{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,30]],"date-time":"2026-01-30T18:02:48Z","timestamp":1769796168160,"version":"3.49.0"},"reference-count":25,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,28]],"date-time":"2026-01-28T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1769558400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,28]],"date-time":"2026-01-28T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1769558400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Neurosurg Rev"],"DOI":"10.1007\/s10143-025-04074-z","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,28]],"date-time":"2026-01-28T03:18:26Z","timestamp":1769570306000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Comparing one vs. two grafts in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: clinical and radiographic outcomes"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"49","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-2640-9704","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Alan T.","family":"Villavicencio","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0007-3056-8878","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Hash Brown","family":"Taha","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Nandhana","family":"Vivek","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-6508-4140","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Sigita","family":"Burneikiene","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,28]]},"reference":[{"issue":"19","key":"4074_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"E562","DOI":"10.1097\/01.brs.0000180505.80347.b1","volume":"30","author":"CP Ames","year":"2005","unstructured":"Ames CP, Acosta FL, Chi J, Iyengar J, Muiru W, Acaroglu E et al (2005) (2005) Biomechanical comparison of posterior lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion performed at 1 and 2 Levels. Spine. 30(19):E562\u2013E6. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/01.brs.0000180505.80347.b1","journal-title":"Spine."},{"issue":"2","key":"4074_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"153","DOI":"10.3171\/2012.5.SPINE111044","volume":"17","author":"Y Aoki","year":"2012","unstructured":"Aoki Y, Yamagata M, Ikeda Y, Nakajima F, Ohtori S, Nakagawa K et al (2012) A prospective randomized controlled study comparing transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion techniques for degenerative spondylolisthesis: unilateral pedicle screw and 1 cage versus bilateral pedicle screws and 2 cages. J Neurosurg Spine 17(2):153\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3171\/2012.5.SPINE111044","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"},{"issue":"21","key":"4074_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"E1260","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0000000000002684","volume":"43","author":"JH Badhiwala","year":"2018","unstructured":"Badhiwala JH, Witiw CD, Nassiri F, Akbar MA, Jaja B, Wilson JR et al (2018) (2018) Minimum clinically important difference in SF-36 scores for use in degenerative cervical myelopathy. Spine. 43(21):E1260\u2013E6. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/BRS.0000000000002684","journal-title":"Spine."},{"key":"4074_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Cho JH, Hwang CJ, Lee D-H, Lee CS (2021) Clinical and radiological outcomes in patients who underwent posterior lumbar interbody fusion: comparisons between unilateral and bilateral cage insertion. BMC Musculoskel Disord 2021;22(1). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12891-021-04852-y","DOI":"10.1186\/s12891-021-04852-y"},{"issue":"6","key":"4074_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"968","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2007.11.006","volume":"8","author":"AG Copay","year":"2008","unstructured":"Copay AG, Glassman SD, Subach BR, Berven S, Schuler TC (2008) Carreon LY (2008) Minimum clinically important difference in lumbar spine surgery patients: a choice of methods using the Oswestry Disability Index, Medical Outcomes Study questionnaire Short Form 36, and Pain Scales. Spine J 8(6):968\u201374. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.spinee.2007.11.006","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"key":"4074_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"D\u2019Souza M, Macdonald NA, Gendreau JL, Duddleston PJ, Feng AY, Ho AL (2019) Graft Materials and biologics for spinal interbody fusion. Biomedicines. 2019;7(4). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/biomedicines7040075","DOI":"10.3390\/biomedicines7040075"},{"key":"4074_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"144","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2023.12.111","volume":"183","author":"Y Duan","year":"2024","unstructured":"Duan Y, Feng D, Li T, Wang Y, Jiang L, Huang Y (2024) Comparison of lumbar interbody fusion with 3d-printed porous titanium cage versus polyetheretherketone cage in treating lumbar degenerative disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World Neurosurg 183:144\u201356. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.wneu.2023.12.111","journal-title":"World Neurosurg"},{"issue":"1","key":"4074_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2","DOI":"10.1037\/a0024338","volume":"141","author":"CO Fritz","year":"2012","unstructured":"Fritz CO, Morris PE (2012) Richler JJ (2012) Effect size estimates: current use, calculations, and interpretation. J Exper Psychol Gen 141(1):2\u201318. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/a0024338","journal-title":"J Exper Psychol Gen"},{"issue":"1","key":"4074_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"109","DOI":"10.1227\/01.NEU.0000335077.62599.F0","volume":"63","author":"CH Jo","year":"2008","unstructured":"Jo CH, Kang S-B, Yoon K-S, Lee JH, Lee J-H (2008) Comparative study of unilateral and bilateral cages with respect to clinical outcomes and stability in instrumented posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Neurosurg 63(1):109\u201314. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1227\/01.NEU.0000335077.62599.F0","journal-title":"Neurosurg"},{"issue":"19","key":"4074_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2083","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e31818448a9","volume":"33","author":"S Kroppenstedt","year":"2008","unstructured":"Kroppenstedt S, Gulde M, Sch\u00f6nmayr R (2008) Radiological comparison of instrumented posterior lumbar interbody fusion with one or two closed-box plasmapore coated titanium cages. Spine 33(19):2083\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/BRS.0b013e31818448a9","journal-title":"Spine"},{"issue":"3","key":"4074_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"236","DOI":"10.1111\/os.12119","volume":"6","author":"J Liu","year":"2014","unstructured":"Liu J, Tang J, Liu H (2014) Comparison of one versus two cages in lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spinal disease: a meta-analysis. Orthop Surg 6(3):236\u201343. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/os.12119","journal-title":"Orthop Surg"},{"issue":"1","key":"4074_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"110","DOI":"10.3171\/2013.4.SPINE12319","volume":"19","author":"L Marchi","year":"2013","unstructured":"Marchi L, Abdala N, Oliveira L, Amaral R, Coutinho E, Pimenta L (2013) Radiographic and clinical evaluation of cage subsidence after stand-alone lateral interbody fusion. J Neurosurg Spine 19(1):110\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3171\/2013.4.SPINE12319","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"},{"issue":"7","key":"4074_CR13","first-page":"337","volume":"32","author":"RW Molinari","year":"2013","unstructured":"Molinari RW, Sloboda J, Johnstone FL (2013) Are 2 cages needed with instrumented PLIF? A comparison of 1 versus 2 interbody cages in a military population. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) 32(7):337\u201343","journal-title":"Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ)"},{"key":"4074_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Murakami H, Horton W, Tomita K, Hutton W (2004) A two-cage reconstruction versus a single mega-cage reconstruction for lumbar interbody fusion: an experimental comparison. Eur Spine J 13(5)","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-003-0668-y"},{"key":"4074_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Pairojboriboon S, Niruthisard S, Chandhanayingyong C, Monsereenusorn C, Poopan S, Lo S-FL (2024) A comparison of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) cage material on fusion rates: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. World Neurosurg X. 2024;23. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00586-003-0668-y","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-003-0668-y"},{"issue":"3","key":"4074_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"193","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2009.09.006","volume":"10","author":"Y Park","year":"2010","unstructured":"Park Y, Maeda T, Cho W, Riew KD (2010) Comparison of anterior cervical fusion after two-level discectomy or single-level corpectomy: sagittal alignment, cervical lordosis, graft collapse, and adjacent-level ossification. Spine J 10(3):193\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.spinee.2009.09.006","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"key":"4074_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"162","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2023.07.017","volume":"178","author":"Q Peng","year":"2023","unstructured":"Peng Q, Yang S, Zhang Y, Liu H, Meng B, Zhao W et al (2023) Effects of structural allograft versus polyetheretherketone cage in patients undergoing spinal fusion surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World Neurosurg 178:162\u201371.e7. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.wneu.2023.07.017","journal-title":"World Neurosurg"},{"issue":"1","key":"4074_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"58","DOI":"10.1097\/00002517-200002000-00012","volume":"13","author":"DW Polly","year":"2000","unstructured":"Polly DW, Klemme WR, Cunningham BW, Burnette JB, Haggerty CJ, Oda I (2000) The biomechanical significance of anterior column support in a simulated single-level spinal fusion. J Spinal Disord 13(1):58\u201362. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/00002517-200002000-00012","journal-title":"J Spinal Disord"},{"issue":"10","key":"4074_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1352","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.90B10.21078","volume":"90","author":"KT Suh","year":"2008","unstructured":"Suh KT, Park WW, Kim SJ, Cho HM, Lee JS, Lee JS (2008) Posterior lumbar interbody fusion for adult isthmic spondylolisthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Brit 90(10):1352\u20136. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1302\/0301-620X.90B10.21078","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Brit"},{"issue":"1","key":"4074_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"14","DOI":"10.1007\/s005860050003","volume":"9","author":"A Tsantrizos","year":"2000","unstructured":"Tsantrizos A, Andreou A, Aebi M, Steffen T (2000) Biomechanical stability of five stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion constructs. Eur Spine J 9(1):14\u201322. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s005860050003","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"issue":"1","key":"4074_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"84","DOI":"10.1016\/j.spinee.2021.06.005","volume":"22","author":"AT Villavicencio","year":"2022","unstructured":"Villavicencio AT, Nelson EL, Rajpal S, Beasley K, Burneikiene S (2022) Prospective, randomized, double-blinded clinical trial comparing PEEK and allograft spacers in patients undergoing transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion surgeries. Spine J 22(1):84\u201394. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.spinee.2021.06.005","journal-title":"Spine J"},{"key":"4074_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Xu H, Ju W, Xu N, Zhang X, Zhu X, Zhu L et al (2013) Biomechanical comparison of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with 1 or 2 cages by finite-element analysis. Oper Neurosurg 73:ons198\u2013ons205. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1227\/01.neu.0000430320.39870.f7","DOI":"10.1227\/01.neu.0000430320.39870.f7"},{"issue":"5","key":"4074_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"496","DOI":"10.3171\/2009.2.SPINE0862","volume":"10","author":"H Xu","year":"2013","unstructured":"Xu H, Tang H, Li Z (2013) Surgical treatment of adult degenerative spondylolisthesis by instrumented transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in the Han nationality. J Neurosurg Spine 10(5):496\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3171\/2009.2.SPINE0862","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Spine"},{"key":"4074_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Zhang F, Xu Hc, Yin B, Xia Xl M, Xs W, Hl et al (2016) Can an Endplate-conformed Cervical Cage Provide a Better Biomechanical Environment than a Typical Non\u2010conformed Cage?. Orthop Surg 8(3):367\u201376. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/os.12261","DOI":"10.1111\/os.12261"},{"key":"4074_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Zhao J, Wang X, Hou T, He S (2002) One Versus Two BAK Fusion Cages in Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion to L4\u2013L5 Degenerative Spondylolisthesis. Spine. 2002;27(24):2753\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/00007632-200212150-00003. PMID: 12486342","DOI":"10.1097\/00007632-200212150-00003"}],"container-title":["Neurosurgical Review"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10143-025-04074-z.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s10143-025-04074-z","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10143-025-04074-z.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,28]],"date-time":"2026-01-28T03:18:30Z","timestamp":1769570310000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s10143-025-04074-z"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,28]]},"references-count":25,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,12]]}},"alternative-id":["4074"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10143-025-04074-z","relation":{},"ISSN":["1437-2320"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1437-2320","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,28]]},"assertion":[{"value":"8 May 2025","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"13 November 2025","order":2,"name":"revised","label":"Revised","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"19 December 2025","order":3,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"28 January 2026","order":4,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The corresponding Author declares that the procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000. Due to the study\u2019s retrospective nature, the study was exempt from the requirement for institutional review board approval.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethics approval"}},{"value":"Not applicable.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Human Ethics and Consent to Participate declarations"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing interests.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}},{"value":"Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01406405.","order":5,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Clinical Trial Number"}}],"article-number":"164"}}