{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,3]],"date-time":"2026-09-03T19:01:43Z","timestamp":1788462103924,"version":"build-2803163510"},"reference-count":37,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,19]],"date-time":"2025-11-19T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1763510400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,19]],"date-time":"2025-11-19T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1763510400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Neurosurg Rev"],"DOI":"10.1007\/s10143-025-03939-7","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,19]],"date-time":"2025-11-19T06:58:31Z","timestamp":1763535511000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["Cervical disc replacement versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion using stand-alone cage for degenerative cervical spondylosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"49","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-0397-8955","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Yu","family":"Zhang","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0007-3197-7171","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Jidong","family":"Ju","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0006-4646-5374","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Jinchun","family":"Wu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,19]]},"reference":[{"key":"3939_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"955367","DOI":"10.3389\/fneur.2022.955367","volume":"13","author":"DW Shin","year":"2022","unstructured":"Shin DW, Shin JI, Koyanagi A, Jacob L, Smith L, Lee H et al (2022) Global, regional, and national neck pain burden in the general population, 1990\u20132019: an analysis of the global burden of disease study 2019. Front Neurol 13:955367","journal-title":"Front Neurol"},{"issue":"12","key":"3939_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2341","DOI":"10.1007\/s00256-023-04329-0","volume":"52","author":"S Hesni","year":"2023","unstructured":"Hesni S, Baxter D, Saifuddin A (2023) The imaging of cervical spondylotic myeloradiculopathy. Skeletal Radiol 52(12):2341\u20132365","journal-title":"Skeletal Radiol"},{"issue":"4","key":"3939_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"331","DOI":"10.1055\/a-2005-0552","volume":"85","author":"L Shi","year":"2024","unstructured":"Shi L, Ding T, Wang F, Wu C (2024) Comparison of anterior cervical decompression and fusion and posterior laminoplasty for four-segment cervical spondylotic myelopathy: clinical and radiographic outcomes. J Neurol Surg Cent Eur Neurosurg 85(4):331\u2013339","journal-title":"J Neurol Surg Cent Eur Neurosurg"},{"key":"3939_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"142","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2023.05.012","volume":"175","author":"CJ Chang","year":"2023","unstructured":"Chang CJ, Liu YF, Hsiao YM, Chang WL, Hsu CC, Liu KC et al (2023) Full endoscopic spine surgery for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a systematic review. World Neurosurg 175:142\u201350","journal-title":"World Neurosurg"},{"issue":"2","key":"3939_CR5","first-page":"E203","volume":"24","author":"B Ran","year":"2021","unstructured":"Ran B, Yang J, Wei J, Chen X, Zhong Q, Fu M (2021) CT-guided posterolateral full-endoscopic ventral decompression for single-level cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Pain Physician 24(2):E203-e10","journal-title":"Pain Physician"},{"issue":"1","key":"3939_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"758","DOI":"10.1186\/s13018-025-06189-x","volume":"20","author":"Y Zhang","year":"2025","unstructured":"Zhang Y, Ju J, Wu J (2025) Comparison of cervical disc arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for the treatment of single-segment cervical degenerative disc disease with a minimum of 4-year follow-up: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Orthop Surg Res 20(1):758","journal-title":"J Orthop Surg Res"},{"issue":"2","key":"3939_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"188","DOI":"10.1080\/02688697.2017.1394980","volume":"32","author":"J Yu","year":"2018","unstructured":"Yu J, Ha Y, Shin JJ, Oh JK, Lee CK, Kim KN et al (2018) Influence of plate fixation on cervical height and alignment after one- or two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Br J Neurosurg 32(2):188\u201395","journal-title":"Br J Neurosurg"},{"issue":"1","key":"3939_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"189","DOI":"10.1186\/s40001-022-00813-w","volume":"27","author":"J Zhang","year":"2022","unstructured":"Zhang J, Wang S, Tang X, Xiong W, Wu H, Liu C et al (2022) Clinical and radiological comparison of the zero-profile anchored cage and traditional cage-plate fixation in single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Eur J Med Res 27(1):189","journal-title":"Eur J Med Res"},{"key":"3939_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1155\/2021\/6597754","volume":"2021","author":"J Niu","year":"2021","unstructured":"Niu J, Song D, Liu Y, Wang H, Huang C, Yu H et al (2021) Revision surgery for symptomatic adjacent segment disc degeneration after initial anterior cervical fusion: is ROI-C better than plate-cage