{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,28]],"date-time":"2025-10-28T03:19:26Z","timestamp":1761621566644},"reference-count":18,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"5","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,2,5]],"date-time":"2021-02-05T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1612483200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,2,5]],"date-time":"2021-02-05T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1612483200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Int Ophthalmol"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,5]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s10792-021-01720-5","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,2,6]],"date-time":"2021-02-06T14:22:40Z","timestamp":1612621360000},"page":"1659-1669","update-policy":"http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":6,"title":["Agreement of keratometric readings measured using rotating Scheimpflug imaging, auto-refractokeratometer, and biograph in eyes with keratoconus"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"41","author":[{"given":"Meltem Guzin","family":"Alt\u0131nel","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Hasim","family":"Uslu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,2,5]]},"reference":[{"key":"1720_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"244","DOI":"10.1097\/ICL.0b013e318030c96d","volume":"33","author":"N Thebpatiphat","year":"2007","unstructured":"Thebpatiphat N, Hammersmith KM, Rapuano CJ, Ayres BD, Cohen EJ (2007) Cataract surgery in keratoconus. Eye Contact Lens 33:244\u2013246. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/ICL.0b013e318030c96d","journal-title":"Eye Contact Lens"},{"issue":"1","key":"1720_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1312","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-018-20040-w","volume":"22\u20138","author":"K Kamiya","year":"2018","unstructured":"Kamiya K, Iijima K, Nobuyuki S, Mori Y, Miyata K, Yamaguchi T, Shimazaki J, Watanabe S, Maeda N (2018) Predictability of intraocular lens power calculation for cataract with keratoconus: a multicenter study. Sci Rep 22\u20138(1):1312. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41598-018-20040-w","journal-title":"Sci Rep"},{"key":"1720_CR3","volume-title":"Intraocular lens power calculations","author":"HJ Shammas","year":"2004","unstructured":"Shammas HJ (2004) Intraocular lens power calculations. SLACK Incorporated, Thorofare, USA"},{"key":"1720_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"807","DOI":"10.1136\/bjo.2008.152736","volume":"93","author":"MP Holzer","year":"2009","unstructured":"Holzer MP, Mamusa M, Auffarth GU (2009) Accuracy of a new partial coherence interferometry analyser for biometric measurements. Br J Ophthalmol 93:807\u2013810. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bjo.2008.152736","journal-title":"Br J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"1720_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"60","DOI":"10.1038\/eye.1992.11","volume":"6","author":"P Sunderraj","year":"1992","unstructured":"Sunderraj P (1992) Clinical comparison of automated and manual keratometry in pre-operative ocular biometry. Eye (Lond) 6:60\u201362. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/eye.1992.11","journal-title":"Eye (Lond)"},{"issue":"5","key":"1720_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1065","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2014.08.043","volume":"41","author":"H Hashemi","year":"2015","unstructured":"Hashemi H, Yekta A, Khabazkhoob M (2015) Effect of keratoconus grades on repeatability of keratometry readings: comparison of 5 devices. J Cataract Refract Surg 41(5):1065\u20131072. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jcrs.2014.08.043","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"key":"1720_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"307","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(86)90837-8","volume":"1","author":"JM Bland","year":"1986","unstructured":"Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurements. Lancet 1:307\u2013310","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"1720_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e0147086","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0147086","volume":"11","author":"Y Hua","year":"2016","unstructured":"Hua Y, Xu Z, Qiu W et al (2016) Precision (repeatability and reproducibility) and agreement of corneal power measurements obtained by Topcon KR-1W and iTrace. PLoS One 11:e0147086. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0147086","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"key":"1720_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"949","DOI":"10.1136\/bjo.2008.156554","volume":"93","author":"PJ Buckhurst","year":"2009","unstructured":"Buckhurst PJ, Wolffsohn JS, Shah S, Naroo SA, Davies LN, Berrow EJ (2009) A new optical low coherence reflectometry device for ocular biometry in cataract patients. Br J Ophthalmol 93:949\u2013953. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bjo.2008.156554","journal-title":"Br J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"1720_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"644","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2009.11.007","volume":"36","author":"KJ Hoffer","year":"2010","unstructured":"Hoffer KJ, Shammas HJ, Savini G (2010) Comparison of 2 laser instruments for measuring axial length. J Cataract Refract Surg 36:644\u2013648. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jcrs.2009.11.007","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"key":"1720_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"106","DOI":"10.1136\/bjo.2009.161729","volume":"94","author":"LP Cruysberg","year":"2010","unstructured":"Cruysberg LP, Doors M, Verbakel F, Berendschot TT, De Brabander J, Nuijts RM (2010) Evaluation of the Lenstar LS900 non-contact biometer. Br J Ophthalmol 94:106\u2013110. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bjo.2009.161729","journal-title":"Br J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"1720_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1626","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2012.04.031","volume":"38","author":"W Chen","year":"2012","unstructured":"Chen W, Mc Alinden C, Pesudovs K, Wang Q, Lu F, Feng Y et al (2012) Scheimpflug-Placido topographer and optical low-coherence reflectometry biometer: repeatability and agreement. J Cataract Refract Surg 38:1626\u20131632. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jcrs.2012.04.031","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"issue":"5","key":"1720_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"363","DOI":"10.1016\/j.clae.2015.04.003","volume":"38","author":"J Huang","year":"2015","unstructured":"Huang J, Savini G, Su B, Zhu R, Feng Y, Lin S, Chen H, Wang Q (2015) Comparison of keratometry and white-to-white measurements obtained by Lenstar with those obtained by autokeratometry and corneal topography. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 38(5):363\u2013367. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.clae.2015.04.003","journal-title":"Cont Lens Anterior Eye"},{"key":"1720_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"341","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2010.08.044","volume":"37","author":"J Huang","year":"2011","unstructured":"Huang J, Pesudovs K, Wen D, Chen S, Wright T, Wang X et al (2011) Comparison of anterior segment measurements with rotating Scheimpflug photography and partial coherence reflectometry. J Cataract Refract Surg 37:341\u2013348. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jcrs.2010.08.044","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"key":"1720_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"201","DOI":"10.4103\/0974-9233.114791","volume":"20","author":"OO Ucakhan","year":"2013","unstructured":"Ucakhan OO, Akbel V, Biyikli Z, Kanpolat A (2013) Comparison of corneal curvature and anterior chamber depth measurements using the manual keratometer, Lenstar LS900 and the Pentacam. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol 20:201\u2013206. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4103\/0974-9233.114791","journal-title":"Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol"},{"issue":"4","key":"1720_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"232","DOI":"10.1016\/j.optom.2019.06.001","volume":"12","author":"H Hashemi","year":"2019","unstructured":"Hashemi H, Heydarian S, Ali Yekta A, Aghamirsalim M, Ahmadi-Pishkuhi M, Valadkhan M, Ostadimoghaddam H, Amiri AA, Khabazkhoob M (2019) Agreement between Pentacam and handheld Auto-Refractor\/Keratometer for keratometry measurement. J Optom 12(4):232\u2013239. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.optom.2019.06.001","journal-title":"J Optom"},{"issue":"1","key":"1720_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"10","DOI":"10.3341\/kjo.2012.26.1.10","volume":"26","author":"M Chang","year":"2012","unstructured":"Chang M, Kang SY, Kim HM (2012) Which keratometer is most reliable for correcting astigmatism with toric intraocular lenses? Korean J Ophthalmol 26(1):10\u201314. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3341\/kjo.2012.26.1.10","journal-title":"Korean J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"1720_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"295","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2010.08.050","volume":"37","author":"RJ Symes","year":"2011","unstructured":"Symes RJ, Ursell PG (2011) Automated keratometry in routine cataract surgery: comparison of Scheimpflug and conventional values. J Cataract Refract Surg 37:295\u2013301. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jcrs.2010.08.050","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"}],"container-title":["International Ophthalmology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10792-021-01720-5.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s10792-021-01720-5\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10792-021-01720-5.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2021,4,30]],"date-time":"2021-04-30T14:34:54Z","timestamp":1619793294000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s10792-021-01720-5"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,2,5]]},"references-count":18,"journal-issue":{"issue":"5","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,5]]}},"alternative-id":["1720"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10792-021-01720-5","relation":{},"ISSN":["0165-5701","1573-2630"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0165-5701","type":"print"},{"value":"1573-2630","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,2,5]]},"assertion":[{"value":"7 October 2020","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"9 January 2021","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"5 February 2021","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Compliance with ethical standards"}},{"value":"The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}},{"value":"Written informed consent was obtained from the subjects, and the study was conducted according to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethical approval"}}]}}