{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,6]],"date-time":"2026-03-06T06:58:01Z","timestamp":1772780281441,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":12,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,3]],"date-time":"2026-03-03T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1772496000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,6]],"date-time":"2026-03-06T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1772755200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":3,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Tech Coloproctol"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,12]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Background<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Quality of life (QoL) and functional outcomes after redo ileoanal pouch (IPAA) surgery are worse than after primary (index) pouch surgery. However, QoL in failing pouches compared to after redo IPAA has not been reported. We hypothesized that QoL after redo IPAA would be improved compared with failing IPAAs immediately prior to redo surgery.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Adults who underwent redo IPAA (1984\u20132024), had successful loop ileostomy closure, and at least one pouch survey were included. Our primary outcome was the Cleveland Global Quality of Life Index (CGQLI; range, 0 [lowest] to 1 [highest]). Survey responses before and after redo IPAA were compared using unmatched and matched pair analyses.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      A total of 528 redo pouches were included: pouch excision with neo-IPAA in 318 (60%) and pouch repair with neo-IPAA in 210 (40%); 298 (56%) had follow-up survey data available. After redo IPAA, social, work, and sexual restrictions all decreased (\n                      <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u00a0\u2264\u00a00.05), and bowel movements decreased from 10 to 8 per 24\u00a0h (\n                      <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009=\u20090.05), whereas urgency, incontinence, seepage, pad usage, fiber, antidiarrheal usage, and dietary restrictions were comparable to before redo IPAA. After redo IPAA, quality of health, quality of energy, QoL, and CGQLI were significantly higher than those before redo IPAA (\n                      <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009&lt;\u20090.0001). When surveyed after redo IPAA, 86% of patients would undergo redo surgery again, 88% would recommend redo IPAA, and happiness with surgery increased (\n                      <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009=\u20090.001).\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Redo IPAA improved quality of life and restrictions observed prior to redo pouch surgery without compromising functional outcomes for most patients.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1007\/s10151-025-03276-3","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,3]],"date-time":"2026-03-03T20:15:58Z","timestamp":1772568958000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Quality of life before and after redo IPAA: does pouch salvage improve quality of life?"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"30","author":[{"given":"S. D.","family":"Holubar","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"A.","family":"Alipouriani","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"O.","family":"Lavryk","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"J.","family":"Lipman","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"A. E.","family":"Kanters","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"B.","family":"Cohen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"K.","family":"Falloon","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"F.","family":"Rieder","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"T.","family":"Qazi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"E.","family":"Gorgun","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"S. R.","family":"Steele","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"D.","family":"Liska","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,3]]},"reference":[{"key":"3276_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"691","DOI":"10.1007\/s10151-022-02617-w","volume":"26","author":"SH Emile","year":"2022","unstructured":"Emile SH, Khan SM, Silva-Alvarenga E, Garoufalia Z, Wexner SD (2022) A systematic review and meta-analysis of the outcome of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in patients with ulcerative colitis versus patients with familial adenomatous polyposis. Tech Coloproctol 26:691\u2013705","journal-title":"Tech Coloproctol"},{"key":"3276_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1489","DOI":"10.1007\/s10350-004-6799-3","volume":"46","author":"S Holubar","year":"2003","unstructured":"Holubar S, Hyman N (2003) Continence alterations after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis do not diminish quality of life. Dis Colon Rectum 46:1489\u20131491","journal-title":"Dis Colon Rectum"},{"key":"3276_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1663","DOI":"10.1093\/bjs\/znad244","volume":"110","author":"M Maspero","year":"2023","unstructured":"Maspero M, Lavryk O, Holubar SD et al (2023) Long-term quality-of-life and functional outcomes after redo ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Br J Surg 110:1663\u20131667","journal-title":"Br J Surg"},{"key":"3276_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"823","DOI":"10.1097\/DCR.0000000000001644","volume":"63","author":"OA Lavryk","year":"2020","unstructured":"Lavryk OA, Stocchi L, Shawki S et al (2020) Redo IPAA after a failed pouch in patients with Crohn\u2019s disease: is it worth trying? Dis Colon Rectum 63:823\u2013830","journal-title":"Dis Colon Rectum"},{"key":"3276_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"326","DOI":"10.1111\/codi.14484","volume":"21","author":"C Rossi","year":"2019","unstructured":"Rossi C, Beyer-Berjot L, Maggiori L et al (2019) Redo ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: outcomes from a case-controlled study. Colorectal Dis 21:326\u2013334","journal-title":"Colorectal Dis"},{"key":"3276_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1001\/jamahealthforum.2022.0326","volume":"3","author":"C Bull","year":"2022","unstructured":"Bull C, Teede H, Watson D, Callander EJ (2022) Selecting and implementing patient-reported outcome and experience measures to assess health system performance. JAMA Health Forum 3:e220326","journal-title":"JAMA Health Forum"},{"key":"3276_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"252","DOI":"10.1007\/s12664-015-0560-9","volume":"34","author":"S Raviram","year":"2015","unstructured":"Raviram S, Rajan R, Sindhu RS et al (2015) Quality of life, social impact and functional outcome following ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis. Indian J Gastroenterol 34:252\u2013255","journal-title":"Indian J Gastroenterol"},{"key":"3276_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"221","DOI":"10.1097\/01.sla.0000080825.95166.26","volume":"238","author":"CP Delaney","year":"2003","unstructured":"Delaney CP, Fazio VW, Remzi FH et al (2003) Prospective, age-related analysis of surgical results, functional outcome, and quality of life after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Ann Surg 238:221\u2013228","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"key":"3276_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Fazio VW, O\u2019Riordain MG, Lavery IC et al (1999) Long-term functional outcome and quality of life after stapled restorative proctocolectomy. Ann Surg. 230: 575\u201384; discussion 84\u20136","DOI":"10.1097\/00000658-199910000-00013"},{"key":"3276_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"54","DOI":"10.7748\/ns.4.43.54.s49","volume":"4","author":"B Patricia","year":"1990","unstructured":"Patricia B (1990) Community stoma care. Nurs Stand 4:54\u201355","journal-title":"Nurs Stand"},{"key":"3276_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"692","DOI":"10.12968\/bjon.2004.13.12.13254","volume":"13","author":"PK Black","year":"2004","unstructured":"Black PK (2004) Psychological, sexual and cultural issues for patients with a stoma. Br J Nurs 13:692\u2013697","journal-title":"Br J Nurs"},{"key":"3276_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"S20","DOI":"10.12968\/bjon.2021.30.6.S20","volume":"30","author":"P Black","year":"2021","unstructured":"Black P, Notter J (2021) Psychological issues affecting patients living with a stoma. Br J Nurs 30:S20-s32","journal-title":"Br J Nurs"}],"container-title":["Techniques in Coloproctology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s10151-025-03276-3","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10151-025-03276-3.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10151-025-03276-3.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,6]],"date-time":"2026-03-06T05:47:41Z","timestamp":1772776061000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s10151-025-03276-3"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,3]]},"references-count":12,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,12]]}},"alternative-id":["3276"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10151-025-03276-3","relation":{},"ISSN":["1123-6337","1128-045X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1123-6337","type":"print"},{"value":"1128-045X","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,3]]},"assertion":[{"value":"22 September 2025","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"1 December 2025","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"3 March 2026","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing interests.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}},{"value":"This retrospective study was approved by the Cleveland Clinic Institutional Review Board (IRB). The requirement for informed consent was waived due to the minimal risk nature of the study and the use of de-identified data, in accordance with institutional policies and the Declaration of Helsinki.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethical approval"}}],"article-number":"37"}}