{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,8]],"date-time":"2026-08-08T14:01:19Z","timestamp":1786197679436,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":30,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"10","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,7,26]],"date-time":"2021-07-26T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1627257600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,7,26]],"date-time":"2021-07-26T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1627257600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["J Assist Reprod Genet"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,10]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s10815-021-02284-0","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,7,26]],"date-time":"2021-07-26T05:02:43Z","timestamp":1627275763000},"page":"2671-2678","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":9,"title":["Factors associated with vitrification-warming survival in 6167 euploid blastocysts"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"38","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-1442-4587","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Margeaux","family":"Oliva","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Christine","family":"Briton-Jones","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Dmitry","family":"Gounko","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Joseph A.","family":"Lee","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Alan B.","family":"Copperman","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Lucky","family":"Sekhon","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,7,26]]},"reference":[{"key":"2284_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"241","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2019.12.009","volume":"113","author":"ZP Nagy","year":"2020","unstructured":"Nagy ZP, Shapiro D, Ching-Chien C. Vitrification of the human embryo: a more efficient and safer in vitro fertilization treatment. Fertil Steril. 2020;113:241\u20137.","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"2284_CR2","unstructured":"Strauss JF, Barbieri RL. Yen & Jaffe\u2019s reproductive endocrinology: pathophysiology, and clinical management. 8th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2019."},{"key":"2284_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"186","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2007.06.010","volume":"90","author":"KE Loutradi","year":"2008","unstructured":"Loutradi KE, Kolibianakis EM, Venetis CA, Papanikolaou EG, Pado G, Bontis I, et al. Cryopreservation of human embryos by vitrification or slow freezing: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2008;90:186\u201393.","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"2284_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"347","DOI":"10.1007\/s10815-009-9318-6","volume":"26","author":"M Rezazadeh Valojerdi","year":"2009","unstructured":"Rezazadeh Valojerdi M, Eftekhari-Yazdi P, Karimian L, Hassani F, Movaghar B. Vitrification versus slow freezing gives excellent survival, post warming embryo morphology and pregnancy outcomes for human cleaved embryos. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2009;26:347\u201354.","journal-title":"J Assist Reprod Genet"},{"key":"2284_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"270","DOI":"10.1097\/GCO.0b013e3283297dd6","volume":"21","author":"EM Kolibianakis","year":"2009","unstructured":"Kolibianakis EM, Venetis CA, Tarlatzis BC. Cryopreservation of human embryos by vitrification or slow freezing: which one is better? Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2009;21:270\u20134.","journal-title":"Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"2284_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"209","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2009.11.013","volume":"20","author":"FF AbdelHafez","year":"2010","unstructured":"AbdelHafez FF, Desai N, Abou-Setta AM, Falcone T, Goldfarb J. Slow freezing, vitrification and ultra-rapid freezing of human embryos: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Reprod Biomed Online. 2010;20:209\u201322.","journal-title":"Reprod Biomed Online"},{"key":"2284_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"629","DOI":"10.1007\/s10815-009-9369-8","volume":"26","author":"L Keskintepe","year":"2009","unstructured":"Keskintepe L, Sher G, Machnicka A, Tortoriella D, Bayrak A, Fisch J, et al. Vitrification of human embryos subjected to blastomere biopsy for pre-implantation genetic screening produces higher survival and pregnancy rates than slow freezing. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2009;26:629\u201335.","journal-title":"J Assist Reprod Genet"},{"key":"2284_CR8","first-page":"139","volume":"23","author":"L Rienzi","year":"2017","unstructured":"Rienzi L, Gracia C, Maggiulli R, LaBarbera AR, Kaser DJ, Ubaldi FM, et al. Oocyte, embryo and blastocyst cryopreservation in ART: systematic review and meta-analysis comparing slow-freezing versus vitrification to produce evidence for the development of global guidance. Hum Reprod Update. 2017;23:139\u201355.","journal-title":"Hum Reprod Update"},{"key":"2284_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2794","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deu246","volume":"29","author":"Z Li","year":"2014","unstructured":"Li Z, Wang YA, Ledger W, Edgar DH, Sullivan EA. Clinical outcomes following cryopreservation of blastocysts by vitrification or slow freezing: a population-based cohort study. Hum Reprod. 