{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,17]],"date-time":"2026-08-17T15:33:25Z","timestamp":1786980805301,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":39,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,8,28]],"date-time":"2020-08-28T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1598572800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,8,28]],"date-time":"2020-08-28T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1598572800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Breast Cancer Res Treat"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,12]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Purpose<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>To compare the efficacy of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography, with ultrasound, full field digital mammography and magnetic resonance imaging in detection and size estimation of histologically proven breast tumors.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>This open-label, single center, prospective study, included 160 dense breast women with at least one suspicious mammary lesion evaluated by ultrasound, full field digital mammography and magnetic resonance imaging in whom a mammary tumor was histologically proven after surgery performed at the European Institute of Oncology between January 2013 and December 2015. Following the complete diagnostic procedure, the patients were further investigated by contrast-enhanced spectral mammography prior to surgery.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      Overall, the detection rate of malignant breast lesions (in situ and invasive) was 93.8% (165\/176) for contrast-enhanced spectral mammography, 94.4% (168\/178) for ultrasound, 85.5 (147\/172) for full field digital mammography and 97.7% (173\/177) for magnetic resonance imaging. Radiological measurements were concordant with the post-surgical pathological measurements of the invasive tumor (i.e., within 5\u00a0mm) in: 64.6% for contrast-enhanced spectral mammography, 62.0% for ultrasound, 45.2% for full field digital mammography (\n                      <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009&lt;\u20090.0001) and 69.9% for magnetic resonance imaging (\n                      <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009=\u20090.28); underestimated in: 17.4% for contrast-enhanced spectral mammography, 19.6% for ultrasound, 24.2% for full field digital mammography (\n                      <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009=\u20090.03) and 6.7% for magnetic resonance imaging (\n                      <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009=\u20090.0005); and overestimated in: 16.2% for contrast-enhanced spectral mammography, 16.6% for ultrasound, 16.6% for full field digital mammography and 22.7% for magnetic resonance imaging (\n                      <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009=\u20090.02).\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Our data suggest that contrast-enhanced spectral mammography improves on full field digital mammography and is comparable to ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in terms of detection sensitivity and size estimation of malignant lesions in dense breasts.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1007\/s10549-020-05881-2","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2020,8,28]],"date-time":"2020-08-28T12:03:59Z","timestamp":1598616239000},"page":"723-731","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":31,"title":["Clinical performance of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography in pre-surgical evaluation of breast malignant lesions in dense breasts: a single center study"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"184","author":[{"given":"Anna","family":"Bozzini","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Luca","family":"Nicosia","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Giancarlo","family":"Pruneri","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Patrick","family":"Maisonneuve","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Lorenza","family":"Meneghetti","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Giuseppe","family":"Renne","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Andrea","family":"Vingiani","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Enrico","family":"Cassano","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-8306-0839","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Mauro Giuseppe","family":"Mastropasqua","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2020,8,28]]},"reference":[{"key":"5881_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1773","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa052911","volume":"353","author":"ED Pisano","year":"2005","unstructured":"Pisano ED, Gatsonis C, Hendrick E et al (2005) Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening. N Engl J Med 353:1773\u20131783. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1056\/NEJMoa052911","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"5881_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"830","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2333031484","volume":"233","author":"WA Berg","year":"2004","unstructured":"Berg WA, Gutierrez L, NessAiver MS et al (2004) Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer. Radiology 233:830\u2013849. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1148\/radiol.2333031484","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"5881_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"285","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejrad.2019.06.012","volume":"48","author":"AM Bosch","year":"2003","unstructured":"Bosch AM, Kessels AG, Beets GL et al (2003) Preoperative estimation of the pathological breast tumour size by physical examination, mammography and ultrasound: a prospective study on 105 invasive tumours. Eur J Radiol 48:285\u2013292. