{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,6]],"date-time":"2026-05-06T02:27:12Z","timestamp":1778034432477,"version":"3.51.4"},"reference-count":44,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,27]],"date-time":"2023-10-27T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1698364800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,27]],"date-time":"2023-10-27T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1698364800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/100010269","name":"Wellcome Trust","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["206619\/Z\/17\/Z"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["206619\/Z\/17\/Z"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/100010269","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100000272","name":"National Institute for Health and Care Research","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["NIHR301696"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["NIHR301696"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100000272","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100017645","name":"Moorfields Eye Charity","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["GR001376"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["GR001376"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100017645","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100018956","name":"NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["NIHR203312"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["NIHR203312"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100018956","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100012618","name":"National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre at Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and UCL Institute of Ophthalmology","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["NIHR203322"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["NIHR203322"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100012618","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Doc Ophthalmol"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,12]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Purpose<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>To compare the diagnostic accuracy of the photopic negative response (PhNR) elicited by red-blue (RB) and white-white (WW) stimuli, for detection of retinal ganglion cell (RGC) dysfunction in a heterogeneous clinical cohort.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>Adults referred for electrophysiological investigations were recruited consecutively for this single-centre, prospective, paired diagnostic accuracy study. PhNRs were recorded to red flashes (1.5\u00a0cd\u00b7s\u00b7m<jats:sup>\u22122<\/jats:sup>) on a blue background (10\u00a0cd\u00b7m<jats:sup>\u22122<\/jats:sup>) and to white flashes on a white background (the latter being the ISCEV standard LA 3 stimulus). PhNR results were compared with a reference test battery assessing RGC\/optic nerve structure and function including optical coherence tomography (OCT) retinal nerve fibre layer thickness and mean RGC volume measurements, fundus photography, pattern electroretinography and visual evoked potentials. Primary outcome measures were differences in sensitivity and specificity of the two PhNR methods.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>Two hundred and forty-three participants were initially enrolled, with 200 (median age 54; range 18\u201395; female 65%) meeting inclusion criteria. Sensitivity was 53% (95% confidence intervals [CI] 39% to 68%) and 62% (95% CI 48% to 76%), for WW and RB PhNRs, respectively. Specificity was 80% (95% CI 74% to 86%) and 78% (95% CI 72% to 85%), respectively. There was a statistically significant difference between sensitivities (<jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u20090.046) but not specificities (<jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u20090.08) of the two methods. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) area under the curve (AUC) values were 0.73 for WW and 0.74 for RB PhNRs.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>PhNRs to red flashes on a blue background may be more sensitive than white-on-white stimuli, but there is no significant difference between specificities. This study highlights the value and potential convenience of using white-on-white stimuli, already used widely for routine ERG assessment.