2014;29:2794\u2013801.","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"2284_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"275","DOI":"10.1007\/s10815-006-9051-3","volume":"23","author":"R Medved","year":"2006","unstructured":"Medved R, Virant-Klun I, Meden-Vrtovec H, Tomazevic T. Outcome of frozen-thawed blastocysts derived from gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist or antagonist cycles. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2006;23:275\u20139.","journal-title":"J Assist Reprod Genet"},{"key":"2284_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"821","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2004.02.136","volume":"82","author":"L Pal","year":"2004","unstructured":"Pal L, Kovacs P, Witt B, Jindal S, Santoro N, Barad D. Postthaw blastomere survival is predictive of the success of frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles. Fertil Steril. 2004;82:821\u20136.","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"2284_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"411","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2010.04.008","volume":"21","author":"E Surrey","year":"2010","unstructured":"Surrey E, Keller J, Stevens J, Gustofson R, Minjarez D, Schoolcraft W. Freeze-all: enhanced outcomes with cryopreservation at the blastocyst stage versus pronuclear stage using slow-freeze techniques. Reprod Biomed Online. 2010;21:411\u20137.","journal-title":"Reprod Biomed Online"},{"key":"2284_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"23","DOI":"10.4103\/0974-1208.82356","volume":"4","author":"ME Pavone","year":"2011","unstructured":"Pavone ME, Innes J, Hirshfeld-Cytron J, Kazer R, Zhang J. Comparing thaw survival, implantation and live birth rates from cryopreserved zygotes, embryos and blastocysts. J Hum Reprod Sci. 2011;4:23\u20138.","journal-title":"J Hum Reprod Sci"},{"key":"2284_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1551","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2011.03101.x","volume":"118","author":"T El-Toukhy","year":"2011","unstructured":"El-Toukhy T, Wharf E, Walavalkar R, Singh A, Bolton V, Khalaf Y, et al. Delayed blastocyst development does not influence the outcome of frozen-thawed transfer cycles. BJOG. 2011;118:1551\u20136.","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"2284_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"114","DOI":"10.5653\/cerm.2012.39.3.114","volume":"39","author":"AR Han","year":"2012","unstructured":"Han AR, Park CW, Lee HS, Yang KM, Song IO, Koong MK. Blastocyst transfer in frozen-thawed cycles. Clin Exp Reprod Med. 2012;39:114\u20137.","journal-title":"Clin Exp Reprod Med"},{"key":"2284_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1992","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dey291","volume":"33","author":"D Cimadomo","year":"2018","unstructured":"Cimadomo D, Capalbo A, Levi-Setti PE, Soscia D, Orlando G, Albani E, et al. Associations of blastocyst features, trophectoderm biopsy and other laboratory practice with post-warming behavior and implantation. Hum Reprod. 2018;33:1992\u20132001.","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"2284_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"401","DOI":"10.1007\/s10815-016-0647-y","volume":"33","author":"J Rodriguez-Purata","year":"2016","unstructured":"Rodriguez-Purata J, Lee J, Whitehouse M, Duke M, Grunfeld L, Sandler B, et al. Reproductive outcome is optimized by genomic embryo screening, vitrification, and subsequent transfer into a prepared synchronous endometrium. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2016;33:401\u201312.","journal-title":"J Assist Reprod Genet"},{"key":"2284_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Gardner DK, Stevens J, Sheehan CB, Schoolcraft W. Analysis of blastocyst morphology. In: Elder K, Jacques C, eds. Human preimplantation embryo selection. London: Informa Healthcare, 2007;79\u201387.","DOI":"10.3109\/9780203089712.007"},{"key":"2284_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"819","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2012.01.115","volume":"97","author":"NR Treff","year":"2012","unstructured":"Treff NR, Tao X, Ferry KM, Su J, Taylor D, Scott RT Jr. Development and validation of an accurate quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction-based assay for human blastocyst comprehensive chromosomal aneuploidy screening. Fertil Steril. 2012;97:819\u201324.","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"2284_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1375","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2014.01.051","volume":"101","author":"F Fiorentino","year":"2014","unstructured":"Fiorentino F, Biricik A, Bono S, Spizzichino L, Cotroneo E, Cottone G, et al. Development and validation of a next-generation sequencing-based protocol for 24-chromosome aneuploidy screening of embryos. Fertil Steril. 2014;101:1375\u201382.","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"2284_CR21","first-page":"200","volume":"78","author":"L Grunfeld","year":"1991","unstructured":"Grunfeld L, Walker B, Bergh PA, Sandler B, Hofmann G, Navot D. High-resolution endovaginal ultrasonography of the endometrium: a noninvasive test for endometrial adequacy. Obstet Gynecol. 1991;78:200\u20134.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"2284_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"17","DOI":"10.1093\/humupd\/dmq032","volume":"17","author":"J Qiao","year":"2011","unstructured":"Qiao J, Feng HL. Extra- and intra-ovarian factors in polycystic ovary syndrome: impact on oocyte maturation and embryo developmental competence. Hum Reprod Update. 