construct? Biomed Res Int 2021:6597754","journal-title":"Biomed Res Int"},{"key":"3939_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"60","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jocn.2020.06.014","volume":"78","author":"J Zhou","year":"2020","unstructured":"Zhou J, Li J, Lin H, Li X, Dong J, Zhou X (2020) Could self-locking stand-alone cage reduce adjacent-level ossification development after aneterior cervical discectomy and fusion? J Clin Neurosci 78:60\u201366","journal-title":"J Clin Neurosci"},{"issue":"1","key":"3939_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"276","DOI":"10.1186\/s13018-023-03726-4","volume":"18","author":"L Tang","year":"2023","unstructured":"Tang L, Liu X, Lu Y, Liu Y, Yu J, Zhao J (2023) Clinical and imaging outcomes of self-locking stand-alone cages and anterior cage-with-plate in three-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a retrospective comparative study. J Orthop Surg Res 18(1):276","journal-title":"J Orthop Surg Res"},{"issue":"1","key":"3939_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"644","DOI":"10.1186\/s13018-023-04134-4","volume":"18","author":"Y Zhang","year":"2023","unstructured":"Zhang Y, Ju J, Wu J (2023) Zero-profile anchored spacer versus conventional plate-cage construct in bilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg Res 18(1):644","journal-title":"J Orthop Surg Res"},{"issue":"2","key":"3939_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"694","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-024-08613-y","volume":"34","author":"Y Zhang","year":"2025","unstructured":"Zhang Y, Ju J, Wu J (2025) Long-term effectiveness of stand-alone anchored spacer in multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion compared with cage-plate system: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Spine J 34(2):694\u2013706","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"key":"3939_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cmpb.2020.105352","volume":"189","author":"W Hua","year":"2020","unstructured":"Hua W, Zhi J, Wang B, Ke W, Sun W, Yang S et al (2020) Biomechanical evaluation of adjacent segment degeneration after one- or two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus cervical disc arthroplasty: a finite element analysis. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 189:105352","journal-title":"Comput Methods Programs Biomed"},{"issue":"1","key":"3939_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"217","DOI":"10.21037\/jss.2019.12.09","volume":"6","author":"JH Badhiwala","year":"2020","unstructured":"Badhiwala JH, Platt A, Witiw CD, Traynelis VC (2020) Cervical disc arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a meta-analysis of rates of adjacent-level surgery to 7-year follow-up. J Spine Surg 6(1):217\u2013232","journal-title":"J Spine Surg"},{"issue":"1","key":"3939_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000005123","volume":"50","author":"RD Guyer","year":"2025","unstructured":"Guyer RD, Bae H, Coric D, Nunley PD, Musacchio M, Sasso RC et al (2025) Five-year follow-up of a prospective Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption trial evaluating a PEEK-on-Ceramic cervical disk replacement. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 50(1):1\u20139","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"issue":"20","key":"3939_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1417","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000005060","volume":"49","author":"FCS Altorfer","year":"2024","unstructured":"Altorfer FCS, Kelly MJ, Avrumova F, Zhu J, Abjornson C, Lebl DR (2024) Reasons for revision surgery after cervical disk arthroplasty based on medical device reports maintained by the US food and drug administration. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 49(20):1417\u20131425","journal-title":"Spine (Phila Pa 1976)"},{"issue":"5","key":"3939_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1875","DOI":"10.1007\/s00590-022-03365-1","volume":"33","author":"JH N\u00fa\u00f1ez","year":"2023","unstructured":"N\u00fa\u00f1ez JH, Escudero B, Omiste I, Mart\u00ednez-Pe\u00f1as J, Surroca M, Alonzo-Gonz\u00e1lez F et al (2023) Outcomes of cervical arthroplasty versus anterior cervical arthrodesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials with a minimum follow-up of 7-year. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 33(5):1875\u201384","journal-title":"Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol"},{"key":"3939_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3389\/fsurg.2023.1124423","volume":"10","author":"Z Wang","year":"2023","unstructured":"Wang Z, Luo G, Yu H, Zhao H, Li T, Yang H et al (2023) Comparison of discover cervical disc arthroplasty and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for the treatment of cervical degenerative disc diseases: a meta-analysis of prospective, randomized controlled trials. Front Surg 10:1124423","journal-title":"Front Surg"},{"issue":"7","key":"3939_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1609","DOI":"10.1007\/s00264-022-05318-z","volume":"46","author":"Z Peng","year":"2022","unstructured":"Peng Z, Hong Y, Meng Y, Liu H (2022) A meta-analysis comparing the short- and