{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,31]],"date-time":"2026-01-31T17:37:16Z","timestamp":1769881036857,"version":"3.49.0"},"reference-count":30,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,7,22]],"date-time":"2024-07-22T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1721606400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,7,22]],"date-time":"2024-07-22T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1721606400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"name":"Science Research Foundation of Aier Eye Hospital Group","award":["AM169D04"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["AM169D04"]}]},{"name":"Funded by Alcon Laboratories Pvt. Ltd","award":["IIT # 52058705"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["IIT # 52058705"]}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Int Ophthalmol"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n          <jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>Purpose<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>To compare the clinical outcomes of myopiacorrected with corneal-wavefront-guided (CWG) laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) with AMARIS 1050S (SCHWIND eye-tech-solutions GmbH &amp; Co. KG) and corneal-topography-guided (CTG) LASIK with WaveLight EX500 (Alcon Laboratories, Fort Worth, TX).<\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>\n          <jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>In this prospective, pseudo-randomized expanded cohort study, a total of 266 patients were subjected to binocular LASIK surgery, either with WaveLight EX500 (WaveLight group) or Amaris 1050S (AMARIS group) platforms. Data related to right eyes were selected for analysis. Corneal higher-order aberration (HOA) was selected as the primary endpoint; while visual acuity and refraction were the secondary endpoints. All the endpoints were assessed at 3\u00a0months postoperatively.<\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>\n          <jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>There were 134 eyes in the AMARIS group and 132 eyes in the WaveLight group. After 3\u00a0months of postoperative follow-up, spherical and coma aberrations were significantly lower (<jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\u2009&lt;\u20090.05) in the WaveLight group (spherical aberration:\u2009\u2212\u20090.104\u2009\u00b1\u20090.199\u00a0\u00b5m; coma aberration:\u2009\u2212\u20090.117\u2009\u00b1\u20090.202\u00a0\u00b5m) in comparison with the AMARIS group (spherical aberrations: 0.254\u2009\u00b1\u20090.146\u00a0\u00b5m; coma aberrations: 0.316\u2009\u00b1\u20090.297\u00a0\u00b5m). In the AMARIS group, 96.3% of the eyes achieved an uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) of 20\/20 while in the WaveLight group, 96.2% of the eyes achieved an UDVA of 20\/20. Furthermore, the mean postoperative manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE) was\u2009\u2212\u20090.02\u2009\u00b1\u20090.28 in the AMARIS group and\u2009\u2212\u20090.05\u2009\u00b1\u20090.21 in the WaveLight group (<jats:italic>P<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u20090.34).<\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>\n          <jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>Both WaveLight EX500 and Amaris 1050S LASIK showed excellent refractive and visual outcomes. In addition, the WaveLight group showed minimal spherical and coma aberrations when compared to the AMARIS group.<\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1007\/s10792-024-03235-1","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,7,22]],"date-time":"2024-07-22T04:01:39Z","timestamp":1721620899000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":4,"title":["Comparison of clinical outcomes of a corneal wavefront- and topography-guided platforms for laser in situ keratomileusis on virgin eyes: an expanded cohort study"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"44","author":[{"given":"Li","family":"Li","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Lu","family":"Xiong","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Zheng","family":"Wang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,7,22]]},"reference":[{"issue":"2","key":"3235_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"251","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2013.07.043","volume":"40","author":"M