2011;17:17\u201333.","journal-title":"Hum Reprod Update"},{"key":"2284_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1889","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deaa123","volume":"35","author":"C Hernandez-Nieto","year":"2020","unstructured":"Hernandez-Nieto C, Lee JA, Alkon-Meadows T, Luna-Rojas M, Mukherjee T, Copperman AB, et al. Late follicular phase progesterone elevation during ovarian stimulation is not associated with decreased implantation of chromosomally screened embryos in thaw cycles. Hum Reprod. 2020;35:1889\u201399.","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"2284_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1697","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dez129","volume":"34","author":"C Hernandez-Nieto","year":"2019","unstructured":"Hernandez-Nieto C, Lee JA, Slifkin R, Sandler B, Copperman AB, Flisser E. What is the reproductive potential of day 7 euploid embryos? Hum Reprod. 2019;34:1697\u2013706.","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"2284_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"665","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2017.12.025","volume":"109","author":"N Desai","year":"2018","unstructured":"Desai N, Goldberg J, Austin C, Falcone T. Are cleavage anomalies, multinucleation or specific cell cycle kinetics observed with time-lapse imaging predictive of embryo developmental capacity or ploidy? Fertil Steril. 2018;109:665\u201374.","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"2284_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2245","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dew183","volume":"31","author":"MG Minasi","year":"2016","unstructured":"Minasi MG, Colasante A, Riccio T, Ruberti A, Casciani V, Scarselli F, Spinella F, Fiorentino F, Varricchio MT, Greco E. Correlation between aneuploidy, standard morphology evaluation and morphokinetic development in 1730 biopsied blastocysts: a consecutive case series study. Hum Reprod. 2016;31:2245\u201354.","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"2284_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"59","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2014.03.001","volume":"29","author":"TH Taylor","year":"2014","unstructured":"Taylor TH, Patrick JL, Gitlin SA, Michael Wilson J, Crain JL, Griffin DK. Outcomes of blastocysts biopsied and vitrified once versus those cryopreserved twice for euploid blastocyst transfer. Reprod Biomed Online. 2014;29:59\u201364.","journal-title":"Reprod Biomed Online"},{"key":"2284_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1370","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2016.07.1095","volume":"106","author":"N Desai","year":"2016","unstructured":"Desai N, Ploskonka S, Goodman L, Attaran M, Goldberg JM, Austin C, et al. Delayed blastulation, multinucleation, and expansion grade are independently associated with live-birth rates in frozen blastocyst transfer cycles. Fertil Steril. 2016;106:1370\u20138.","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"2284_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2458","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dew205","volume":"31","author":"J Rodriguez-Purata","year":"2016","unstructured":"Rodriguez-Purata J, Gingold J, Lee J, Whitehouse M, Slifkin R, Briton-Jones C, et al. Hatching status before embryo transfer is not correlated with implantation rate in chromosomally screened blastocysts. Hum Reprod. 2016;31:2458\u201370.","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"2284_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"572","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2020.11.019","volume":"42","author":"A Aluko","year":"2021","unstructured":"Aluko A, Vaughan DA, Modest AM, Penzias AS, Hacker MR, Thorton K, Sakas D. Multiple cryopreservation-warming cycles, coupled with blastocyst biopsy, negatively affect IVF outcomes. Reprod Biomed Online. 2021;42:572\u20138.","journal-title":"Reprod Biomed Online"}],"container-title":["Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10815-021-02284-0.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s10815-021-02284-0\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10815-021-02284-0.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2021,11,11]],"date-time":"2021-11-11T01:07:13Z","timestamp":1636592833000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s10815-021-02284-0"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,7,26]]},"references-count":30,"journal-issue":{"issue":"10","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,10]]}},"alternative-id":["2284"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10815-021-02284-0","relation":{},"ISSN":["1058-0468","1573-7330"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1058-0468","type":"print"},{"value":"1573-7330","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,7,26]]},"assertion":[{"value":"4 February 2021","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"19 July 2021","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"26 July 2021","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"This study was approved by the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Institutional Review Board with a waiver of consent for retrospective analysis of de-identified data.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethics approval"}},{"value":"ABC is the Chief Medical Officer of Sema4 and Medical Director of Progyny. MO, CB, DG, JAL, and LS have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}}]}}