{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,29]],"date-time":"2026-10-29T14:20:40Z","timestamp":1793283640349,"version":"4.5.0"},"reference-count":26,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"15-16","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2010,8,1]],"date-time":"2010-08-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1280620800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Wien Med Wochenschr"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2010,8]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s10354-010-0779-0","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2010,9,1]],"date-time":"2010-09-01T13:35:49Z","timestamp":1283348149000},"page":"399-405","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":3,"title":["Expected frequency of femoral neck fractures by fall in the osteoporotic and osteopenic East Slovak female population: Epidemiological study","Erwartete H\u00e4ufigkeit von sturzbedingten Schenkelhalsfrakturen in der Population osteoporotischer und osteopenischer Frauen in der Ostslowakei: Eine epidemiologische Studie"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"160","author":[{"given":"Jaroslava","family":"Wendlova","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","reference":[{"key":"779_CR1","first-page":"16","volume":"11","author":"P Pietschmann","year":"2004","unstructured":"Pietschmann P, Kerschan-Schindl K. Knochenqualit\u00e4t \u2013 wissenschaftliche Aspekte versus praktische Relevanz. J Miner Stoffwechs, 11: 16\u201318, 2004","journal-title":"J Miner Stoffwechs"},{"key":"779_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1783","DOI":"10.1185\/03007990802115796","volume":"24","author":"S Boonen","year":"2008","unstructured":"Boonen S, Singer AJ. Osteoporosis management: impact of fracture type on cost and quality of life in patient at risk of fracture. Curr Med Res Opin, 24: 1783\u20131790, 2008","journal-title":"Curr Med Res Opin"},{"key":"779_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"417","DOI":"10.1007\/s001980170112","volume":"12","author":"JA Kanis","year":"2001","unstructured":"Kanis JA, Oden A, Johnell O, et al. The burden of osteoporotic fractures: a method for setting intervention thresholds. Osteoporos Int, 12: 417\u2013427, 2001","journal-title":"Osteoporos Int"},{"key":"779_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"429","DOI":"10.1007\/s00198-003-1395-2","volume":"14","author":"HW Finnern","year":"2003","unstructured":"Finnern HW, Sykes DP. The hospital cost of vertebral fractures in the EU: estimates using national data sets. Osteoporos Int, 14: 429\u2013436, 2003","journal-title":"Osteoporos Int"},{"key":"779_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"78","DOI":"10.1007\/s00198-004-1646-x","volume":"16","author":"R Lindsay","year":"2005","unstructured":"Lindsay R, Burge RT, Strauss DM. One year outcomes and costs following a vertebral fracture. Osteoporos Int, 16: 78\u201385, 2005","journal-title":"Osteoporos Int"},{"key":"779_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1346","DOI":"10.1007\/s00198-005-0066-x","volume":"17","author":"V Rabenda","year":"2006","unstructured":"Rabenda V, Manette C, Lemmens R, et al. The direct and indirect costs of the chronic management of osteoporosis: a prospective follow-up of 3440 active subjects. Osteoporos Int, 17: 1346\u20131352, 2006","journal-title":"Osteoporos Int"},{"key":"779_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"385","DOI":"10.1007\/s00198-007-0543-5","volume":"19","author":"JA Kanis","year":"2008","unstructured":"Kanis JA, Johnell O, Oden A, et al. FRAXTM and the assessment of fracture probability in men and women from UK. Osteoporos Int, 19: 385\u2013397, 2008","journal-title":"Osteoporos Int"},{"key":"779_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"429","DOI":"10.1007\/s00198-007-0544-4","volume":"19","author":"S Fujiwara","year":"2008","unstructured":"Fujiwara S, Nakamura T, Orimo H, et al. Development