{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,23]],"date-time":"2026-09-23T15:09:27Z","timestamp":1790176167479,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":38,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,23]],"date-time":"2026-09-23T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1790121600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,23]],"date-time":"2026-09-23T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1790121600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["HEC Forum"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>Most jurisdictions that have adopted presumed consent for deceased organ donation have simultaneously retained a family veto: where relatives object, retrieval does not proceed, even where the deceased registered a decision to donate. This article argues that the combination cannot be justified on any of the rationales offered for presumed consent itself. If the policy is defended as producing fewer frustrated wishes than an opt-in default, the veto substitutes a third party\u2019s preference for the person\u2019s own, and does so most often in the very class of cases the default governs; if it is defended on non-consensual grounds \u2014 the wrongfulness of refusal, or the claims of those awaiting transplant \u2014 the family\u2019s preferences have no standing at all. Disclosure does not dissolve the difficulty: telling registrants that relatives may object supplies no justification for the veto, leaves them no means of securing their decision, and, if complete, removes the ground on which the default was adopted. Three defences of the veto are then examined. The claim that the deceased has no interests to be set back is unavailable to defenders of the present arrangement; the burdens families bear ground support rather than authority; and public trust yields a defeasible institutional reason rather than a conferred power. A procedural\u2013substantive distinction is proposed that preserves the family\u2019s evidentiary and supportive role while withdrawing the override.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1007\/s10730-026-09616-6","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,23]],"date-time":"2026-09-23T14:47:10Z","timestamp":1790174830000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["The Family Veto in Presumed-Consent Organ Donation: Procedural Standing Without Substantive Override"],"prefix":"10.1007","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-6053-9137","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Kennedy Chun Yin","family":"Kong","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,23]]},"reference":[{"issue":"5","key":"9616_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"314","DOI":"10.1136\/medethics-2017-104475","volume":"44","author":"A Albertsen","year":"2018","unstructured":"Albertsen, A. (2018). Deemed consent: Assessing the new opt-out approach to organ procurement in Wales. Journal of Medical Ethics, 44(5), 314\u2013318.","journal-title":"Journal of Medical Ethics"},{"issue":"3","key":"9616_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"272","DOI":"10.1111\/bioe.12661","volume":"34","author":"A Albertsen","year":"2020","unstructured":"Albertsen, A. (2020). Against the family veto in organ procurement: Why the wishes of the dead should prevail when the living and the deceased disagree on organ donation. Bioethics, 34(3), 272\u2013280.","journal-title":"Bioethics"},{"issue":"6","key":"9616_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1453","DOI":"10.1016\/j.kint.2019.01.036","volume":"95","author":"A Arshad","year":"2019","unstructured":"Arshad, A., Anderson, B., & Sharif, A. (2019). Comparison of organ donation and transplantation rates between opt-out and opt-in systems. Kidney International, 95(6), 1453\u20131460.","journal-title":"Kidney International"},{"key":"9616_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/oso\/9780198842101.001.0001","volume-title":"Dead wrong: The ethics of posthumous harm","author":"D Boonin","year":"2019","unstructured":"Boonin, D. (2019). Dead wrong: The ethics of posthumous harm. Oxford University Press."},{"issue":"3","key":"9616_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"180","DOI":"10.1136\/jme.2009.032912","volume":"36","author":"J de Wispelaere","year":"2010","unstructured":"de Wispelaere, J., & Stirton, L. (2010). Advance commitment: An alternative approach to the family veto problem in organ procurement. Journal of Medical Ethics, 36(3), 180\u2013183.","journal-title":"Journal of Medical Ethics"},{"issue":"5","key":"9616_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e112","DOI":"10.1097\/TP.0000000000002622","volume":"103","author":"J Delgado","year":"2019","unstructured":"Delgado, J., Molina-P\u00e9rez, A., Shaw, D., & Rodr\u00edguez-Arias, D. (2019). The role of the family in deceased organ procurement: A guide for clinicians and policy makers. Transplantation, 103(5), e112\u2013e118.","journal-title":"Transplantation"},{"issue":"3","key":"9616_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"295","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1468-5930.2011.00524.x","volume":"28","author":"G den Hartogh","year":"2011","unstructured":"den Hartogh, G. (2011). Can consent be presumed? Journal of Applied Philosophy, 28(3), 295\u2013307.","journal-title":"Journal of Applied Philosophy"},{"key":"9616_CR8","volume-title":"Life\u2019s dominion: An argument about abortion, euthanasia, and individual freedom","author":"R Dworkin","year":"1993","unstructured":"Dworkin, R. (1993). Life\u2019s dominion: An argument about abortion, euthanasia, and individual freedom. Alfred A. Knopf."},{"key":"9616_CR9","volume-title":"Democratic authority: A philosophical framework","author":"D Estlund","year":"2008","unstructured":"Estlund, D. (2008). Democratic authority: A philosophical framework. Princeton University Press."