{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,31]],"date-time":"2026-01-31T15:38:16Z","timestamp":1769873896063,"version":"3.49.0"},"reference-count":26,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"7","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,4,5]],"date-time":"2021-04-05T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1617580800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,4,5]],"date-time":"2021-04-05T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1617580800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["J Assist Reprod Genet"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,7]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s10815-021-02183-4","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,4,5]],"date-time":"2021-04-05T19:02:35Z","timestamp":1617649355000},"page":"1777-1786","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":2,"title":["When using donor oocytes, does embryo stage matter? An analysis of blastocyst versus cleavage stage embryo transfers using a cryopreserved donor oocyte bank"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"38","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-8486-7247","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Sarah M.","family":"Capelouto","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Audrey J.","family":"Gaskins","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Zsolt Peter","family":"Nagy","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Daniel B.","family":"Shapiro","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Jessica B.","family":"Spencer","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Heather S.","family":"Hipp","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,4,5]]},"reference":[{"issue":"1","key":"2183_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"6","DOI":"10.1186\/s12958-016-0225-2","volume":"15","author":"VA Kushnir","year":"2017","unstructured":"Kushnir VA, Barad DH, Albertini DF, Darmon SK, Gleicher N. Systematic review of worldwide trends in assisted reproductive technology 2004-2013. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2017;15(1):6.","journal-title":"Reprod Biol Endocrinol."},{"key":"2183_CR2","volume-title":"2006 assisted reproductive technology success rates: national summary and fertility clinic reports","author":"Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, American Society for Reproductive Medicine, Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology","year":"2008","unstructured":"Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, American Society for Reproductive Medicine, Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. 2006 assisted reproductive technology success rates: national summary and fertility clinic reports. Atlanta (GA): US Dept of Health and Human Services; 2008."},{"key":"2183_CR3","volume-title":"2016 assisted reproductive technology national summary report","author":"Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, American Society for Reproductive Medicine, Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology","year":"2018","unstructured":"Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, American Society for Reproductive Medicine, Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. 2016 assisted reproductive technology national summary report. Atlanta (GA): US Dept of Health and Human Services; 2018."},{"issue":"10","key":"2183_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1115","DOI":"10.1038\/nbt.1686","volume":"28","author":"CC Wong","year":"2010","unstructured":"Wong CC, Loewke KE, Bossert NL, Behr B, De Jonge CJ, Baer TM, et al. Non-invasive imaging of human embryos before embryonic genome activation predicts development to the blastocyst stage. Nat Biotechnol. 2010;28(10):1115\u201321.","journal-title":"Nat Biotechnol."},{"issue":"3","key":"2183_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"210","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2012.10.021","volume":"26","author":"R Machtinger","year":"2013","unstructured":"Machtinger R, Racowsky C. Morphological systems of human embryo assessment and clinical evidence. Reprod Biomed Online. 2013;26(3):210\u201321.","journal-title":"Reprod Biomed Online."},{"key":"2183_CR6","volume":"6","author":"D Glujovsky","year":"2016","unstructured":"Glujovsky D, Farquhar C, Quinteiro Retamar AM, Alvarez Sedo CR, Blake D. Cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technology. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;6:CD002118.","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev."},{"issue":"6","key":"2183_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1115","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/16.6.1115","volume":"16","author":"R Fanchin","year":"2001","unstructured":"Fanchin R, Ayoubi JM, Righini C, Olivennes F, Schonauer LM, Frydman R. Uterine contractility decreases at the time of blastocyst transfers. Hum Reprod. 2001;16(6):1115\u20139.","journal-title":"Hum Reprod."