{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,11,4]],"date-time":"2026-11-04T10:18:02Z","timestamp":1793787482814,"version":"4.6.1"},"reference-count":21,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,1,12]],"date-time":"2019-01-12T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1547251200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Doc Ophthalmol"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,2]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s10633-018-09668-1","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2019,1,11]],"date-time":"2019-01-11T21:35:21Z","timestamp":1547242521000},"page":"21-33","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":16,"title":["Comparison between broadband and monochromatic photopic negative response in full-field electroretinogram in controls and subjects with primary open-angle glaucoma"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"138","author":[{"given":"Aniruddha","family":"Banerjee","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Mona","family":"Khurana","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ramya","family":"Sachidanandam","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-2256-9380","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Parveen","family":"Sen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2019,1,12]]},"reference":[{"issue":"2","key":"9668_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"238","DOI":"10.1136\/bjo.86.2.238","volume":"86","author":"PJ Foster","year":"2002","unstructured":"Foster PJ, Buhrmann R, Quigley HA, Johnson GJ (2002) The definition and classification of glaucoma in prevalence surveys. Br J Ophthalmol 86(2):238\u2013242","journal-title":"Br J Ophthalmol"},{"issue":"7","key":"9668_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1359","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2014.01.020","volume":"121","author":"SK Gardiner","year":"2014","unstructured":"Gardiner SK, Swanson WH, Goren D, Mansberger SL, Demirel S (2014) Assessment of the reliability of standard automated perimetry in regions of glaucomatous damage. Ophthalmology 121(7):1359\u20131369. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ophtha.2014.01.020","journal-title":"Ophthalmology"},{"issue":"10","key":"9668_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1895","DOI":"10.1016\/S0161-6420(03)00541-4","volume":"110","author":"EZ Blumenthal","year":"2003","unstructured":"Blumenthal EZ, Sample PA, Berry CC, Lee AC, Girkin CA, Zangwill L, Caprioli J, Weinreb RN (2003) Evaluating several sources of variability for standard and SWAP visual fields in glaucoma patients, suspects, and normals. Ophthalmology 110(10):1895\u20131902. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S0161-6420(03)00541-4","journal-title":"Ophthalmology"},{"issue":"11","key":"9668_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"7010","DOI":"10.1167\/iovs.12-10268","volume":"53","author":"FG JunoyMontolio","year":"2012","unstructured":"JunoyMontolio FG, Wesselink C, Gordijn M, Jansonius NM (2012) Factors\u00a0that\u00a0influence\u00a0standard\u00a0automated\u00a0perimetry\u00a0test\u00a0results\u00a0in\u00a0glaucoma:\u00a0test\u00a0reliability,\u00a0technician\u00a0experience,\u00a0time\u00a0of\u00a0day, and season. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 53(11):7010\u20137017. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1167\/iovs.12-10268","journal-title":"Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci"},{"issue":"7","key":"9668_CR5","first-page":"2006","volume":"41","author":"KE Kutzko","year":"2000","unstructured":"Kutzko KE, Brito CF, Wall M (2000) Effect of instructions on conventional automated perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 41(7):2006\u20132013","journal-title":"Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci"},{"issue":"6","key":"9668_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1124","DOI":"10.1167\/iovs.14-13937","volume":"40","author":"S Viswanathan","year":"1999","unstructured":"Viswanathan S, Frishman LJ, Robson JG, Harwerth RS, Smith EL (1999) The photopic negative response of the macaque electroretinogram: reduction by experimental glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 40(6):1124\u20131136. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1167\/iovs.14-13937","journal-title":"Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci"},{"issue":"2","key":"9668_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"514","DOI":"10.1007\/s10633-016-9528","volume":"42","author":"S Viswanathan","year":"2001","unstructured":"Viswanathan S, Frishman LJ, Robson JG, Walters JW (2001) The photopic negative response of the flash electroretinogram in primary open angle glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 42(2):514\u2013522. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10633-016-9528","journal-title":"Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci"},{"issue":"2","key":"9668_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1216","DOI":"10.1167\/iovs.09-3409","volume":"51","author":"RV North","year":"2010","unstructured":"North RV, Jones AL, Drasdo N, Wild JM, Morgan JE (2010) Electrophysiological evidence of early functional damage in glaucoma and ocular hypertension. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 51(2):1216\u20131222. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1167\/iovs.09-3409","journal-title":"Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci"},{"key":"9668_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1155\/2011\/564131","author":"S Machida","year":"2011","unstructured":"Machida S, Tamada K, Oikawa T, Gotoh Y, Nishimura T, Kaneko M, Kurosaka D (2011) Comparison of photopic negative response of full-field and focal electroretinograms in detecting glaucomatous eyes. J Ophthalmol. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1155\/2011\/564131","journal-title":"J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"9668_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"182021","DOI":"10.1155\/2013\/182021","volume":"2013","author":"X Shen","year":"2013","unstructured":"Shen X, Huang L, Fan N, He J (2013) Relationship among photopic negative response, retinal nerve fiber layer thickness, and visual field between normal and POAG eyes. ISRN Ophthalmol 2013:182021. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1155\/2013\/182021","journal-title":"ISRN Ophthalmol"},{"issue":"10","key":"9668_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3827","DOI":"10.1167\/iovs.04-0458","volume":"45","author":"NV Rangaswamy","year":"2004","unstructured":"Rangaswamy NV, Frishman LJ, Dorotheo EU, Schiffman JS, Bahrani HM, Tang RA (2004) Photopic ERGs in patients with optic neuropathies: comparison with primate ERGs after pharmacologic blockade of inner retina. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 45(10):3827\u20133837. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1167\/iovs.04-0458","journal-title":"Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci"},{"issue":"3","key":"9668_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"341","DOI":"10.1001\/archopht.122.3.341","volume":"122","author":"Y Gotoh","year":"2004","unstructured":"Gotoh Y, Machida S, Tazawa Y (2004) Selective loss of the photopic negative response in patients with optic nerve atrophy. Arch Ophthalmol 122(3):341\u2013346. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/archopht.122.3.341","journal-title":"Arch Ophthalmol"},{"issue":"2","key":"9668_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"89","DOI":"10.3341\/kjo.2010.24.2.89","volume":"24","author":"HD Kim","year":"2010","unstructured":"Kim HD, Park JY, Ohn YH (2010) Clinical applications of photopic negative response (PhNR) for the treatment of glaucoma and diabetic retinopathy. Korean J Ophthalmol 24(2):89\u201395. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3341\/kjo.2010.24.2.89","journal-title":"Korean J Ophthalmol"},{"issue":"3","key":"9668_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"167","DOI":"10.1007\/s10633-008-9150-9","volume":"118","author":"M Sustar","year":"2009","unstructured":"Sustar M, Cvenkel B, Brecelj J (2009) The effect of broadband and monochromatic stimuli on the photopic negative response of the electroretinogram in normal subjects and in open-angle glaucoma patients. Doc Ophthalmol 118(3):167\u2013177. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10633-008-9150-9","journal-title":"Doc Ophthalmol"},{"issue":"10","key":"9668_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"4818","DOI":"10.1167\/iovs.07-0218","volume":"48","author":"NV Rangaswamy","year":"2007","unstructured":"Rangaswamy NV, Shirato S, Kaneko M, Digby BI, Robson JG, Frishman LJ (2007) Effects of spectral characteristics of ganzfeld stimuli on the photopic negative response (PhNR) of the ERG. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 48(10):4818\u20134828. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1167\/iovs.07-0218","journal-title":"Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci"},{"issue":"2","key":"9668_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"79","DOI":"10.1007\/s10633-011-9304-z","volume":"124","author":"J Kremers","year":"2012","unstructured":"Kremers J, Jertila M, Link B, Pangeni G, Horn FK (2012) Spectral characteristics of the PhNR in the full-field flash electroretinogram of normals and glaucoma patients. Doc Ophthalmol 124(2):79\u201390. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10633-011-9304","journal-title":"Doc Ophthalmol"},{"issue":"6","key":"9668_CR17","first-page":"1266","volume":"42","author":"N Drasdo","year":"2001","unstructured":"Drasdo N, Aldebasi YH, Chiti Z, Mortlock KE, Morgan JE, North RV (2001) The s-cone PHNR and pattern ERG in primary open angle glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 42(6):1266\u20131272","journal-title":"Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci"},{"issue":"2","key":"9668_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"238","DOI":"10.1136\/bjo.86.2.238","volume":"86","author":"PJ Foster","year":"2002","unstructured":"Foster PJ, Buhrmann R, Quigley HA, Johnson GJ (2002) The definition and classification of glaucoma in prevalence surveys. Br J Ophthalmol 86(2):238\u2013242","journal-title":"Br J Ophthalmol"},{"issue":"8","key":"9668_CR19","first-page":"2205","volume":"41","author":"A Colotto","year":"2000","unstructured":"Colotto A, Falsini B, Salgarello T, Iarossi G, Galan ME, Scullica L (2000) Photopic negative response of the human ERG: losses associated with glaucomatous damage. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 41(8):2205\u20132211","journal-title":"Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci"},{"issue":"1","key":"9668_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1007\/s10633-014-9473-7","volume":"130","author":"DL McCulloch","year":"2015","unstructured":"McCulloch DL, Marmor MF, Brigell MG et al (2015) ISCEV standard for full-field clinical electroretinography (2015 update). Doc Ophthalmol 130(1):1\u201312. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10633-015-9504","journal-title":"Doc Ophthalmol"},{"issue":"13","key":"9668_CR21","first-page":"215","volume":"48","author":"S Machida","year":"2007","unstructured":"Machida S, Gotoh Y, Kaneko M, Toba Y, Ohtaki A, Kurosaka D (2007) Comparison of the photopic negative response obtained under different recording conditions in glaucomatous eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 48(13):215\u2013221","journal-title":"Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci"}],"container-title":["Documenta Ophthalmologica"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s10633-018-09668-1\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10633-018-09668-1.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10633-018-09668-1.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2020,1,11]],"date-time":"2020-01-11T19:26:06Z","timestamp":1578770766000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s10633-018-09668-1"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2019,1,12]]},"references-count":21,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,2]]}},"alternative-id":["9668"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10633-018-09668-1","relation":{},"ISSN":["0012-4486","1573-2622"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0012-4486","type":"print"},{"value":"1573-2622","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2019,1,12]]},"assertion":[{"value":"8 August 2017","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"27 December 2018","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"12 January 2019","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Compliance with ethical standards"}},{"value":"All authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}},{"value":"All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and\/or national research committee and with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Statement of human rights"}},{"value":"This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Statement on the welfare of animals"}},{"value":"Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.","order":5,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Informed consent"}}]}}