},{"issue":"3\u20134","key":"9616_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"309","DOI":"10.1111\/1467-8519.00070","volume":"11","author":"R Fan","year":"1997","unstructured":"Fan, R. (1997). Self-determination vs. family-determination: Two incommensurable principles of autonomy. Bioethics, 11(3\u20134), 309\u2013322.","journal-title":"Bioethics"},{"key":"9616_CR11","volume-title":"Harm to others","author":"J Feinberg","year":"1984","unstructured":"Feinberg, J. (1984). Harm to others. Oxford University Press."},{"issue":"1","key":"9616_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"37","DOI":"10.1076\/jmep.29.1.37.30412","volume":"29","author":"MB Gill","year":"2004","unstructured":"Gill, M. B. (2004). Presumed consent, autonomy, and organ donation. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 29(1), 37\u201359.","journal-title":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy"},{"issue":"3","key":"9616_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"130","DOI":"10.1136\/jme.29.3.130","volume":"29","author":"J Harris","year":"2003","unstructured":"Harris, J. (2003). Organ procurement: Dead interests, living needs. Journal of Medical Ethics, 29(3), 130\u2013134.","journal-title":"Journal of Medical Ethics"},{"issue":"3","key":"9616_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"212","DOI":"10.1093\/jmp\/jhaf008","volume":"50","author":"AS Iltis","year":"2025","unstructured":"Iltis, A. S., & Denny, B. (2025). First-person authorization and family objections to organ donation. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 50(3), 212\u2013224.","journal-title":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy"},{"issue":"5649","key":"9616_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1338","DOI":"10.1126\/science.1091721","volume":"302","author":"EJ Johnson","year":"2003","unstructured":"Johnson, E. J., & Goldstein, D. (2003). Do defaults save lives? Science, 302(5649), 1338\u20131339.","journal-title":"Science"},{"issue":"10","key":"9616_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"832","DOI":"10.1136\/medethics-2015-102775","volume":"41","author":"D MacKay","year":"2015","unstructured":"MacKay, D. (2015). Opt-out and consent. Journal of Medical Ethics, 41(10), 832\u2013835.","journal-title":"Journal of Medical Ethics"},{"issue":"6","key":"9616_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1301","DOI":"10.1016\/j.kint.2019.02.028","volume":"95","author":"R Matesanz","year":"2019","unstructured":"Matesanz, R., & Dom\u00ednguez-Gil, B. (2019). Opt-out legislations: The mysterious viability of the false. Kidney International, 95(6), 1301\u20131303.","journal-title":"Kidney International"},{"issue":"1","key":"9616_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"100673","DOI":"10.1016\/j.trre.2021.100673","volume":"36","author":"A Molina-P\u00e9rez","year":"2022","unstructured":"Molina-P\u00e9rez, A., Delgado, J., Frunza, M., Morgan, M., Randhawa, G., Reiger-Van de Wijdeven, J., Schicktanz, S., Schiks, E., W\u00f6hlke, S., & Rodr\u00edguez-Arias, D. (2022). Should the family have a role in deceased organ donation decision-making? A systematic review of public knowledge and attitudes towards organ procurement policies in Europe. Transplantation Reviews, 36(1), 100673.","journal-title":"Transplantation Reviews"},{"key":"9616_CR19","volume-title":"Organ and tissue donation and transplantation activity report 2024\/25","author":"NHS Blood and Transplant","year":"2025","unstructured":"NHS Blood and Transplant. (2025). Organ and tissue donation and transplantation activity report 2024\/25. NHS Blood and Transplant."},{"issue":"2","key":"9616_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"243","DOI":"10.1086\/292226","volume":"91","author":"E Partridge","year":"1981","unstructured":"Partridge, E. (1981). Posthumous interests and posthumous respect. Ethics, 91(2), 243\u2013264.","journal-title":"Ethics"},{"issue":"2","key":"9616_CR21","first-page":"183","volume":"21","author":"G Pitcher","year":"1984","unstructured":"Pitcher, G. (1984). The misfortunes of the dead. American Philosophical Quarterly, 21(2), 183\u2013188.","journal-title":"American Philosophical Quarterly"},{"issue":"12","key":"9616_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"854","DOI":"10.1136\/medethics-2021-107630","volume":"49","author":"GM Qurashi","year":"2023","unstructured":"Qurashi, G. M. (2023). Opt-out paradigms for deceased organ donation are ethically incoherent. Journal of Medical Ethics, 49(12), 854\u2013859.","journal-title":"Journal of Medical Ethics"},{"key":"9616_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.4159\/9780674042605","volume-title":"A theory of justice","author":"J Rawls","year":"1971","unstructured":"Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Harvard University Press."},{"key":"9616_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.a3162","volume":"338","author":"A Rithalia","year":"2009","unstructured":"Rithalia, A., McDaid, C., Suekarran, S., Myers, L., & Sowden, A. (2009). Impact of presumed consent for organ donation on donation rates: A systematic review. BMJ, 338, Article a3162.","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"9746","key":"9616_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1109","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(10)61342-6","volume":"376","author":"D Rodr\u00edguez-Arias","year":"2010","unstructured":"Rodr\u00edguez-Arias, D., Wright, L., & Paredes, D. (2010). Success factors and ethical challenges of the Spanish model of organ donation. The Lancet, 376(9746), 1109\u20131112.","journal-title":"The Lancet"},{"issue":"2","key":"9616_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"84","DOI":"10.1136\/jme.2009.033423","volume":"36","author":"B