{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,18]],"date-time":"2026-05-18T13:10:50Z","timestamp":1779109850970,"version":"3.51.4"},"reference-count":17,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"6","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,6,1]],"date-time":"2019-06-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1559347200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,6,1]],"date-time":"2019-06-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1559347200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Tech Coloproctol"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,6]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s10151-019-02014-w","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2019,6,28]],"date-time":"2019-06-28T11:02:57Z","timestamp":1561719777000},"page":"529-535","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":38,"title":["Robotic vs. laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy for external rectal prolapse and rectal intussusception: a systematic review"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"23","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-7834-1767","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"S.","family":"Albayati","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"P.","family":"Chen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"M. J.","family":"Morgan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"J. W. T.","family":"Toh","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2019,6,28]]},"reference":[{"issue":"16","key":"2014_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1569","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2017.7219","volume":"318","author":"D Jayne","year":"2017","unstructured":"Jayne D et al (2017) Effect of robotic-assisted vs conventional laparoscopic surgery on risk of conversion to open laparotomy among patients undergoing resection for rectal cancer: the ROLARR Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 318(16):1569\u20131580","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"issue":"7","key":"2014_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"381","DOI":"10.1007\/s10151-015-1320-7","volume":"19","author":"L Ramage","year":"2015","unstructured":"Ramage L et al (2015) Is robotic ventral mesh rectopexy better than laparoscopy in the treatment of rectal prolapse and obstructed defecation? A meta-analysis. Tech Coloproctol 19(7):381\u2013389","journal-title":"Tech Coloproctol"},{"issue":"10","key":"2014_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1201","DOI":"10.1007\/s00384-009-0766-3","volume":"24","author":"DE de Hoog","year":"2009","unstructured":"de Hoog DE et al (2009) Recurrence and functional results after open versus conventional laparoscopic versus robot-assisted laparoscopic rectopexy for rectal prolapse: a case-control study. Int J Colorectal Dis 24(10):1201\u20131206","journal-title":"Int J Colorectal Dis"},{"issue":"11","key":"2014_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1825","DOI":"10.1007\/s10350-007-9017-2","volume":"50","author":"J Heemskerk","year":"2007","unstructured":"Heemskerk J et al (2007) Robot-assisted vs. conventional laparoscopic rectopexy for rectal prolapse: a comparative study on costs and time. Dis Colon Rectum 50(11):1825\u20131830","journal-title":"Dis Colon Rectum"},{"issue":"10","key":"2014_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"695","DOI":"10.1007\/s10151-016-1518-3","volume":"20","author":"JL Faucheron","year":"2016","unstructured":"Faucheron JL et al (2016) Day case robotic ventral rectopexy compared with day case laparoscopic ventral rectopexy: a prospective study. Tech Coloproctol 20(10):695\u2013700","journal-title":"Tech Coloproctol"},{"issue":"10","key":"2014_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1010","DOI":"10.1111\/codi.13309","volume":"18","author":"J Makela-Kaikkonen","year":"2016","unstructured":"Makela-Kaikkonen J et al (2016) Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for external, internal rectal prolapse and enterocele: a randomised controlled trial. Colorectal Dis 18(10):1010\u20131015","journal-title":"Colorectal Dis"},{"key":"2014_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"g7647","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.g7647","volume":"349","author":"L Shamseer","year":"2015","unstructured":"Shamseer L et al (2015) Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation. BMJ 349:g7647","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"9","key":"2014_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"603","DOI":"10.1007\/s10654-010-9491-z","volume":"25","author":"A Stang","year":"2010","unstructured":"Stang A (2010) Critical evaluation of the Newcastle\u2013Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. Eur J Epidemiol 25(9):603\u2013605","journal-title":"Eur J Epidemiol"},{"issue":"9","key":"2014_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1113","DOI":"10.1007\/s00384-014-1937-4","volume":"29","author":"RK Mehmood","year":"2014","unstructured":"Mehmood RK et al (2014) Short-term outcome of laparoscopic versus robotic ventral mesh rectopexy for