Tomita","year":"2014","unstructured":"Tomita M, Watabe M, Yukawa S, Nakamura N, Nakamura T, Magnago T (2014) Safety, efficacy, and predictability of laser in Situ Keratomileusis to correct myopia or myopic astigmatism with a 750 Hz scanning-spot laser system. J Cataract Refract Surg 40(2):251\u2013258","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"issue":"4","key":"3235_CR2","first-page":"662","volume":"11","author":"M-S Sun","year":"2018","unstructured":"Sun M-S, Zhang L, Guo N, Song Y-Z, Zhang F-J (2018) Consistent comparison of angle Kappa adjustment between Oculyzer and Topolyzer Vario topography guided LASIK for myopia by EX500 excimer laser. Int J Ophthalmol 11(4):662\u2013667","journal-title":"Int J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"3235_CR3","unstructured":"Moshirfar M, Bennett P, Ronquillo Y (2021). Laser in Situ Keratomileusis. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing. http:\/\/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/books\/NBK555970\/. Accessed 4 Oct 2021"},{"issue":"3","key":"3235_CR4","first-page":"163","volume":"8","author":"U Vaidyanathan","year":"2019","unstructured":"Vaidyanathan U, Hopping GC, Liu HY et al (2019) Persistent corneal epithelial defects: a review article. Med Hypothesis Discov Innov Ophthalmol 8(3):163\u2013176","journal-title":"Med Hypothesis Discov Innov Ophthalmol"},{"issue":"13","key":"3235_CR5","first-page":"211","volume":"45","author":"I Cox","year":"2004","unstructured":"Cox I, MacRae S, Porter J, Yoon G, Roberts C, Williams D (2004) What causes the increase in higher order aberrations after lasik? The cut, the flap manipulation and\/or the ablation? Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 45(13):211","journal-title":"Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci"},{"issue":"7","key":"3235_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"959","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2019.01.031","volume":"45","author":"J Kim","year":"2019","unstructured":"Kim J, Choi S-H, Lim DH, Yang CM, Yoon G-J, Chung T-Y (2019) Topography-guided versus wavefront-optimized laser in Situ keratomileusis for myopia: Surgical outcomes. J Cataract Refract Surg 45(7):959\u2013965","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"key":"3235_CR7","unstructured":"Wavefront-guided vs Topography-guided. CRSTEurope. https:\/\/crstodayeurope.com\/articles\/2006-may\/0506_14-php\/. Accessed 4 Oct 2021."},{"issue":"4","key":"3235_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"286","DOI":"10.1097\/ICU.0000000000000488","volume":"29","author":"E Manche","year":"2018","unstructured":"Manche E, Roe J (2018) Recent advances in wavefront-guided LASIK. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 29(4):286\u2013291","journal-title":"Curr Opin Ophthalmol"},{"issue":"4","key":"3235_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"314","DOI":"10.1097\/ICU.0b013e328302ccae","volume":"19","author":"A Kim","year":"2008","unstructured":"Kim A, Chuck RS (2008) Wavefront-guided customized corneal ablation. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 19(4):314\u2013320","journal-title":"Curr Opin Ophthalmol"},{"issue":"2","key":"3235_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"191","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2005.10.004","volume":"113","author":"JL Ali\u00f3","year":"2006","unstructured":"Ali\u00f3 JL, Mont\u00e9s-Mico R (2006) Wavefront-guided versus standard LASIK enhancement for residual refractive errors. Ophthalmology 113(2):191\u2013197","journal-title":"Ophthalmology"},{"issue":"4","key":"3235_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"418","DOI":"10.3928\/1081-597X-20020701-01","volume":"18","author":"M Mrochen","year":"2002","unstructured":"Mrochen M, Krueger RR, Bueeler M, Seiler T (2002) Aberration-sensing and wavefront-guided laser in Situ keratomileusis: management of decentered ablation. J Refract Surg 18(4):418\u2013429","journal-title":"J Refract Surg"},{"issue":"5","key":"3235_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"595","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2018.12.008","volume":"45","author":"D Durrie","year":"2019","unstructured":"Durrie D, Stulting RD, Potvin R, Petznick A (2019) More eyes with 20\/10 distance visual acuity at 12 months versus 3 months in a topography-guided excimer laser trial: possible contributing factors. J Cataract Refract Surg 