{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,17]],"date-time":"2025-04-17T04:09:09Z","timestamp":1744862949870,"version":"3.40.4"},"reference-count":27,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,1,23]],"date-time":"2025-01-23T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1737590400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,1,23]],"date-time":"2025-01-23T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1737590400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100009827","name":"Alexandria University","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100009827","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"crossref"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Jpn J Ophthalmol"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,3]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n          <jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>Purpose<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>To compare the surgical outcomes of visco-circumferential-suture-trabeculotomy (VCST) and rigid probe segmental viscotrabeculotomy (VT) in primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG).<\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>\n          <jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>Study design<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>A prospective randomized controlled study.<\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>\n          <jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>Patients and Methods<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>Patients presenting with POAG and operated upon in Mansoura Ophthalmic Center in Mansoura, Egypt between February 2017 and September 2021 were enrolled. Study eyes were randomized to either VCST or VT and follow up extended for 24 months. Success was defined as an intra ocular pressure (IOP)\u226418 mmHg with a 40% reduction from baseline. Complications were noted.<\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>\n          <jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>The study enrolled 166 (82 in the circumferential group) eyes of 107 patients. There were no statistically significant differences between both groups in any demographic or preoperative clinical characteristics. The IOP trend demonstrated marked initial reduction (from 32.3\u00b12.4 and 31.8\u00b12.6 mmHg preoperatively in VCST and VT groups respectively) followed by a slow gradual rise over subsequent follow-up settling at lower IOP values in the circumferential (12.4\u00b11.2 mmHg) than in the segmental group (15.5\u00b10.9 mmHg) (p&lt;0.001), both settling at significantly lower levels than preoperative values. The survival curve demonstrates complete success rates at 12, 15, 18, and 24 months were 98.8%, 96.4%, 95.1%, and 85.4% in the circumferential group and 98.8%, 92.9%, 91.7%, 79.8% in the segmental group respectively. Minimal self-limiting hyphema was universal in all study eyes.<\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>\n          <jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>Angle procedures -segmental and circumferential- are effective in lowering the IOP for at least 2 years in eyes with POAG, with circumferential angle surgery providing a greater reduction of IOP and requiring fewer subsequent glaucoma procedures.<\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1007\/s10384-024-01150-7","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,1,23]],"date-time":"2025-01-23T07:26:00Z","timestamp":1737617160000},"page":"279-286","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Two-year randomized controlled trial of circumferential versus segmental ab externo angle surgery in patients with primary open angle glaucoma"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"69","author":[{"given":"Ahmed Samy","family":"Elwehidy","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Nader Hussein Lotfy","family":"Bayoumi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Mostafa A. S.","family":"Elwehidy","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Nashaat Shawky","family":"Zaky","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Sherein M.","family":"Hagras","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Nader H. L.","family":"Bayoumi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,1,23]]},"reference":[{"key":"1150_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"262","DOI":"10.1136\/bjo.2005.081224","volume":"90","author":"HA Quigley","year":"2006","unstructured":"Quigley HA, Broman AT. The number of people with glaucoma worldwide in 2010 and 2020. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006;90:262\u20137.","journal-title":"Br J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"1150_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"86","DOI":"10.1136\/bjophthalmol-2015-307223","volume":"100","author":"VV Kapetanakis","year":"2016","unstructured":"Kapetanakis VV, Chan MPY, Foster PJ, Cook DG, Owen CG, Rudnicka AR. Global variations and time trends in the prevalence of primary open angle glaucoma (POAG): a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Ophthalmol. 2016;100:86\u201393.","journal-title":"Br J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"1150_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lusthaus J, Goldberg I. Current management of glaucoma. Med J Aust [Internet]. 