{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,17]],"date-time":"2025-04-17T04:09:09Z","timestamp":1744862949891,"version":"3.40.4"},"reference-count":29,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,7]],"date-time":"2025-02-07T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1738886400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,7]],"date-time":"2025-02-07T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1738886400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100004206","name":"Osaka University","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100004206","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"crossref"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Jpn J Ophthalmol"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,3]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n          <jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>Purpose<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>To investigate the safety and aesthetic outcomes of silicone buckle #506 for anophthalmic socket reconstruction.<\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>\n          <jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>Study Design<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>Retrospective cohort study.<\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>\n          <jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>Patients who underwent enucleation or evisceration at the Osaka University Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. Patients under 18 years old, with &lt;\u20093 months follow-up, without a prosthesis, or with bilateral surgery were excluded. Aesthetic outcomes were assessed using standardized photographs taken 3 months postoperatively, scored by five independent ophthalmologists for upper eyelid sulcus deepening asymmetry. Scoring was categorized as 0: no noticeable side difference, 1: slight asymmetry, and 2: marked asymmetry characterized by upper eyelid sulcus deepening.<\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>\n          <jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>Fifty-nine patients (60 sockets) were analyzed. Thirty-three received silicone buckle implants (1\u20134 buckles). Implant exposure occurred in two patients (6.1%). Aesthetic scores were assessed in 48 patients. Mean aesthetic scores were 0.97 (no implant), 0.78 (one buckle), 0.68 (two buckles), and 0.42 (three\/four buckles) (<jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u20090.123).<\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>\n          <jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>Silicone buckle #506 appears to be a safe and feasible option for anophthalmic socket reconstruction. Further studies are needed to optimize aesthetic outcomes and determine the ideal number of buckles.<\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1007\/s10384-025-01164-9","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,7]],"date-time":"2025-02-07T06:22:19Z","timestamp":1738909339000},"page":"214-220","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Safety and aesthetic outcomes of silicone buckles as an implant for anophthalmic sockets: a decade of experience in Japan"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"69","author":[{"given":"Rikako","family":"Iwasaki","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-0135-9715","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Yoshiyuki","family":"Kitaguchi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Takeshi","family":"Morimoto","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Hiroshi","family":"Shimojo","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Takahiro","family":"Fujino","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Shimpei","family":"Komoto","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Kohji","family":"Nishida","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,7]]},"reference":[{"key":"1164_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"253","DOI":"10.1080\/02713683.2020.1712423","volume":"45","author":"M Borrelli","year":"2020","unstructured":"Borrelli M, Geerling G, Spaniol K, Witt J. Eye socket regeneration and reconstruction. Curr Eye Res. 2020;45:253\u201364.","journal-title":"Curr Eye Res"},{"key":"1164_CR2","first-page":"325","volume":"120","author":"G Stephen","year":"2002","unstructured":"Stephen G, et al. Twenty-year follow-up for scleral buckling. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2002;120:325\u20139.","journal-title":"JAMA Ophthalmol"},{"key":"1164_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1993","DOI":"10.1177\/1120672120940209","volume":"31","author":"R Paolo","year":"2021","unstructured":"Paolo R, et al. Standardized scleral buckling approach in the management of noncomplex primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2021;31:1993\u20132002.","journal-title":"Eur J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"1164_CR4","first-page":"124","volume":"13","author":"K Ra","year":"2020","unstructured":"Ra K, Ra S, Chiba M, Kurosaki S, Mori K. Ra\u2019s orbital implant fixed with 6 muscles and long term follow up of prosthesis motility. Folia Japonica De Ophthalmol Clin. 2020;13:124\u20139. (in Japanese).","journal-title":"Folia Japonica De Ophthalmol Clin"},{"key":"1164_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"336","DOI":"10.1097\/IOP.0000000000000987","volume":"34","author":"TV Dave","year":"2018","unstructured":"Dave TV, Ezeanosike E, Basu S, Ali MJ, Kaliki S, Naik MN. Effect of optic nerve disinsertion during evisceration on nonporous implant migration: a comparative case series and a review of literature. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018;34:336\u201341.","journal-title":"Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg"},{"key":"1164_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"364","DOI":"10.1097\/01.IOP.0000083643.36461.84","volume":"19","author":"SM Blaydon","year":"2003","unstructured":"Blaydon SM, Shepler TR, Neuhaus RW, White WL, Shore JW. The porous polyethylene (medpor) spherical orbital implant: a retrospective study of 136 cases. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;19:364\u201371.","journal-title":"Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg"},{"key":"1164_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"37","DOI":"10.1080\/01676830701512585","volume":"27","author":"SA Sadiq","year":"2008","unstructured":"Sadiq SA, Mengher LS, Lowry J, Downes R. Integrated orbital implants\u2013a comparison of hydroxyapatite and porous polyethylene implants. Orbit. 2008;27:37\u201340.","journal-title":"Orbit"},{"key":"1164_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"919","DOI":"10.1016\/S0161-6420(98)95038-2","volume":"105","author":"PA Rubin","year":"1998","unstructured":"Rubin PA, Popham J, Rumelt S, Remulla H, Bilyk JR, Holds J, et al. Enhancement of the cosmetic and functional outcome of enucleation with the conical orbital implant. Ophthalmology. 1998;105:919\u201325.","journal-title":"Ophthalmology"},{"key":"1164_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"431","DOI":"10.1097\/00002341-200111000-00009","volume":"17","author":"T Li","year":"2001","unstructured":"Li T, Shen J, Duffy MT. Exposure rates of wrapped and unwrapped orbital implants following enucleation. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;17:431\u20135.","journal-title":"Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg"},{"key":"1164_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"253","DOI":"10.1111\/aos.12960","volume":"94","author":"HP Jongman","year":"2016","unstructured":"Jongman HP, Marinkovic M, Notting I, Koetsier L, Swart W, Schalij-Delfos NE, et al. Donor sclera-wrapped acrylic orbital implants following enucleation: experience in 179 patients in the Netherlands. Acta Ophthalmol. 2016;94:253\u20136.","journal-title":"Acta Ophthalmol"},{"key":"1164_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"269","DOI":"10.1097\/01.iop.0000225749.83440.2a","volume":"22","author":"PL Custer","year":"2006","unstructured":"Custer PL, McCaffery S. Complications of sclera-covered enucleation implants. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;22:269\u201373.","journal-title":"Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg"},{"key":"1164_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"90","DOI":"10.1097\/00002341-199306000-00003","volume":"9","author":"WR Nunery","year":"1993","unstructured":"Nunery WR, Cepela MA, Heinz GW, Zale D, Martin RT. Extrusion rate of silicone spherical anophthalmic socket implants. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 1993;9:90\u20135.","journal-title":"Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg"},{"key":"1164_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"364","DOI":"10.1097\/IOP.0b013e31821c1298","volume":"27","author":"TS Wells","year":"2011","unstructured":"Wells TS, Harris GJ. Direct fixation of extraocular muscles to a silicone sphere: a cost-sensitive, low-risk enucleation procedure. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;27:364\u20137.","journal-title":"Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg"},{"key":"1164_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"220","DOI":"10.1097\/01.IOP.0000159174.80985.E2","volume":"21","author":"AD Abel","year":"2005","unstructured":"Abel AD, Meyer DR. Enucleation with primary implant insertion for treatment of recalcitrant endophthalmitis and panophthalmitis. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;21:220\u20136.","journal-title":"Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg"},{"key":"1164_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"675","DOI":"10.1038\/s41433-019-0571-3","volume":"34","author":"MM Sobti","year":"2020","unstructured":"Sobti MM, Shams F, Jawaheer L, Cauchi P, Chadha V. Unwrapped hydroxyapatite orbital implants: our experience in 347 cases. Eye (Lond). 2020;34:675\u201382.","journal-title":"Eye (Lond)"},{"key":"1164_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"324","DOI":"10.1016\/S0161-6420(97)30316-9","volume":"104","author":"JH Oestreicher","year":"1997","unstructured":"Oestreicher JH, Liu E, Berkowitz M. Complications of hydroxyapatite orbital implants: a review of 100 consecutive cases and a comparison of Dexon mesh (polyglycolic acid) with scleral wrapping. Ophthalmology. 1997;104:324\u20139.","journal-title":"Ophthalmology"},{"key":"1164_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"566","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2007.06.014","volume":"115","author":"JS Yoon","year":"2008","unstructured":"Yoon JS, Lew H, Kim SJ, Lee SY. Exposure rate of hydroxyapatite orbital implants: a 15-year experience of 802 cases. Ophthalmology. 2008;115:566\u2013e5722.","journal-title":"Ophthalmology"},{"key":"1164_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"29","DOI":"10.1038\/eye.1996.4","volume":"10","author":"JL Ashworth","year":"1996","unstructured":"Ashworth JL, Rhatigan M, Sampath R, Brammar R, Sunderland S, Leatherbarrow B. The hydroxyapatite orbital implant: a prospective study. Eye (Lond). 