Saunders","year":"2010","unstructured":"Saunders, B. (2010). Normative consent and opt-out organ donation. Journal of Medical Ethics, 36(2), 84\u201387.","journal-title":"Journal of Medical Ethics"},{"issue":"2","key":"9616_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"69","DOI":"10.1136\/medethics-2011-100039","volume":"38","author":"B Saunders","year":"2012","unstructured":"Saunders, B. (2012). Opt-out organ donation without presumptions. Journal of Medical Ethics, 38(2), 69\u201372.","journal-title":"Journal of Medical Ethics"},{"issue":"3","key":"9616_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"482","DOI":"10.1097\/TP.0000000000001536","volume":"101","author":"D Shaw","year":"2017","unstructured":"Shaw, D., Georgieva, D., Haase, B., Gardiner, D., Lewis, P., Jansen, N., Wind, T., Samuel, U., McDonald, M., & Ploeg, R. (2017). Family over rules? An ethical analysis of allowing families to overrule donation intentions. Transplantation, 101(3), 482\u2013487.","journal-title":"Transplantation"},{"issue":"2","key":"9616_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"179","DOI":"10.1177\/1751143719846416","volume":"21","author":"D Shaw","year":"2020","unstructured":"Shaw, D., Lewis, P., Jansen, N., Samuel, U., Wind, T., Georgieva, D., Haase, B., Ploeg, R., & Gardiner, D. (2020). Family overrule of registered refusal to donate organs. Journal of the Intensive Care Society, 21(2), 179\u2013182.","journal-title":"Journal of the Intensive Care Society"},{"issue":"4","key":"9616_CR30","first-page":"311","volume":"42","author":"JS Taylor","year":"2005","unstructured":"Taylor, J. S. (2005). The myth of posthumous harm. American Philosophical Quarterly, 42(4), 311\u2013322.","journal-title":"American Philosophical Quarterly"},{"key":"9616_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.4324\/9780203106426","volume-title":"Death, posthumous harm, and bioethics","author":"JS Taylor","year":"2012","unstructured":"Taylor, J. S. (2012). Death, posthumous harm, and bioethics. Routledge."},{"key":"9616_CR32","volume-title":"Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness","author":"RH Thaler","year":"2008","unstructured":"Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. Yale University Press."},{"issue":"2","key":"9616_CR33","first-page":"1888","volume":"27","author":"RM Veatch","year":"1995","unstructured":"Veatch, R. M., & Pitt, J. B. (1995). The myth of presumed consent: Ethical problems in new organ procurement strategies. Transplantation Proceedings, 27(2), 1888\u20131892.","journal-title":"Transplantation Proceedings"},{"issue":"1","key":"9616_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"26","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1468-5930.2007.00339.x","volume":"24","author":"TM Wilkinson","year":"2007","unstructured":"Wilkinson, T. M. (2007). Individual and family decisions about organ donation. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 24(1), 26\u201340.","journal-title":"Journal of Applied Philosophy"},{"key":"9616_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780199607860.001.0001","volume-title":"Ethics and the acquisition of organs","author":"TM Wilkinson","year":"2011","unstructured":"Wilkinson, T. M. (2011). Ethics and the acquisition of organs. Clarendon Press."},{"key":"9616_CR36","volume-title":"Ethics and the limits of philosophy","author":"B Williams","year":"1985","unstructured":"Williams, B. (1985). Ethics and the limits of philosophy. Harvard University Press."},{"issue":"8","key":"9616_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"829","DOI":"10.1111\/bioe.13052","volume":"36","author":"NJ Williams","year":"2022","unstructured":"Williams, N. J., & Manson, N. C. (2022). Take my kidneys but not my corneas \u2014 Selective preferences as a hidden problem for \u2018opt-out\u2019 organ donation policy. Bioethics, 36(8), 829\u2013839.","journal-title":"Bioethics"},{"issue":"1","key":"9616_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"58","DOI":"10.1093\/jmp\/jhaa027","volume":"46","author":"A Zambrano","year":"2021","unstructured":"Zambrano, A. (2021). Fewer mistakes and presumed consent. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 46(1), 58\u201379.","journal-title":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy"}],"container-title":["HEC Forum"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10730-026-09616-6.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s10730-026-09616-6","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10730-026-09616-6.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,23]],"date-time":"2026-09-23T14:47:12Z","timestamp":1790174832000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s10730-026-09616-6"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,23]]},"references-count":38,"alternative-id":["9616"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10730-026-09616-6","relation":{},"ISSN":["0956-2737","1572-8498"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0956-2737","type":"print"},{"value":"1572-8498","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,23]]},"assertion":[{"value":"19 August 2026","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"17 September 2026","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"23 September 2026","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing interests.","order":1,"name":"Ethics","label":"Competing Interests","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The author would like to thank the editor and the anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments and constructive suggestions, which greatly improved the quality of this paper.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","label":"Remarks","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}}]}}