and application of a Japanese model of the WHO fracture risk assessment tool (FRAXTM). Osteoporos Int, 19: 429\u2013435, 2008","journal-title":"Osteoporos Int"},{"key":"779_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1071","DOI":"10.1002\/jbmr.5650090715","volume":"9","author":"T Nakamura","year":"1994","unstructured":"Nakamura T, Turner CH, Yoshikawa T, et al. Do variations in hip geometry explain differences in hip fracture risk between Japanese and white Americans? J Bone Miner Res, 9: 1071\u20131076, 1994","journal-title":"J Bone Miner Res"},{"key":"779_CR10","first-page":"174","volume-title":"Statistical methods for economists","author":"V Pac\u00e1kov\u00e1","year":"2009","unstructured":"Pac\u00e1kov\u00e1 V. Statistical methods for economists. 2nd ed. Bratislava: Iura Edition, pp 174\u2013177, 2009","edition":"2"},{"key":"779_CR11","first-page":"1","volume":"3","author":"S Varga","year":"2009","unstructured":"Varga S. Another view on the fuzzy regression. Forum Statisticum Slovacum, 3: 1\u20137, 2009","journal-title":"Forum Statisticum Slovacum"},{"key":"779_CR12","first-page":"67","volume-title":"Applied actuarial statistics (Aplikovan\u00e1 poistn\u00e1 \u0161tatistika)","author":"V Pac\u00e1kov\u00e1","year":"2004","unstructured":"Pac\u00e1kov\u00e1 V. Applied actuarial statistics (Aplikovan\u00e1 poistn\u00e1 \u0161tatistika). 1st ed. Bratislava: Iura Edition, pp 67\u201386, 2004","edition":"1"},{"key":"779_CR13","first-page":"41","volume-title":"Analysis of categorical data. (Anal\u00fdza kategori\u00e1lnych \u00fadajov)","author":"E Rubl\u00edkov\u00e1","year":"2009","unstructured":"Rubl\u00edkov\u00e1 E, Labudov\u00e1 V, Sandtnerov\u00e1 S. Analysis of categorical data. (Anal\u00fdza kategori\u00e1lnych \u00fadajov). 1st ed. Bratislava: Economic University Bratislava, pp 41\u2013141, 2009","edition":"1"},{"key":"779_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"427","DOI":"10.1016\/S0020-1383(02)00076-1","volume":"33","author":"C Kukla","year":"2002","unstructured":"Kukla C, Gaebler C, Pichl RW, et al. Predictive geometric factors in a standardized model of femoral neck fracture. Experimental study of cadaveric human femurs. Injury, Int Care Injured, 33: 427\u2013433, 2002","journal-title":"Injury, Int Care Injured"},{"key":"779_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"5","DOI":"10.1007\/s00198-003-1451-y","volume":"15","author":"JS Gregory","year":"2004","unstructured":"Gregory JS, Testil D, Stewart A, et al. A method for assessment of the shape of the proximal femur and its relationship to osteoporotic hip fracture. Osteoporos Int, 15: 5\u201311, 2004","journal-title":"Osteoporos Int"},{"key":"779_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"714","DOI":"10.1007\/s001980070071","volume":"11","author":"C Alonso Gomez","year":"2000","unstructured":"Alonso Gomez C, Curiel Diaz M, Carranza Hawkins F, et al. Femoral bone mineral density, neck shaft angle and mean femoral neck with as predictors of hip fracture in men and women. Osteoporos Int, 11: 714\u2013720, 2000","journal-title":"Osteoporos Int"},{"key":"779_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1299","DOI":"10.1007\/s00198-005-1988-z","volume":"16","author":"S El Kaissi","year":"2005","unstructured":"El Kaissi S, Pasco JA, Henry MJ, et al. Femoral neck geometry and hip fracture risk: the Geelong osteoporosis study. Osteoporos Int, 16: 1299\u20131303, 2005","journal-title":"Osteoporos Int"},{"key":"779_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"847","DOI":"10.1007\/s00198-004-1681-7","volume":"15","author":"NB Watts","year":"2004","unstructured":"Watts NB. Fundamentals and pitfalls of bone densitometry using dual \u2013 energy X-ray absorbtiometry (DXA). Osteoporos Int, 15: 847\u2013854, 2004","journal-title":"Osteoporos Int"},{"key":"779_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"219","DOI":"10.1259\/bjr\/79551075","volume":"77","author":"S Gnudi","year":"2004","unstructured":"Gnudi S, Malavolta