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejrad.2019.06.012","journal-title":"Eur J Radiol"},{"key":"5881_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"398","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejrad.2006.08.002","volume":"60","author":"PA Fasching","year":"2006","unstructured":"Fasching PA, Heusinger K, Loehberg CR et al (2006) Influence of mammographic density on the diagnostic accuracy of tumor size assessment and association with breast cancer tumor characteristics. Eur J Radiol 60:398\u2013404. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejrad.2006.08.002","journal-title":"Eur J Radiol"},{"key":"5881_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"75","DOI":"10.3322\/canjclin.57.2.75.Erratumin(2007)CACancerJClin57:185","volume":"57","author":"D Saslow","year":"2007","unstructured":"Saslow D, Boetes C, Burke W et al (2007) American Cancer Society Breast Cancer Advisory Group. American Cancer Society guidelines for breast screening with MRI as an adjunct to mammography. CA Cancer J Clin 57:75\u201389. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3322\/canjclin.57.2.75.Erratumin(2007)CACancerJClin57:185","journal-title":"CA Cancer J Clin"},{"key":"5881_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"180","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jamcollsurg.2009.04.010","volume":"209","author":"RJ Bleicher","year":"2009","unstructured":"Bleicher RJ, Ciocca RM, Egleston BL et al (2009) Association of routine pretreatment magnetic resonance imaging with time to surgery, mastectomy rate, and margin status. J Am Coll Surg 209:180\u2013187. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jamcollsurg.2009.04.010","journal-title":"J Am Coll Surg"},{"key":"5881_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"565","DOI":"10.1007\/s00330-010-1944-y","volume":"21","author":"C Dromain","year":"2011","unstructured":"Dromain C, Thibault F, Muller S et al (2011) Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography: initial clinical results. Eur Radiol 21:565\u2013574. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00330-010-1944-y","journal-title":"Eur Radiol"},{"key":"5881_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"256","DOI":"10.1007\/s00330-013-3007-7","volume":"24","author":"EM Fallenberg","year":"2014","unstructured":"Fallenberg EM, Dromain C, Diekmann F et al (2014) Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography versus MRI: initial results in the detection of breast cancer and assessment of tumour size. Eur Radiol 24:256\u2013264. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00330-013-3007-7","journal-title":"Eur Radiol"},{"key":"5881_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"371","DOI":"10.1007\/s10549-014-3023-6","volume":"146","author":"EM Fallenberg","year":"2014","unstructured":"Fallenberg EM, Dromain C, Diekmann F et al (2014) Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography: does mammography provide additional clinical benefits or can some radiation exposure be avoided? Breast Cancer Res Treat 146:371\u2013381. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10549-014-3023-6","journal-title":"Breast Cancer Res Treat"},{"key":"5881_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"743","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.12121084","volume":"266","author":"MS Jochelson","year":"2013","unstructured":"Jochelson MS, Dershaw DD, Sung JS et al (2013) Bilateral contrast-enhanced dual-energy digital mammography: feasibility and comparison with conventional digital mammography and MR imaging in women with known breast carcinoma. Radiology 266:743\u2013751. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1148\/radiol.12121084","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"5881_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2752","DOI":"10.1007\/s00330-016-4650-6","volume":"27","author":"EM Fallenberg","year":"2017","unstructured":"Fallenberg EM, Schmitzberger FF, Amer H et al (2017) Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography vs. mammography and MRI - clinical performance in a multi-reader evaluation. Eur Radiol 27:2752\u20132764. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00330-016-4650-6","journal-title":"Eur Radiol"},{"key":"5881_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2394","DOI":"10.1007\/s00330-014-3271-13","volume":"24","author":"YC Cheung","year":"2014","unstructured":"Cheung YC, Lin YC, Wan YL et al (2014) Diagnostic performance of dual-energy contrast-enhanced subtracted mammography in dense breasts compared to mammography alone: interobserver blind-reading analysis. Eur Radiol 24:2394\u20132403. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00330-014-3271-13","journal-title":"Eur Radiol"},{"key":"5881_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"W267","DOI":"10.2214\/AJR.17.19355","volume":"211","author":"V Sorin","year":"2018","unstructured":"Sorin V, Yagil Y, Yosepovich A et al (2018) Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography in women with intermediate breast cancer risk and dense breasts. AJR Am J Roentgenol 211:W267\u2013W274. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2214\/AJR.17.19355","journal-title":"AJR Am J Roentgenol"},{"key":"5881_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"245","DOI":"10.1016\/j.diii.2013.10.002","volume":"95","author":"S Badr","year":"2014","unstructured":"Badr S, Laurent N, R\u00e9gis C et al (2014) Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography in routine clinical practice in 2013. Diagn Interv Imaging 95:245\u2013258. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.diii.2013.10.002","journal-title":"Diagn Interv Imaging"},{"key":"5881_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"113","DOI":"10.1016\/j.diii.2016.08.013","volume":"98","author":"L Li","year":"2017","unstructured":"Li L, Roth R, Germaine P et al (2017) Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) versus breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): a retrospective comparison in 66 breast lesions. Diagn Interv Imaging 98:113\u2013123. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.diii.2016.08.013","journal-title":"Diagn Interv Imaging"},{"key":"5881_CR16","volume-title":"European Commission European guidelines for quality assurance in mammography screening","author":"N Perry","year":"2006","unstructured":"Perry N, Broedeers M, de Wolf C et al (2006) European Commission European guidelines for quality assurance in mammography screening, 4th edn. EC, Luxembourg","edition":"4"},{"key":"5881_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"31","DOI":"10.1043\/1543-2165-133.1.31","volume":"133","author":"A Grin","year":"2009","unstructured":"Grin A, Horne G, Ennis M, O'Malley FP (2009) Measuring extent of ductal carcinoma in situ in breast excision specimens: a comparison of 4 methods. Arch Pathol Lab Med 133:31\u201337. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1043\/1543-2165-133.1.31","journal-title":"Arch Pathol Lab Med"},{"key":"5881_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1438","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa1600249","volume":"375","author":"HG Welch","year":"2016","unstructured":"Welch HG, Prorok PC, O'Malley AJ, Kramer BS (2016) Breast-cancer tumor size, overdiagnosis, and mammography screening effectiveness. N Engl J Med 375:1438\u20131447. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1056\/NEJMoa1600249","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"5881_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"72","DOI":"10.1016\/j.mri.2014.08.034","volume":"33","author":"JY Kim","year":"2015","unstructured":"Kim JY, Kim SH, Kim YJ et al (2015) Enhancement parameters on dynamic contrast enhanced breast MRI: do they correlate with prognostic factors and subtypes of breast cancers? Magn Reson Imaging 33:72\u201380. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.mri.2014.08.034","journal-title":"Magn Reson Imaging"},{"key":"5881_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"921","DOI":"10.2214\/AJR.11.7895","volume":"199","author":"M Han","year":"2012","unstructured":"Han M, Kim TH, Kang DK, Kim KS, Yim H (2012) Prognostic role of MRI enhancement features in patients with breast cancer: value of adjacent vessel sign and increased ipsilateral whole-breast vascularity. AJR 199:921\u2013928. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2214\/AJR.11.7895","journal-title":"AJR"},{"key":"5881_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"791","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2353040733","volume":"235","author":"F Sardanelli","year":"2005","unstructured":"Sardanelli F, Iozzelli A, Fausto A, Carriero A, Kirchin MA (2005) Gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MR imaging breast vascular maps: association between invasive cancer and ipsilateral increased vascularity. Radiology 235:791\u2013797. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1148\/radiol.2353040733","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"5881_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"116","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2461061298","volume":"246","author":"NH Peters","year":"2008","unstructured":"Peters NH, Borel Rinkes IH, Zuithoff NP et al (2008) Meta-analysis of MR imaging in the diagnosis of breast lesions. Radiology 246:116\u2013124. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1148\/radiol.2461061298","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"5881_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"585","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2322030547","volume":"232","author":"W Huang","year":"2004","unstructured":"Huang W, Fisher PR, Dulaimy K et al (2004) Detection of breast malignancy: diagnostic MR protocol for improved specificity. Radiology 232:585\u2013291. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1148\/radiol.2322030547","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"5881_CR24","unstructured":"ACR Manual on Contrast Media ACR Committee on Drug and Contrast Media. (2020) Reston, VA: American College of Radiology. https:\/\/www.acr.org\/-\/media\/ACR\/Files\/Clinical-Resources\/Contrast_Media.pdf."},{"key":"5881_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2813","DOI":"10.1007\/s00330-015-3695-2","volume":"25","author":"UC Lalji","year":"2015","unstructured":"Lalji UC, Jeukens CR, Houben I et al (2015) Evaluation of low-energy contrast-enhanced spectral mammography images by comparing them to full-field digital mammography using EUREF image quality criteria. Eur Radiol 25:2813\u20132820. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00330-015-3695-2","journal-title":"Eur Radiol"},{"key":"5881_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"281","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2532091401","volume":"253","author":"CK Kuhl","year":"2009","unstructured":"Kuhl CK (2009) Why do purely intraductal cancers enhance on breast MR images? Radiology 253:281\u2013283. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1148\/radiol.2532091401","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"5881_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"399","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.2533082026","volume":"253","author":"SA Jansen","year":"2009","unstructured":"Jansen SA, Paunesku T, Fan X et al (2009) Ductal carcinoma in situ: X-ray fluorescence microscopy and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging reveals gadolinium uptake within neoplastic mammary ducts in a murine model. Radiology 253:399\u2013406. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1148\/radiol.2533082026","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"5881_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"S112","DOI":"10.1259\/bjr\/55166688","volume":"84","author":"JP O'Connor","year":"2011","unstructured":"O'Connor JP, Tofts PS, Miles KA et al (2011) Dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging techniques: CT and MRI. Br J Radiol 84:S112\u2013120. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1259\/bjr\/55166688","journal-title":"Br J Radiol"},{"key":"5881_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"188","DOI":"10.1007\/s00261-005-0386-5","volume":"31","author":"CA Cuenod","year":"2006","unstructured":"Cuenod CA, Fournier L, Balvay D, Guinebreti\u00e8re JM (2006) Tumor angiogenesis: pathophysiology and implications for contrast-enhanced MRI and CT assessment. Abdom Imaging 31:188\u2013193. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00261-005-0386-5","journal-title":"Abdom Imaging"},{"key":"5881_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3","DOI":"10.1111\/tbj.12361","volume":"21","author":"S Zurrida","year":"2015","unstructured":"Zurrida S, Veronesi U (2015) Milestones in breast cancer treatment. Breast J 21:3\u201312. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/tbj.12361","journal-title":"Breast J"},{"key":"5881_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"351","DOI":"10.1016\/s0002-9610(01)00726-7","volume":"182","author":"TJ Hieken","year":"2001","unstructured":"Hieken TJ, Harrison J, Herreros J, Velasco JM (2001) Correlating sonography, mammography, and pathology in the assessment of breast cancer size. Am J Surg 182:351\u2013354. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/s0002-9610(01)00726-7","journal-title":"Am J Surg"},{"key":"5881_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"44","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejso.2011.10.008","volume":"38","author":"M Meier-Meitinger","year":"2012","unstructured":"Meier-Meitinger M, Rauh C, Adamietz B et al (2012) Accuracy of radiological tumour size assessment and the risk for re-excision in a cohort of primary breast cancer patients. Eur J Surg Oncol 38:44\u201351. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejso.2011.10.008","journal-title":"Eur J Surg Oncol"},{"key":"5881_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1180","DOI":"10.1007\/s00330-010-2016-z","volume":"21","author":"M Meier-Meitinger","year":"2011","unstructured":"Meier-Meitinger M, H\u00e4berle L, Fasching PA et al (2011) Assessment of breast cancer tumour size using six different methods. Eur Radiol 21:1180\u20131187. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00330-010-2016-z","journal-title":"Eur Radiol"},{"key":"5881_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1551","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2009.1450","volume":"302","author":"M Morrow","year":"2009","unstructured":"Morrow M, Jagsi R, Alderman A et al (2009) Surgeon recommendations and receipt of mastectomy for treatment of breast cancer. JAMA 302:1551\u20131556. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/jama.2009.1450","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"5881_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"467","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2012.43","volume":"307","author":"LE McCahill","year":"2012","unstructured":"McCahill LE, Single RM, Aiello Bowles EJ et al (2012) Variability in reexcision following breast conservation surgery. JAMA 307:467\u2013475. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/jama.2012.43","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"5881_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"426","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejrad.2007.02.033","volume":"64","author":"FK Schaefer","year":"2007","unstructured":"Schaefer FK, Eden I, Schaefer PJ et al (2007) Factors associated with one step surgery in case of non-palpable breast cancer. Eur J Radiol 64:426\u2013431. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejrad.2007.02.033","journal-title":"Eur J Radiol"},{"key":"5881_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3886","DOI":"10.12659\/msm.900371","volume":"22","author":"E \u0141uczy\u0144ska","year":"2016","unstructured":"\u0141uczy\u0144ska E, Niemiec J, Hendrick E et al (2016) Degree of enhancement on contrast enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) and lesion type on mammography (MG): comparison based on histological results. Med Sci Monit 22:3886\u20133893. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.12659\/msm.900371","journal-title":"Med Sci Monit"},{"key":"5881_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"44","DOI":"10.1002\/(SICI)1096-9896(199609)180:1<44::AID-PATH648>3.0.CO;2-C","volume":"180","author":"G Morphopoulos","year":"1996","unstructured":"Morphopoulos G, Pearson M, Ryder WD, Howell A, Harris M (1996) Tumour angiogenesis as a prognostic marker in infiltrating lobular carcinoma of the breast. J Pathol 180:44\u201349. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/(SICI)1096-9896(199609)180:1<44:AID-PATH648>3.0.CO;2-C","journal-title":"J Pathol"},{"key":"5881_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"268","DOI":"10.7326\/M15-1789","volume":"164","author":"J Melnikow","year":"2016","unstructured":"Melnikow J, Fenton JJ, Whitlock EP et al (2016) Supplemental screening for breast cancer in women with dense breasts: a systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med 164:268\u2013278","journal-title":"Ann Intern Med"}],"container-title":["Breast Cancer Research and Treatment"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10549-020-05881-2.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s10549-020-05881-2\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10549-020-05881-2.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2021,8,27]],"date-time":"2021-08-27T19:51:52Z","timestamp":1630093912000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s10549-020-05881-2"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2020,8,28]]},"references-count":39,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,12]]}},"alternative-id":["5881"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10549-020-05881-2","relation":{},"ISSN":["0167-6806","1573-7217"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0167-6806","type":"print"},{"value":"1573-7217","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2020,8,28]]},"assertion":[{"value":"16 May 2020","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"13 August 2020","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"28 August 2020","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Compliance with ethical standards"}},{"value":"We have no conflicts of interest to declare.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}}]}}