{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,17]],"date-time":"2026-08-17T15:33:25Z","timestamp":1786980805290,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":23,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,10,22]],"date-time":"2021-10-22T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1634860800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,10,22]],"date-time":"2021-10-22T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1634860800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/100006093","name":"patient-centered outcomes research institute","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["CS-1504-30370"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["CS-1504-30370"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/100006093","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Breast Cancer Res Treat"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,1]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s10549-021-06418-x","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,10,22]],"date-time":"2021-10-22T16:29:55Z","timestamp":1634920195000},"page":"177-190","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":16,"title":["Preoperative MRI in breast cancer: effect of breast density on biopsy rate and yield"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"191","clinical-trial-number":[{"clinical-trial-number":"nct02980848","registry":"10.18810\/clinical-trials-gov"}],"author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-1633-3040","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Tracy","family":"Onega","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Weiwei","family":"Zhu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Karla","family":"Kerlikowske","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Diana L.","family":"Miglioretti","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Christoph I.","family":"Lee","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Louise M.","family":"Henderson","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Anna N. A.","family":"Tosteson","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Karen J.","family":"Wernli","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Roberta","family":"diFlorio","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Donald L.","family":"Weaver","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Diana S. M.","family":"Buist","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,10,22]]},"reference":[{"issue":"1","key":"6418_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"201","DOI":"10.1186\/bcr1831","volume":"10","author":"LJ Martin","year":"2008","unstructured":"Martin LJ, Boyd NF (2008) Mammographic density. Potential mechanisms of breast cancer risk-associated with mammographic density: hypotheses based on epidemiological evidence. Breast Cancer Res 10(1):201","journal-title":"Breast Cancer Res"},{"issue":"12","key":"6418_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2587","DOI":"10.1158\/1055-9965.EPI-07-0458","volume":"16","author":"ES Hwang","year":"2007","unstructured":"Hwang ES, Miglioretti DL, Ballard-Barbash R, Weaver DL, Kerlikowske K, National Cancer Institute Breast Cancer Surveillance C (2007) Association between breast density and subsequent breast cancer following treatment for ductal carcinoma in situ. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 16(12):2587\u201393","journal-title":"Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev"},{"issue":"4","key":"6418_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e1900999","DOI":"10.1148\/rycan.2020190099","volume":"2","author":"H Rahbar","year":"2020","unstructured":"Rahbar H, Hippe DS, Alaa A, Cheeney SH, van der Schaar M, Partridge SC, Lee CI (2020) The value of patient and tumor factors in predicting preoperative breast MRI outcomes. Radiol Imaging Cancer 2(4):e1900999","journal-title":"Radiol Imaging Cancer"},{"key":"6418_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"18","DOI":"10.1016\/j.clinimag.2020.10.021","volume":"70","author":"A Elmi","year":"2020","unstructured":"Elmi A, Conant EF, Kozlov A, Young AJ, Long Q, Doot RK, McDonald ES (2020) Preoperative breast MR imaging in newly diagnosed breast cancer: comparison of outcomes based on mammographic modality, breast density and breast parenchymal enhancement. Clin Imaging 70:18\u201324. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.clinimag.2020.10.021","journal-title":"Clin Imaging"},{"key":"6418_CR5","unstructured":"https:\/\/www.nejm.org\/doi\/full\/10.1056\/nejmoa065447"},{"issue":"3","key":"6418_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"339","DOI":"10.1016\/j.mric.2006.07.007","volume":"14","author":"L Liberman","year":"2006","unstructured":"Liberman L (2006) Breast MR imaging in assessing extent of disease. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 14(3):339\u2013349","journal-title":"Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am"},{"issue":"19","key":"6418_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3248","DOI":"10.1200\/JCO.2007.15.2108","volume":"26","author":"N Houssami","year":"2008","unstructured":"Houssami N, Ciatto S, Macaskill P, Lord SJ, Warren RM, Dixon JM, Irwig L (2008) Accuracy and surgical impact of magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer staging: systematic review and meta-analysis in detection of multifocal and multicentric cancer. J Clin Oncol 26(19):3248\u20133258","journal-title":"J Clin Oncol"},{"issue":"33","key":"6418_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"5640","DOI":"10.1200\/JCO.2008.21.5756","volume":"27","author":"ME Brennan","year":"2009","unstructured":"Brennan ME, Houssami N, Lord S, Macaskill P, Irwig L, Dixon JM, Warren RM, Ciatto S (2009) Magnetic resonance imaging screening of the contralateral breast in women with newly diagnosed breast cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of incremental cancer detection and impact on surgical management. J Clin Oncol 27(33):5640\u20135649","journal-title":"J Clin Oncol"},{"issue":"9","key":"6418_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1238","DOI":"10.1001\/jamaoncol.2015.3018","volume":"1","author":"A Anaout","year":"2015","unstructured":"Anaout A, Catley C, Booth CM, McInnes M, Graham I, Kumar V, Simos D, Van Walraven C, Clemons M (2015) Use of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging for breast cancer. A Canadian population-based study. JAMA Oncol 1(9):1238\u20131250","journal-title":"JAMA Oncol"},{"issue":"10","key":"6418_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1393","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejca.2005.03.017","volume":"41","author":"EE Deurloo","year":"2005","unstructured":"Deurloo EE, Peterse JL, Rutgers EJT, Besnard APE, Muller SH, Gilhuijs KA (2005) Additional breast lesions in patients eligible for breast-conserving therapy by MRI: impact of