45(5):595\u2013600","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"issue":"9","key":"3235_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1302","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2016.06.035","volume":"42","author":"AK Jain","year":"2016","unstructured":"Jain AK, Malhotra C, Pasari A, Kumar P, Moshirfar M (2016) Outcomes of topography-guided versus wavefront-optimized laser in Situ Keratomileusis for myopia in virgin eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg 42(9):1302\u20131311","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"key":"3235_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"135","DOI":"10.2147\/OPTH.S115270","volume":"11","author":"M Moshirfar","year":"2017","unstructured":"Moshirfar M, Shah TJ, Skanchy DF, Linn SH, Kang P, Durrie DS (2017) Comparison and analysis of FDA reported visual outcomes of the three latest platforms for LASIK: wavefront guided Visx iDesign, topography guided wavelight allegro Contoura, and topography guided Nidek EC-5000 CATz. Clin Ophthalmol 11:135\u2013147","journal-title":"Clin Ophthalmol"},{"issue":"1","key":"3235_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"11","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2015.08.016","volume":"42","author":"RD Stulting","year":"2016","unstructured":"Stulting RD, Fant BS, Bond W, Chotiner B, Durrie D, Gordon M, Milauskas A, Moore C, Slade S, Randleman JB, Stonecipher K (2016) Results of topography-guided laser in Situ Keratomileusis custom ablation treatment with a refractive excimer laser. J Cataract Refract Surg. 42(1):11\u201318","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg."},{"issue":"5","key":"3235_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"549","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1475-1313.2009.00650.x","volume":"29","author":"MC Arbelaez","year":"2009","unstructured":"Arbelaez MC, Vidal C, Arba-Mosquera S (2009) Clinical outcomes of corneal wavefront customized ablation strategies with SCHWIND CAM in LASIK treatments. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 29(5):549\u2013556","journal-title":"Ophthalmic Physiol Opt"},{"issue":"2","key":"3235_CR17","first-page":"148","volume":"27","author":"S Arba Mosquera","year":"2011","unstructured":"Arba Mosquera S, de Ortueta D (2011) Optimized zernike term selection in customized treatments for laser corneal refractive surgery: case report. J Refract Surg 27(2):148\u2013152","journal-title":"J Refract Surg"},{"issue":"11","key":"3235_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"727","DOI":"10.3928\/1081597X-20160718-02","volume":"32","author":"I Toda","year":"2016","unstructured":"Toda I, Ide T, Fukumoto T, Tsubota K (2016) Visual outcomes after lasik using topography-guided vs wavefront-guided customized ablation systems. J Refract Surg 32(11):727\u2013732","journal-title":"J Refract Surg"},{"issue":"9","key":"3235_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1183","DOI":"10.1097\/j.jcrs.0000000000000592","volume":"47","author":"L Li","year":"2021","unstructured":"Li L, Zhang B, Liu S, Xiong L, Wang Z (2021) Comparison of clinical outcomes of 2 platforms for topography-guided LASIK in primary eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg 47(9):1183\u20131190","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"issue":"2","key":"3235_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"78","DOI":"10.3928\/1081597X-20151119-04","volume":"32","author":"S Arba-Mosquera","year":"2016","unstructured":"Arba-Mosquera S, de Ortueta D (2016) LASIK for hyperopia using an aberration-neutral profile with an asymmetric offset centration. J Refract Surg 32(2):78\u201383","journal-title":"J Refract Surg"},{"issue":"6","key":"3235_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"573","DOI":"10.3928\/1081-597X-20070601-07","volume":"23","author":"C Zhou","year":"2007","unstructured":"Zhou C, Jin M, Wang X, Ren Q (2007) Corneal wavefront-guided ablation with the Schwind ESIRIS laser for myopia. J Refract Surg 23(6):573\u2013580","journal-title":"J Refract Surg"},{"issue":"1","key":"3235_CR22","first-page":"23","volume":"8","author":"C Blanton","year":"2015","unstructured":"Blanton C (2015) Meta-analysis of six excimer laser platforms for safety and efficacy in myopic laser-assisted in Situ Keratomileusis. US Ophthalmic Review. 8(1):23","journal-title":"US Ophthalmic Review."