1996;10:29\u201337.","journal-title":"Eye (Lond)"},{"key":"1164_CR19","first-page":"185","volume":"5","author":"CP Tataru","year":"2012","unstructured":"Tataru CP, Pop MD. Enucleation in malignant choroidal melanoma\u2013result in 15 years of using a new material in the prosthesis of the orbital cavity. J Med Life. 2012;5:185\u20138.","journal-title":"J Med Life"},{"key":"1164_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"128","DOI":"10.1097\/01.IOP.0000056027.63698.FE","volume":"19","author":"DR Jordan","year":"2003","unstructured":"Jordan DR, Gilberg S, Mawn LA. The bioceramic orbital implant: experience with 107 implants. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;19:128\u201335.","journal-title":"Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg"},{"key":"1164_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"162","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajo.2008.05.001","volume":"147","author":"JK Wang","year":"2009","unstructured":"Wang JK, Lai PC, Liao SL. Late exposure of the bioceramic orbital implant. Am J Ophthalmol. 2009;147:162\u2013e701.","journal-title":"Am J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"1164_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"80","DOI":"10.1097\/IOP.0b013e3181b80c30","volume":"26","author":"DR Jordan","year":"2010","unstructured":"Jordan DR, Klapper SR, Gilberg SM, Dutton JJ, Wong A, Mawn L. The bioceramic implant: evaluation of implant exposures in 419 implants. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;26:80\u20132.","journal-title":"Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg"},{"key":"1164_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2270","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2006.06.021","volume":"113","author":"T Nakra","year":"2006","unstructured":"Nakra T, Simon GJ, Douglas RS, Schwarcz RM, McCann JD, Goldberg RA. Comparing outcomes of enucleation and evisceration. Ophthalmology. 2006;113:2270\u20135.","journal-title":"Ophthalmology"},{"key":"1164_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"53","DOI":"10.1097\/00002341-200301000-00007","volume":"19","author":"DR Jordan","year":"2003","unstructured":"Jordan DR, Klapper SR, Gilberg SM. The use of Vicryl Mesh in 200 porous orbital implants: a technique with few exposures. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;19:53\u201361.","journal-title":"Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg"},{"key":"1164_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"336","DOI":"10.1097\/00002341-200209000-00004","volume":"18","author":"SA Kaltreider","year":"2002","unstructured":"Kaltreider SA, Lucarelli MJ. A simple algorithm for selection of implant size for enucleation and evisceration: a prospective study. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;18:336\u201341.","journal-title":"Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg"},{"key":"1164_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Mawatari Y, Fukushima M, Kawaji T. Changes in sunken eyes combined with blepharoptosis after levator resection. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2017;5:e1616.","DOI":"10.1097\/GOX.0000000000001616"},{"key":"1164_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"795","DOI":"10.2147\/OPTH.S77948","volume":"9","author":"O Aryasit","year":"2015","unstructured":"Aryasit O, Preechawai P. Indications and results in anophthalmic socket reconstruction using dermis-fat graft. Clin Ophthalmol. 2015;9:795\u20139.","journal-title":"Clin Ophthalmol"},{"key":"1164_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1171","DOI":"10.1097\/SCS.0000000000000807","volume":"25","author":"CY Kim","year":"2014","unstructured":"Kim CY, Woo YJ, Lee SY, Yoon JS. Postoperative outcomes of anophthalmic socket reconstruction using an autologous buccal mucosa graft. J Craniofac Surg. 2014;25:1171\u20134.","journal-title":"J Craniofac Surg"},{"key":"1164_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"821","DOI":"10.1007\/s00417-014-2600-z","volume":"252","author":"YH Wei","year":"2014","unstructured":"Wei YH, Liao SL. The reconstruction of a contracted eye socket using a post-auricular full-thickness skin graft. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2014;252:821\u20137.","journal-title":"Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol"}],"container-title":["Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10384-025-01164-9.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s10384-025-01164-9\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10384-025-01164-9.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,16]],"date-time":"2025-04-16T11:04:38Z","timestamp":1744801478000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s10384-025-01164-9"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,7]]},"references-count":29,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,3]]}},"alternative-id":["1164"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10384-025-01164-9","relation":{},"ISSN":["0021-5155","1613-2246"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0021-5155"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1613-2246"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,7]]},"assertion":[{"value":"13 May 2024","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"9 December 2024","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"7 February 2025","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}}]}}