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1007\/s10633-023-09956-5","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,27]],"date-time":"2023-10-27T14:02:11Z","timestamp":1698415331000},"page":"165-177","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":5,"title":["The diagnostic accuracy of photopic negative responses evoked by broadband and chromatic stimuli in a clinically heterogeneous population"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"147","author":[{"given":"Shaun M.","family":"Leo","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Magella M.","family":"Neveu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Patrick","family":"Yu-Wai-Man","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Omar A.","family":"Mahroo","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-8391-6123","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Anthony G.","family":"Robson","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,27]]},"reference":[{"issue":"1","key":"9956_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1007\/s10633-012-9353-y","volume":"126","author":"M Bach","year":"2013","unstructured":"Bach M, Brigell MG, Hawlina M, Holder GE, Johnson MA, McCulloch DL et al (2013) ISCEV standard for clinical pattern electroretinography (PERG): 2012 update. Doc Ophthalmol 126(1):1\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10633-012-9353-y","journal-title":"Doc Ophthalmol"},{"issue":"1","key":"9956_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1007\/s10633-016-9553-y","volume":"133","author":"JV Odom","year":"2016","unstructured":"Odom JV, Bach M, Brigell M, Holder GE, McCulloch DL, Mizota A et al (2016) ISCEV standard for clinical visual evoked potentials: (2016 update). Doc Ophthalmol 133(1):1\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10633-016-9553-y","journal-title":"Doc Ophthalmol"},{"key":"9956_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"79","DOI":"10.1016\/b978-0-12-821377-3.00019-2","volume":"178","author":"N Jurkute","year":"2021","unstructured":"Jurkute N, Robson AG (2021) Electrophysiology in neuro-ophthalmology. Handb Clin Neurol 178:79\u201396. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/b978-0-12-821377-3.00019-2","journal-title":"Handb Clin Neurol"},{"issue":"1","key":"9956_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1007\/s10633-017-9621-y","volume":"136","author":"AG Robson","year":"2018","unstructured":"Robson AG, Nilsson J, Li S, Jalali S, Fulton AB, Tormene AP et al (2018) ISCEV guide to visual electrodiagnostic procedures. Doc Ophthalmol 136(1):1\u201326. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10633-017-9621-y","journal-title":"Doc Ophthalmol"},{"issue":"9","key":"9956_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2386","DOI":"10.1038\/s41433-021-01614-x","volume":"35","author":"OR Marmoy","year":"2021","unstructured":"Marmoy OR, Viswanathan S (2021) Clinical electrophysiology of the optic nerve and retinal ganglion cells. Eye 35(9):2386\u20132405. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41433-021-01614-x","journal-title":"Eye"},{"issue":"8","key":"9956_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"841","DOI":"10.1080\/08164622.2021.1903808","volume":"104","author":"PA Constable","year":"2021","unstructured":"Constable PA, Lee IO, Marmolejo-Ramos F, Skuse DH, Thompson DA (2021) The photopic negative response in autism spectrum disorder. Clin Exp Optom 104(8):841\u2013847. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/08164622.2021.1903808","journal-title":"Clin Exp Optom"},{"key":"9956_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"34","DOI":"10.1016\/j.schres.2019.09.005","volume":"219","author":"P Moghimi","year":"2020","unstructured":"Moghimi P, Jimenez NT, McLoon LK, Netoff TI, Lee MS, MacDonald A et al (2020) Electoretinographic evidence of retinal ganglion cell -dependent function in schizophrenia. Schizophr Res 219:34\u201346. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.schres.2019.09.005","journal-title":"Schizophr Res"},{"key":"9956_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1167\/tvst.9.12.7","author":"KO Al-Nosairy","year":"2020","unstructured":"Al-Nosairy KO, Prabhakaran GT, Pappelis K, Thieme H, Hoffmann MB (2020) Combined multi-modal assessment of glaucomatous damage with electroretinography and optical coherence tomography\/angiography. Transl Vis Sci Technol. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1167\/tvst.9.12.7","journal-title":"Transl Vis Sci Technol"},{"issue":"8","key":"9956_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3544","DOI":"10.1167\/iovs.08-1798","volume":"49","author":"M Kondo","year":"2008","unstructured":"Kondo M, Kurimoto Y, Sakai T, Koyasu T, Miyata K, Ueno S et al (2008) Recording focal macular photopic negative response (PhNR) from monkeys. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 49(8):3544\u20133550. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1167\/iovs.08-1798","journal-title":"Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci"},{"issue":"12","key":"9956_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"5636","DOI":"10.1167\/iovs.08-1946","volume":"49","author":"S Machida","year":"2008","unstructured":"Machida S, Toba Y, Ohtaki A, Gotoh Y, Kaneko M, Kurosaka D (2008) Photopic negative response of focal electoretinograms in glaucomatous eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 49(12):5636\u20135644. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1167\/iovs.08-1946","journal-title":"Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci"},{"issue":"13","key":"9956_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"7629","DOI":"10.1167\/iovs.15-17951","volume":"56","author":"EKA Morny","year":"2015","unstructured":"Morny EKA, Margrain TH, Binns AM, Votruba M (2015) Electrophysiological ON and OFF responses in autosomal dominant optic atrophy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 56(13):7629\u20137637. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1167\/iovs.15-17951","journal-title":"Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci"},{"issue":"3","key":"9956_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"207","DOI":"10.1007\/s10633-018-9638-x","volume":"136","author":"L Frishman","year":"2018","unstructured":"Frishman L, Sustar M, Kremers J, McAnany JJ, Sarossy M, Tzekov R et al (2018) ISCEV extended protocol for the photopic negative response (PhNR) of the full-field electroretinogram. Doc Ophthalmol 136(3):207\u2013211. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10633-018-9638-x","journal-title":"Doc Ophthalmol"},{"issue":"13","key":"9956_CR13","first-page":"4762","volume":"46","author":"NV Rangaswamy","year":"2005","unstructured":"Rangaswamy NV, Digby B, Harwerth RS, Frishman LJ (2005) Optimizing the spectral characteristics of a ganzfeld stimulus used for eliciting the photopic negative response (PhNR). Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci 46(13):4762\u20134762","journal-title":"Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci"},{"issue":"3","key":"9956_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"167","DOI":"10.1007\/s10633-008-9150-9","volume":"118","author":"M Sustar","year":"2009","unstructured":"Sustar M, Cvenkel B, Brecelj J (2009) The effect of broadband and monochromatic stimuli on the photopic negative response of the electroretinogram in normal subjects and in open-angle glaucoma patients. Doc Ophthalmol 118(3):167\u2013177. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10633-008-9150-9","journal-title":"Doc Ophthalmol"},{"issue":"2","key":"9956_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"79","DOI":"10.1007\/s10633-011-9304-z","volume":"124","author":"J Kremers","year":"2012","unstructured":"Kremers J, Jertila M, Link B, Pangeni G, Horn FK (2012) Spectral characteristics of the PhNR in the full-field flash electroretinogram of normals and glaucoma patients. Doc Ophthalmol 124(2):79\u201390. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10633-011-9304-z","journal-title":"Doc Ophthalmol"},{"issue":"2","key":"9956_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"114","DOI":"10.1007\/s10384-019-00711-5","volume":"64","author":"Y Hara","year":"2020","unstructured":"Hara Y, Machida S, Ebihara S, Ishizuka M, Tada A, Nishimura T (2020) Comparisons of photopic negative responses elicited by different conditions from glaucomatous eyes. Jpn J Ophthalmol 64(2):114\u2013126. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10384-019-00711-5","journal-title":"Jpn J Ophthalmol"},{"issue":"2","key":"9956_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"147","DOI":"10.1007\/s10633-008-9116-y","volume":"117","author":"N Wakili","year":"2008","unstructured":"Wakili N, Horn FK, J\u00fcnemann AG, Nguyen NX, Mardin CY, Korth M et al (2008) The photopic negative response of the blue-on-yellow flash-electroretinogram in glaucomas and normal subjects. Doc Ophthalmol 117(2):147\u2013154. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10633-008-9116-y","journal-title":"Doc Ophthalmol"},{"issue":"4","key":"9956_CR18","first-page":"203","volume":"19","author":"A-M \u0160imundi\u0107","year":"2009","unstructured":"\u0160imundi\u0107 A-M (2009) Measures of diagnostic accuracy: basic definitions. EJIFCC 19(4):203\u2013211","journal-title":"EJIFCC"},{"issue":"10","key":"9956_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"4818","DOI":"10.1167\/iovs.07-0218","volume":"48","author":"NV Rangaswamy","year":"2007","unstructured":"Rangaswamy NV, Shirato S, Kaneko M, Digby BI, Robson JG, Frishman LJ (2007) Effects of spectral characteristics of ganzfeld stimuli on the photopic negative response (PhNR) of the ERG. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 48(10):4818\u20134828. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1167\/iovs.07-0218","journal-title":"Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci"},{"key":"9956_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1155\/2013\/182021","volume":"2013","author":"X Shen","year":"2013","unstructured":"Shen X, Huang L, Fan N, He J (2013) Relationship among photopic negative response, retinal nerve fiber layer thickness, and visual field between normal and POAG Eyes. ISRN Ophthalmol 2013:182021. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1155\/2013\/182021","journal-title":"ISRN Ophthalmol"},{"issue":"1","key":"9956_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"21","DOI":"10.1007\/s10633-018-09668-1","volume":"138","author":"A Banerjee","year":"2019","unstructured":"Banerjee A, Khurana M, Sachidanandam R, Sen P (2019) Comparison between broadband and monochromatic photopic negative response in full-field electroretinogram in controls and subjects with primary open-angle glaucoma. Doc Ophthalmol 138(1):21\u201333. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10633-018-09668-1","journal-title":"Doc Ophthalmol"},{"issue":"2","key":"9956_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"111","DOI":"10.1007\/s10633-017-9578-x","volume":"134","author":"L Wilsey","year":"2017","unstructured":"Wilsey L, Gowrisankaran S, Cull G, Hardin C, Burgoyne CF, Fortune B (2017) Comparing three different modes of electroretinography in experimental glaucoma: diagnostic performance and correlation to structure. Doc Ophthalmol 134(2):111\u2013128. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10633-017-9578-x","journal-title":"Doc Ophthalmol"},{"issue":"1","key":"9956_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"17","DOI":"10.1007\/s10633-017-9595-9","volume":"135","author":"B Cvenkel","year":"2017","unstructured":"Cvenkel B, Sustar M, Perovsek D (2017) Ganglion cell loss in early glaucoma, as assessed by photopic negative response, pattern electroretinogram, and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Doc Ophthalmol 135(1):17\u201328. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10633-017-9595-9","journal-title":"Doc Ophthalmol"},{"issue":"7","key":"9956_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"572","DOI":"10.1097\/ijg.0000000000001509","volume":"29","author":"Y Kita","year":"2020","unstructured":"Kita Y, Hollo G, Saito T, Momota Y, Kita R, Tsunoda K et al (2020) RETeval portable electroretinogram parameters in different severity stages of glaucoma. J Glaucoma 29(7):572\u2013580. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/ijg.0000000000001509","journal-title":"J Glaucoma"},{"issue":"3","key":"9956_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"113","DOI":"10.3969\/j.issn.1000-4432.2012.03.001","volume":"27","author":"L Huang","year":"2012","unstructured":"Huang L, Shen X, Fan N, He J (2012) Clinical application of photopic negative response of the flash electroretinogram in primary open-angle Glaucoma. Eye Sci 27(3):113\u2013118. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3969\/j.issn.1000-4432.2012.03.001","journal-title":"Eye Sci"},{"key":"9956_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1155\/2011\/564131","author":"S Machida","year":"2011","unstructured":"Machida S, Tamada K, Oikawa T, Gotoh Y, Nishimura T, Kaneko M et al (2011) Comparison of photopic negative response of full-field and focal electroretinograms in detecting glaucomatous eyes. J Ophthalmol. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1155\/2011\/564131","journal-title":"J Ophthalmol"},{"issue":"5","key":"9956_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2201","DOI":"10.1167\/iovs.07-0887","volume":"49","author":"S Machida","year":"2008","unstructured":"Machida S, Gotoh Y, Toba Y, Ohtaki A, Kaneko M, Kurosaka D (2008) Correlation between photopic negative response and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness and optic disc topography in glaucomatous eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 49(5):2201\u20132207. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1167\/iovs.07-0887","journal-title":"Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci"},{"issue":"2","key":"9956_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"202","DOI":"10.1136\/bjo.2009.161166","volume":"94","author":"S Machida","year":"2010","unstructured":"Machida S, Tamada K, Oikawa T, Yokoyama D, Kaneko M, Kurosaka D (2010) Sensitivity and specificity of photopic negative response of focal electoretinogram to detect glaucomatous eyes. Br J Ophthalmol 94(2):202\u2013208. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bjo.2009.161166","journal-title":"Br J Ophthalmol"},{"issue":"3","key":"9956_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"165","DOI":"10.1007\/s10633-022-09872-0","volume":"144","author":"AG Robson","year":"2022","unstructured":"Robson AG, Frishman LJ, Grigg J, Hamilton R, Jeffrey BG, Kondo M et al (2022) ISCEV Standard for full-field clinical electroretinography (2022 update). Doc Ophthalmol 144(3):165\u2013177. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10633-022-09872-0","journal-title":"Doc Ophthalmol"},{"issue":"8","key":"9956_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"883","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2009.08.024","volume":"63","author":"A Hayen","year":"2010","unstructured":"Hayen A, Macaskill P, Irwig L, Bossuyt P (2010) Appropriate statistical methods are required to assess diagnostic tests for replacement, add-on, and triage. J Clin Epidemiol 63(8):883\u2013891. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2009.08.024","journal-title":"J Clin Epidemiol"},{"issue":"2","key":"9956_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"153","DOI":"10.1007\/bf02295996","volume":"12","author":"Q McNemar","year":"1947","unstructured":"McNemar Q (1947) Note on the sampling error of the difference between correlated proportions or percentages. Psychometrika 12(2):153\u2013157. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/bf02295996","journal-title":"Psychometrika"},{"issue":"3","key":"9956_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"272","DOI":"10.1191\/1740774506cn147oa","volume":"3","author":"CS Moskowitz","year":"2006","unstructured":"Moskowitz CS, Pepe MS (2006) Comparing the predictive values of diagnostic tests: sample size and analysis for paired study designs. Clin Trials 3(3):272\u2013279. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1191\/1740774506cn147oa","journal-title":"Clin Trials"},{"issue":"Suppl 1","key":"9956_CR33","first-page":"S83","volume":"29","author":"CM Florkowski","year":"2008","unstructured":"Florkowski CM (2008) Sensitivity, specificity, receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves and likelihood ratios: communicating the performance of diagnostic tests. Clin Biochem Rev 29(Suppl 1):S83\u2013S87","journal-title":"Clin Biochem Rev"},{"issue":"1","key":"9956_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"102","DOI":"10.1186\/s12874-017-0386-5","volume":"17","author":"GPJ McCray","year":"2017","unstructured":"McCray GPJ, Titman AC, Ghaneh P, Lancaster GA (2017) Sample size re-estimation in paired comparative diagnostic accuracy studies with a binary response. BMC Med Res Methodol 17(1):102. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12874-017-0386-5","journal-title":"BMC Med Res Methodol"},{"key":"9956_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3762651","DOI":"10.1155\/2017\/3762651","volume":"2017","author":"I Unal","year":"2017","unstructured":"Unal I (2017) Defining an optimal cut-point value in ROC analysis: an alternative approach. Comput Math Methods Med 2017:3762651. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1155\/2017\/3762651","journal-title":"Comput Math Methods Med"},{"issue":"4","key":"9956_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"327","DOI":"10.1007\/s10384-008-0546-6","volume":"52","author":"K Miyata","year":"2008","unstructured":"Miyata K, Ueno S, Kondo M, Koyasu T, Terasaki H (2008) Comparison of photopic negative responses elicited by red and white xenon flashes in monkeys. Jpn J Ophthalmol 52(4):327\u2013330. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10384-008-0546-6","journal-title":"Jpn J Ophthalmol"},{"issue":"2","key":"9956_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"186","DOI":"10.1093\/ptj\/79.2.186","volume":"79","author":"J Sim","year":"1999","unstructured":"Sim J, Reid N (1999) Statistical inference by confidence intervals: issues of interpretation and utilization. Phys Ther 79(2):186\u2013195. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/ptj\/79.2.186","journal-title":"Phys Ther"},{"issue":"1","key":"9956_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"57","DOI":"10.1007\/s10633-016-9528-z","volume":"132","author":"M Kirkiewicz","year":"2016","unstructured":"Kirkiewicz M, Lubinski W, Penkala K (2016) Photopic negative response of full-field electroretinography in patients with different stages of glaucomatous optic neuropathy. Doc Ophthalmol 132(1):57\u201365. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10633-016-9528-z","journal-title":"Doc Ophthalmol"},{"issue":"2","key":"9956_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1182","DOI":"10.1167\/iovs.12-11201","volume":"54","author":"D Preiser","year":"2013","unstructured":"Preiser D, Lagreze WA, Bach M, Poloschek CM (2013) Photopic negative response versus pattern electroretinogram in early glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 54(2):1182\u20131191. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1167\/iovs.12-11201","journal-title":"Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci"},{"issue":"3","key":"9956_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"145","DOI":"10.1136\/jmg.2007.054270","volume":"46","author":"P Yu-Wai-Man","year":"2009","unstructured":"Yu-Wai-Man P, Griffiths PG, Hudson G, Chinnery PF (2009) Inherited mitochondrial optic neuropathies. J Med Genet 46(3):145\u2013158. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/jmg.2007.054270","journal-title":"J Med Genet"},{"key":"9956_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"138","DOI":"10.1016\/j.mito.2017.07.006","volume":"36","author":"A Majander","year":"2017","unstructured":"Majander A, Robson AG, Joao C, Holder GE, Chinnery PF, Moore AT et al (2017) The pattern of retinal ganglion cell dysfunction in Leber hereditary optic neuropathy. Mitochondrion 36:138\u2013149. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.mito.2017.07.006","journal-title":"Mitochondrion"},{"issue":"2","key":"9956_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"820","DOI":"10.1167\/iovs.06-0845","volume":"48","author":"K Miyata","year":"2007","unstructured":"Miyata K, Nakamura M, Kondo M, Lin J, Ueno S, Miyake Y et al (2007) Reduction of oscillatory potentials and photopic negative response in patients with autosomal dominant optic atrophy with OPA1 mutations. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 48(2):820\u2013824. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1167\/iovs.06-0845","journal-title":"Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci"},{"issue":"6","key":"9956_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"608","DOI":"10.1007\/s10384-009-0731-2","volume":"53","author":"K Tamada","year":"2009","unstructured":"Tamada K, Machida S, Yokoyama D, Kurosaka D (2009) Photopic negative response of full-field and focal macular electroretinograms in patients with optic nerve atrophy. Jpn J Ophthalmol 53(6):608\u2013614. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10384-009-0731-2","journal-title":"Jpn J Ophthalmol"},{"issue":"3","key":"9956_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"189","DOI":"10.7326\/0003-4819-140-3-200402030-00010","volume":"140","author":"P Whiting","year":"2004","unstructured":"Whiting P, Rutjes AW, Reitsma JB, Glas AS, Bossuyt PM, Kleijnen J (2004) Sources of variation and bias in studies of diagnostic accuracy: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med 140(3):189\u2013202. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7326\/0003-4819-140-3-200402030-00010","journal-title":"Ann Intern Med"}],"container-title":["Documenta Ophthalmologica"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10633-023-09956-5.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s10633-023-09956-5\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10633-023-09956-5.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,11,11]],"date-time":"2023-11-11T02:03:00Z","timestamp":1699668180000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s10633-023-09956-5"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,27]]},"references-count":44,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,12]]}},"alternative-id":["9956"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10633-023-09956-5","relation":{},"ISSN":["0012-4486","1573-2622"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0012-4486","type":"print"},{"value":"1573-2622","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,27]]},"assertion":[{"value":"1 June 2023","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"28 September 2023","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"27 October 2023","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"None declared.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}},{"value":"Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Informed consent"}},{"value":"All procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and national research committees and with the Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments and comparable ethical standards.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Statement of human rights"}}]}}