preoperative management and potential benefit of computerised analysis. Eur J Cancer 41(10):1393\u20131401","journal-title":"Eur J Cancer"},{"issue":"3","key":"6418_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"143","DOI":"10.1097\/RMR.0b013e31818a40a5","volume":"19","author":"W DeMartini","year":"2008","unstructured":"DeMartini W, Lehman C (2008) A review of current evidence-based clinical applications for breast magnetic resonance imaging. Top Magn Reson Imaging 19(3):143\u2013150","journal-title":"Top Magn Reson Imaging"},{"key":"6418_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"531","DOI":"10.1007\/s10549-015-3556-3","volume":"153","author":"M Debald","year":"2015","unstructured":"Debald M, Abramian A, Nemes L et al (2015) Who may benefit from preoperative breast MRI? A single-center analysis of 1102 consecutive patients with primary breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 153:531\u2013537","journal-title":"Breast Cancer Res Treat"},{"key":"6418_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"W93","DOI":"10.2214\/AJR.10.4804","volume":"196","author":"RL Gutierrez","year":"2010","unstructured":"Gutierrez RL, DeMartini WB, Silbergeld JJ, Eby PR, Peacock S, Javid SH, Lehman CD (2010) High cancer yield and positive predictive value: outcomes at a center routinely using preoperative breast MRI for staging. Am J Roent 196:W93\u2013W99","journal-title":"Am J Roent"},{"key":"6418_CR14","unstructured":"National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN guidelines for breast cancer (version 2.2015). 2015 Contract No.: October 15, 2014"},{"issue":"5","key":"6418_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"290","DOI":"10.3322\/caac.20028","volume":"59","author":"N Houssami","year":"2009","unstructured":"Houssami N, Hayes DF (2009) Review of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in breast cancer: should MRI be performed on all women with newly diagnosed, early stage breast cancer? CA Cancer J Clin 59(5):290\u2013302","journal-title":"CA Cancer J Clin"},{"key":"6418_CR16","unstructured":"Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium (BCSC). https:\/\/bcsc-research.org\/. Accessed 11 Oct 2020"},{"key":"6418_CR17","unstructured":"National Institute for Health Research. Good research practice guidelines. https:\/\/www.nihr.ac.uk\/health-and-care-professionals\/learning-and-support\/good-clinical-practice.htm. Accessed 11 Oct 2020"},{"key":"6418_CR18","volume-title":"Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System\u00ae (BI-RADS\u00ae)","author":"American College of Radiology","year":"2013","unstructured":"American College of Radiology (2013) Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System\u00ae (BI-RADS\u00ae). American College of Radiology, Reston"},{"key":"6418_CR19","unstructured":"Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium. https:\/\/www.bcsc-research.org\/application\/files\/4516\/0096\/5722\/BCSC_Data_Definitions_v3__2020.09.23.pdf. Accessed 12 Dec 2020"},{"key":"6418_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"27","DOI":"10.1080\/00031305.1992.10475842","volume":"46","author":"GW Oehlert","year":"1992","unstructured":"Oehlert GW (1992) A note on the delta method. Am Stat 46:27\u201329","journal-title":"Am Stat"},{"issue":"13","key":"6418_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1295","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa065447","volume":"356","author":"CD Lehman","year":"2007","unstructured":"Lehman CD, Gatsonis C, Kuhl CK, Hendrick RE, Pisano ED, Hanna L, Peacock S, Smazal SF, Maki DD, Julian TB, DePeri ER, Bluemke DA, Schnall MD, ACRIN Trial 6667 Investigators Group (2007) MRI evaluation of the contralateral breast in women with recently diagnosed breast cancer. N Engl J Med 356(13):1295\u2013303","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"issue":"11","key":"6418_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2372","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2648.2010.05439.x","volume":"66","author":"M Montgomery","year":"2010","unstructured":"Montgomery M, McCrone SH (2010) Psychological distress associated with the diagnostic phase for suspected breast cancer: systematic review. J Adv Nurs 66(11):2372\u20132390","journal-title":"J Adv Nurs"},{"issue":"13","key":"6418_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.3310\/hta17130","volume":"17","author":"M Bond","year":"2013","unstructured":"Bond M, Pavey T, Welch K, Cooper C, Garside R, Dean S, Hyde C (2013) Systematic review of the psychological consequences of false-positive screening mammograms. Health Technol Assess 17(13):1\u2013170","journal-title":"Health Technol Assess"}],"container-title":["Breast Cancer Research and Treatment"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10549-021-06418-x.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s10549-021-06418-x\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10549-021-06418-x.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,9,10]],"date-time":"2024-09-10T11:48:52Z","timestamp":1725968932000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s10549-021-06418-x"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,10,22]]},"references-count":23,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,1]]}},"alternative-id":["6418"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10549-021-06418-x","relation":{},"ISSN":["0167-6806","1573-7217"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0167-6806","type":"print"},{"value":"1573-7217","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,10,22]]},"assertion":[{"value":"29 June 2021","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"11 October 2021","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"22 October 2021","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"Authors report no conflicts of interest or competing interests.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}},{"value":"All authors consent to publication of this manuscript.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent for publication"}},{"value":"The institutional review boards of the participating Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium (BCSC) registries and Statistical Coordinating Center approved all study activities through passive consent (three registries) or waiver of written consent (two registries and the Statistical Coordinating Center). This study was Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act compliant. Registries and the Statistical Coordinating Center received a federal Certificate of Confidentiality and other protections for the identities of women, physicians, and facilities. Our study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02980848) and followed the Good Research Practices guidelines for comparative effectiveness research.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethics approval and consent to participate"}}]}}