{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,6]],"date-time":"2026-05-06T06:15:19Z","timestamp":1778048119777,"version":"3.51.4"},"reference-count":20,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,6]],"date-time":"2026-05-06T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1778025600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,6]],"date-time":"2026-05-06T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1778025600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100002806","name":"Carl Zeiss Meditec AG","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100002806","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"name":"Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universit\u00e4t, Frankfurt am Main"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Int Ophthalmol"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Purpose<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Rating of central corneal topography of a swept-source OCT biometer (IOL Master 700) and tomographic maps from a Scheimpflug device (Pentacam AXL) by different experienced professionals regarding irregularities to support decisions on implanting premium intraocular lenses (IOLs).<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>In this prospective study healthy eyes (H), irregular corneas (I) and eyes with previous corneal refractive surgery (P) were randomly selected. Five observers with different experience in corneal map evaluation compared the corneal topography maps of both devices individually. They answered a questionnaire for each picture and eye and the matched pictures. The questionnaire included the similarity in regularity of the cornea, the classification of the pictures regarding the included patient groups and the decision of premium IOL implantation.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      The study included 25 eyes per group. The correct category (H, I or P) was reported in 52% to 70% of individual cases. Except one observer (\n                      <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009&lt;\u20090.001) there were no significant difference between the two devices. Most observers rated irregular corneas significantly different than healthy or post refractive surgery eyes (\n                      <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009&lt;\u20090.001). There were significant inter-observer agreements among the three observers for rating implantation premium IOLs 0.137 to 0.374 (\n                      <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009&lt;\u20090.05) and rating the correct category 0.435 (\n                      <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009&lt;\u20090.001).\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Irregular corneas were rated as significantly different to healthy or post refractive surgery eyes. Most observers rated the images of the swept-source OCT biometer and the Scheimpflug device equally. Regarding the selection of premium IOL experienced colleagues are preferable.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1007\/s10792-026-04088-6","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,6]],"date-time":"2026-05-06T05:36:07Z","timestamp":1778045767000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Comparison of corneal topography maps of a swept-source OCT biometer and a Scheimpflug device"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"46","author":[{"given":"Michael","family":"M\u00fcller","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Eva","family":"Hemkeppler","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Myriam","family":"B\u00f6hm","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Tyll","family":"Jandewerth","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Christoph","family":"Lwowski","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Thomas","family":"Kohnen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,6]]},"reference":[{"issue":"11","key":"4088_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1625","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2019.07.014","volume":"45","author":"M B\u00f6hm","year":"2019","unstructured":"B\u00f6hm M, Petermann K, Hemkeppler E, Kohnen T (2019) Defocus curves of 4 presbyopia-correcting IOL designs: diffractive panfocal, diffractive trifocal, segmental refractive, and extended-depth-of-focus. J Cataract Refract Surg 45(11):1625\u20131636. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jcrs.2019.07.014","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"issue":"11","key":"4088_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e132","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2020.08.025","volume":"128","author":"E Yeu","year":"2021","unstructured":"Yeu E, Cuozzo S (2021) Matching the patient to the intraocular lens: preoperative considerations to optimize surgical outcomes. Ophthalmology 128(11):e132\u2013e141. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ophtha.2020.08.025","journal-title":"Ophthalmology"},{"issue":"12","key":"4088_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1209","DOI":"10.1097\/j.jcrs.0000000000001296","volume":"49","author":"C Lwowski","year":"2023","unstructured":"Lwowski C, Kohnen T (2023) Prospective evaluation of the ESCRS online calculator for calculation of a multifocal intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 49(12):1209\u20131215. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/j.jcrs.0000000000001296","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"issue":"11","key":"4088_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e142","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2020.11.016","volume":"128","author":"S Goto","year":"2021","unstructured":"Goto S, Maeda N (2021) Corneal topography for intraocular lens selection in refractive cataract surgery. Ophthalmology 128(11):e142\u2013e152. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ophtha.2020.11.016","journal-title":"Ophthalmology"},{"issue":"Suppl 1","key":"4088_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"33","DOI":"10.1007\/s40123-019-00212-1","volume":"8","author":"I Vastardis","year":"2019","unstructured":"Vastardis I, Sagri D, Fili S, W\u00f6lfelschneider P, Kohlhaas M (2019) Current trends in modern visual intraocular lens enhancement surgery in stable keratoconus: a synopsis of do\u2019s, don\u2019ts and pitfalls. Ophthalmol Ther 8(Suppl 1):33\u201347. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s40123-019-00212-1","journal-title":"Ophthalmol Ther"},{"issue":"8","key":"4088_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"826","DOI":"10.1111\/aos.13517","volume":"95","author":"A Fredriksson","year":"2017","unstructured":"Fredriksson A, Behndig A (2017) Measurement centration and zone diameter in anterior, posterior and total corneal astigmatism in keratoconus. Acta Ophthalmol 95(8):826\u2013833. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/aos.13517","journal-title":"Acta Ophthalmol"},{"issue":"1","key":"4088_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"122","DOI":"10.1016\/j.survophthal.2023.09.005","volume":"69","author":"F D\u2019Oria","year":"2024","unstructured":"D\u2019Oria F, Bagaglia SA, Alio Del Barrio JL, Alessio G, Alio JL, Mazzotta C (2024) Refractive surgical correction and treatment of keratoconus. Surv Ophthalmol 69(1):122\u2013139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.survophthal.2023.09.005","journal-title":"Surv Ophthalmol"},{"issue":"11","key":"4088_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e121","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2020.06.054","volume":"128","author":"L Wang","year":"2021","unstructured":"Wang L, Koch DD (2021) Intraocular lens power calculations in eyes with previous corneal refractive surgery: review and expert opinion. Ophthalmology 128(11):e121\u2013e131. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ophtha.2020.06.054","journal-title":"Ophthalmology"},{"issue":"1","key":"4088_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"54","DOI":"10.3928\/1081597X-20181119-01","volume":"35","author":"V Vrijman","year":"2019","unstructured":"Vrijman V, Abulafia A, van der Linden JW, van der Meulen IJE, Mourits MP, Lapid-Gortzak R (2019) Evaluation of different IOL calculation formulas of the ASCRS calculator in eyes after corneal refractive laser surgery for myopia with multifocal IOL implantation. J Refract Surg 35(1):54\u201359. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3928\/1081597X-20181119-01","journal-title":"J Refract Surg"},{"issue":"9","key":"4088_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1240","DOI":"10.1097\/j.jcrs.0000000000000238","volume":"46","author":"C Lwowski","year":"2020","unstructured":"Lwowski C, Pawlowicz K, Hinzelmann L, Adas M, Kohnen T (2020) Prediction accuracy of IOL calculation formulas using the ASCRS online calculator for a diffractive extended depth-of-focus IOL after myopic laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg 46(9):1240\u20131246. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/j.jcrs.0000000000000238","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"issue":"4","key":"4088_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"222","DOI":"10.3928\/1081597X-20220207-01","volume":"38","author":"R Cobo-Soriano","year":"2022","unstructured":"Cobo-Soriano R, Rodr\u00edguez-Guti\u00e9rrez B, Bilbao-Calabuig R et al (2022) Trifocal IOL implantation in eyes with previous laser corneal refractive surgery: the impact of corneal spherical aberration on postoperative visual outcomes. J Refract Surg 38(4):222\u2013228. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3928\/1081597X-20220207-01","journal-title":"J Refract Surg"},{"key":"4088_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/ICU.0000000000001006","author":"DS Ting","year":"2023","unstructured":"Ting DS, Gatinel D, Ang M (2023) Cataract surgery after corneal refractive surgery: preoperative considerations and management. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/ICU.0000000000001006","journal-title":"Curr Opin Ophthalmol"},{"key":"4088_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3390\/diagnostics11081466","author":"P Kanclerz","year":"2021","unstructured":"Kanclerz P, Khoramnia R, Wang X (2021) Current developments in corneal topography and tomography. Diagnostics Basel. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/diagnostics11081466","journal-title":"Diagnostics Basel"},{"issue":"4","key":"4088_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1150","DOI":"10.4103\/ijo.IJO_2153_21","volume":"70","author":"G Kundu","year":"2022","unstructured":"Kundu G, Shetty R, Khamar P et al (2022) Impact of tear optics on the repeatability of Pentacam AXL wave and iTrace in measuring anterior segment parameters and aberrations. Indian J Ophthalmol 70(4):1150\u20131157. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4103\/ijo.IJO_2153_21","journal-title":"Indian J Ophthalmol"},{"issue":"4","key":"4088_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"482","DOI":"10.1097\/j.jcrs.0000000000000459","volume":"47","author":"L Wang","year":"2021","unstructured":"Wang L, Canedo ALC, Wang Y, Xie KC, Koch DD (2021) Comparison of central topographic maps from a swept-source OCT biometer and a Placido disk-dual Scheimpflug tomographer. J Cataract Refract Surg 47(4):482\u2013487. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/j.jcrs.0000000000000459","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"issue":"1","key":"4088_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-021-86185-3","volume":"11","author":"F-X Crahay","year":"2021","unstructured":"Crahay F-X, Debellemani\u00e8re G, Tobalem S, Ghazal W, Moran S, Gatinel D (2021) Quantitative comparison of corneal surface areas in keratoconus and normal eyes. Sci Rep 11(1):6840. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41598-021-86185-3","journal-title":"Sci Rep"},{"issue":"4","key":"4088_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"368","DOI":"10.3928\/1081-597X-20070401-09","volume":"23","author":"MS Reuland","year":"2007","unstructured":"Reuland MS, Reuland AJ, Nishi Y, Auffarth GU (2007) Corneal radii and anterior chamber depth measurements using the IOLmaster versus the Pentacam. J Refract Surg 23(4):368\u2013373. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3928\/1081-597X-20070401-09","journal-title":"J Refract Surg"},{"issue":"7","key":"4088_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"882","DOI":"10.1080\/02713683.2018.1458881","volume":"43","author":"L Asena","year":"2018","unstructured":"Asena L, Akman A, G\u00fcng\u00f6r SG, Dursun Alt\u0131n\u00f6rs D (2018) Comparison of keratometry obtained by a swept source OCT-based biometer with a standard optical biometer and Scheimpflug imaging. Curr Eye Res 43(7):882\u2013888. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/02713683.2018.1458881","journal-title":"Curr Eye Res"},{"key":"4088_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1155\/2017\/1516395","volume":"2017","author":"S Jung","year":"2017","unstructured":"Jung S, Chin HS, Kim NR, Lee KW, Jung JW (2017) Comparison of repeatability and agreement between swept-source optical biometry and Dual-Scheimpflug topography. J Ophthalmol 2017:1516395. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1155\/2017\/1516395","journal-title":"J Ophthalmol"},{"issue":"8","key":"4088_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"790","DOI":"10.1097\/j.jcrs.0000000000001193","volume":"49","author":"S Brar","year":"2023","unstructured":"Brar S, Ganesh S, Murkey V (2023) Interobserver agreement between central topography and Scheimpflug tomography for premium intraocular lens selection. J Cataract Refract Surg 49(8):790\u2013794. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/j.jcrs.0000000000001193","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"}],"container-title":["International Ophthalmology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10792-026-04088-6.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s10792-026-04088-6","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10792-026-04088-6.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,6]],"date-time":"2026-05-06T05:36:08Z","timestamp":1778045768000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s10792-026-04088-6"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,6]]},"references-count":20,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,12]]}},"alternative-id":["4088"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10792-026-04088-6","relation":{},"ISSN":["1573-2630"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1573-2630","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,6]]},"assertion":[{"value":"12 January 2026","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"21 April 2026","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"6 May 2026","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"Prof. Kohnen has served as a consultant, received research funding and lecturing fees from Alcon, Oculus, Schwind, Staar, served as a consultant and received lecturing fees from Tarsus and Ziemer. He received research and lecturing fees from Teleon Surgical and works as a consultant for Abbvie, Geuder, LensGen, Santen, Stadapharm, Thieme, Zeiss Meditec.\u00a0 Prof. Kohnen received lecturing fees from  Allergan, Bausch & Lomb,  Johnson & Johnson, Med Update, streamedup. \u00a0All other authors have no conflict of interest.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}}],"article-number":"225"}}