{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,10]],"date-time":"2026-03-10T20:05:29Z","timestamp":1773173129172,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":22,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,2,1]],"date-time":"2021-02-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1612137600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,2,1]],"date-time":"2021-02-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1612137600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["J Assist Reprod Genet"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,3]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s10815-021-02065-9","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,2,1]],"date-time":"2021-02-01T21:03:42Z","timestamp":1612213422000},"page":"627-634","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":7,"title":["Patient and provider satisfaction with saline ultrasound versus office hysteroscopy for uterine cavity evaluation prior to in vitro fertilization: a randomized controlled trial"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"38","author":[{"given":"Sarah","family":"Moustafa","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Emma","family":"Rosen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Linnea","family":"Goodman","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,2,1]]},"reference":[{"key":"2065_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"479","DOI":"10.1093\/humupd\/dmw008","volume":"22","author":"SA Di Spiezio","year":"2016","unstructured":"Di Spiezio SA, Di Carlo C, Minozzi S, Spinelli M, Pistotti V, Alviggi C, et al. Efficacy of hysteroscopy in improving reproductive outcomes of infertile couples: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2016;22:479\u201396.","journal-title":"Hum Reprod Update"},{"issue":"1","key":"2065_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2007.09.069","volume":"89","author":"E Taylor","year":"2008","unstructured":"Taylor E, Gomel V. The uterus and fertility. Fertil Steril. 2008;89(1):1\u201316.","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"2065_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"235","DOI":"10.1080\/09513590500366696","volume":"21","author":"N Doldi","year":"2005","unstructured":"Doldi N, Persico P, Di Sebastiano F, Marsiglio E, De Santis L, Rabellotti E, et al. Pathologic findings in hysteroscopy before in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF-ET). Gynecol Endocrinol. 2005;21:235\u20137.","journal-title":"Gynecol Endocrinol"},{"issue":"3","key":"2065_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"296","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2012.01.010","volume":"19","author":"T Tulandi","year":"2012","unstructured":"Tulandi T, Marzal A. Redefining reproductive surgery. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2012;19(3):296\u2013306.","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"2065_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"406","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(99)00532-4","volume":"73","author":"S Rgio","year":"2000","unstructured":"Rgio S, Soares R, Messala M, Barbosa B, Reis D, Camargos AF. Diagnostic accuracy of sonohysterography, transvaginal sonography, and hysterosalpingography in patients with uterine cavity diseases. Fertil Steril. 2000;73(2):406\u201311.","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"2065_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"236","DOI":"10.4103\/jhrs.JHRS_47_18","volume":"11","author":"V Singh","year":"2018","unstructured":"Singh V, Mishra B, Sinha S, Agrawal S, Thakur P. Role of saline infusion sonohysterography in infertility evaluation. J Hum Reprod Sci. 2018;11:236\u201341.","journal-title":"J Hum Reprod Sci"},{"issue":"6","key":"2065_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e44","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.03.019","volume":"103","author":"Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine P","year":"2015","unstructured":"Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine P. Diagnostic evaluation of the infertile female: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2015;103(6):e44\u201350.","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"2065_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1237","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(16)55576-9","volume":"58","author":"FN Shamma","year":"1992","unstructured":"Shamma FN, Lee G, Gutmann JN, Lavy G. The role of office hysteroscopy in in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 1992;58:1237\u20139.","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"2065_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"30","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1479-828X.2005.00336.x","volume":"45","author":"I Cepni","year":"2005","unstructured":"Cepni I, Ocal P, Erkan S, Saricali FS, Akbas H, Demi Emirkkiran F, et al. Comparison of transvaginal sonography, saline infusion sonography and hysteroscopy in the evaluation of uterine cavity pathologies. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2005;45:30\u20135.","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"2065_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1327","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(96)70680-4","volume":"174","author":"T Widrich","year":"1996","unstructured":"Widrich T, Bradley LD, Mitchinson AR, Collins RL. Comparison of saline infusion sonography with office hysteroscopy for the evaluation of the endometrium. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;174:1327\u201334.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"2065_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"236","DOI":"10.4103\/0974-1208.197661","volume":"9","author":"A Reda","year":"2016","unstructured":"Reda A, Hamid ASA, Mostafa R, Refaei E. Comparison between findings of saline infusion sonohysterography and office hysteroscopy in patients with recurrent implantation failure. J Hum Reprod Sci. 2016;9:236\u201340.","journal-title":"J Hum Reprod Sci"},{"key":"2065_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"262","DOI":"10.1093\/humupd\/dmu057","volume":"21","author":"S Seshadri","year":"2014","unstructured":"Seshadri S, El-Toukhy T, Douiri A, Jayaprakasan K, Khalaf Y. Diagnostic accuracy of saline infusion sonography in the evaluation of uterine cavity abnormalities prior to assisted reproductive techniques: a systematic review and meta-analyses. Hum Reprod Update. 