{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,13]],"date-time":"2025-06-13T16:04:34Z","timestamp":1749830674359},"reference-count":20,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2018,5,5]],"date-time":"2018-05-05T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1525478400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Breast Cancer Res Treat"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,8]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s10549-018-4800-4","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2018,5,5]],"date-time":"2018-05-05T08:37:41Z","timestamp":1525509461000},"page":"143-149","update-policy":"http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":3,"title":["Incorporation of the technologist\u2019s opinion for arbitration of discrepant assessments among radiologists at screening mammography"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"171","author":[{"given":"Angela M. P.","family":"Coolen","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Joost R. C.","family":"Lameijer","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Adri C.","family":"Voogd","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Luc J.","family":"Strobbe","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Marieke W. J.","family":"Louwman","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Vivianne C. G.","family":"Tjan-Heijnen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Lucien E. M.","family":"Duijm","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2018,5,5]]},"reference":[{"key":"4800_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"671","DOI":"10.1002\/ijc.30754","volume":"141","author":"VDV Sankatsing","year":"2017","unstructured":"Sankatsing VDV, van Ravesteyn NT, Heijnsdijk EAM et al (2017) The effect of population-based mammography screening in Dutch municipalities on breast cancer mortality: 20 years of follow-up. Int J Cancer 141:671\u2013677","journal-title":"Int J Cancer"},{"key":"4800_CR2","volume-title":"European guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screening and diagnosis","author":"N Perry","year":"2006","unstructured":"European Commission. Directorate-general for health and consumer protection, Perry N, Puthaar E (2006) European guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screening and diagnosis, 4th\u00a0edn. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg","edition":"4"},{"key":"4800_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"901","DOI":"10.1038\/sj.bjc.6604954","volume":"100","author":"LE Duijm","year":"2009","unstructured":"Duijm LE, Louwman MW, Groenewoud JH, van de Poll-Franse LV, Fracheboud J, Coebergh JW (2009) Inter-observer variability in mammography screening and effect of type and number of readers on screening outcome. Br J Cancer 100:901\u2013907","journal-title":"Br J Cancer"},{"key":"4800_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1590","DOI":"10.1002\/cncr.20053","volume":"100","author":"D Gur","year":"2004","unstructured":"Gur D, Sumkin JH, Hardesty LA et al (2004) Recall and detection rates in screening mammography. Cancer 100:1590\u20131594","journal-title":"Cancer"},{"key":"4800_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2821","DOI":"10.1007\/s00330-015-3711-6","volume":"25","author":"EG Klompenhouwer","year":"2015","unstructured":"Klompenhouwer EG, Voogd AC, den Heeten GJ et al (2015) Discrepant screening mammography assessments at blinded and non-blinded double reading: impact of arbitration by a third reader on screening outcome. Eur Radiol 25:2821\u20132829","journal-title":"Eur Radiol"},{"key":"4800_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"354","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2502080224","volume":"250","author":"CM Shaw","year":"2009","unstructured":"Shaw CM, Flanagan FL, Fenlon HM, McNicholas MM (2009) Consensus review of discordant findings maximizes cancer detection rate in double-reader screening mammography: Irish National Breast Screening Program experience. Radiology 250:354\u2013362","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"4800_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1162","DOI":"10.1093\/jnci\/djm050","volume":"99","author":"LE Duijm","year":"2007","unstructured":"Duijm LE, Groenewoud JH, Fracheboud J, de Koning HJ (2007) Additional double reading of screening mammograms by radiologic technologists: impact on screening performance parameters. J Natl Cancer Inst 99:1162\u20131170","journal-title":"J Natl Cancer Inst"},{"key":"4800_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"410","DOI":"10.1186\/s12885-015-1399-2","volume":"15","author":"G Torres-Mejia","year":"2015","unstructured":"Torres-Mejia G, Smith RA, Carranza-Flores Mde L et al (2015) Radiographers supporting radiologists in the interpretation of screening mammography: a viable strategy to meet the shortage in the number of radiologists. BMC Cancer 15:410","journal-title":"BMC Cancer"},{"key":"4800_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"391","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejca.2014.12.008","volume":"51","author":"EG Klompenhouwer","year":"2015","unstructured":"Klompenhouwer EG, Voogd AC, den Heeten GJ et al (2015) Blinded double reading yields a higher programme sensitivity than non-blinded double reading at digital screening mammography: a prospected population based study in the south of The Netherlands. Eur J Cancer 51:391\u2013399","journal-title":"Eur J Cancer"},{"key":"4800_CR10","volume-title":"ACR BI-RADS atlas: breast imaging reporting and data system","author":"American College of Radiology. BI-RADS Committee","year":"2013","unstructured":"American College of Radiology. BI-RADS Committee (2013) ACR BI-RADS atlas: breast imaging reporting and data system, 5th\u00a0edn. American College of Radiology, Reston","edition":"5"},{"key":"4800_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"18","DOI":"10.1177\/096914139600300106","volume":"3","author":"R Pauli","year":"1996","unstructured":"Pauli R, Hammond