mid- to long-term outcomes of artificial cervical disc replacement(ACDR) with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for the treatment of cervical degenerative disc disease. Int Orthop 46(7):1609\u20131625","journal-title":"Int Orthop"},{"key":"3939_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"n71","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.n71","volume":"372","author":"MJ Page","year":"2021","unstructured":"Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD et al (2021) The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 372:n71","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"3939_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"d5928","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.d5928","volume":"343","author":"JP Higgins","year":"2011","unstructured":"Higgins JP, Altman DG, G\u00f8tzsche PC, J\u00fcni P, Moher D, Oxman AD et al (2011) The Cochrane collaboration\u2019s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 343:d5928","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"3939_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0183603","author":"RD Donk","year":"2017","unstructured":"Donk RD, Verbeek ALM, Verhagen WIM, Groenewoud H, Hosman AJF, Bartels RHMA (2017) What\u2019s the best surgical treatment for patients with cervical radiculopathy due to single-level degenerative disease? A randomized controlled trial. PLoS One 12(8):e0183603. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0183603","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"issue":"3","key":"3939_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"350","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2022.11.006","volume":"23","author":"CMW Goedmakers","year":"2023","unstructured":"Goedmakers CMW, de Vries F, Bosscher L, Peul WC, Arts MP, Vleggeert-Lankamp CLA (2023) Long-term results of the NECK trial-implanting a disc prosthesis after cervical anterior discectomy cannot prevent adjacent segment disease: five-year clinical follow-up of a double-blinded randomised controlled trial. Spine J 23(3):350\u201360","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"issue":"5","key":"3939_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1260","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-021-07055-0","volume":"31","author":"N Kumar","year":"2022","unstructured":"Kumar N, Liu ZJ, Poon WS, Park CK, Lin RM, Cho KS et al (2022) ProDisc-C versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for the surgical treatment of symptomatic cervical disc disease: two-year outcomes of Asian prospective randomized controlled multicentre study. Eur Spine J 31(5):1260\u20131272","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"issue":"4","key":"3939_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1225","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-016-4922-5","volume":"26","author":"J Sundseth","year":"2017","unstructured":"Sundseth J, Fredriksli OA, Kolstad F, Johnsen LG, Pripp AH, Andresen H et al (2017) The Norwegian cervical arthroplasty trial (NORCAT): 2-year clinical outcome after single-level cervical arthroplasty versus fusion-a prospective, single-blinded, randomized, controlled multicenter study. Eur Spine J 26(4):1225\u20131235","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"issue":"5","key":"3939_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"551","DOI":"10.29271\/jcpsp.2024.05.551","volume":"34","author":"A Tabanli","year":"2024","unstructured":"Tabanli A, Akcay E, Yilmaz H, Ak C, Bologur O, Kayikci E (2024) Comparison of the outcomes of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion and cervical disc replacement for cervical disc disease. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 34(5):551\u2013555","journal-title":"J Coll Physicians Surg Pak"},{"issue":"6","key":"3939_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"965","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2018.12.013","volume":"19","author":"CLA Vleggeert-Lankamp","year":"2019","unstructured":"Vleggeert-Lankamp CLA, Janssen TMH, van Zwet E, Goedmakers CMW, Bosscher L, Peul W et al (2019) The NECK trial: effectiveness of anterior cervical discectomy with or without interbody fusion and arthroplasty in the treatment of cervical disc herniation; a double-blinded randomized controlled trial. Spine J 19(6):965\u201375","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"issue":"11","key":"3939_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2655","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-019-06157-0","volume":"29","author":"X Yang","year":"2020","unstructured":"Yang X, Bartels R, Donk R, Arts MP, Goedmakers CMW, Vleggeert-Lankamp CLA (2020) The association of cervical sagittal alignment with adjacent segment degeneration. Eur Spine J 29(11):2655\u20132664","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"issue":"3","key":"3939_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1047","DOI":"10.14245\/ns.2346498.249","volume":"20","author":"JH Lee","year":"2023","unstructured":"Lee JH, Lee YJ, Chang MC, Lee JH (2023) Clinical effectiveness of artificial disc replacement in comparison with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion in the patients with cervical