2019 Mar 1 [cited 2023 Sep 14];210(4):180\u20137","DOI":"10.5694\/mja2.50020"},{"key":"1150_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"804","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajo.2011.10.024","volume":"153","author":"SJ Gedde","year":"2012","unstructured":"Gedde SJ, Herndon LW, Brandt JD, Budenz DL, Feuer WJ, Schiffman JC. Postoperative complications in the Tube Versus Trabeculectomy (TVT) study during five years of follow-up. Am J Ophthalmol. 2012;153:804\u201314. e1.","journal-title":"Am J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"1150_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Riva I, Brusini P, Oddone F, Michelessi M, Weinreb RN, Quaranta L. Canaloplasty in the treatment of open-angle glaucoma: a review of patient selection and outcomes. Adv Ther;36:31\u201343.","DOI":"10.1007\/s12325-018-0842-6"},{"key":"1150_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"389","DOI":"10.1186\/s12886-020-01645-0","volume":"20","author":"H Wang","year":"2020","unstructured":"Wang H, Xin C, Han Y, Shi Y, Ziaei S, Wang N. Intermediate outcomes of ab externo circumferential trabeculotomy and canaloplasty in POAG patients with prior incisional glaucoma surgery. BMC Ophthalmol. 2020;20:389.","journal-title":"BMC Ophthalmol"},{"key":"1150_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"884","DOI":"10.1097\/IJG.0000000000001331","volume":"28","author":"Z Aktas","year":"2019","unstructured":"Aktas Z, Ucgul AY, Bektas C, Sahin Karamert S. Surgical outcomes of prolene gonioscopy-assisted transluminal trabeculotomy in patients with moderate to advanced open-angle glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 2019;28:884\u20138.","journal-title":"J Glaucoma"},{"key":"1150_CR8","first-page":"587","volume":"84","author":"BM de Faria","year":"2021","unstructured":"de Faria BM, Daga FB, Rebou\u00e7as-Santos V, de Ara\u00fajo RB, Neto CM, Jacobina JS, et al. Gonioscopy-assisted transluminal trabeculotomy (GATT) outcomes in eyes with open-angle glaucoma resistant to maximum treatment. Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2021;84:587\u201393.","journal-title":"Arq Bras Oftalmol"},{"key":"1150_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1088","DOI":"10.1097\/IJG.0000000000001627","volume":"29","author":"D Yalinbas","year":"2020","unstructured":"Yalinbas D, Dilekmen N, Hepsen IF. Comparison of ab externo and ab interno 360-degree suture trabeculotomy in adult open-angle glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 2020;29:1088\u201394.","journal-title":"J Glaucoma"},{"key":"1150_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"858","DOI":"10.1111\/ceo.12778","volume":"44","author":"Z Aktas","year":"2016","unstructured":"Aktas Z, Hepsen IF, Dilekmen N, Onol M. Are the outcomes of circumferential trabeculotomy for adult open angle glaucoma comparable to those of trabeculectomy? Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2016;44:858\u20139.","journal-title":"Clin Exp Ophthalmol"},{"key":"1150_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1137","DOI":"10.1097\/IJG.0000000000000802","volume":"26","author":"K Rahmatnejad","year":"2017","unstructured":"Rahmatnejad K, Pruzan NL, Amanullah S, Shaukat BA, Resende AF, Waisbourd M, et al. Surgical outcomes of gonioscopy-assisted transluminal trabeculotomy (GATT) in patients with open-angle glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 2017;26:1137\u201343.","journal-title":"J Glaucoma"},{"key":"1150_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"393","DOI":"10.1097\/IJG.0000000000000956","volume":"27","author":"DS Grover","year":"2018","unstructured":"Grover DS, Smith O, Fellman RL, Godfrey DG, Gupta A, De Oca IM, et al. Gonioscopy-assisted transluminal trabeculotomy: an ab interno circumferential trabeculotomy: 24 months follow-up. J Glaucoma. 2018;27:393\u2013401.","journal-title":"J Glaucoma"},{"key":"1150_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"786","DOI":"10.1177\/1120672120922453","volume":"31","author":"AS Elwehidy","year":"2021","unstructured":"Elwehidy AS, Hagras SM, Bayoumi N, AbdelGhafar AE, Badawi AE. Five-year results of viscotrabeculotomy versus conventional trabeculotomy in primary congenital glaucoma: a randomized controlled study. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2021;31:786\u201395.","journal-title":"Eur J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"1150_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"30","DOI":"10.1097\/IJG.0000000000002218","volume":"32","author":"AS Elwehidy","year":"2023","unstructured":"Elwehidy AS, Bayoumi NH, Elzeini RM, Abdelkader A. Visco-circumferential-suture-trabeculotomy versus rigid-probe viscotrabeculotomy in neonatal-onset primary congenital glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 2023;32:30.","journal-title":"J Glaucoma"},{"key":"1150_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"371","DOI":"10.1097\/IJG.0000000000000892","volume":"27","author":"YM El Sayed","year":"2018","unstructured":"El Sayed YM, Gawdat GI. Microcatheter-assisted trabeculotomy versus 2-site trabeculotomy with the rigid probe trabeculotome in primary congenital glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 2018;27:371\u20136.","journal-title":"J Glaucoma"},{"key":"1150_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"795172","DOI":"10.3389\/fmed.2021.795172","volume":"8","author":"W Zhang","year":"2021","unstructured":"Zhang W, Wang Y, Xin C, Sun Y, Cao K, Wang H, et al. Ab interno vs. ab externo microcatheter-assisted circumferential trabeculotomy in treating patients with primary open-angle glaucoma. Front Med. 2021;8:795172.","journal-title":"Front Med"},{"key":"1150_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"48","DOI":"10.1097\/IJG.0000000000001944","volume":"31","author":"AS Elwehidy","year":"2022","unstructured":"Elwehidy AS, Bayoumi NHL, Abd Elfattah D, Hagras SM. Surgical outcomes of visco-circumferential-suture-trabeculotomy versus rigid probe trabeculotomy in primary congenital glaucoma: a 3-year randomized controlled study. J Glaucoma. 