},{"issue":"3","key":"2183_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"457","DOI":"10.1007\/s10815-017-1092-2","volume":"35","author":"PE Levi-Setti","year":"2018","unstructured":"Levi-Setti PE, Cirillo F, Smeraldi A, Morenghi E, Mulazzani GEG, Albani E. No advantage of fresh blastocyst versus cleavage stage embryo transfer in women under the age of 39: a randomized controlled study. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2018;35(3):457\u201365.","journal-title":"J Assist Reprod Genet."},{"issue":"2","key":"2183_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"244","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2016.06.029","volume":"106","author":"D Glujovsky","year":"2016","unstructured":"Glujovsky D, Farquhar C. Cleavage-stage or blastocyst transfer: what are the benefits and harms? Fertil Steril. 2016;106(2):244\u201350.","journal-title":"Fertil Steril."},{"issue":"6","key":"2183_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1615","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2013.08.044","volume":"100","author":"A Maheshwari","year":"2013","unstructured":"Maheshwari A, Kalampokas T, Davidson J, Bhattacharya S. Obstetric and perinatal outcomes in singleton pregnancies resulting from the transfer of blastocyst-stage versus cleavage-stage embryos generated through in vitro fertilization treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2013;100(6):1615\u201321 e1-10.","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"issue":"1","key":"2183_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"89","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2018.03.033","volume":"110","author":"EC Holden","year":"2018","unstructured":"Holden EC, Kashani BN, Morelli SS, Alderson D, Jindal SK, Ohman-Strickland PA, et al. Improved outcomes after blastocyst-stage frozen-thawed embryo transfers compared with cleavage stage: a Society for Assisted Reproductive Technologies Clinical Outcomes Reporting System study. Fertil Steril. 2018;110(1):89\u201394 e2.","journal-title":"Fertil Steril."},{"issue":"2","key":"2183_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"520","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2008.06.005","volume":"92","author":"ZP Nagy","year":"2009","unstructured":"Nagy ZP, Chang CC, Shapiro DB, Bernal DP, Elsner CW, Mitchell-Leef D, et al. Clinical evaluation of the efficiency of an oocyte donation program using egg cryo-banking. Fertil Steril. 2009;92(2):520\u20136.","journal-title":"Fertil Steril."},{"issue":"4","key":"2183_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"488","DOI":"10.1097\/EDE.0b013e3181a819a1","volume":"20","author":"EF Schisterman","year":"2009","unstructured":"Schisterman EF, Cole SR, Platt RW. Overadjustment bias and unnecessary adjustment in epidemiologic studies. Epidemiology. 2009;20(4):488\u201395.","journal-title":"Epidemiology."},{"issue":"5","key":"2183_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"583","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.17327","volume":"49","author":"WP Martins","year":"2017","unstructured":"Martins WP, Nastri CO, Rienzi L, van der Poel SZ, Gracia C, Racowsky C. Blastocyst vs cleavage-stage embryo transfer: systematic review and meta-analysis of reproductive outcomes. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017;49(5):583\u201391.","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol."},{"issue":"1","key":"2183_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"36","DOI":"10.1186\/s12958-017-0255-4","volume":"15","author":"X Wang","year":"2017","unstructured":"Wang X, Du M, Guan Y, Wang B, Zhang J, Liu Z. Comparative neonatal outcomes in singleton births from blastocyst transfers or cleavage-stage embryo transfers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2017;15(1):36.","journal-title":"Reprod Biol Endocrinol."},{"issue":"4","key":"2183_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"805","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deaa032","volume":"35","author":"AL Spangmose","year":"2020","unstructured":"Spangmose AL, Ginstrom Ernstad E, Malchau S, Forman J, Tiitinen A, Gissler M, et al. Obstetric and perinatal risks in 4601 singletons and 884 twins conceived after fresh blastocyst transfers: a Nordic study from the CoNARTaS group. Hum Reprod. 2020;35(4):805\u201315.","journal-title":"Hum Reprod."},{"key":"2183_CR17","volume":"4","author":"DA Blake","year":"2007","unstructured":"Blake DA, Farquhar CM, Johnson N, Proctor M. Cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted conception. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;4:CD002118.","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev."},{"issue":"2","key":"2183_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"357","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1447-0756.2009.01135.x","volume":"36","author":"N Porat","year":"2010","unstructured":"Porat N, Boehnlein LM, Barker MA, Kovacs P, Lindheim SR. Blastocyst embryo transfer is the primary determinant for improved outcomes in oocyte donation cycles. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2010;36(2):357\u201363.","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Res."