S, Cooke J, Ansell J (1996) Comparison of radiographer\/radiologist double film reading with single reading in breast cancer screening. J Med Screen 3:18\u201322","journal-title":"J Med Screen"},{"key":"4800_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"85","DOI":"10.1016\/j.breast.2007.07.035","volume":"17","author":"FJ Biggelaar van den","year":"2008","unstructured":"van den Biggelaar FJ, Nelemans PJ, Flobbe K (2008) Performance of radiographers in mammogram interpretation: a systematic review. Breast 17:85\u201390","journal-title":"Breast"},{"key":"4800_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"15","DOI":"10.1002\/jmrs.59","volume":"62","author":"JC Debono","year":"2015","unstructured":"Debono JC, Poulos AE, Houssami N, Turner RM, Boyages J (2015) Evaluation of radiographers\u2019 mammography screen-reading accuracy in Australia. J Med Radiat Sci 62:15\u201322","journal-title":"J Med Radiat Sci"},{"key":"4800_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"529","DOI":"10.1148\/radiology.211.2.r99ma32529","volume":"211","author":"JM Tonita","year":"1999","unstructured":"Tonita JM, Hillis JP, Lim CH (1999) Medical radiologic technologist review: effects on a population-based breast cancer screening program. Radiology 211:529\u2013533","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"4800_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1773","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa052911","volume":"353","author":"ED Pisano","year":"2005","unstructured":"Pisano ED, Gatsonis C, Hendrick E et al (2005) Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening. N Engl J Med 353:1773\u20131783","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"4800_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"707","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.12111461","volume":"265","author":"AM Bluekens","year":"2012","unstructured":"Bluekens AM, Holland R, Karssemeijer N, Broeders MJ, den Heeten GJ (2012) Comparison of digital screening mammography and screen-film mammography in the early detection of clinically relevant cancers: a multicenter study. Radiology 265:707\u2013714","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"4800_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3517","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejca.2013.06.020","volume":"49","author":"PA Luijt van","year":"2013","unstructured":"van Luijt PA, Fracheboud J, Heijnsdijk EA, den Heeten GJ, de Koning HJ, National Evaluation Team for Breast Cancer Screening in Netherlands Study G (2013) Nation-wide data on screening performance during the transition to digital mammography: observations in 6 million screens. Eur J Cancer 49:3517\u20133525","journal-title":"Eur J Cancer"},{"key":"4800_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"40","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejrad.2017.09.013","volume":"96","author":"M Posso","year":"2017","unstructured":"Posso M, Puig T, Carles M, Rue M, Canelo-Aybar C, Bonfill X (2017) Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of double reading in digital mammography screening: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Radiol 96:40\u201349","journal-title":"Eur J Radiol"},{"key":"4800_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"601","DOI":"10.1016\/j.breast.2015.06.004","volume":"24","author":"EG Klompenhouwer","year":"2015","unstructured":"Klompenhouwer EG, Weber RJ, Voogd AC et al (2015) Arbitration of discrepant BI-RADS 0 recalls by a third reader at screening mammography lowers recall rate but not the cancer detection rate and sensitivity at blinded and non-blinded double reading. Breast 24:601\u2013607","journal-title":"Breast"},{"key":"4800_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"748","DOI":"10.1093\/jnci\/dji131","volume":"97","author":"JD Otten","year":"2005","unstructured":"Otten JD, Karssemeijer N, Hendriks JH et al (2005) Effect of recall rate on earlier screen detection of breast cancers based on the Dutch performance indicators. J Natl Cancer Inst 97:748\u2013754","journal-title":"J Natl Cancer Inst"}],"container-title":["Breast Cancer Research and Treatment"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s10549-018-4800-4\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10549-018-4800-4.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10549-018-4800-4.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2019,5,6]],"date-time":"2019-05-06T14:19:39Z","timestamp":1557152379000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s10549-018-4800-4"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2018,5,5]]},"references-count":20,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,8]]}},"alternative-id":["4800"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10549-018-4800-4","relation":{},"ISSN":["0167-6806","1573-7217"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0167-6806","type":"print"},{"value":"1573-7217","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2018,5,5]]},"assertion":[{"value":"17 April 2018","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"21 April 2018","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"5 May 2018","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"Availability of data and materials The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.","order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Compliance with Ethical Standards"}},{"value":"The authors declare no conflict of interest.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}},{"value":"Ethical standards The need for ethical approval was waived by the Central Committee on Research Involving Human Subjects (CCMO) in The Hague, The Netherlands. All women participating in the Dutch nationwide breast cancer screening program are asked to give informed consent to use their data for scientific and educational purposes. All women participating in our study had given this written informed consent.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethics"}}]}}