{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,17]],"date-time":"2026-08-17T15:38:32Z","timestamp":1786981112197,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":27,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"7","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2018,6,22]],"date-time":"2018-06-22T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1529625600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Int Ophthalmol"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,7]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s10792-018-0967-2","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2018,6,22]],"date-time":"2018-06-22T01:40:41Z","timestamp":1529631641000},"page":"1501-1509","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":8,"title":["Comparison of Holladay equivalent keratometry readings and anterior corneal surface keratometry measurements in keratoconus"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"39","author":[{"given":"Ayhan","family":"Saglik","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Hakim","family":"Celik","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2018,6,22]]},"reference":[{"key":"967_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"297","DOI":"10.1016\/S0039-6257(97)00119-7","volume":"42","author":"YS Rabinowitz","year":"1988","unstructured":"Rabinowitz YS (1988) Keratoconus. Surv Ophthalmol 42:297\u2013319","journal-title":"Surv Ophthalmol"},{"key":"967_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"481","DOI":"10.1016\/j.survophthal.2010.03.001","volume":"55","author":"R Gutmark","year":"2010","unstructured":"Gutmark R, Guyton DL (2010) Origins of the keratometer and its evolving role in ophthalmology. Surv Ophthalmol 55:481\u2013497. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.survophthal.2010.03.001","journal-title":"Surv Ophthalmol"},{"key":"967_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"152","DOI":"10.1136\/bjo.70.2.152","volume":"70","author":"T Olsen","year":"1986","unstructured":"Olsen T (1986) On the calculation of power from curvature of the cornea. Br J Ophthalmol 70:152\u2013154","journal-title":"Br J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"967_CR4","first-page":"113","volume-title":"Introduction to the optics of the eye, UK","author":"DA Goss","year":"2002","unstructured":"Goss DA, West RW (2002) Introduction to the optics of the eye, UK. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, pp 113\u2013135"},{"key":"967_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"862","DOI":"10.3928\/1081597X-20090917-07","volume":"25","author":"JT Holladay","year":"2009","unstructured":"Holladay JT, Hill WE, Steinmuller A (2009) Corneal power measurements using Scheimpflug imaging in eyes with prior corneal refractive surgery. J Refract Surg 25:862\u2013868. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3928\/1081597X-20090917-07","journal-title":"J Refract Surg"},{"key":"967_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1198","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2009.02.030","volume":"35","author":"Q Tang","year":"2009","unstructured":"Tang Q, Hoffer KJ, Olson M, Miller KM (2009) Accuracy of Scheimpflug Holladay equivalent keratometry readings after corneal refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 35:1198\u20131203. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jcrs.2009.02.030","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"key":"967_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"700","DOI":"10.3129\/i09-172","volume":"44","author":"J Woodmass","year":"2009","unstructured":"Woodmass J, Rocha G (2009) A comparison of Scheimpflug imaging simulated and Holladay equivalent keratometry values with partial coherence interferometry keratometry measurements in phakic eyes. Can J Ophthalmol 44:700\u2013704. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3129\/i09-172","journal-title":"Can J Ophthalmol"},{"issue":"4","key":"967_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"341","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1442-9071.2010.02286.x","volume":"38","author":"KG Falavarjani","year":"2010","unstructured":"Falavarjani KG, Hashemi M, Joshaghani M, Azadi P, Ghaempanah MJ, Aghai GH (2010) Determining corneal power using Pentacam after myopic photorefractive keratectomy. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 38(4):341\u2013345. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1442-9071.2010.02286.x","journal-title":"Clin Exp Ophthalmol"},{"key":"967_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1984","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2011.05.031","volume":"37","author":"S Lam","year":"2011","unstructured":"Lam S, Gupta BK, Hahn JM, Manastersky NA (2011) Refractive outcomes after cataract surgery: Scheimpflug keratometry versus standard automated keratometry in virgin corneas. J Cataract Refract Surg 37:1984\u20131987. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jcrs.2011.05.031","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"key":"967_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"295","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2010.08.050","volume":"37","author":"RJ Symes","year":"2011","unstructured":"Symes RJ, Ursell PG (2011) Automated keratometry in routine cataract surgery: comparison of Scheimpflug and conventional values. J Cataract Refract Surg 37:295\u2013301. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jcrs.2010.08.050","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"key":"967_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"825","DOI":"10.1111\/ceo.12124","volume":"41","author":"N Karunaratne","year":"2013","unstructured":"Karunaratne N (2013) Comparison of the Pentacam equivalent keratometry reading and IOL Master keratometry measurement in intraocular lens power calculations. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 41:825\u2013834. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/ceo.12124","journal-title":"Clin Exp Ophthalmol"},{"key":"967_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"672","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2016.01.042","volume":"42","author":"A Mueller","year":"2016","unstructured":"Mueller A, Thomas BC, Auffarth GU, Holzer MP (2016) Comparison of a new image-guided system versus partial coherence interferometry, Scheimpflug imaging, and optical low-coherence reflectometry devices: keratometry and repeatability. J Cataract Refract Surg 42:672\u2013678. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jcrs.2016.01.042","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"key":"967_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"539","DOI":"10.3928\/1081-597X-20060601-05","volume":"22","author":"JL Ali\u00f3","year":"2006","unstructured":"Ali\u00f3 JL, Shabayek MH (2006) Corneal higher order aberrations: a method to grade keratoconus. J Refract Surg 22:539\u2013545","journal-title":"J Refract Surg"},{"key":"967_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2181","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2011.06.028","volume":"37","author":"W Hill","year":"2011","unstructured":"Hill W, Osher R, Cooke D, Solomon K, Sandoval H, Salas-Cervantes R, Potvin R (2011) Simulation of toric intraocular lens results: manual keratometry versus dual-zone automated keratometry from an integrated biometer. J Cataract Refract Surg 37:2181\u20132187. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jcrs.2011.06.028","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"key":"967_CR15","unstructured":"Haag-Streit AG. The lenstar LS and T-Cone topography. \n                    https:\/\/www.haag-streit.com\/fileadmin\/Haag-Streit_USA\/Lenstar\/Landing\/papers\/Brochure_Lenstar_eng.pdf"},{"key":"967_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"137","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2007.09.033","volume":"34","author":"J-D Ho","year":"2008","unstructured":"Ho J-D, Tsai C-Y, Tsai RJ-F, Kuo L-L, Tsai I-L, Liou S-W (2008) Validity of the keratometric index: evaluation by the Pentacam rotating Scheimpflug camera. J Cataract Refract Surg 34:137\u2013145. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jcrs.2007.09.033","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"key":"967_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"539","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1475-1313.2012.00942.x","volume":"32","author":"Z Tajbakhsh","year":"2012","unstructured":"Tajbakhsh Z, Salouti R, Nowroozzadeh MH, AmiriM Aghazadeh-, Tabatabaee S, Zamani M (2012) Comparison of keratometry measurements using the Pentacam HR, the Orbscan IIz, and the TMS-4 topographer. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 32:539\u2013546. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1475-1313.2012.00942.x","journal-title":"Ophthalmic Physiol Opt"},{"key":"967_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Tonn B, Klaproth OK, Kohnen T (2015) Anterior surface\u2013based keratometry compared with Scheimpflug tomography\u2013based total corneal astigmatism. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 56:291\u2013298. \n                    http:\/\/iovs.arvojournals.org\/article.aspx?articleid=2212759\n                    \n                  . Accessed January 20, 2016. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1167\/iovs.14-15659","DOI":"10.1167\/iovs.14-15659"},{"key":"967_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Wang L, Mahmoud AM, Anderson BL, Koch DD, Roberts CJ (2011) Total corneal power estimation: ray tracing method versus Gaussian optics formula. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 52:1716\u20131722. \n                    http:\/\/iovs.arvojournals.org\/article.aspx?articleidZ2127132\n                    \n                  . Accessed January 20, 2016. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1167\/iovs.09-4982","DOI":"10.1167\/iovs.09-4982"},{"key":"967_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"307","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(86)90837-8","volume":"327","author":"JM Bland","year":"1986","unstructured":"Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 327:307\u2013310","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"issue":"3","key":"967_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"176","DOI":"10.3928\/1081597X-20150224-01","volume":"31","author":"IR Hidalgo","year":"2015","unstructured":"Hidalgo IR, Rozema JJ, Dhubhghaill SN, Zakaria N, Koppen C, Tassignon MJ (2015) Repeatability and inter-device agreement for three different methods of keratometry: placido, Scheimpflug, and color LED corneal topography. J Refract Surg 31(3):176\u2013181. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3928\/1081597X-20150224-01","journal-title":"J Refract Surg"},{"issue":"4","key":"967_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"249","DOI":"10.3928\/1081597X-20150212-01","volume":"31","author":"S Klijn","year":"2015","unstructured":"Klijn S, Reus NJ, Sicam VA (2015) Evaluation of keratometry with a novel Color-LED corneal topographer. J Refract Surg 31(4):249\u2013256. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3928\/1081597X-20150212-01","journal-title":"J Refract Surg"},{"issue":"1","key":"967_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"17","DOI":"10.1007\/s10792-015-0069-3","volume":"36","author":"JV Laursen","year":"2016","unstructured":"Laursen JV, Jeppesen P, Olsen T (2016) Precision of 5 different keratometry devices. Int Ophthalmol 36(1):17\u201320. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10792-015-0069-3","journal-title":"Int Ophthalmol"},{"issue":"3","key":"967_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"453","DOI":"10.18240\/ijo.2017.03.20","volume":"10","author":"RR Penna","year":"2017","unstructured":"Penna RR, de Sanctis U, Catalano M, Brusasco L, Grignolo FM (2017) Placido disk-based topography versus high-resolution rotating Scheimpflug camera for corneal power measurements in keratoconic and post-LASIK eyes: reliability and agreement. Int J Ophthalmol 10(3):453. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.18240\/ijo.2017.03.20","journal-title":"Int J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"967_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"330","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2008.10.041","volume":"35","author":"HJ Shammas","year":"2009","unstructured":"Shammas HJ, Hoffer KJ, Shammas MC (2009) Scheimpflug photography keratometry readings for routine intraocular lens power calculation. J Cataract Refract Surg 35:330\u2013334. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jcrs.2008.10.041","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"key":"967_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1107","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2009.11.026","volume":"36","author":"RJ Symes","year":"2010","unstructured":"Symes RJ, Say MJ, Ursell PG (2010) Scheimpflug keratometry versus conventional automated keratometry in routine cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 36:1107\u20131114. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jcrs.2009.11.026","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"issue":"4","key":"967_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"598","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2012.11.022","volume":"39","author":"G Savini","year":"2013","unstructured":"Savini G, Barboni P, Carbonelli M, Hoffer KJ (2013) Comparison of methods to measure corneal power for intraocular lens power calculation using a rotating Scheimpflug camera. J Cataract Refract Surg 39(4):598\u2013604. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jcrs.2012.11.022","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"}],"container-title":["International Ophthalmology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10792-018-0967-2.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s10792-018-0967-2\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10792-018-0967-2.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2019,8,31]],"date-time":"2019-08-31T07:03:12Z","timestamp":1567234992000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s10792-018-0967-2"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2018,6,22]]},"references-count":27,"journal-issue":{"issue":"7","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,7]]}},"alternative-id":["967"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10792-018-0967-2","relation":{},"ISSN":["0165-5701","1573-2630"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0165-5701","type":"print"},{"value":"1573-2630","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2018,6,22]]},"assertion":[{"value":"25 January 2018","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"16 June 2018","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"22 June 2018","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Compliance with ethical standards"}},{"value":"All authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest (such as honoraria; educational grants; participation in speakers\u2019 bureaus; membership, employment, consultancies, stock ownership, or other equity interest; and expert testimony or patent-licensing arrangements), or non-financial interest (such as personal or professional relationships, affiliations, knowledge or beliefs) in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}},{"value":"All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and\/or national research committee and with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethical approval"}},{"value":"Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. \u201cAdditional informed consent was obtained from all individual participants for whom identifying information is included in this article.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Informed consent"}}]}}