myelopathy: systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurospine 20(3):1047\u20131060","journal-title":"Neurospine"},{"issue":"1","key":"3939_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"364","DOI":"10.1186\/s13018-024-04729-5","volume":"19","author":"P Zhang","year":"2024","unstructured":"Zhang P, Zheng H, Luo J, Xu J (2024) Comparative efficacy of zero-profile implant and conventional cage-plate implant in the treatment of single-level degenerative cervical spondylosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg Res 19(1):364","journal-title":"J Orthop Surg Res"},{"issue":"1","key":"3939_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"403","DOI":"10.1186\/s13018-023-03885-4","volume":"18","author":"Y Zhang","year":"2023","unstructured":"Zhang Y, Ju J, Wu J (2023) Self-locking stand-alone cage versus cage-plate fixation in monosegmental anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with a minimum 2-year follow-up: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg Res 18(1):403","journal-title":"J Orthop Surg Res"},{"issue":"6","key":"3939_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"555","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.K.00599","volume":"95","author":"Y Gao","year":"2013","unstructured":"Gao Y, Liu M, Li T, Huang F, Tang T, Xiang Z (2013) A meta-analysis comparing the results of cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for the treatment of symptomatic cervical disc disease. J Bone Joint Surg Am 95(6):555\u2013561","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am"},{"key":"3939_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3390\/jcm13113203","author":"CM Chen","year":"2024","unstructured":"Chen CM, Yang JJ, Wu CC (2024) Cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for two-level cervical disc degenerative disease: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Med 13(11):3203. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/jcm13113203","journal-title":"J Clin Med"},{"issue":"4","key":"3939_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"985","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-016-4655-5","volume":"26","author":"S Zou","year":"2017","unstructured":"Zou S, Gao J, Xu B, Lu X, Han Y, Meng H (2017) Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) versus cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) for two contiguous levels cervical disc degenerative disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Eur Spine J 26(4):985\u2013997","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"key":"3939_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"228","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2024.07.102","volume":"190","author":"L Chen","year":"2024","unstructured":"Chen L, Liu D, Wang M, Huang Y, Chen Z (2024) Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with Zero-Profile anchored spacer versus plate and cage for 3-level contiguous cervical degenerative disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World Neurosurg 190:228\u2013239","journal-title":"World Neurosurg"},{"issue":"9","key":"3939_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"711","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e3182797592","volume":"38","author":"RB Delamarter","year":"2013","unstructured":"Delamarter RB, Zigler J (2013) Five-year reoperation rates, cervical total disc replacement versus fusion, results of a prospective randomized clinical trial. Spine Phila Pa 1976 38(9):711\u2013717","journal-title":"Spine Phila Pa 1976"}],"container-title":["Neurosurgical Review"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10143-025-03939-7.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s10143-025-03939-7\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10143-025-03939-7.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,19]],"date-time":"2025-11-19T06:58:32Z","timestamp":1763535512000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s10143-025-03939-7"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,19]]},"references-count":37,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,12]]}},"alternative-id":["3939"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10143-025-03939-7","relation":{},"ISSN":["1437-2320"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1437-2320","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,19]]},"assertion":[{"value":"1 October 2025","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"1 November 2025","order":2,"name":"revised","label":"Revised","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"8 November 2025","order":3,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"19 November 2025","order":4,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"Not applicable in this section.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethics approval and consent to participate"}},{"value":"Not applicable in this section.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent to publish"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing interests.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}},{"value":"Not applicable.","order":5,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Clinical trial number"}}],"article-number":"11"}}