2022;31:48\u201353.","journal-title":"J Glaucoma"},{"key":"1150_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"395","DOI":"10.1007\/s10384-020-00801-9","volume":"65","author":"AS Elwehidy","year":"2021","unstructured":"Elwehidy AS, Mokbel TH, Bayoumi NHL, Badawi AE, Hagras SM. Viscotrabeculotomy versus trabeculectomy in the surgical treatment of open angle glaucoma: a single center, randomised controlled trial. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2021;65:395\u2013401.","journal-title":"Jpn J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"1150_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"449","DOI":"10.1097\/IJG.0b013e31829484df","volume":"23","author":"JB Dao","year":"2014","unstructured":"Dao JB, Sarkisian SR, Freedman SF. Illuminated microcatheter-facilitated 360-degree trabeculotomy for refractory aphakic and juvenile open-angle glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 2014;23:449\u201354.","journal-title":"J Glaucoma"},{"key":"1150_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajo.2016.11.011","volume":"175","author":"ME Lim","year":"2017","unstructured":"Lim ME, Dao JB, Freedman SF. 360-degree trabeculotomy for medically refractory glaucoma following cataract surgery and juvenile open-angle glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 2017;175:1\u20137.","journal-title":"Am J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"1150_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"4254","DOI":"10.1167\/iovs.06-0299","volume":"47","author":"AR Rudnicka","year":"2006","unstructured":"Rudnicka AR, Mt.-Isa S, Owen CG, Cook DG, Ashby D. Variations in primary open-angle glaucoma prevalence by age, gender, and race: a bayesian meta-analysis. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47:4254\u201361.","journal-title":"Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci"},{"key":"1150_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-020-79139-8","volume":"11","author":"N Zhang","year":"2021","unstructured":"Zhang N, Wang J, Li Y, Jiang B. Prevalence of primary open angle glaucoma in the last 20 years: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Sci Rep. 2021;11:1\u201312.","journal-title":"Sci Rep"},{"key":"1150_CR23","unstructured":"Mahabadi N, Zeppieri M, Tripathy K. Open Angle Glaucoma. [Updated March 7 2024]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; January 2024. https:\/\/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/books\/NBK441887\/ Accessed 14 November 2024."},{"key":"1150_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"46","DOI":"10.3390\/jcm11010046","volume":"11","author":"M Takata","year":"2022","unstructured":"Takata M, Ishikawa H, Ikeda T, Gomi F. Conventional trabeculotomy versus gonioscopy-assisted transluminal trabeculotomy: a retrospective cohort study. J Clin Med. 2022;11:46.","journal-title":"J Clin Med"},{"key":"1150_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"118","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajo.2023.08.002","volume":"256","author":"Y Zhang","year":"2023","unstructured":"Zhang Y, Yu P, Zhang Y, Sugihara K, Zhu X, Zhang Y, et al. Influence of goniotomy size on treatment safety and efficacy for primary open-angle glaucoma: a multicenter study. Am J Ophthalmol. 2023;256:118\u201325.","journal-title":"Am J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"1150_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"255","DOI":"10.4103\/tjo.tjo_63_20","volume":"10","author":"H Jayaram","year":"2020","unstructured":"Jayaram H. Intraocular pressure reduction in glaucoma: does every mmHg count? Taiwan J Ophthalmol. 2020;10:255.","journal-title":"Taiwan J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"1150_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"401","DOI":"10.1097\/IJG.0b013e318218240c","volume":"21","author":"S Chin","year":"2012","unstructured":"Chin S, Nitta T, Shinmei Y, Aoyagi M, Nitta A, Ohno S, et al. Reduction of intraocular pressure using a modified 360-degree suture trabeculotomy technique in primary and secondary open-angle glaucoma: a pilot study. J Glaucoma. 2012;21:401\u20137.","journal-title":"J Glaucoma"}],"container-title":["Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10384-024-01150-7.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s10384-024-01150-7\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10384-024-01150-7.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,16]],"date-time":"2025-04-16T11:04:39Z","timestamp":1744801479000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s10384-024-01150-7"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,1,23]]},"references-count":27,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,3]]}},"alternative-id":["1150"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10384-024-01150-7","relation":{},"ISSN":["0021-5155","1613-2246"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0021-5155"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1613-2246"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,1,23]]},"assertion":[{"value":"15 April 2024","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"14 November 2024","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"23 January 2025","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"A. S. Elwehidy, None; N. HL. Bayoumi, None; M. AS. Elwehidy, None; N. S. Zaky, None; S. M. Hagras, None.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}}]}}