{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,2]],"date-time":"2026-10-02T15:58:49Z","timestamp":1790956729253,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":67,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,2]],"date-time":"2026-10-02T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1790899200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,2]],"date-time":"2026-10-02T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1790899200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100000265","name":"Medical Research Council","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["G116768"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["G116768"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100000265","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100004282","name":"Evelyn Trust","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["MED-25-2328"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["MED-25-2328"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100004282","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["JARO"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Purpose<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Cochlear implant (CI) users struggle to understand speech under noisy conditions. This has long been attributed to channel interactions: a given neuron not only responds to electrical stimulation from the closest electrode but also is sensitive to stimulation from electrodes located further away. Shaping the stimulation voltage into a very sharp profile (e.g. using tripolar instead of the more common monopolar stimulation) has been proposed as a solution, only with limited success. We argue this is due to several factors: the strong correlation between envelopes of adjacent CI channels with speech sounds, the necessity to recruit enough neurons for sufficient loudness, and, at loud levels, the similarity between monopolar and sharp stimulation output voltages at locations that are at least 3\u20134 electrodes away from a given stimulation electrode.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      We describe a \u201cHilltop\u201d method to effectively reduce the voltage more than 3\u20134 electrodes away from a given electrode, while keeping the same percept of place pitch as with monopolar stimulation. We assess this method psychophysically in human CI users (\n                      <jats:italic>N<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009=\u20097 males, 9 females) and with computational modelling.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Based on computational modelling and on psychophysical measures of charge summation, we show that the voltage difference between monopolar and Hilltop stimulation persists at the level of the spiral ganglion neurons.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The results warrant investigations with more complex, multichannel stimuli. We also describe possible limitations of this strategy, including the presence of sidelobes of opposite effective polarity in some participants, and suggest ways to mitigate their effects.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1007\/s10162-026-01076-6","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,2]],"date-time":"2026-10-02T15:36:56Z","timestamp":1790955416000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["On Balancing Sharpness of Excitation Patterns, Loudness, and Potential Effects on Speech Perception with Cochlear-Implant Current-Focussing Strategies"],"prefix":"10.1007","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-9404-3575","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Fran\u00e7ois","family":"Gu\u00e9rit","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-6166-501X","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Robert P.","family":"Carlyon","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,2]]},"reference":[{"issue":"5","key":"1076_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0232421","volume":"15","author":"I Boisvert","year":"2020","unstructured":"Boisvert I, Reis M, Au A, Cowan R, Dowell RC (2020) Cochlear implantation outcomes in adults: a scoping review. PLoS ONE 15(5):1\u201326. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0232421","journal-title":"PLoS ONE"},{"issue":"4","key":"1076_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"375","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AUD.0000134552.22205.EE","volume":"25","author":"JB Firszt","year":"2004","unstructured":"Firszt JB, Holden LK, Skinner MW, Tobey EA, Peterson A, Gaggl W, Runge-Samuelson CL, Wackym PA (2004) Recognition of speech presented at soft to loud levels by adult cochlear implant recipients of three cochlear implant systems. Ear Hear 25(4):375\u2013387. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/01.AUD.0000134552.22205.EE","journal-title":"Ear Hear"},{"issue":"1\u20132","key":"1076_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"33","DOI":"10.1016\/j.heares.2005.08.008","volume":"211","author":"GS Stickney","year":"2006","unstructured":"Stickney GS, Loizou PC, Mishra LN, Assmann PF, Shannon RV, Opie JM (2006) Effects of electrode design and configuration on channel interactions. Hear Res 211(1\u20132):33\u201345. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.heares.2005.08.008","journal-title":"Hear Res"},{"key":"1076_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/2331216514553783","volume":"18","author":"AJ Oxenham","year":"2014","unstructured":"Oxenham AJ, Kreft HA (2014) Speech perception in tones and noise via cochlear implants reveals influence of spectral resolution on temporal processing. Trends Hear 18:233121651455378. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/2331216514553783","journal-title":"Trends Hear"},{"issue":"1","key":"1076_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"19","DOI":"10.1007\/s10162-004-5024-3","volume":"6","author":"Q-J Fu","year":"2005","unstructured":"Fu Q-J, Nogaki G (2005) Noise susceptibility of cochlear implant users: the role of spectral resolution and smearing. JARO 6(1):19\u201327. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10162-004-5024-3","journal-title":"JARO - Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology"},{"issue":"2","key":"1076_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1150","DOI":"10.1121\/1.1381538","volume":"110","author":"LM Friesen","year":"2001","unstructured":"Friesen LM, Shannon RV, Baskent D, Wang X (2001) Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants. J Acoust Soc Am 110(2):1150\u20131163. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1121\/1.1381538","journal-title":"J Acoust Soc Am"},{"issue":"4","key":"1076_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"353","DOI":"10.1007\/s10162-020-00758-z","volume":"21","author":"T Goehring","year":"2020","unstructured":"Goehring T, Arenberg JG, Carlyon RP (2020) Using spectral blurring to assess effects of channel interaction on speech-in-noise perception with cochlear implants. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 21(4):353\u2013371. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10162-020-00758-z","journal-title":"J Assoc Res Otolaryngol"},{"key":"1076_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"115","DOI":"10.1109\/RBME.2008.2008250","volume":"1","author":"F-G Zeng","year":"2008","unstructured":"Zeng F-G, Rebscher S, Harrison W, Sun X, Feng H (2008) Cochlear implants: system design, integration, and evaluation. IEEE Rev Biomed Eng 1:115\u2013142. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/RBME.2008.2008250","journal-title":"IEEE Rev Biomed Eng"},{"key":"1076_CR9","unstructured":"Black RC (1978) The cochlear prosthesis: electrochemical and electrophysiological studies. PhD thesis, University of Melbourne"},{"issue":"1\u20132","key":"1076_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"11","DOI":"10.1016\/S0378-5955(98)00061-6","volume":"121","author":"A Kral","year":"1998","unstructured":"Kral A, Hartmann R, Mortazavi D, Klinke R (1998) Spatial resolution of cochlear implants: the electrical field and excitation of auditory afferents. Hear Res 121(1\u20132):11\u201328. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S0378-5955(98)00061-6","journal-title":"Hear Res"},{"issue":"6","key":"1076_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3703","DOI":"10.1121\/1.2722047","volume":"121","author":"C van den Honert","year":"2007","unstructured":"van den Honert C, Kelsall DC (2007) Focused intracochlear electric stimulation with phased array channels. J Acoust Soc Am 121(6):3703\u20133716. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1121\/1.2722047","journal-title":"J Acoust Soc Am"},{"issue":"1\u20132","key":"1076_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"141","DOI":"10.1016\/j.heares.2008.03.006","volume":"242","author":"BH Bonham","year":"2008","unstructured":"Bonham BH, Litvak LM (2008) Current focusing and steering: modeling, physiology, and psychophysics. Hear Res 242(1\u20132):141\u2013153. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.heares.2008.03.006","journal-title":"Hear Res"},{"issue":"3","key":"1076_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1642","DOI":"10.1063\/1.361010","volume":"121","author":"JA Bierer","year":"2007","unstructured":"Bierer JA (2007) Threshold and channel interaction in cochlear implant users: evaluation of the tripolar electrode configuration. J Acoust Soc Am 121(3):1642\u20131653. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1063\/1.361010","journal-title":"J Acoust Soc Am"},{"issue":"1","key":"1076_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"15","DOI":"10.1007\/s10162-005-0019-2","volume":"7","author":"M Chatterjee","year":"2006","unstructured":"Chatterjee M, Galvin JJ, Fu Q-J, Shannon RV (2006) Effects of stimulation mode, level and location on forward-masked excitation patterns in cochlear implant patients. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 7(1):15\u201325. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10162-005-0019-2","journal-title":"J Assoc Res Otolaryngol"},{"issue":"5","key":"1076_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2913","DOI":"10.1121\/1.4869687","volume":"135","author":"CA Fielden","year":"2014","unstructured":"Fielden CA, Kluk K, McKay CM (2014) Interpulse interval discrimination within and across channels: comparison of monopolar and tripolar mode of stimulation. J Acoust Soc Am 135(5):2913\u20132922. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1121\/1.4869687","journal-title":"J Acoust Soc Am"},{"issue":"3","key":"1076_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"401","DOI":"10.1007\/s10162-015-0511-2","volume":"16","author":"J Marozeau","year":"2015","unstructured":"Marozeau J, McDermott HJ, Swanson BA, McKay CM (2015) Perceptual interactions between electrodes using focused and monopolar cochlear stimulation. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 16(3):401\u2013412. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10162-015-0511-2","journal-title":"J Assoc Res Otolaryngol"},{"issue":"11","key":"1076_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"935","DOI":"10.1017\/S0022215100084607","volume":"91","author":"GM Clark","year":"1977","unstructured":"Clark GM, Tong YC, Black R, Forster IC, Patrick JF, Dewhurst DJ (1977) A multiple electrode cochlear implant. J Laryngol Otol 91(11):935\u2013945. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/S0022215100084607","journal-title":"J Laryngol Otol"},{"key":"1076_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1177\/2331216516653389","volume":"20","author":"JA Bierer","year":"2016","unstructured":"Bierer JA, Litvak L (2016) Reducing channel interaction through cochlear implant programming may improve speech perception. Trends Hear 20:1\u201312. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/2331216516653389","journal-title":"Trends Hear"},{"key":"1076_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"29","DOI":"10.1016\/j.heares.2013.02.004","volume":"299","author":"AG Srinivasan","year":"2013","unstructured":"Srinivasan AG, Padilla M, Shannon RV, Landsberger DM (2013) Improving speech perception in noise with current focusing in cochlear implant users. Hear Res 299:29\u201336. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.heares.2013.02.004","journal-title":"Hear Res"},{"issue":"5","key":"1076_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"957","DOI":"10.1097\/01.mao.0000185060.74339.9d","volume":"26","author":"LHM Mens","year":"2005","unstructured":"Mens LHM, Berenstein CK (2005) Speech perception with mono- and quadrupolar electrode configurations: a crossover study. Otology Neurotology 26(5):957\u2013964","journal-title":"Otology Neurotology"},{"issue":"2","key":"1076_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"306","DOI":"10.1097\/aud.0000000000001282","volume":"44","author":"NRA van Groesen","year":"2023","unstructured":"van Groesen NRA, Briaire JJ, de Jong MAM, Frijns JHM (2023) Dynamic current focusing compared to monopolar stimulation in a take-home trial of cochlear implant users. Ear Hear 44(2):306\u2013317. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/aud.0000000000001282","journal-title":"Ear Hear"},{"issue":"2","key":"1076_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"250","DOI":"10.1097\/AUD.0b013e3181645336","volume":"29","author":"CK Berenstein","year":"2008","unstructured":"Berenstein CK, Mens LHM, Mulder JJS, Vanpoucke FJ (2008) Current steering and current focusing in cochlear implants: comparison of monopolar, tripolar, and virtual channel electrode configurations. Ear Hear 29(2):250\u2013260. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/AUD.0b013e3181645336","journal-title":"Ear Hear"},{"issue":"2","key":"1076_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"201","DOI":"10.1007\/s10162-024-00937-2","volume":"25","author":"F Gu\u00e9rit","year":"2024","unstructured":"Gu\u00e9rit F, Middlebrooks JC, Gransier R, Richardson ML, Wouters J, Carlyon RP (2024) Exploring the use of interleaved stimuli to measure cochlear-implant excitation patterns. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 25(2):201\u2013213. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10162-024-00937-2","journal-title":"J Assoc Res Otolaryngol"},{"key":"1076_CR24","unstructured":"Swanson BA (2024) Nucleus toolbox. Matlab. Retrieved from https:\/\/uk.mathworks.com\/matlabcentral\/fileexchange\/159688-nucleus-toolbox"},{"key":"1076_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-021-89932-8","author":"T Goehring","year":"2021","unstructured":"Goehring T, Archer-Boyd AW, Arenberg JG, Carlyon RP (2021) The effect of increased channel interaction on speech perception with cochlear implants. Sci Rep. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41598-021-89932-8","journal-title":"Sci Rep"},{"key":"1076_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3389\/fnins.2019.01173","author":"R Bachmaier","year":"2019","unstructured":"Bachmaier R, Encke J, Obando-Leit\u00f3n M, Hemmert W, Bai S (2019) Comparison of multi-compartment cable models of human auditory nerve fibers. Front Neurosci. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fnins.2019.01173","journal-title":"Front Neurosci"},{"key":"1076_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"89","DOI":"10.1016\/j.heares.2014.12.004","volume":"322","author":"RK Kalkman","year":"2015","unstructured":"Kalkman RK, Briaire JJ, Frijns JHM (2015) Current focussing in cochlear implants: an analysis of neural recruitment in a computational model. Hear Res 322:89\u201398. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.heares.2014.12.004","journal-title":"Hear Res"},{"key":"1076_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Swords C (2024) Anatomical and electrical characterisation of the human cochlea towards the improvement of cochlear implant performance. PhD thesis, University of Cambridge. Retrieved from https:\/\/doi.org\/10.17863\/CAM.112673","DOI":"10.17863\/CAM.112673"},{"key":"1076_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijporl.2023.111659","volume":"171","author":"DP Curtis","year":"2023","unstructured":"Curtis DP, Baumann AN, Jeyakumar A (2023) Variation in cochlear size: a systematic review. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 171:111659. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ijporl.2023.111659","journal-title":"Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol"},{"issue":"1\u20132","key":"1076_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"16","DOI":"10.1016\/j.heares.2011.12.009","volume":"284","author":"DM Landsberger","year":"2012","unstructured":"Landsberger DM, Padilla M, Srinivasan AG (2012) Reducing current spread using current focusing in cochlear implant users. Hear Res 284(1\u20132):16\u201324. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.heares.2011.12.009","journal-title":"Hear Res"},{"issue":"1\u20132","key":"1076_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"45","DOI":"10.1016\/j.heares.2011.11.005","volume":"283","author":"Z Zhu","year":"2012","unstructured":"Zhu Z, Tang Q, Zeng F-G, Guan T, Ye D (2012) Cochlear-implant spatial selectivity with monopolar, bipolar and tripolar stimulation. Hear Res 283(1\u20132):45\u201358. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.heares.2011.11.005","journal-title":"Hear Res"},{"issue":"2","key":"1076_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"145","DOI":"10.1007\/s10162-015-0549-1","volume":"17","author":"CC Wu","year":"2016","unstructured":"Wu CC, Luo X (2016) Excitation patterns of standard and steered partial tripolar stimuli in cochlear implants. JARO 17(2):145\u2013158. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10162-015-0549-1","journal-title":"JARO J Assoc Res Otolaryngol"},{"key":"1076_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.heares.2026.109571","volume":"473","author":"M Geys","year":"2026","unstructured":"Geys M, Sijgers L, Oesch TL, Boyle P, Chalupper J, Huber A, Pfiffner F (2026) Toward individualized cochlear implant programming: relating electrophysiological and psychophysical indicators of tonotopic region performance. Hear Res 473:109571. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.heares.2026.109571","journal-title":"Hear Res"},{"issue":"4","key":"1076_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"441","DOI":"10.1097\/AUD.0000000000000144","volume":"36","author":"RA Scheperle","year":"2015","unstructured":"Scheperle RA, Abbas PJ (2015) Relationships among peripheral and central electrophysiological measures of spatial and spectral selectivity and speech perception in cochlear implant users. Ear Hear 36(4):441\u2013453. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/AUD.0000000000000144","journal-title":"Ear Hear"},{"key":"1076_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1196","DOI":"10.1097\/aud.0000000000000837","volume":"41","author":"SR de Rijk","year":"2020","unstructured":"de Rijk SR, Tam YC, Carlyon RP, Bance ML (2020) Detection of extracochlear electrodes in cochlear implants with electric field imaging\/transimpedance measurements. Ear Hear 41:1196\u20131207. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/aud.0000000000000837","journal-title":"Ear Hear"},{"issue":"12","key":"1076_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2174","DOI":"10.1109\/TBME.2004.836518","volume":"51","author":"FJ Vanpoucke","year":"2004","unstructured":"Vanpoucke FJ, Zarowski AJ, Peeters SA (2004) Identification of the impedance model of an implanted cochlear prosthesis from intracochlear potential measurements. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 51(12):2174\u20132183. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/TBME.2004.836518","journal-title":"IEEE Trans Biomed Eng"},{"key":"1076_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1088\/1741-2552\/aaecff","volume":"16","author":"Q Mesnildrey","year":"2019","unstructured":"Mesnildrey Q, Macherey O, Herzog P, Venail F (2019) Impedance measures for a better understanding of the electrical stimulation of the inner ear. J Neural Eng 16:016023. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1088\/1741-2552\/aaecff","journal-title":"J Neural Eng"},{"key":"1076_CR38","unstructured":"Gu\u00e9rit F, de Rijk SR (2023) Voltage tools. Matlab. Retrieved from https:\/\/gitlab.developers.cam.ac.uk\/chg\/bob\/voltage-tools"},{"issue":"4","key":"1076_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"487","DOI":"10.1097\/AUD.0000000000000416","volume":"38","author":"D Vellinga","year":"2017","unstructured":"Vellinga D, Briaire JJ, Van Meenen DMP, Frijns JHM (2017) Comparison of multipole stimulus configurations with respect to loudness and spread of excitation. Ear Hear 38(4):487\u2013496. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/AUD.0000000000000416","journal-title":"Ear Hear"},{"key":"1076_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Long CJ, Nimmo-Smith I, Baguley DM, O\u2019Driscoll M, Ramsden R, Otto SR, Axon PR, Carlyon RP (2005) Optimizing the clinical fit of auditory brain stem implants. Ear and Hearing 26(3):251\u2013262.\u00a0https:\/\/www.ovid.com\/jnls\/ear-hearing\/abstract\/00003446-200506000-00002~optimizing-the-clinical-fit-of-auditory-brain-stem-implants","DOI":"10.1097\/00003446-200506000-00002"},{"issue":"3","key":"1076_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2209","DOI":"10.1121\/1.3683248","volume":"131","author":"CM McKay","year":"2012","unstructured":"McKay CM (2012) Forward masking as a method of measuring place specificity of neural excitation in cochlear implants: a review of methods and interpretation. J Acoust Soc Am 131(3):2209\u20132224. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1121\/1.3683248","journal-title":"J Acoust Soc Am"},{"key":"1076_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1177\/2331216515607067","volume":"19","author":"S Cosentino","year":"2015","unstructured":"Cosentino S, Deeks JM, Carlyon RP (2015) Procedural factors that affect psychophysical measures of spatial selectivity in cochlear implant users. Trends Hear 19:1\u201316. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/2331216515607067","journal-title":"Trends Hear"},{"issue":"6","key":"1076_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"645","DOI":"10.1097\/01.aud.0000246683.29611.1b","volume":"27","author":"JG Dingemanse","year":"2006","unstructured":"Dingemanse JG, Frijns JHM, Briaire JJ (2006) Psychophysical assessment of spatial spread of excitation in electrical hearing with single and dual electrode contact maskers. Ear Hear 27(6):645\u2013657. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/01.aud.0000246683.29611.1b","journal-title":"Ear Hear"},{"issue":"1","key":"1076_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"32","DOI":"10.1007\/s10162-003-3057-7","volume":"5","author":"JA Bierer","year":"2004","unstructured":"Bierer JA, Middlebrooks JC (2004) Cortical responses to cochlear implant stimulation: channel interactions. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 5(1):32\u201348. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10162-003-3057-7","journal-title":"J Assoc Res Otolaryngol"},{"key":"1076_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"497","DOI":"10.1007\/s10162-020-00767-y","volume":"21","author":"F Gu\u00e9rit","year":"2020","unstructured":"Gu\u00e9rit F, Marozeau J, Epp B, Carlyon RP (2020) Effect of the relative timing between same-polarity pulses on thresholds and loudness in cochlear implant users. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 21:497\u2013510. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10162-020-00767-y","journal-title":"J Assoc Res Otolaryngol"},{"issue":"5","key":"1076_CR46","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2751","DOI":"10.1121\/1.5070150","volume":"144","author":"F Gu\u00e9rit","year":"2018","unstructured":"Gu\u00e9rit F, Marozeau J, Deeks JM, Epp B, Carlyon RP (2018) Effects of the relative timing of opposite-polarity pulses on loudness for cochlear implant listeners. J Acoust Soc Am 144(5):2751\u20132763. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1121\/1.5070150","journal-title":"J Acoust Soc Am"},{"key":"1076_CR47","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"117","DOI":"10.1007\/BF02363130","volume":"7","author":"C van den Honert","year":"1979","unstructured":"van den Honert C, Mortimer JT (1979) The response of the myelinated nerve fiber to short duration biphasic stimulating currents. Ann Biomed Eng 7:117\u2013125. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/BF02363130","journal-title":"Ann Biomed Eng"},{"issue":"4","key":"1076_CR48","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2049","DOI":"10.1121\/1.1610451","volume":"114","author":"C Bo\u00ebx","year":"2003","unstructured":"Bo\u00ebx C, de Balthasar C, K\u00f3s M-I, Pelizzone M (2003) Electrical field interactions in different cochlear implant systems. J Acoust Soc Am 114(4):2049\u20132057. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1121\/1.1610451","journal-title":"J Acoust Soc Am"},{"issue":"1\u20132","key":"1076_CR49","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"77","DOI":"10.1016\/S0378-5955(03)00174-6","volume":"182","author":"C de Balthasar","year":"2003","unstructured":"de Balthasar C, Bo\u00ebx C, Cosendai G, Valentini G, Sigrist A, Pelizzone M (2003) Channel interactions with high-rate biphasic electrical stimulation in cochlear implant subjects. Hear Res 182(1\u20132):77\u201387. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S0378-5955(03)00174-6","journal-title":"Hear Res"},{"issue":"2","key":"1076_CR50","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"187","DOI":"10.1007\/s10162-013-0440-x","volume":"15","author":"D Ramekers","year":"2014","unstructured":"Ramekers D, Versnel H, Strahl SB, Smeets EM, Klis SFL, Grolman W (2014) Auditory-nerve responses to varied inter-phase gap and phase duration of the electric pulse stimulus as predictors for neuronal degeneration. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 15(2):187\u2013202. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10162-013-0440-x","journal-title":"J Assoc Res Otolaryngol"},{"issue":"1\u20132","key":"1076_CR51","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"47","DOI":"10.1016\/j.heares.2006.03.006","volume":"215","author":"P Prado-Guitierrez","year":"2006","unstructured":"Prado-Guitierrez P, Fewster LM, Heasman JM, McKay CM, Shepherd RK (2006) Effect of interphase gap and pulse duration on electrically evoked potentials is correlated with auditory nerve survival. Hear Res 215(1\u20132):47\u201355. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.heares.2006.03.006","journal-title":"Hear Res"},{"issue":"1","key":"1076_CR52","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"425","DOI":"10.1121\/1.4768881","volume":"133","author":"GL Jones","year":"2013","unstructured":"Jones GL, Ho Won J, Drennan WR, Rubinstein JT (2013) Relationship between channel interaction and spectral-ripple discrimination in cochlear implant users. J Acoust Soc Am 133(1):425\u2013433. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1121\/1.4768881","journal-title":"J Acoust Soc Am"},{"key":"1076_CR53","unstructured":"Smith ZM (2010) Multi-electrode channel configurations. Retrieved from https:\/\/patents.google.com\/patent\/US8954158B2\/en"},{"key":"1076_CR54","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"241","DOI":"10.1007\/s10162-008-0112-4","volume":"9","author":"O Macherey","year":"2008","unstructured":"Macherey O, Carlyon RP, van Wieringen A, Deeks JM, Wouters J (2008) Higher sensitivity of human auditory nerve fibers to positive electrical currents. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 9:241\u2013251. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10162-008-0112-4","journal-title":"J Assoc Res Otolaryngol"},{"key":"1076_CR55","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Carlyon RP, Guerit F, Deeks JM (2026) Measuring the effective polarity and level along the excitation patterns produced by focussed cochlear-implant stimulation. PsyArXiv. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.31234\/osf.io\/7smvk_v2","DOI":"10.31234\/osf.io\/7smvk_v2"},{"key":"1076_CR56","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"10","DOI":"10.1016\/j.heares.2014.06.003","volume":"315","author":"RK Kalkman","year":"2014","unstructured":"Kalkman RK, Briaire JJ, Dekker DMT, Frijns JHM (2014) Place pitch versus electrode location in a realistic computational model of the implanted human cochlea. Hear Res 315:10\u201324. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.heares.2014.06.003","journal-title":"Hear Res"},{"key":"1076_CR57","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.heares.2020.108001","volume":"393","author":"T Potrusil","year":"2020","unstructured":"Potrusil T, Heshmat A, Sajedi S, Wenger C, Johnson Chacko L, Glueckert R, Schrott-Fischer A, Rattay F (2020) Finite element analysis and three-dimensional reconstruction of tonotopically aligned human auditory fiber pathways: a computational environment for modeling electrical stimulation by a cochlear implant based on micro-CT. Hear Res 393:108001. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.heares.2020.108001","journal-title":"Hear Res"},{"issue":"11","key":"1076_CR58","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3300","DOI":"10.1109\/TBME.2022.3167113","volume":"69","author":"T Brochier","year":"2022","unstructured":"Brochier T, Schlittenlacher J, Roberts I, Goehring T, Jiang C, Vickers D, Bance M (2022) From microphone to phoneme: an end-to-end computational neural model for predicting speech perception with cochlear implants. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 69(11):3300\u20133312. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/TBME.2022.3167113","journal-title":"IEEE Trans Biomed Eng"},{"issue":"2","key":"1076_CR59","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"335","DOI":"10.1016\/S0306-4522(98)00330-3","volume":"89","author":"F Rattay","year":"1999","unstructured":"Rattay F (1999) The basic mechanism for the electrical stimulation of the nervous system. Neuroscience 89(2):335\u2013346. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S0306-4522(98)00330-3","journal-title":"Neuroscience"},{"issue":"9","key":"1076_CR60","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3495","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bpj.2008.12.3961","volume":"96","author":"S Joucla","year":"2009","unstructured":"Joucla S, Yvert B (2009) The \u2018mirror\u2019 estimate: an intuitive predictor of membrane polarization during extracellular stimulation. Biophys J 96(9):3495\u20133508. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.bpj.2008.12.3961","journal-title":"Biophys J"},{"issue":"6","key":"1076_CR61","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"609","DOI":"10.1007\/s10162-016-0582-8","volume":"17","author":"X Luo","year":"2016","unstructured":"Luo X, Wu CC (2016) Symmetric electrode spanning narrows the excitation patterns of partial tripolar stimuli in cochlear implants. JARO 17(6):609\u2013619. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10162-016-0582-8","journal-title":"JARO - Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology"},{"issue":"4","key":"1076_CR62","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"390","DOI":"10.1007\/s10162-005-0016-5","volume":"6","author":"F-G Zeng","year":"2005","unstructured":"Zeng F-G, Chen H, Han S (2005) Temporal masking in electric hearing. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 6(4):390\u2013400. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10162-005-0016-5","journal-title":"J Assoc Res Otolaryngol"},{"key":"1076_CR63","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"513","DOI":"10.1007\/s10162-016-0614-4","volume":"18","author":"O Macherey","year":"2017","unstructured":"Macherey O, Carlyon RP, Chatron J, Roman S (2017) Effect of pulse polarity on thresholds and on non-monotonic loudness growth in cochlear implant users. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 18:513\u2013527. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10162-016-0614-4","journal-title":"J Assoc Res Otolaryngol"},{"key":"1076_CR64","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"10","DOI":"10.1016\/j.heares.2013.01.015","volume":"299","author":"SA Karg","year":"2013","unstructured":"Karg SA, Lackner C, Hemmert W (2013) Temporal interaction in electrical hearing elucidates auditory nerve dynamics in humans. Hear Res 299:10\u201318. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.heares.2013.01.015","journal-title":"Hear Res"},{"key":"1076_CR65","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1088\/1741-2560\/12\/6\/066005","author":"SS George","year":"2015","unstructured":"George SS, Shivdasani MN, Wise AK, Shepherd RK, Fallon JB (2015) Electrophysiological channel interactions using focused multipolar stimulation for cochlear implants. J Neural Eng. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1088\/1741-2560\/12\/6\/066005","journal-title":"J Neural Eng"},{"issue":"3","key":"1076_CR66","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"108","DOI":"10.3109\/03005367909078884","volume":"13","author":"J Bench","year":"1979","unstructured":"Bench J, Kowal \u00c5, Bamford J (1979) The BKB (Bamford-Kowal-Bench) sentence lists for partially-hearing children. Br J Audiol 13(3):108\u2013112. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3109\/03005367909078884","journal-title":"Br J Audiol"},{"issue":"1","key":"1076_CR67","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"29","DOI":"10.3109\/03005369009077840","volume":"24","author":"A Macleod","year":"1990","unstructured":"Macleod A, Summerfield Q (1990) A procedure for measuring auditory and audiovisual speech-reception thresholds for sentences in noise: rationale, evaluation, and recommendations for use. Br J Audiol 24(1):29\u201343. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3109\/03005369009077840","journal-title":"Br J Audiol"}],"container-title":["Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10162-026-01076-6.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s10162-026-01076-6","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10162-026-01076-6.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,2]],"date-time":"2026-10-02T15:36:57Z","timestamp":1790955417000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s10162-026-01076-6"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,2]]},"references-count":67,"alternative-id":["1076"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10162-026-01076-6","relation":{},"ISSN":["1438-7573"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1438-7573","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,2]]},"assertion":[{"value":"14 October 2025","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"28 August 2026","order":2,"name":"revised","label":"Revised","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"13 September 2026","order":3,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"2 October 2026","order":4,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"Research was approved by the Cambridge Psychology Research Ethics Committee (CPREC 2017.085) and the National Research Ethics Service Committee for East of England (LREC 00\/327); all participants provided written consent before participating.","order":1,"name":"Ethics","label":"Ethics Approval","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing interests.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","label":"Competing interests","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"Large language models (LLMs) were not used for the generation of text or figures. A LLM was used to help with the statistical design, as well as the implementation in R.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","label":"Use of AI","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}}]}}