei CJ, Levenson RB, Lee KS (2020) Diagnostic Utility of CT and Fluoroscopic Esophagography for Suspected Esophageal Perforation in the Emergency Department. Am J Roentgenol 215(3):631\u2013638. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2214\/ajr.19.22166","journal-title":"Am J Roentgenol"},{"issue":"2","key":"2532_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"650","DOI":"10.1007\/s00261-025-05142-0","volume":"51","author":"A Salehpoor","year":"2025","unstructured":"Salehpoor A, Thompson W (2025) Imaging of esophageal perforation including in the postoperative patient: a contemporary review. Abdom Radiol 51(2):650\u2013659. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00261-025-05142-0","journal-title":"Abdom Radiol"},{"key":"2532_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"101928","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bpg.2024.101928","volume":"70","author":"C Kulinna-Cosentini","year":"2024","unstructured":"Kulinna-Cosentini C, Hodge JC, Ba-Ssalamah A (2024) The role of radiology in diagnosing gastrointestinal tract perforation. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 70:101928. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.bpg.2024.101928","journal-title":"Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol"},{"issue":"1","key":"2532_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"33","DOI":"10.1007\/s10140-023-02193-y","volume":"31","author":"BA Evans","year":"2023","unstructured":"Evans BA, Craig WY, Cinelli CM, Siegel SG (2023) CT esophagogram in the emergency setting: typical findings and suggested workflow. Emerg Radiol 31(1):33\u201344. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10140-023-02193-y","journal-title":"Emerg Radiol"},{"issue":"12","key":"2532_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2606","DOI":"10.1007\/s11605-022-05454-2","volume":"26","author":"PG Khaitan","year":"2022","unstructured":"Khaitan PG, Famiglietti A, Watson TJ (2022) The Etiology, Diagnosis, and Management of Esophageal Perforation. J Gastrointest Surg 26(12):2606\u20132615. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11605-022-05454-2","journal-title":"J Gastrointest Surg"},{"key":"2532_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"10","DOI":"10.21037\/aoe-2020-23","volume":"6","author":"D Nachira","year":"2023","unstructured":"Nachira D, Sassorossi C, Petracca-Ciavarella L, Zanfrini E, Tabacco D, Pogliani L, Meacci E, Congedo MT, Vita ML, Chiappetta M, Margaritora S, Porziella V (2023) Management of esophageal perforations and postoperative leaks. Annals Esophagus 6:10\u201310. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.21037\/aoe-2020-23","journal-title":"Annals Esophagus"},{"issue":"1","key":"2532_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"66","DOI":"10.1186\/1757-7241-19-66","volume":"19","author":"J S\u00f8reide","year":"2011","unstructured":"S\u00f8reide J, Viste A (2011) Esophageal perforation: diagnostic work-up and clinical decision-making in the first 24 hours. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 19(1):66. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/1757-7241-19-66","journal-title":"Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med"},{"key":"2532_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Chirica M, Kelly MD, Siboni S, Aiolfi A, Riva CG, Asti E, Ferrari D, Lepp\u00e4niemi A, Broek T, Brichon RPG, Kluger PY, Fraga Y, Frey GP, Andreollo G, Coccolini NA, Frattini F, Moore C, Chiara EE, Di Saverio O, S et al (2019) Esophageal emergencies: WSES guidelines. World J Emerg Surg 14(1). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s13017-019-0245-2","DOI":"10.1186\/s13017-019-0245-2"},{"issue":"5","key":"2532_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"505","DOI":"10.1007\/s10140-014-1222-4","volume":"21","author":"T Suarez-Poveda","year":"2014","unstructured":"Suarez-Poveda T, Morales-Uribe CH, Sanabria A, Llano-S\u00e1nchez A, Valencia-Delgado AM, Rivera-Vel\u00e1zquez LF, Bedoya-Ospina JF (2014) Diagnostic performance of CT esophagography in patients with suspected esophageal rupture. Emerg Radiol 21(5):505\u2013510. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10140-014-1222-4","journal-title":"Emerg Radiol"},{"issue":"6","key":"2532_CR10","first-page":"461","volume":"37","author":"S Lee","year":"1996","unstructured":"Lee S, Mergo PJ, Ros PR (1996) The leaking esophagus: CT patterns of esophageal rupture, perforation, and fistulization. Crit Rev Diagn Imaging 37(6):461\u2013490","journal-title":"Crit Rev Diagn Imaging"},{"issue":"3","key":"2532_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"517","DOI":"10.1007\/s00068-018-0929-4","volume":"45","author":"M Awais","year":"2019","unstructured":"Awais M, Qamar S, Rehman A, Baloch NU-A, Shafqat G (2019) Accuracy of CT chest without oral contrast for ruling out esophageal perforation using fluoroscopic esophagography as reference standard: a retrospective study. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 45(3):517\u2013525. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00068-018-0929-4","journal-title":"Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg"},{"issue":"10","key":"2532_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2980","DOI":"10.1007\/s00261-019-02187-w","volume":"45","author":"M Terrazas","year":"2020","unstructured":"Terrazas M, Marjon L, Geter M, Schwartz J, Thompson W (2020) Esophagography and chest CT for detection of perforated esophagus: what factors influence accuracy? Abdom Radiol 45(10):2980\u20132988. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00261-019-02187-w","journal-title":"Abdom Radiol"},{"issue":"12","key":"2532_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3362","DOI":"10.1002\/wjs.70158","volume":"49","author":"AG Keogan","year":"2025","unstructured":"Keogan AG, Rybachok A, Patel S, Latorre-Rodr\u00edguez AR, Vittori A, Mittal SK (2025) Diagnostic Utility of Computed Tomography in Patients With Spontaneous Pneumomediastinum Evaluated for Suspected Esophageal Perforation. World J Surg 49(12):3362\u20133367. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/wjs.70158","journal-title":"World J Surg"},{"key":"2532_CR14","unstructured":"American College of Radiology Committee on Drugs and Contrast Media (2025) ACR manual on contrast media (2025 ed). American College of Radiology. https:\/\/www.acr.org\/Clinical-Resources\/Contrast-Manual"},{"issue":"2","key":"2532_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"447","DOI":"10.1148\/rg.2021200132","volume":"41","author":"AA Norton-Gregory","year":"2021","unstructured":"Norton-Gregory AA, Kulkarni NM, O\u2019Connor SD, Budovec JJ, Zorn AP, Desouches SL (2021) CT Esophagography for Evaluation of Esophageal Perforation. Radiographics 41(2):447\u2013461. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1148\/rg.2021200132","journal-title":"Radiographics"},{"issue":"4","key":"2532_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"289","DOI":"10.1067\/j.cpradiol.2023.03.002","volume":"52","author":"ME Buchanan","year":"2023","unstructured":"Buchanan ME, Fishman EK, Azadi JR (2023) CT Evaluation of the Esophagus: The Role of CT Imaging and CT Imaging Findings in Diagnosing Esophageal Abnormalities. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 52(4):289\u2013299. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1067\/j.cpradiol.2023.03.002","journal-title":"Curr Probl Diagn Radiol"},{"issue":"2","key":"2532_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"121128","DOI":"10.1097\/rti.0b013e31826ff062","volume":"28","author":"JE Lantos","year":"2013","unstructured":"Lantos JE, Levine MS, Rubesin SE, Lau CT, Torigian DA (2013) Comparison Between Esophagography and Chest Computed Tomography for Evaluation of Leaks After Esophagectomy and Gastric Pull-through. J Thorac Imaging 28(2):121128. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/rti.0b013e31826ff062","journal-title":"J Thorac Imaging"}],"container-title":["Emergency Radiology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10140-026-02532-9.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s10140-026-02532-9","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10140-026-02532-9.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,2]],"date-time":"2026-10-02T07:27:33Z","timestamp":1790926053000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s10140-026-02532-9"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,14]]},"references-count":17,"journal-issue":{"issue":"5","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,10]]}},"alternative-id":["2532"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10140-026-02532-9","relation":{},"ISSN":["1438-1435"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1438-1435","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,14]]},"assertion":[{"value":"21 July 2026","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"7 August 2026","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"14 August 2026","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"Ethics approval was obtained from the Alfred Health Ethics Committee. The study was approved under Ethics Committee Project No. 433\/26. In accordance with the ethics approval granted, the requirement for individual patient consent was waived because the study uses deidentified routinely collected clinical data.","order":1,"name":"Ethics","label":"Ethics approval and consent to participate","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The authors declare no conflict of interest.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","label":"Competing interests","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}}]}}