{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,30]],"date-time":"2026-06-30T16:11:09Z","timestamp":1782835869215,"version":"3.54.5"},"reference-count":34,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2018,12,1]],"date-time":"2018-12-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1543622400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["J Med Ultrasonics"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,4]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s10396-018-0919-5","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2018,12,1]],"date-time":"2018-12-01T16:20:57Z","timestamp":1543681257000},"page":"201-207","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":2,"title":["Associations of temporal changes in cervical length and lower uterine segment length with spontaneous preterm delivery risk: a prospective study of 727 Japanese women"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"46","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-1855-4584","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Rie","family":"Oi","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Naoyuki","family":"Miyasaka","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Takahiro","family":"Yamashita","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Tomoko","family":"Adachi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2018,12,1]]},"reference":[{"key":"919_CR1","first-page":"161","volume":"371","author":"S Suigal","year":"2008","unstructured":"Suigal S, Doyle LW. An overview of mortality and sequalae of preterm birth from infancy to adulthood. Lancet. 2008;371:161\u20139.","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"919_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1035","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(98)70544-7","volume":"178","author":"JD Iams","year":"1998","unstructured":"Iams JD, Goldenberg RL, Mercer BM, et al. The Preterm Prediction Study: recurrence risk of spontaneous preterm birth. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998;178:1035\u201340.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"919_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"241","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2003.12.029","volume":"191","author":"NP Yost","year":"2004","unstructured":"Yost NP, Owen J, Berghella V, et al. Number and gestational age of prior preterm birth does not modify the predictive value of a short cervix. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191:241\u20136.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"919_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"7","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.15781","volume":"48","author":"K Hughes","year":"2016","unstructured":"Hughes K, Kane SC, Araujo Junior E, et al. Cervical length as a predictor for spontaneous preterm birth in high-risk singleton pregnancy: current knowledge. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016;48:7\u201315.","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"919_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"298","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2003.11.025","volume":"191","author":"J Owen","year":"2004","unstructured":"Owen J, Yost N, Berghella V, et al. Can shortened midtrimester cervical length predict very early spontaneous preterm birth? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191:298\u2013303.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"919_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"567","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM199602293340904","volume":"334","author":"JD Iams","year":"1996","unstructured":"Iams JD, Goldenberg RL, Meis PJ, et al. The length of the cervix and the risk of spontaneous preterm delivery. N Eng J Med. 1996;334:567\u201372.","journal-title":"N Eng J Med"},{"key":"919_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"135","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.32","volume":"21","author":"MH Carvalho","year":"2003","unstructured":"Carvalho MH, Bittar RE, Brizot ML, et al. Cervical length at 11\u201314\u00a0weeks\u2019 and 22\u201324\u00a0weeks\u2019 gestation evaluated by transvaginal sonography, and gestational age at delivery. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2003;21:135\u20139.","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"919_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"128","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.47","volume":"21","author":"G Conoscenti","year":"2003","unstructured":"Conoscenti G, Meir YJ, D\u2019Ottavio G, et al. Does cervical length at 13\u201315\u00a0weeks\u2019 gestation predict preterm delivery in an unselected population? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2003;21:128\u201334.","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"919_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"176","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2006.03.021","volume":"130","author":"I Ozdemir","year":"2007","unstructured":"Ozdemir I, Demirci F, Yucel O, et al. Ultrasonographic cervical length measurement at 10\u201314 and 20\u201324\u00a0weeks gestation and the risk of preterm delivery. Eur J Obstet Reprod Biol. 2007;130:176\u20139.","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Reprod Biol."},{"key":"919_CR10","first-page":"159","volume":"34","author":"P Tsikouras","year":"2007","unstructured":"Tsikouras P, Galazios G, Zalvanos A, et al. Transvaginal sonographic assessment of the cervix an preterm labor. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2007;34:159\u201362.","journal-title":"Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"919_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"465","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2010.501124","volume":"24","author":"P Antsaklis","year":"2011","unstructured":"Antsaklis P, Daskalakis G, Pilalis A, et al. The role of cervical length measurement at 11\u201314\u00a0weeks for the prediction of preterm delivery. J Matern Fetal Neonat Med. 2011;24:465\u201370.","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonat Med."},{"key":"919_CR12","first-page":"1027","volume":"43","author":"RW Zaler Jr","year":"1998","unstructured":"Zaler RW Jr. Early cervical length, preterm prelabor and gestational age at delivery. Is there a relationship? J Reprod Med. 1998;43:1027\u201333.","journal-title":"J Reprod Med"},{"key":"919_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"140","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.28","volume":"21","author":"V Berghella","year":"2003","unstructured":"Berghella V, Talucci M, Desai A. Does transvaginal sonographic measurement of cervical length before 14\u00a0weeks predict preterm delivery in high-risk pregnancies? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2003;21:140\u20134.","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"919_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"887","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2002.123058","volume":"186","author":"A Naim","year":"2002","unstructured":"Naim A, Haberman S, Burgess T, et al. Changes in cervical length and the risk of preterm labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;186:887\u20139.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"919_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"997","DOI":"10.7863\/jum.2011.30.7.997","volume":"30","author":"AP Souka","year":"2011","unstructured":"Souka AP, Papastefanou I, Salambasis K, et al. Cervical length changes from the first to second trimester of pregnancy, and prediction of preterm birth by first-trimester sonographic cervical measurement. J Ultrasound Med. 2011;30:997\u20131002.","journal-title":"J Ultrasound Med"},{"key":"919_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"84","DOI":"10.1002\/pd.2640","volume":"31","author":"E Greco","year":"2011","unstructured":"Greco E, Lange A, Ushakov F, et al. Prediction of spontaneous preterm delivery from endocervical length at 11 to 13 weeks. Prenat Diagn. 2011;31:84\u20139.","journal-title":"Prenat Diagn"},{"key":"919_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"154","DOI":"10.1159\/000335686","volume":"31","author":"E Greco","year":"2012","unstructured":"Greco E, Gupta R, Syngelaki A, et al. First-trimester screening for spontaneous preterm delivery with maternal characteristics and cervical length. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2012;31:154\u201361.","journal-title":"Fetal Diagn Ther"},{"key":"919_CR18","first-page":"350","volume":"33","author":"A Sabramaniam","year":"2016","unstructured":"Sabramaniam A, Harper LM, Szychowski JM, et al. Predictive value of initial cervical length shortening in women with a prior preterm birth. Am J Perinatol. 2016;33:350\u20135.","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"key":"919_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"789","DOI":"10.1080\/01443615.2017.1419461","volume":"28","author":"S Mishra","year":"2018","unstructured":"Mishra S, Bagga R, Kalra J, et al. Routine second trimester cervical length screening in low risk women identified women at risk of a \u201cvery\u201d preterm birth but did not reduce the preterm birth rate: a randomized study from India. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2018;28:789\u201395.","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"919_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.19050","author":"AP Souka","year":"2018","unstructured":"Souka AP, Papastefanou I, Pilalis A, et al. Implementation of universal screening for preterm delivery by mid-trimester cervical length measurement. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/uog.19050\n                    \n                  .","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol."},{"key":"919_CR21","first-page":"1","volume":"5","author":"R Navathe","year":"2018","unstructured":"Navathe R, Saccone G, Villani M, et al. Decrease in the incidence of threatened preterm labor after implementation of transvaginal ultrasound cervical length universal screening. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018;5:1\u20136.","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med."},{"key":"919_CR22","first-page":"4270","volume":"21","author":"R Granese","year":"2017","unstructured":"Granese R, Mantegna S, Mondello S, et al. Preterm birth: incidence, risk factors and second trimester cervical length in a single center population. A two-year retrospective study. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2017;21:4270\u20137.","journal-title":"Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci."},{"key":"919_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"329","DOI":"10.5468\/ogs.2017.60.4.329","volume":"64","author":"AB Peixoto","year":"2017","unstructured":"Peixoto AB, da Cunha Caldas TMR, Tahan LA, et al. Second trimester cervical length measurement for prediction spontaneous preterm birth in an unselected risk population. Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2017;64:329\u201335.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol Sci."},{"key":"919_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"598","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.12622","volume":"94","author":"P Kuusela","year":"2015","unstructured":"Kuusela P, Jacobsson B, Soderlund M, et al. Transvaginal sonographic evaluation of cervical length in the second trimester of asymptomatic singleton pregnancies, and the risk of preterm delivery. Acta Obstet Gynecol of Scand. 