{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,9]],"date-time":"2025-06-09T04:07:49Z","timestamp":1749442069075,"version":"3.37.3"},"reference-count":15,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"5","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,11,23]],"date-time":"2022-11-23T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1669161600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,11,23]],"date-time":"2022-11-23T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1669161600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100004702","name":"Universit\u00e0 degli Studi di Genova","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100004702","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"crossref"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Int Ophthalmol"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Purpose<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>To describe reoperations in the operating room for complications that occurred within the first 90\u00a0days after gel stent implantation or trabeculectomy at a single institution over 5\u00a0years.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>In this retrospective chart review, patients who have undergone gel stent implantation with mitomycin C (MMC) or trabeculectomy with MMC were enrolled. Postoperative complications that required reoperations within the first 90\u00a0days were evaluated.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>A total of 510 surgeries were performed on 392 patients over a 57-month period by 2 glaucoma surgeons. Of these, 284 were gel stent implantation, and 226 were trabeculectomy. Combined phacoemulsification was performed in 52\/284 (18.3%) in the gel stent group and in 26\/226 (11.5%) of eyes in the trabeculectomy group (<jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u20090.03). Reoperations took place in 13\/510 (2.5%) eyes, including 4\/284 (1.4%) in the gel stent group, 9\/226 (4.0%) in the trabeculectomy group (<jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u20090.07). In the gel stent group, indications for reoperation were bleb failure (2), suprachoroidal hemorrhage (1), bullous keratopathy (1). In the trabeculectomy group, indications for reoperation were bleb failure (3), overfiltration (2), persistent wound leak (2), aqueous misdirection (2).<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>The rates of reoperation for early postoperative complications after gel stent or trabeculectomy was low and comparable with previous studies. A slightly higher number of reoperations within 90\u00a0days was observed in the trabeculectomy group than the gel stent group despite the more significant number of combined procedures in the latter group. Bleb failure was the most common indications for reoperation in both groups. Excessive outflow was a cause of reoperation mostly in the trabeculectomy group.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1007\/s10792-022-02575-0","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,11,24]],"date-time":"2022-11-24T15:58:34Z","timestamp":1669305514000},"page":"1745-1749","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":3,"title":["Reoperations for complications within 90\u00a0days after gel stent implantation or trabeculectomy"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"43","author":[{"given":"Carlo A.","family":"Cutolo","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Chiara","family":"Bonzano","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Carlo","family":"Catti","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Chiara","family":"Pizzorno","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Alessandro","family":"Bagnis","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Carlo E.","family":"Traverso","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Michele","family":"Iester","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,11,23]]},"reference":[{"key":"2575_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1336","DOI":"10.1016\/S0161-6420(02)01069-2","volume":"109","author":"R Bindlish","year":"2002","unstructured":"Bindlish R, Condon GP, Schlosser JD et al (2002) Efficacy and safety of mitomycin-C in primary trabeculectomy: five-year follow-up. Ophthalmology 109:1336\u20131341. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S0161-6420(02)01069-2","journal-title":"Ophthalmology"},{"key":"2575_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"97","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2003.04.005","volume":"111","author":"B Edmunds","year":"2004","unstructured":"Edmunds B, Bunce CV, Thompson JR et al (2004) Factors associated with success in first-time trabeculectomy for patients at low risk of failure with chronic open-angle glaucoma. Ophthalmology 111:97\u2013103. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ophtha.2003.04.005","journal-title":"Ophthalmology"},{"key":"2575_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"132","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajo.2020.06.016","volume":"219","author":"N Cardakli","year":"2020","unstructured":"Cardakli N, Friedman DS, Boland MV (2020) Unplanned return to the operating room after trabeculectomy. Am J Ophthalmol 219:132\u2013140. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajo.2020.06.016","journal-title":"Am J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"2575_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"100879","DOI":"10.1016\/j.preteyeres.2020.100879","volume":"81","author":"G SunaricMegevand","year":"2021","unstructured":"SunaricMegevand G, Bron AM (2021) Personalising surgical treatments for glaucoma patients. Prog Retin Eye Res 81:100879. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.preteyeres.2020.100879","journal-title":"Prog Retin Eye Res"},{"key":"2575_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"4789","DOI":"10.1167\/iovs.15-16625","volume":"56","author":"A Sheybani","year":"2015","unstructured":"Sheybani A, Reitsamer H, Ahmed IIK (2015) Fluid dynamics of a novel micro-fistula implant for the surgical treatment of glaucomamicro-fistula implant for glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 56:4789\u20134795. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1167\/iovs.15-16625","journal-title":"Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci"},{"key":"2575_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1741","DOI":"10.1007\/s00417-019-04341-y","volume":"257","author":"MT Marcos Parra","year":"2019","unstructured":"Marcos Parra MT, Salinas L\u00f3pez JA, L\u00f3pezGrau NS et al (2019) XEN implant device versus trabeculectomy, either alone or in combination with phacoemulsification, in open-angle glaucoma patients. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 257:1741\u20131750. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00417-019-04341-y","journal-title":"Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol"},{"key":"2575_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"344","DOI":"10.1097\/IJG.0000000000001484","volume":"29","author":"C-K Chu","year":"2020","unstructured":"Chu C-K, Liebmann JM, Cioffi GA et al (2020) Reoperations for complications within 90 days after glaucoma surgery. J Glaucoma 29:344\u2013346. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/IJG.0000000000001484","journal-title":"J Glaucoma"},{"key":"2575_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/j.jcrs.0000000000000545","author":"WS Shalaby","year":"2020","unstructured":"Shalaby WS, Bechay J, Myers JS et al (2020) Reoperation for complications within 90 days of minimally invasive glaucoma surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/j.jcrs.0000000000000545","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"key":"2575_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1579","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2017.05.004","volume":"124","author":"MB Schlenker","year":"2017","unstructured":"Schlenker MB, Gulamhusein H, Conrad-Hengerer I et al (2017) Efficacy, safety, and risk factors for failure of standalone Ab interno gelatin microstent implantation versus standalone trabeculectomy. Ophthalmology 124:1579\u20131588. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ophtha.2017.05.004","journal-title":"Ophthalmology"},{"key":"2575_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"198","DOI":"10.1177\/1062860607300652","volume":"22","author":"HM Kroon","year":"2007","unstructured":"Kroon HM, Breslau PJ, Lardenoye JWHP (2007) Can the incidence of unplanned reoperations be used as an indicator of quality of care in surgery? Am J Med Qual 22:198\u2013202. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1062860607300652","journal-title":"Am J Med Qual"},{"key":"2575_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2538","DOI":"10.1007\/s12325-020-01278-1","volume":"37","author":"JF Panarelli","year":"2020","unstructured":"Panarelli JF, Yan DB, Francis B, Craven ER (2020) XEN gel stent open conjunctiva technique: a practical approach paper. Adv Ther 37:2538\u20132549. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s12325-020-01278-1","journal-title":"Adv Ther"},{"key":"2575_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/IJG.0000000000001360","author":"S Olivari","year":"2019","unstructured":"Olivari S, Cutolo CA, Negri L et al (2019) XEN implant fracture during needling procedure. J Glaucoma. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/IJG.0000000000001360","journal-title":"J Glaucoma"},{"key":"2575_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"6674505","DOI":"10.1155\/2021\/6674505","volume":"2021","author":"CA Cutolo","year":"2021","unstructured":"Cutolo CA, Negri L, Olivari S et al (2021) Choroidal detachment after XEN gel stent implantation. J Ophthalmol 2021:6674505. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1155\/2021\/6674505","journal-title":"J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"2575_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"87","DOI":"10.1097\/IJG.0000000000000533","volume":"26","author":"YC Hsia","year":"2017","unstructured":"Hsia YC, Lee JH, Cui QN et al (2017) Early reoperation rate, complication, and outcomes in resident-performed glaucoma surgery. J Glaucoma 26:87\u201392. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/IJG.0000000000000533","journal-title":"J Glaucoma"},{"key":"2575_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1179","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajo.2014.02.027","volume":"157","author":"H Saheb","year":"2014","unstructured":"Saheb H, Gedde SJ, Schiffman JC et al (2014) Outcomes of glaucoma reoperations in the tube versus trabeculectomy (TVT) study. Am J Ophthalmol 157:1179-1189.e2. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajo.2014.02.027","journal-title":"Am J Ophthalmol"}],"container-title":["International Ophthalmology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10792-022-02575-0.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s10792-022-02575-0\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10792-022-02575-0.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,4,30]],"date-time":"2023-04-30T15:06:41Z","timestamp":1682867201000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s10792-022-02575-0"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,11,23]]},"references-count":15,"journal-issue":{"issue":"5","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023,5]]}},"alternative-id":["2575"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10792-022-02575-0","relation":{},"ISSN":["1573-2630"],"issn-type":[{"type":"electronic","value":"1573-2630"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,11,23]]},"assertion":[{"value":"24 May 2022","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"12 November 2022","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"23 November 2022","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing interests.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}},{"value":"The following authors have no financial disclosures (CAC, CB, CC, CP, AB, CET, MI).","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}},{"value":"This study was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Approval was granted by the local institutional review board.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethical approval"}},{"value":"Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. provided by the University Hospital (CONSAZHQA_0001).","order":5,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent to participate"}}]}}