},{"issue":"3","key":"2183_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"482","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(00)00685-3","volume":"74","author":"WB Schoolcraft","year":"2000","unstructured":"Schoolcraft WB, Gardner DK. Blastocyst culture and transfer increases the efficiency of oocyte donation. Fertil Steril. 2000;74(3):482\u20136.","journal-title":"Fertil Steril."},{"issue":"6","key":"2183_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1426","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.08.020","volume":"104","author":"A Cobo","year":"2015","unstructured":"Cobo A, Garrido N, Pellicer A, Remohi J. Six years\u2019 experience in ovum donation using vitrified oocytes: report of cumulative outcomes, impact of storage time, and development of a predictive model for oocyte survival rate. Fertil Steril. 2015;104(6):1426\u201334 e1-8.","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"issue":"5","key":"2183_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"750","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2017.07.1167","volume":"108","author":"J Mersereau","year":"2017","unstructured":"Mersereau J, Stanhiser J, Coddington C, Jones T, Luke B, Brown MB. Patient and cycle characteristics predicting high pregnancy rates with single-embryo transfer: an analysis of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology outcomes between 2004 and 2013. Fertil Steril. 2017;108(5):750\u20136.","journal-title":"Fertil Steril."},{"key":"2183_CR22","unstructured":"Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. Preliminary National Summary Report for 2018. Available at: https:\/\/www.sartcorsonline.com\/rptCSR_PublicMultYear.aspx?reportingYear=2018. Accessed July 28, 2020."},{"issue":"4","key":"2183_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"847","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deaa003","volume":"35","author":"HS Hipp","year":"2020","unstructured":"Hipp HS, Gaskins AJ, Nagy ZP, Capelouto SM, Shapiro DB, Spencer JB. Effect of oocyte donor stimulation on recipient outcomes: data from a US national donor oocyte bank. Hum Reprod. 2020;35(4):847\u201358.","journal-title":"Hum Reprod."},{"issue":"5","key":"2183_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"859","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2018.06.003","volume":"110","author":"SM Capelouto","year":"2018","unstructured":"Capelouto SM, Nagy ZP, Shapiro DB, Archer SR, Ellis DP, Smith AK, et al. Impact of male partner characteristics and semen parameters on in vitro fertilization and obstetric outcomes in a frozen oocyte donor model. Fertil Steril. 2018;110(5):859\u201369.","journal-title":"Fertil Steril."},{"issue":"2","key":"2183_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"436","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dep414","volume":"25","author":"D Bodri","year":"2010","unstructured":"Bodri D, Guillen JJ, Lopez M, Vernaeve V, Coll O. Racial disparity in oocyte donation outcome: a multiethnic, matched cohort study. Hum Reprod. 2010;25(2):436\u201342.","journal-title":"Hum Reprod."},{"issue":"5","key":"2183_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1331","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2014.01.056","volume":"101","author":"JS Yeh","year":"2014","unstructured":"Yeh JS, Steward RG, Dude AM, Shah AA, Goldfarb JM, Muasher SJ. Pregnancy outcomes decline in recipients over age 44: an analysis of 27,959 fresh donor oocyte in vitro fertilization cycles from the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. Fertil Steril. 2014;101(5):1331\u20136.","journal-title":"Fertil Steril."}],"container-title":["Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10815-021-02183-4.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s10815-021-02183-4\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10815-021-02183-4.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2021,7,30]],"date-time":"2021-07-30T05:24:10Z","timestamp":1627622650000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s10815-021-02183-4"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,4,5]]},"references-count":26,"journal-issue":{"issue":"7","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,7]]}},"alternative-id":["2183"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10815-021-02183-4","relation":{},"ISSN":["1058-0468","1573-7330"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1058-0468","type":"print"},{"value":"1573-7330","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,4,5]]},"assertion":[{"value":"8 January 2021","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"29 March 2021","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"5 April 2021","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"Approval for this project was obtained through the Institutional Review Board at Emory University (Protocol # IRB00080463). The procedures used in this study adhere to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethics approval"}},{"value":"Zsolt Nagy is a member of Origio\/Cooper-Surgical Scientific Advisory Board. Zsolt Nagy and Daniel Shapiro are stock owners of Prelude Fertility. Audrey Gaskins was supported in part by a career development award from the NIEHS (R00ES026648). All other authors declare they have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}}]}}