2015;94:598\u2013607.","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol of Scand."},{"key":"919_CR25","first-page":"e1","volume":"554","author":"EF Werner","year":"2015","unstructured":"Werner EF, Hamel MS, Orzechowski K, et al. Cost-effectiveness of transvaginal ultrasound cervical length screening in singletons without a prior preterm birth: an update. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;554:e1\u20136.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"919_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1223","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.12721","volume":"94","author":"J Ven van der","year":"2015","unstructured":"van der Ven J, van Os MA, Kazemier BM, et al. The capacity of mid-pregnancy cervical length to predict preterm birth in low-risk women: a national cohort study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2015;94:1223\u201334.","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"919_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"534","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000000976","volume":"126","author":"WS Miller","year":"2015","unstructured":"Miller WS, Tita AT, Grobman WA. Second-trimester cervical length screening among asymptomatic women: an evaluation of risk-based strategies. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;126:534\u20138.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"919_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"200","DOI":"10.1159\/000381144","volume":"28","author":"I Papastefanou","year":"2015","unstructured":"Papastefanou I, Pilalis A, Eleftheriades M, et al. Prediction of preterm delivery by late cervical length measurement after 24\u00a0weeks. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2015;28:200\u20134.","journal-title":"Fetal Diagn Ther."},{"issue":"603","key":"919_CR29","first-page":"e1","volume":"214","author":"A Khalifeh","year":"2016","unstructured":"Khalifeh A, Berghella V. Universal cervical length screening in singleton gestations without a previous preterm birth: ten reasons why it should be implemented. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;214(603):e1\u20135.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"365","key":"919_CR30","first-page":"e1","volume":"212","author":"M Son","year":"2016","unstructured":"Son M, Grobman WA, Ayala NK, et al. A universal mid-trimester transvaginal cervical length screening program and its associated reduced preterm birth rate. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;212(365):e1\u20135.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"919_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1340","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.286.11.1340","volume":"286","author":"J Owen","year":"2001","unstructured":"Owen J, Yost N, Berghella V, et al. Mid-trimester endovaginal sonography in women at high risk for spontaneous preterm birth. JAMA. 2001;286:1340\u20138.","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"919_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"31","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(98)00120-3","volume":"92","author":"ER Guzman","year":"1998","unstructured":"Guzman ER, Mellon C, Vintzileos AM, et al. Longitudinal assessment of endocervical canal length between 15 and 24\u00a0weeks\u2019 gestation in women at risk for pregnancy loss or preterm birth. Obstet Gynecol. 1998;92:31\u20137.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"130","key":"919_CR33","first-page":"e1","volume":"205","author":"JD Iams","year":"2011","unstructured":"Iams JD, Cebrik D, Lynch C, et al. The rate of cervical change and the phenotype of spontaneous preterm birth. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;205(130):e1\u20136.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"919_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"894","DOI":"10.1002\/pd.4158","volume":"33","author":"N Sananes","year":"2013","unstructured":"Sananes N, Schuller E, Gaudineau A, et al. What is predictive of preterm delivery in the first trimester: isthmus or cervical length? Prenat Diagn. 2013;33:894\u20138.","journal-title":"Prenat Diagn"}],"container-title":["Journal of Medical Ultrasonics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10396-018-0919-5.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s10396-018-0919-5\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10396-018-0919-5.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2019,12,2]],"date-time":"2019-12-02T07:59:27Z","timestamp":1575273567000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s10396-018-0919-5"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2018,12,1]]},"references-count":34,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,4]]}},"alternative-id":["919"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10396-018-0919-5","relation":{},"ISSN":["1346-4523","1613-2254"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1346-4523","type":"print"},{"value":"1613-2254","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2018,12,1]]},"assertion":[{"value":"3 October 2018","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"15 November 2018","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"1 December 2018","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Compliance with ethical standards"}},{"value":"The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}},{"value":"All procedures were conducted in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1964 and later versions.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethical statements"}},{"value":"Informed consent was obtained from all patients before inclusion in this study.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Informed consent"}}]}}