N, Testi D, Viceconti M. Differences in proximal femur geometry distinguish vertebral from femoral neck fractures in osteoporotic women. Br J Radiol, 77: 219\u2013223, 2004","journal-title":"Br J Radiol"},{"key":"779_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"69","DOI":"10.1007\/s198-002-8340-2","volume":"13","author":"S Gnudi","year":"2002","unstructured":"Gnudi S, Ripamonti C, Lisi L, et al. Proximal femur geometry to detect and distinguish femoral neck fractures from trochanteric fractures in postmenopausal women. Osteoporos Int, 13: 69\u201373, 2002","journal-title":"Osteoporos Int"},{"key":"779_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"593","DOI":"10.1007\/s00198-005-0019-4","volume":"17","author":"KG Faulkner","year":"2006","unstructured":"Faulkner KG, Wacker WK, Barden HS, et al. Femur strength index predicts hip fracture independent of bone density and hip axis length. Osteoporos Int, 17: 593\u2013599, 2006","journal-title":"Osteoporos Int"},{"key":"779_CR22","first-page":"502","volume":"109","author":"J Wendlov\u00e1","year":"2008","unstructured":"Wendlov\u00e1 J. Why is so important to balance the muscular dysbalance in mm coxae Area in osteoporotic patients? Bratisl lek listy, 109: 502\u2013507, 2008","journal-title":"Bratisl lek listy"},{"key":"779_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"169","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bone.2006.06.018","volume":"40","author":"X Cheng","year":"2007","unstructured":"Cheng X, Li J, Lu Y, et al. Proximal femoral density and geometry measurements by quantitative computed tomography. Association with hip fracture. Bone, 40: 169\u2013174, 2007","journal-title":"Bone"},{"key":"779_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1539","DOI":"10.1007\/s00198-006-0162-6","volume":"17","author":"SL Manske","year":"2006","unstructured":"Manske SL, Liu Ambrose T, De Bakker PM, et al. Femoral neck cortical geometry measured with magnetic resonance imaging is associated with proximal femur strength. Osteoporos Int, 17: 1539\u20131545, 2006","journal-title":"Osteoporos Int"},{"key":"779_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"855","DOI":"10.1007\/s00198-006-0074-5","volume":"17","author":"V Bousson","year":"2006","unstructured":"Bousson V, Le Brass A, Roqueplan F, et al. Volumetric quantitative computed tomography of the proximal femur: relationships linking geometric and densitometric variables to bone strength. Role for compact bone. Osteoporos Int, 17: 855\u2013864, 2006","journal-title":"Osteoporos Int"},{"key":"779_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"123","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jocd.2007.12.010","volume":"11","author":"K Engelke","year":"2008","unstructured":"Engelke K, Adams JE, Armbrecht G, et al. Clinical use of quantitative computed tomography and peripheral quantitative computed tomography in the management of osteoporosis in adults. The 2007 ICSD official position. J Clin Densit, 11: 123\u2013162, 2008","journal-title":"J Clin Densit"}],"container-title":["Wiener Medizinische Wochenschrift"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10354-010-0779-0.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s10354-010-0779-0\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10354-010-0779-0","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2019,5,29]],"date-time":"2019-05-29T16:03:52Z","timestamp":1559145832000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s10354-010-0779-0"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2010,8]]},"references-count":26,"journal-issue":{"issue":"15-16","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2010,8]]}},"alternative-id":["779"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10354-010-0779-0","relation":{},"ISSN":["0043-5341","1563-258X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0043-5341","type":"print"},{"value":"1563-258X","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2010,8]]}}}