{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,8]],"date-time":"2026-09-08T14:46:48Z","timestamp":1788878808884,"version":"build-2803163510"},"reference-count":50,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,9,5]],"date-time":"2022-09-05T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1662336000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,9,5]],"date-time":"2022-09-05T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1662336000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100001809","name":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["82070937"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["82070937"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100001809","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100001809","name":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["81870640"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["81870640"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100001809","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"name":"National Science Foundation for Young Scientists of China","award":["82101097"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["82101097"]}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Int Ophthalmol"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Purpose<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>To compare the accuracy of the new-generation intraocular lens power calculation formulae in axial myopic eyes.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>Four databases, PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE and Cochrane library, were searched to select relevant studies published between Apr 11, 2011, and Apr 11, 2021. Axial myopic eyes were defined as an axial length more than 24.5\u00a0mm. There are 13 formulae to participate in the final comparison (SRK\/T, Hoffer Q, Holladay I, Holladay II, Haigis for traditional formulae, Barrett Universal II, Olsen, T2, VRF, EVO, Kane, Hill-RBF, LSF for the new-generation formulae). The primary outcomes were the percentage of eyes with a refractive prediction error in \u00b1\u20090.5D and \u00b1\u20091.0D.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>A total of 2273 eyes in 15 studies were enrolled in the final meta-analysis. Overall, the new-generation formulae showed a relatively more accurate outcome in comparison with traditional formulae. The percentage of eyes with a predictive refraction error in \u00b1\u20090.5D (\u00b1\u20091.0D) of Kane, EVO and LSF was higher than 80% (95%), which was only significantly different from Hoffer Q (all <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\u2009&lt;\u20090.05). Moreover, another two new-generation formulae, Barrett Universal II and Olsen, had higher percentages than SRK\/T, Hoffer Q, Holladay I and Haigis for eyes with predictive refraction error in \u00b1\u20090.5D and \u00b1\u20091.0D (all <jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\u2009&lt;\u20090.05). In \u00b1\u20090.5D group, Hill-RBF was better than SRK\/T (<jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u20090.02), and Holladay I was better than EVO (<jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u20090.03) and LSF (<jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u20090.009), and Hoffer Q had a lower percentage than EVO, Kane, Hill-RBF and LSF (<jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u20090.007, 0.004, 0.002, 0.03, respectively). Barrett Universal II was better than T2 (<jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u20090.02), and Hill-RBF was better than SRK\/T (<jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u20090.009). No significant difference was found in other pairwise comparison.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>The new-generation formula is more accurate in intraocular lens power calculation for axial myopic eyes in comparison with the third- or fourth-generation formula.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1007\/s10792-022-02466-4","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,9,5]],"date-time":"2022-09-05T07:06:05Z","timestamp":1662361565000},"page":"619-633","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":23,"title":["Comparing the accuracy of the new-generation intraocular lens power calculation formulae in axial myopic eyes: a meta-analysis"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"43","author":[{"given":"Hongyu","family":"Li","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Zi","family":"Ye","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Yu","family":"Luo","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-4132-658X","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Zhaohui","family":"Li","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,9,5]]},"reference":[{"issue":"1","key":"2466_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"45","DOI":"10.1097\/icu.0000000000000217","volume":"27","author":"EW Chong","year":"2016","unstructured":"Chong EW, Mehta JS (2016) High myopia and cataract surgery. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 27(1):45\u201350. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/icu.0000000000000217","journal-title":"Curr Opin Ophthalmol"},{"issue":"2","key":"2466_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"187","DOI":"10.1016\/s0886-3350(13)80249-0","volume":"17","author":"T Olsen","year":"1991","unstructured":"Olsen T, Thim K, Corydon L (1991) Accuracy of the newer generation intraocular lens power calculation formulas in long and short eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg 17(2):187\u2013193. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/s0886-3350(13)80249-0","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"issue":"10","key":"2466_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1490","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2016.07.021","volume":"42","author":"JX Kane","year":"2016","unstructured":"Kane JX, Van Heerden A, Atik A, Petsoglou C (2016) Intraocular lens power formula accuracy: comparison of 7 formulas. J Cataract Refract Surg 42(10):1490\u20131500. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jcrs.2016.07.021","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"issue":"1","key":"2466_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"96","DOI":"10.1177\/1120672119889016","volume":"31","author":"J Ji","year":"2021","unstructured":"Ji J, Liu Y, Zhang J, Wu X, Shao W, Ma B, Luo M (2021) Comparison of six methods for the intraocular lens power calculation in high myopic eyes. Eur J Ophthalmol 31(1):96\u2013102. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1120672119889016","journal-title":"Eur J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"2466_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1917268","DOI":"10.1155\/2016\/1917268","volume":"2016","author":"Y Zhang","year":"2016","unstructured":"Zhang Y, Liang XY, Liu S, Lee JW, Bhaskar S, Lam DS (2016) Accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation formulas for highly myopic eyes. J Ophthalmol 2016:1917268. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1155\/2016\/1917268","journal-title":"J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"2466_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Hill WE, Abulafia A, Wang L, Koch DD (2017) Pursuing perfection in IOL calculations. II.\u00a0Measurement foibles: measurement errors, validation criteria, IOL constants, and\u00a0lane\u00a0length. J Cataract Refract Surg 43(7):869\u201370. http:\/\/doi.org\/https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jcrs.2017.07.006","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2017.07.006"},{"issue":"4","key":"2466_CR7","first-page":"15","volume":"40","author":"RM Fayette","year":"2015","unstructured":"Fayette RM, Cakiner-Egilmez T (2015) What factors affect intraocular lens power calculation? Insight 40(4):15\u201318","journal-title":"Insight"},{"issue":"1","key":"2466_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"63","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2010.07.032","volume":"37","author":"P Aristodemou","year":"2011","unstructured":"Aristodemou P, Knox Cartwright NE, Sparrow JM, Johnston RL (2011) Formula choice: Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, or SRK\/T and refractive outcomes in 8108 eyes after cataract surgery with biometry by partial coherence interferometry. J Cataract Refract Surg 37(1):63\u201371. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jcrs.2010.07.032","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"issue":"8","key":"2466_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1157","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2016.06.029","volume":"42","author":"DL Cooke","year":"2016","unstructured":"Cooke DL, Cooke TL (2016) Comparison of 9 intraocular lens power calculation formulas. J Cataract Refract Surg 42(8):1157\u20131164. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jcrs.2016.06.029","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"key":"2466_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Wang L, Shirayama M, Ma XJ, Kohnen T, Koch DD (2011) Optimizing intraocular lens power calculations in eyes with axial lengths above 25.0 mm. J Cataract Refract Surg 37(11):2018\u20132027. http:\/\/doi.org\/https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jcrs.2011.05.042","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2011.05.042"},{"issue":"3","key":"2466_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"503","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2010.07.008","volume":"118","author":"S Bang","year":"2011","unstructured":"Bang S, Edell E, Yu Q, Pratzer K, Stark W (2011) Accuracy of intraocular lens calculations using the IOLMaster in eyes with long axial length and a comparison of various formulas. Ophthalmology 118(3):503\u2013506. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ophtha.2010.07.008","journal-title":"Ophthalmology"},{"key":"2466_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1155\/2015\/976847","volume":"2015","author":"C Chen","year":"2015","unstructured":"Chen C, Xu X, Miao Y, Zheng G, Sun Y, Xu X (2015) Accuracy of intraocular lens power formulas involving 148 eyes with long axial lengths: a retrospective chart-review study. J Ophthalmol 2015:976847. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1155\/2015\/976847","journal-title":"J Ophthalmol"},{"issue":"2","key":"2466_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"280","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2004.04.054","volume":"31","author":"RE Maclaren","year":"2005","unstructured":"Maclaren RE, Sagoo MS, Restori M, Allan BD (2005) Biometry accuracy using zero- and negative-powered intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg 31(2):280\u2013290. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jcrs.2004.04.054","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"issue":"3","key":"2466_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"240","DOI":"10.1111\/ceo.13034","volume":"46","author":"TV Roberts","year":"2018","unstructured":"Roberts TV, Hodge C, Sutton G, Lawless M, Vision Eye Inst IOLO (2018) Comparison of Hill-radial basis function, Barrett Universal and current third generation formulas for the calculation of intraocular lens power during cataract surgery. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 46(3):240\u2013246. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/ceo.13034","journal-title":"Clin Exp Ophthalmol"},{"key":"2466_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Savini G, Taroni L, Hoffer KJ (2020) Recent developments in intraocular lens power calculation methods-update 2020. Ann Transl Med 8(22):1553. http:\/\/doi.org\/https:\/\/doi.org\/10.21037\/atm-20-2290","DOI":"10.21037\/atm-20-2290"},{"issue":"2","key":"2466_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"288","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2017.08.027","volume":"125","author":"RB Melles","year":"2018","unstructured":"Melles RB, Holladay JT, Chang WJ (2018) Accuracy of intraocular lens calculation formulas. Ophthalmology 125(2):288\u2013294. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ophtha.2017.08.027","journal-title":"Ophthalmology"},{"key":"2466_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"4395","DOI":"10.2147\/opth.S290125","volume":"14","author":"D Hipolito-Fernandes","year":"2020","unstructured":"Hipolito-Fernandes D, Elisa Luis M, Gil P, Maduro V, Feijao J, Yeo TK, Voytsekhivskyy O, Alves N (2020) VRF-G, a new intraocular lens power calculation formula: a 13-formulas comparison study. Clin Ophthalmol 14:4395\u20134402. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2147\/opth.S290125","journal-title":"Clin Ophthalmol"},{"issue":"40","key":"2466_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.3310\/hta17400","volume":"17","author":"SN Deshpande","year":"2013","unstructured":"Deshpande SN, Van Asselt AD, Tomini F, Armstrong N, Allen A, Noake C, Khan K, Severens JL, Kleijnen J, Westwood ME (2013) Rapid fetal fibronectin testing to predict preterm birth in women with symptoms of premature labour: a systematic review and cost analysis. Health Technol Assess 17(40):1\u2013138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3310\/hta17400","journal-title":"Health Technol Assess"},{"issue":"4","key":"2466_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"356","DOI":"10.1111\/ceo.13058","volume":"46","author":"Q Wang","year":"2018","unstructured":"Wang Q, Jiang W, Lin T, Wu X, Lin H, Chen W (2018) Meta-analysis of accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation formulas in short eyes. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 46(4):356\u2013363. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/ceo.13058","journal-title":"Clin Exp Ophthalmol"},{"issue":"5","key":"2466_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"663","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2018.12.046","volume":"126","author":"L Wang","year":"2019","unstructured":"Wang L, Cao D, Weikert MP, Koch DD (2019) Calculation of axial length using a single group refractive index versus using different refractive indices for each ocular segment: theoretical study and refractive outcomes. Ophthalmology 126(5):663\u2013670. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ophtha.2018.12.046","journal-title":"Ophthalmology"},{"key":"2466_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Doshi D, Limdi P, Parekh N, Gohil N (2017) A comparative study to assess the predictability of different iol power calculation formulas in eyes of short and long axial length. J Clin Diagn Res 11(1):NC01\u2013NC4. http:\/\/doi.org\/https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7860\/JCDR\/2017\/22095.9136","DOI":"10.7860\/JCDR\/2017\/22095.9136"},{"issue":"6","key":"2466_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"732","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2018.12.025","volume":"45","author":"X Rong","year":"2019","unstructured":"Rong X, He W, Zhu Q, Qian D, Lu Y, Zhu X (2019) Intraocular lens power calculation in eyes with extreme myopia: Comparison of Barrett Universal II, Haigis, and Olsen formulas. J Cataract Refract Surg 45(6):732\u2013737. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jcrs.2018.12.025","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"issue":"6","key":"2466_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"725","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2019.01.018","volume":"45","author":"J Liu","year":"2019","unstructured":"Liu J, Wang L, Chai F, Han Y, Qian S, Koch DD, Weikert MP (2019) Comparison of intraocular lens power calculation formulas in Chinese eyes with axial myopia. J Cataract Refract Surg 45(6):725\u2013731. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jcrs.2019.01.018","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"issue":"3","key":"2466_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"333","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2016.12.021","volume":"43","author":"JX Kane","year":"2017","unstructured":"Kane JX, Van Heerden A, Atik A, Petsoglou C (2017) Accuracy of 3 new methods for intraocular lens power selection. J Cataract Refract Surg 43(3):333\u2013339. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jcrs.2016.12.021","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"key":"2466_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s10792-020-01684-y","author":"M Fuest","year":"2021","unstructured":"Fuest M, Plange N, Kuerten D, Schellhase H, Mazinani BAE, Walter P, Kohnen S, Widder RA, Roessler G (2021) Intraocular lens power calculation for plus and minus lenses in high myopia using partial coherence interferometry. Int Ophthalmol. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10792-020-01684-y","journal-title":"Int Ophthalmol"},{"issue":"4","key":"2466_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"484","DOI":"10.4103\/ijo.IJO_937_18","volume":"67","author":"D Zhou","year":"2019","unstructured":"Zhou D, Sun Z, Deng G (2019) Accuracy of the refractive prediction determined by intraocular lens power calculation formulas in high myopia. Indian J Ophthalmol 67(4):484\u2013489. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4103\/ijo.IJO_937_18","journal-title":"Indian J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"2466_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/1120672120962030","author":"D Carmona-Gonzalez","year":"2020","unstructured":"Carmona-Gonzalez D, Castillo-Gomez A, Palomino-Bautista C, Romero-Dominguez M, Gutierrez-Moreno MA (2020) Comparison of the accuracy of 11 intraocular lens power calculation formulas. Eur J Ophthalmol. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1120672120962030","journal-title":"Eur J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"2466_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Zhang Z, Miao Y, Fang X, Luo Q, Wang Y (2018) Accuracy of the Haigis and SRK\/T Formulas in Eyes Longer than 29.0 mm and the Influence of Central Corneal Keratometry Reading. Curr Eye Res 43(11):1316\u201321. http:\/\/doi.org\/https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/02713683.2018.1488265","DOI":"10.1080\/02713683.2018.1488265"},{"key":"2466_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Idrobo-Robalino CA, Santaella G, Gutierrez AM (2019) T2 formula in a highly myopic population, comparison with other methods and description of an improved approach for estimating corneal height. BMC Ophthalmol 19(1). http:\/\/doi.org\/https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12886-019-1226-7","DOI":"10.1186\/s12886-019-1226-7"},{"key":"2466_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"66","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajo.2019.04.019","volume":"205","author":"KH Wan","year":"2019","unstructured":"Wan KH, Lam TCH, Yu MCV, Chan TCY (2019) Accuracy and precision of intraocular lens calculations using the new Hill-RBF Version 2.0 in eyes with high axial myopia. Am J Ophthalmol 205:66\u201373. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajo.2019.04.019","journal-title":"Am J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"2466_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"56","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajo.2017.10.020","volume":"185","author":"OV Voytsekhivskyy","year":"2018","unstructured":"Voytsekhivskyy OV (2018) Development and clinical accuracy of a new intraocular lens power formula (VRF) compared to other formulas. Am J Ophthalmol 185:56\u201367. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajo.2017.10.020","journal-title":"Am J Ophthalmol"},{"issue":"7","key":"2466_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"738","DOI":"10.1111\/ceo.13184","volume":"46","author":"Q Wang","year":"2018","unstructured":"Wang Q, Jiang W, Lin T, Zhu Y, Chen C, Lin H, Chen W (2018) Accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation formulas in long eyes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 46(7):738\u2013749. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/ceo.13184","journal-title":"Clin Exp Ophthalmol"},{"issue":"3","key":"2466_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"403","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajo.2015.05.029","volume":"160","author":"KJ Hoffer","year":"2015","unstructured":"Hoffer KJ, Aramberri J, Haigis W, Olsen T, Savini G, Shammas HJ, Bentow S (2015) Protocols for studies of intraocular lens formula accuracy. Am J Ophthalmol 160(3):403\u20135.e1. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajo.2015.05.029","journal-title":"Am J Ophthalmol"},{"issue":"4","key":"2466_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"386","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1444-0938.2012.00761.x","volume":"95","author":"C Mcalinden","year":"2012","unstructured":"Mcalinden C (2012) Corneal refractive surgery: past to present. Clin Exp Optom 95(4):386\u2013398. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1444-0938.2012.00761.x","journal-title":"Clin Exp Optom"},{"issue":"6","key":"2466_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"769","DOI":"10.1016\/j.survophthal.2016.07.001","volume":"61","author":"JL Alio","year":"2016","unstructured":"Alio JL, Abdelghany AA, Abdou AA, Maldonado MJ (2016) Cataract surgery on the previous corneal refractive surgery patient. Surv Ophthalmol 61(6):769\u2013777. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.survophthal.2016.07.001","journal-title":"Surv Ophthalmol"},{"key":"2466_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"18","DOI":"10.1186\/s40662-018-0110-5","volume":"5","author":"G Savini","year":"2018","unstructured":"Savini G, Hoffer KJ (2018) Intraocular lens power calculation in eyes with previous corneal refractive surgery. Eye Vis 5:18. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s40662-018-0110-5","journal-title":"Eye Vis"},{"key":"2466_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Nejima R, Miyai T, Kataoka Y, Miyata K, Honbou M, Tokunaga T, Kawana K, Kiuchi T, Oshika T (2006) Prospective intrapatient comparison of 6.0-millimeter optic single-piece and 3-piece hydrophobic acrylic foldable intraocular lenses. Ophthalmology 113(4):585\u2013590. http:\/\/doi.org\/https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ophtha.2005.10.064","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2005.10.064"},{"issue":"10","key":"2466_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1456","DOI":"10.1016\/s0886-3350(96)80147-7","volume":"22","author":"WA Lyle","year":"1996","unstructured":"Lyle WA, Jin GJ (1996) Prospective evaluation of early visual and refractive effects with small clear corneal incision for cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 22(10):1456\u20131460. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/s0886-3350(96)80147-7","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"issue":"1","key":"2466_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"17","DOI":"10.1016\/s0886-3350(88)80059-2","volume":"14","author":"JT Holladay","year":"1988","unstructured":"Holladay JT, Prager TC, Chandler TY, Musgrove KH, Lewis JW, Ruiz RS (1988) A three-part system for refining intraocular lens power calculations. J Cataract Refract Surg 14(1):17\u201324. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/s0886-3350(88)80059-2","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"issue":"6","key":"2466_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"700","DOI":"10.1016\/s0886-3350(13)80338-0","volume":"19","author":"KJ Hoffer","year":"1993","unstructured":"Hoffer KJ (1993) The Hoffer Q formula: a comparison of theoretic and regression formulas. J Cataract Refract Surg 19(6):700\u2013712. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/s0886-3350(13)80338-0","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"issue":"3","key":"2466_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"333","DOI":"10.1016\/s0886-3350(13)80705-5","volume":"16","author":"JA Retzlaff","year":"1990","unstructured":"Retzlaff JA, Sanders DR, Kraff MC (1990) Development of the SRK\/T intraocular lens implant power calculation formula. J Cataract Refract Surg 16(3):333\u2013340. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/s0886-3350(13)80705-5","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"issue":"9","key":"2466_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"765","DOI":"10.1007\/s004170000188","volume":"238","author":"W Haigis","year":"2000","unstructured":"Haigis W, Lege B, Miller N, Schneider B (2000) Comparison of immersion ultrasound biometry and partial coherence interferometry for intraocular lens calculation according to Haigis. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 238(9):765\u2013773","journal-title":"Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol"},{"issue":"6","key":"2466_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"34","DOI":"10.1167\/tvst.7.6.34","volume":"7","author":"M De Bernardo","year":"2018","unstructured":"De Bernardo M, Salerno G, Cornetta P, Rosa N (2018) Axial length shortening after cataract surgery: new approach to solve the question. Transl Vis Sci Technol 7(6):34. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1167\/tvst.7.6.34","journal-title":"Transl Vis Sci Technol"},{"issue":"6","key":"2466_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"713","DOI":"10.1016\/s0886-3350(13)80339-2","volume":"19","author":"GD Barrett","year":"1993","unstructured":"Barrett GD (1993) An improved universal theoretical formula for intraocular lens power prediction. J Cataract Refract Surg 19(6):713\u2013720. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/s0886-3350(13)80339-2","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"issue":"5","key":"2466_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"764","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2013.10.037","volume":"40","author":"T Olsen","year":"2014","unstructured":"Olsen T, Hoffmann P (2014) C constant: new concept for ray tracing-assisted intraocular lens power calculation. J Cataract Refract Surg 40(5):764\u2013773. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jcrs.2013.10.037","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"issue":"11","key":"2466_CR46","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1829","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2010.05.031","volume":"36","author":"RM Sheard","year":"2010","unstructured":"Sheard RM, Smith GT, Cooke DL (2010) Improving the prediction accuracy of the SRK\/T formula: the T2 formula. J Cataract Refract Surg 36(11):1829\u20131834. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jcrs.2010.05.031","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"issue":"12","key":"2466_CR47","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1431","DOI":"10.1001\/jamaophthalmol.2015.3832","volume":"133","author":"JG Ladas","year":"2015","unstructured":"Ladas JG, Siddiqui AA, Devgan U, Jun AS (2015) A 3-D \u201cSuper Surface\u201d combining modern intraocular lens formulas to generate a \u201cSuper Formula\u201d and maximize accuracy. JAMA Ophthalmol 133(12):1431\u20131436. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/jamaophthalmol.2015.3832","journal-title":"JAMA Ophthalmol"},{"issue":"1","key":"2466_CR48","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"27","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2019.08.044","volume":"46","author":"G Savini","year":"2020","unstructured":"Savini G, Hoffer KJ, Balducci N, Barboni P, Schiano-Lomoriello D (2020) Comparison of formula accuracy for intraocular lens power calculation based on measurements by a swept-source optical coherence tomography optical biometer. J Cataract Refract Surg 46(1):27\u201333. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jcrs.2019.08.044","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"issue":"1","key":"2466_CR49","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjophth-2018-000251","volume":"4","author":"BJ Connell","year":"2019","unstructured":"Connell BJ, Kane JX (2019) Comparison of the Kane formula with existing formulas for intraocular lens power selection. BMJ Open Ophthalmol 4(1):e000251. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmjophth-2018-000251","journal-title":"BMJ Open Ophthalmol"},{"key":"2466_CR50","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Wang L, Koch DD, Hill W, Abulafia A (2017) Pursuing perfection in intraocular lens calculations: III.\u00a0Criteria for analyzing outcomes. J Cataract Refract Surg 43(8):999\u20131002. http:\/\/doi.org\/https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jcrs.2017.08.003","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2017.08.003"}],"container-title":["International Ophthalmology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10792-022-02466-4.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s10792-022-02466-4\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10792-022-02466-4.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,2,28]],"date-time":"2023-02-28T02:07:07Z","timestamp":1677550027000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s10792-022-02466-4"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,9,5]]},"references-count":50,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023,2]]}},"alternative-id":["2466"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10792-022-02466-4","relation":{},"ISSN":["1573-2630"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1573-2630","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,9,5]]},"assertion":[{"value":"20 December 2021","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"15 August 2022","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"5 September 2022","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"All authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}},{"value":"All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and\/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethical approval"}},{"value":"The informed consent from each participant was obtained in the original study.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Informed consent"}}]}}