{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,21]],"date-time":"2026-10-21T22:54:54Z","timestamp":1792623294867,"version":"4.5.0"},"reference-count":39,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,4,29]],"date-time":"2023-04-29T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1682726400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,4,29]],"date-time":"2023-04-29T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1682726400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"name":"Scientific Research Project of Health Commission of Shanxi Province","award":["2020133"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["2020133"]}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Neurosurg Rev"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>\n                    This meta-analysis compared the efficacy of oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) in the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases. A computer search for the published literature on OLIF and MIS-TLIF for the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases in the PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, CINAHL, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and other databases was performed, from which 522 related articles were retrieved and 13 were finally included. Two reviewers independently extracted data from the included studies and analyzed them using RevMan 5.4. The quality of the studies was assessed using the Cochrane systematic analysis and the Newcastle\u2013Ottawa scale. Meta-analysis showed that the blood loss [95% confidence intervals (CI) (\u2212\u2009121.01,\u2009\u2212\u200954.56),\n                    <jats:inline-formula>\n                      <jats:alternatives>\n                        <jats:tex-math>$$P&lt;0.001$$<\/jats:tex-math>\n                        <mml:math xmlns:mml=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/1998\/Math\/MathML\">\n                          <mml:mrow>\n                            <mml:mi>P<\/mml:mi>\n                            <mml:mo>&lt;<\/mml:mo>\n                            <mml:mn>0.001<\/mml:mn>\n                          <\/mml:mrow>\n                        <\/mml:math>\n                      <\/jats:alternatives>\n                    <\/jats:inline-formula>\n                    ], hospital stay [95% CI (\u2212\u20091.98,\u2009\u2212\u20090.85),\n                    <jats:inline-formula>\n                      <jats:alternatives>\n                        <jats:tex-math>$$P&lt;0.001$$<\/jats:tex-math>\n                        <mml:math xmlns:mml=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/1998\/Math\/MathML\">\n                          <mml:mrow>\n                            <mml:mi>P<\/mml:mi>\n                            <mml:mo>&lt;<\/mml:mo>\n                            <mml:mn>0.001<\/mml:mn>\n                          <\/mml:mrow>\n                        <\/mml:math>\n                      <\/jats:alternatives>\n                    <\/jats:inline-formula>\n                    ], postoperative fusion rate [95%CI (1.04, 3.60),\n                    <jats:inline-formula>\n                      <jats:alternatives>\n                        <jats:tex-math>$$P=0.04$$<\/jats:tex-math>\n                        <mml:math xmlns:mml=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/1998\/Math\/MathML\">\n                          <mml:mrow>\n                            <mml:mi>P<\/mml:mi>\n                            <mml:mo>=<\/mml:mo>\n                            <mml:mn>0.04<\/mml:mn>\n                          <\/mml:mrow>\n                        <\/mml:math>\n                      <\/jats:alternatives>\n                    <\/jats:inline-formula>\n                    ], postoperative disc height [95% CI (0.50, 3.63),\n                    <jats:inline-formula>\n                      <jats:alternatives>\n                        <jats:tex-math>$$P=0.01$$<\/jats:tex-math>\n                        <mml:math xmlns:mml=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/1998\/Math\/MathML\">\n                          <mml:mrow>\n                            <mml:mi>P<\/mml:mi>\n                            <mml:mo>=<\/mml:mo>\n                            <mml:mn>0.01<\/mml:mn>\n                          <\/mml:mrow>\n                        <\/mml:math>\n                      <\/jats:alternatives>\n                    <\/jats:inline-formula>\n                    ], and postoperative foraminal height [95% CI (0.96, 4.13),\n                    <jats:inline-formula>\n                      <jats:alternatives>\n                        <jats:tex-math>$$P=0.002$$<\/jats:tex-math>\n                        <mml:math xmlns:mml=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/1998\/Math\/MathML\">\n                          <mml:mrow>\n                            <mml:mi>P<\/mml:mi>\n                            <mml:mo>=<\/mml:mo>\n                            <mml:mn>0.002<\/mml:mn>\n                          <\/mml:mrow>\n                        <\/mml:math>\n                      <\/jats:alternatives>\n                    <\/jats:inline-formula>\n                    ] were all better in the OLIF group; however, the complication rates were significantly lower in the MIS-TLIF group [95% CI (1.01, 2.06),\n                    <jats:inline-formula>\n                      <jats:alternatives>\n                        <jats:tex-math>$$P=0.04$$<\/jats:tex-math>\n                        <mml:math xmlns:mml=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/1998\/Math\/MathML\">\n                          <mml:mrow>\n                            <mml:mi>P<\/mml:mi>\n                            <mml:mo>=<\/mml:mo>\n                            <mml:mn>0.04<\/mml:mn>\n                          <\/mml:mrow>\n                        <\/mml:math>\n                      <\/jats:alternatives>\n                    <\/jats:inline-formula>\n                    ]. However, there were no significant differences between the two in terms of surgery time, patient satisfaction, or postoperative functional scores. The OLIF group had the advantages of lower blood loss, a shorter hospital stay, a higher postoperative fusion rate, and better recovery of the disc and foraminal heights, whereas MIS-TLIF had a relatively lower complication rate.\n                  <\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1007\/s10143-023-02009-0","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2023,4,29]],"date-time":"2023-04-29T02:02:14Z","timestamp":1682733734000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":19,"title":["Oblique lumbar interbody fusion versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of degenerative disease of the lumbar spine: a systematic review and meta-analysis"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"46","author":[{"given":"Yun-lu","family":"Wang","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Xi-yong","family":"Li","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Lun","family":"Liu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Song-feng","family":"Li","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Peng-fei","family":"Han","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Xiao-dong","family":"Li","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023,4,29]]},"reference":[{"key":"2009_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"6739","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-020-63784-0","volume":"10","author":"Y Aoki","year":"2020","unstructured":"Aoki Y, Takahashi H, Nakajima A, Kubota G, Watanabe A, Nakajima T, Eguchi Y, Orita S, Fukuchi H, Yanagawa N, Nakagawa K, Ohtori S (2020) Prevalence of lumbar spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis in patients with degenerative spinal disease. Sci Rep 10:6739. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41598-020-63784-0","journal-title":"Sci Rep"},{"key":"2009_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"50","DOI":"10.1007\/s00132-018-03670-w","volume":"48","author":"KJ Schnake","year":"2019","unstructured":"Schnake KJ, Rappert D, Storzer B, Schreyer S, Hilber F, Mehren C (2019) Lumbar fusion-indications and techniques. Orthopade 48:50\u201358. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00132-018-03670-w","journal-title":"Orthopade"},{"key":"2009_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"39","DOI":"10.1097\/01.CSMR.0000308663.13278.69","volume":"7","author":"V Akuthota","year":"2008","unstructured":"Akuthota V, Ferreiro A, Moore T, Fredericson M (2008) Core stability exercise principles. Curr Sports Med Rep 7:39\u201344. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/01.CSMR.0000308663.13278.69","journal-title":"Curr Sports Med Rep"},{"key":"2009_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Foley KT, Holly LT, Schwender JD (2003) Minimally invasive lumbar fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 28:26\u201335. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/01.BRS.0000076895.52418.5E","DOI":"10.1097\/01.BRS.0000076895.52418.5E"},{"key":"2009_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"962","DOI":"10.14444\/8126","volume":"15","author":"HN Modi","year":"2021","unstructured":"Modi HN, Shrestha U (2021) Comparison of clinical outcome and radiologic parameters in open TLIF versus MIS-TLIF in single- or double-level lumbar surgeries. Int J Spine Surg 15:962\u2013970. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.14444\/8126","journal-title":"Int J Spine Surg"},{"key":"2009_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"143S","DOI":"10.1177\/2192568219882344","volume":"10","author":"CH Kim","year":"2020","unstructured":"Kim CH, Easley K, Lee J-S, Hong J-Y, Virk M, Hsieh PC, Yoon ST (2020) Comparison of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal interbody lumbar fusion. Global Spine J 10:143S-150S. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/2192568219882344","journal-title":"Global Spine J"},{"key":"2009_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"89","DOI":"10.4184\/asj.2012.6.2.89","volume":"6","author":"C Silvestre","year":"2012","unstructured":"Silvestre C, Mac-Thiong J-M, Hilmi R, Roussouly P (2012) Complications and morbidities of mini-open anterior retroperitoneal lumbar interbody fusion: oblique lumbar interbody fusion in 179 patients. Asian Spine J 6:89\u201397. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4184\/asj.2012.6.2.89","journal-title":"Asian Spine J"},{"key":"2009_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2","DOI":"10.3978\/j.issn.2414-469X.2015.10.05","volume":"1","author":"RJ Mobbs","year":"2015","unstructured":"Mobbs RJ, Phan K, Malham G, Seex K, Rao PJ (2015) Lumbar interbody fusion: techniques, indications and comparison of interbody fusion options including PLIF, TLIF, MI-TLIF, OLIF\/ATP, LLIF and ALIF. J Spine Surg 1:2\u201318. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3978\/j.issn.2414-469X.2015.10.05","journal-title":"J Spine Surg"},{"key":"2009_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"603","DOI":"10.1007\/s10654-010-9491-z","volume":"25","author":"A Stang","year":"2010","unstructured":"Stang A (2010) Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. Eur J Epidemiol 25:603\u2013605. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10654-010-9491-z","journal-title":"Eur J Epidemiol"},{"key":"2009_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2288","DOI":"10.7759\/cureus.2288","volume":"10","author":"H Abbasi","year":"2018","unstructured":"Abbasi H, Grant A (2018) Effect of body mass index on perioperative outcomes in minimally invasive oblique lateral lumbar interbody fusion versus open fusions: a multivariant analysis. Cureus 10:2288. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7759\/cureus.2288","journal-title":"Cureus"},{"key":"2009_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"450","DOI":"10.31616\/asj.2018.0128","volume":"13","author":"P-O Champagne","year":"2019","unstructured":"Champagne P-O, Walsh C, Diabira J, Plante M-\u00c9, Wang Z, Boubez G, Shedid D (2019) Sagittal balance correction following lumbar interbody fusion: a comparison of the three approaches. Asian Spine J 13:450\u2013458. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.31616\/asj.2018.0128","journal-title":"Asian Spine J"},{"key":"2009_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"127","DOI":"10.4103\/0028-3886.338732","volume":"70","author":"VVR Chandra","year":"2022","unstructured":"Chandra VVR, PrasadBC, Hanu TG, Kale PG, M (2022) Comparison between oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MISTLIF) for lumbar spondylolisthesis. Neurol India 70:127\u2013134. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4103\/0028-3886.338732","journal-title":"Neurol India"},{"key":"2009_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"829426","DOI":"10.3389\/fmed.2022.829426","volume":"9","author":"Q-Y Gao","year":"2022","unstructured":"Gao Q-Y, Wei F-L, Li T, Zhu K-L, Du M-R, Heng W, Yang F, Gao H-R, Qian J-X, Zhou C-P (2022) Oblique lateral interbody fusion vs minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis: a retrospective cohort study. Front Med (Lausanne) 9:829426. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fmed.2022.829426","journal-title":"Front Med (Lausanne)"},{"key":"2009_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2093","DOI":"10.1111\/os.13151","volume":"13","author":"X-G Han","year":"2021","unstructured":"Han X-G, Tang G-Q, Han X, Xing Y-G, Zhang Q, He D, Tian W (2021) Comparison of outcomes between robot-assisted minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and oblique lumbar interbody fusion in single-level lumbar spondylolisthesis. Orthop Surg 13:2093\u20132101. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/os.13151","journal-title":"Orthop Surg"},{"key":"2009_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"12783","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-021-92330-9","volume":"11","author":"S-F Hung","year":"2021","unstructured":"Hung S-F, Liao J-C, Tsai T-T, Li Y-D, Chiu P-Y, Hsieh M-K, Kao F-C (2021) Comparison of outcomes between indirect decompression of oblique lumbar interbody fusion and MIS-TLIF in one single-level lumbar spondylosis. Sci Rep 11:12783. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41598-021-92330-9","journal-title":"Sci Rep"},{"key":"2009_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"97","DOI":"10.31616\/asj.2019.0342","volume":"15","author":"Y Koike","year":"2021","unstructured":"Koike Y, Kotani Y, Terao H, Iwasaki N (2021) Comparison of outcomes of oblique lateral interbody fusion with percutaneous posterior fixation in lateral position and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis. Asian Spine J 15:97\u2013106. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.31616\/asj.2019.0342","journal-title":"Asian Spine J"},{"key":"2009_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"756","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jos.2020.08.005","volume":"26","author":"Y Kotani","year":"2021","unstructured":"Kotani Y, Ikeura A, Tokunaga H, Saito T (2021) Single-level controlled comparison of OLIF51 and percutaneous screw in lateral position versus MIS-TLIF for lumbosacral degenerative disorders: clinical and radiologic study. J Orthop Sci 26:756\u2013764. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jos.2020.08.005","journal-title":"J Orthop Sci"},{"key":"2009_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"992","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jos.2020.10.013","volume":"26","author":"Y Kotani","year":"2021","unstructured":"Kotani Y, Koike Y, Ikeura A, Tokunaga H, Saito T (2021) Clinical and radiologic comparison of anterior-posterior single-position lateral surgery versus MIS-TLIF for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. J Orthop Sci 26:992\u2013998. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jos.2020.10.013","journal-title":"J Orthop Sci"},{"key":"2009_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e898","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2018.08.003","volume":"119","author":"G-X Lin","year":"2018","unstructured":"Lin G-X, Akbary K, Kotheeranurak V, Quillo-Olvera J, Jo H-J, Yang X-W, Mahatthanatrakul A, Kim J-S (2018) Clinical and radiologic outcomes of direct versus indirect decompression with lumbar interbody fusion: a matched-pair comparison analysis. World Neurosurg 119:e898\u2013e909. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.wneu.2018.08.003","journal-title":"World Neurosurg"},{"key":"2009_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"45","DOI":"10.2217\/cer-2019-0055","volume":"9","author":"S-R Sheng","year":"2020","unstructured":"Sheng S-R, Geng Y-B, Zhou K-L, Wu A-M, Wang X-Y, Ni W-F (2020) Minimally invasive surgery for degenerative spondylolisthesis: transforaminal or oblique lumbar interbody fusion. J Comp Eff Res 9:45\u201351. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2217\/cer-2019-0055","journal-title":"J Comp Eff Res"},{"key":"2009_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"712","DOI":"10.31616\/asj.2021.0264","volume":"16","author":"W Yingsakmongkol","year":"2022","unstructured":"Yingsakmongkol W, Jitpakdee K, Varakornpipat P, Choentrakool C, Tanasansomboon T, Limthongkul W, Singhatanadgige W, Kotheeranurak V (2022) Clinical and radiographic comparisons among minimally invasive lumbar interbody fusion: a comparison with three-way matching. Asian Spine J 16:712\u2013722. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.31616\/asj.2021.0264","journal-title":"Asian Spine J"},{"key":"2009_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Zhu H-F, Fang X-Q, Zhao F-D, Zhang J-F, Zhao X, Hu Z-J, Fan S-W (2022) Comparison of oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-TLIF) for treatment of lumbar degeneration disease a prospective cohort study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 47:233 242.\u00a0https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/BRS.0000000000004303","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000004303"},{"key":"2009_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"189","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2020.12.113","volume":"148","author":"AR Dias Pereira Filho","year":"2021","unstructured":"Dias Pereira Filho AR (2021) Technique for exposing lumbar discs in anterior approach using Steinmann wires: arthroplasties or arthrodesis. World Neurosurg 148:189\u2013195. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.wneu.2020.12.113","journal-title":"World Neurosurg"},{"key":"2009_CR24","first-page":"194","volume":"13","author":"EH Smith","year":"1915","unstructured":"Smith EH (1915) A consideration of the relative merits of the Albee operation and the Hibbs operation. Cal State J Med 13:194\u2013195","journal-title":"Cal State J Med"},{"key":"2009_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"14635","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-020-71515-8","volume":"10","author":"C-J Fu","year":"2020","unstructured":"Fu C-J, Chen W-C, Lu M-L, Cheng C-H, Niu C-C (2020) Comparison of paraspinal muscle degeneration and decompression effect between conventional open and minimal invasive approaches for posterior lumbar spine surgery. Sci Rep 10:14635. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41598-020-71515-8","journal-title":"Sci Rep"},{"key":"2009_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"23","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jocn.2016.02.030","volume":"31","author":"K Phan","year":"2016","unstructured":"Phan K, Maharaj M, Assem Y, Mobbs RJ (2016) Review of early clinical results and complications associated with oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF). J Clin Neurosci 31:23\u201329. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jocn.2016.02.030","journal-title":"J Clin Neurosci"},{"key":"2009_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"18887","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-020-76028-y","volume":"10","author":"A Hiyama","year":"2020","unstructured":"Hiyama A, Katoh H, Sakai D, Tanaka M, Sato M, Watanabe M (2020) Short-term comparison of preoperative and postoperative pain after indirect decompression surgery and direct decompression surgery in patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis. Sci Rep 10:18887. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41598-020-76028-y","journal-title":"Sci Rep"},{"key":"2009_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"107082","DOI":"10.1016\/j.clineuro.2021.107082","volume":"212","author":"Y Lv","year":"2022","unstructured":"Lv Y, Chen M, Wang S-L, Qin R-J, Ma C, Ding Q-R, Qin H-N, Wang X-F, Ren Y-X (2022) Endo-TLIF versus MIS-TLIF in 1-segment lumbar spondylolisthesis: a prospective randomized pilot study. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 212:107082. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.clineuro.2021.107082","journal-title":"Clin Neurol Neurosurg"},{"key":"2009_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"466","DOI":"10.1177\/2192568218800054","volume":"9","author":"K Kobayashi","year":"2019","unstructured":"Kobayashi K, Ando K, Kato F, Kanemura T, Sato K, Hachiya Y, Matsubara Y, Kamiya M, Sakai Y, Yagi H, Shinjo R, Ishiguro N (2019) Imagama S (2019) Predictors of prolonged length of stay after lumbar interbody fusion: a multicenter study. Global Spine J 9:466\u2013472","journal-title":"Global Spine J"},{"key":"2009_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"802","DOI":"10.1186\/s12891-021-04687-7","volume":"22","author":"Q-Y Zhang","year":"2021","unstructured":"Zhang Q-Y, Tan J, Huang K, Xie H-Q (2021) Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus oblique lateral interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative disease: a meta-analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 22:802. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12891-021-04687-7","journal-title":"BMC Musculoskelet Disord"},{"key":"2009_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Wu H, Shan Z, Zhang T, Liu J, Fan S, Zhao F, Cheung JPY (2022) Small preoperative dural sac cross-sectional area and anteriorly placed fusion cages are risk factors for indirect decompression failure after oblique lateral interbody fusion. World Neurosurg S1878\u20138750(22)01244.\u00a0https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.wneu.2022.08.134","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2022.08.134"},{"key":"2009_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"545","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2016.10.026","volume":"17","author":"KRM Woods","year":"2017","unstructured":"Woods KRM, Billys JB, Hynes RA (2017) Technical description of oblique lateral interbody fusion at L1\u2013L5 (OLIF25) and at L5\u2013S1 (OLIF51) and evaluation of complication and fusion rates. Spine J 17:545\u2013553. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.spinee.2016.10.026","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"key":"2009_CR33","first-page":"421","volume":"98","author":"JS Will","year":"2018","unstructured":"Will JS, Bury DC, Miller JA (2018) Mechanical low back pain. Am Fam Physician 98:421\u2013428","journal-title":"Am Fam Physician"},{"key":"2009_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"745","DOI":"10.1007\/s00590-016-1755-1","volume":"26","author":"Y Tian","year":"2016","unstructured":"Tian Y, Liu X (2016) Clinical outcomes of two minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) for lumbar degenerative diseases. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 26:745\u2013751. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00590-016-1755-1","journal-title":"Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol"},{"key":"2009_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"445","DOI":"10.1186\/s13018-020-01971-5","volume":"15","author":"Y Zhou","year":"2020","unstructured":"Zhou Y, Fu X, Yang M, Ke S, Wang B, Li Z (2020) Hidden blood loss and its possible risk factors in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. J Orthop Surg Res 15:445. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s13018-020-01971-5","journal-title":"J Orthop Surg Res"},{"key":"2009_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1595","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-015-4365-4","volume":"25","author":"H Wang","year":"2016","unstructured":"Wang H, Zhou Y, Zhang Z (2016) Postoperative dysesthesia in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a report of five cases. Eur Spine J 25:1595\u20131600. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00586-015-4365-4","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"key":"2009_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"364","DOI":"10.1111\/os.12204","volume":"7","author":"K Phan","year":"2015","unstructured":"Phan K, Mobbs RJ (2015) Oblique lumbar interbody fusion for revision of non-union following prior posterior surgery: a case report. Orthop Surg 7:364\u2013367. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/os.12204","journal-title":"Orthop Surg"},{"key":"2009_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"137","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2019.10.171","volume":"134","author":"SG Yoon","year":"2020","unstructured":"Yoon SG, Kim MS, Kwon SC, Lyo IU, Sim HB (2020) Delayed ureter stricture and kidney atrophy after oblique lumbar interbody fusion. World Neurosurg 134:137\u2013140. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.wneu.2019.10.171","journal-title":"World Neurosurg"},{"key":"2009_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"101","DOI":"10.21037\/atm.2018.01.22","volume":"6","author":"J Quillo-Olvera","year":"2018","unstructured":"Quillo-Olvera J, Lin G-X, Jo H-J, Kim J-S (2018) Complications on minimally invasive oblique lumbar interbody fusion at L2\u2013L5 levels: a review of the literature and surgical strategies. Ann Transl Med 6:101. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.21037\/atm.2018.01.22","journal-title":"Ann Transl Med"}],"container-title":["Neurosurgical Review"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10143-023-02009-0.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s10143-023-02009-0\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10143-023-02009-0.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,1,22]],"date-time":"2024-01-22T01:15:43Z","timestamp":1705886143000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s10143-023-02009-0"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2023,4,29]]},"references-count":39,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023,12]]}},"alternative-id":["2009"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10143-023-02009-0","relation":{},"ISSN":["1437-2320"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1437-2320","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2023,4,29]]},"assertion":[{"value":"11 January 2023","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"20 March 2023","order":2,"name":"revised","label":"Revised","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"23 April 2023","order":3,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"29 April 2023","order":4,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and\/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. For this type of study, formal consent is not required.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethical approval and consent to participate"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing interests.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}}],"article-number":"100"}}