full-thickness rectal prolapse. Is robotic superior? Int J Colorectal Dis 29(9):1113\u20131118","journal-title":"Int J Colorectal Dis"},{"issue":"1471\u20132288 (Elec","key":"2014_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"13","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2288-5-13","volume":"5","author":"SP Hozo","year":"2005","unstructured":"Hozo SP, Djulbegovic B, Hozo I (2005) Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample. BMC Med Res Methodol 5(1471\u20132288 (Electronic)):13","journal-title":"BMC Med Res Methodol"},{"issue":"2","key":"2014_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"151","DOI":"10.1007\/s10151-013-1042-7","volume":"18","author":"J Makela-Kaikkonen","year":"2014","unstructured":"Makela-Kaikkonen J et al (2014) Robotic-assisted and laparoscopic ventral rectopexy in the treatment of rectal prolapse: a matched-pairs study of operative details and complications. Tech Coloproctol 18(2):151\u2013155","journal-title":"Tech Coloproctol"},{"issue":"8","key":"2014_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e469","DOI":"10.1111\/codi.12251","volume":"15","author":"S Mantoo","year":"2013","unstructured":"Mantoo S et al (2013) Is robotic-assisted ventral mesh rectopexy superior to laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy in the management of obstructed defaecation? Colorectal Dis 15(8):e469\u2013e475","journal-title":"Colorectal Dis"},{"issue":"12","key":"2014_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1919","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-005-0485-y","volume":"20","author":"A D\u2019Hoore","year":"2006","unstructured":"D\u2019Hoore A, Penninckx F (2006) Laparoscopic ventral recto(colpo)pexy for rectal prolapse: surgical technique and outcome for 109 patients. Surg Endosc 20(12):1919\u20131923","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"2014_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"S153","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijsu.2014.08.359","volume":"12","author":"F Rondelli","year":"2014","unstructured":"Rondelli F et al (2014) Robot-assisted or conventional laparoscopic rectopexy for rectal prolapse? Systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg 12:S153\u2013S159","journal-title":"Int J Surg"},{"issue":"6","key":"2014_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1034","DOI":"10.1097\/SLA.0000000000002523","volume":"267","author":"FP Prete","year":"2018","unstructured":"Prete FP et al (2018) Robotic versus laparoscopic minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ann Surg 267(6):1034\u20131046","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"issue":"4","key":"2014_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1576","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-015-4381-9","volume":"30","author":"AR Bhama","year":"2016","unstructured":"Bhama AR et al (2016) A comparison of laparoscopic and robotic colorectal surgery outcomes using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) database. Surg Endosc 30(4):1576\u20131584","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"2014_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/codi.13893","author":"MA Mercer-Jones","year":"2017","unstructured":"Mercer-Jones MA, Brown SR, Knowles CH, Williams AB (2017) Position statement by the pelvic floor society on behalf of the association of coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland on the use of mesh in ventral mesh rectopexy (VMR). Colorectal Dis. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/codi.13893","journal-title":"Colorectal Dis"}],"container-title":["Techniques in Coloproctology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10151-019-02014-w.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s10151-019-02014-w\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10151-019-02014-w.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2020,6,27]],"date-time":"2020-06-27T02:22:40Z","timestamp":1593224560000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s10151-019-02014-w"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2019,6]]},"references-count":17,"journal-issue":{"issue":"6","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,6]]}},"alternative-id":["2014"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10151-019-02014-w","relation":{},"ISSN":["1123-6337","1128-045X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1123-6337","type":"print"},{"value":"1128-045X","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2019,6]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2 February 2019","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"5 June 2019","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"28 June 2019","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Compliance with ethical standards"}},{"value":"The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}},{"value":"This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by the authors.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethical approval"}},{"value":"For this type of study formal consent is not required.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Informed consent"}}]}}