},{"issue":"3","key":"3235_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"112","DOI":"10.1016\/j.joco.2016.04.007","volume":"28","author":"M Mohammadpour","year":"2016","unstructured":"Mohammadpour M, Heidari Z, Mohammad-Rabei H et al (2016) Correlation of higher order aberrations and components of astigmatism in myopic refractive surgery candidates. J Curr Ophthalmol 28(3):112\u2013116","journal-title":"J Curr Ophthalmol"},{"issue":"2","key":"3235_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"88","DOI":"10.3928\/1081597X-20100121-04","volume":"26","author":"MC Arbelaez","year":"2010","unstructured":"Arbelaez MC, Aslanides IM, Barraquer C et al (2010) LASIK for myopia and astigmatism using the SCHWIND AMARIS excimer laser: an international multicenter trial. J Refract Surg 26(2):88\u201398","journal-title":"J Refract Surg"},{"issue":"5","key":"3235_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"347","DOI":"10.3928\/1081597X-20120410-01","volume":"28","author":"IM Aslanides","year":"2012","unstructured":"Aslanides IM, Kolli S, Padroni S, Padron S, Arba MS (2012) Stability of therapeutic retreatment of corneal wavefront customized ablation with the SCHWIND CAM: 4-year data. J Refract Surg 28(5):347\u2013352","journal-title":"J Refract Surg"},{"issue":"3","key":"3235_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e5","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2012.08.013","volume":"120","author":"AA Farjo","year":"2013","unstructured":"Farjo AA, Sugar A, Schallhorn SC et al (2013) Femtosecond lasers for LASIK flap creation: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology 120(3):e5\u2013e20","journal-title":"Ophthalmology"},{"issue":"4","key":"3235_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"314","DOI":"10.3928\/15428877-20110421-01","volume":"42","author":"HE El Awady","year":"2011","unstructured":"El Awady HE, Ghanem AA, Saleh SM (2011) Wavefront-optimized ablation versus topography-guided customized ablation in myopic LASIK: comparative study of higher order aberrations. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging 42(4):314\u2013320","journal-title":"Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging"},{"issue":"2","key":"3235_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"141","DOI":"10.5301\/ejo.5000835","volume":"27","author":"D de Ortueta","year":"2017","unstructured":"de Ortueta D, Arba-Mosquera S (2017) Laser in Situ keratomileusis for high hyperopia with corneal vertex centration and asymmetric offset. Eur J Ophthalmol 27(2):141\u2013152","journal-title":"Eur J Ophthalmol"},{"issue":"8","key":"3235_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"582","DOI":"10.3928\/1081597X-20110120-02","volume":"27","author":"S Arba Mosquera","year":"2011","unstructured":"Arba Mosquera S, Arbelaez MC (2011) Use of a six-dimensional eye-tracker in corneal laser refractive surgery with the SCHWIND AMARIS totaltech laser. J Refract Surg 27(8):582\u2013590","journal-title":"J Refract Surg"},{"issue":"1","key":"3235_CR30","first-page":"e2131","volume":"10","author":"S Hashmani","year":"2018","unstructured":"Hashmani S, Hashmani N, Haroon H, Hashmi Y (2018) Visual and refractive outcomes of topography-guided laser-assisted in Situ Keratomileusis in virgin eyes. Cureus 10(1):e2131","journal-title":"Cureus"}],"container-title":["International Ophthalmology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10792-024-03235-1.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s10792-024-03235-1\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10792-024-03235-1.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,13]],"date-time":"2025-03-13T15:38:06Z","timestamp":1741880286000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s10792-024-03235-1"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024,7,22]]},"references-count":30,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,12]]}},"alternative-id":["3235"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10792-024-03235-1","relation":{},"ISSN":["1573-2630"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1573-2630","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2024,7,22]]},"assertion":[{"value":"15 May 2023","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"22 June 2024","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"22 July 2024","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The authors declare that they have no financial conflict of interest.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}}],"article-number":"331"}}