2014;21:262\u201374.","journal-title":"Hum Reprod Update"},{"key":"2065_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"279","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.320.7230.279","volume":"320","author":"C Kremer","year":"2000","unstructured":"Kremer C, Duffy S, Moroney M. Patient satisfaction with outpatient hysteroscopy versus day case hysteroscopy: randomised controlled trial. Br Med J. 2000;320:279\u201382.","journal-title":"Br Med J"},{"key":"2065_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"682","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2005.03.036","volume":"84","author":"S Kelekci","year":"2005","unstructured":"Kelekci S, Kaya E, Alan M, Alan Y, Bilge U, Mollamahmutoglu L. Comparison of transvaginal sonography, saline infusion sonography, and office hysteroscopy in reproductive-aged women with or without abnormal uterine bleeding. Fertil Steril. 2005;84:682\u20136.","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"2065_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1029","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(00)01541-7","volume":"74","author":"SE Brown","year":"2000","unstructured":"Brown SE, Coddington CC, Schnorr J, Toner JP, Gibbons W, Oehninger S. Evaluation of outpatient hysteroscopy, saline infusion hysterosonography, and hysterosalpingography in infertile women: a prospective, randomized study. Fertil Steril. 2000;74:1029\u201334.","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"2065_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1232","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2008.01858.x","volume":"115","author":"H van Dongen","year":"2008","unstructured":"van Dongen H, de Kroon C, van den Tillaart S, Louw\u00e9 L, Trimbos-Kemper G, Jansen F. A randomised comparison of vaginoscopic office hysteroscopy and saline infusion sonography: a patient compliance study. BJOG. 2008;115:1232\u20137.","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"2065_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"65","DOI":"10.1007\/s10397-010-0649-1","volume":"8","author":"H van Dongen","year":"2011","unstructured":"van Dongen H, Timmermans A, Jacobi CE, Elskamp T, De Kroon CD, Jansen FW. Diagnostic hysteroscopy and saline infusion sonography in the diagnosis of intrauterine abnormalities: an assessment of patient preference. Gynecol Surg. 2011;8:65\u201370.","journal-title":"Gynecol Surg"},{"issue":"2","key":"2065_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"199","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2017.08.009","volume":"25","author":"CA Salazar","year":"2018","unstructured":"Salazar CA, Isaacson KB. Office operative hysteroscopy: an update. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2018;25(2):199\u2013208.","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"key":"2065_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"791","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2014.03.006","volume":"21","author":"S Keyhan","year":"2014","unstructured":"Keyhan S, Munro MG. Office diagnostic and operative hysteroscopy using local anesthesia only: an analysis of patient reported pain and other procedural outcomes. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014;21:791\u20138.","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"key":"2065_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"830","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2014.03.013","volume":"21","author":"RJA Penketh","year":"2014","unstructured":"Penketh RJA, Bruen EM, White J, Griffiths AN, Patwardhan A, Lindsay P, et al. Feasibility of resectoscopic operative hysteroscopy in a UK outpatient clinic using local anesthetic and traditional reusable equipment, with patient experiences and comparative cost analysis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014;21:830\u20136.","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"2065_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e2014.00393","DOI":"10.4293\/JSLS.2014.00393","volume":"18","author":"NS Moawad","year":"2014","unstructured":"Moawad NS, Santamaria E, Johnson M, Shuster J. Cost-effectiveness of office hysteroscopy for abnormal uterine bleeding. J Soc Laparoendosc Surg. 2014;18(3):e2014.00393.","journal-title":"J Soc Laparoendosc Surg"},{"key":"2065_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"328","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.08.007","volume":"181","author":"L Cobellis","year":"2014","unstructured":"Cobellis L, Castaldi MA, Giordano V, De Franciscis P, Signoriello G, Colacurci N. Is it possible to predict office hysteroscopy failure? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014;181:328\u201333.","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"}],"container-title":["Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10815-021-02065-9.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s10815-021-02065-9\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10815-021-02065-9.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2021,2,27]],"date-time":"2021-02-27T05:47:25Z","timestamp":1614404845000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s10815-021-02065-9"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,2,1]]},"references-count":22,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,3]]}},"alternative-id":["2065"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10815-021-02065-9","relation":{},"ISSN":["1058-0468","1573-7330"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1058-0468","type":"print"},{"value":"1573-7330","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,2,1]]},"assertion":[{"value":"3 November 2020","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"6 January 2021","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"1 February 2021","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Compliance with ethical standards"}},{"value":"The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}},{"value":"This study was prospectively approved by the University of North Carolina Institutional Review Board.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethics approval"}},{"value":"All patients signed informed consents to participate in this trial.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent to participate"}},{"value":"All patients and providers consented to publication of the results of this trial.","order":5,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent for publication"}}]}}