{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,13]],"date-time":"2026-03-13T10:55:21Z","timestamp":1773399321551,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":44,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"10","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,7,23]],"date-time":"2022-07-23T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1658534400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,7,23]],"date-time":"2022-07-23T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1658534400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["J Assist Reprod Genet"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,10]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s10815-022-02564-3","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,7,23]],"date-time":"2022-07-23T09:13:03Z","timestamp":1658567583000},"page":"2325-2333","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":4,"title":["Anti-M\u00fcllerian hormone in guiding the selection of a freeze-all versus a fresh embryo transfer strategy: a cohort study"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"39","author":[{"given":"Kai-Lun","family":"Hu","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Rui","family":"Yang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Huiyu","family":"Xu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Ben W.","family":"Mol","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-0305-5579","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Rong","family":"Li","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Rui","family":"Wang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,7,23]]},"reference":[{"issue":"9","key":"2564_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2108","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dew123","volume":"31","author":"J Datta","year":"2016","unstructured":"Datta J, Palmer MJ, Tanton C, Gibson LJ, Jones KG, Macdowall W, et al. Prevalence of infertility and help seeking among 15 000 women and men. Hum Reprod. 2016;31(9):2108\u201318. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/humrep\/dew123.","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"issue":"7","key":"2564_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1588","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dew082","volume":"31","author":"S Dyer","year":"2016","unstructured":"Dyer S, Chambers GM, de Mouzon J, Nygren KG, Zegers-Hochschild F, Mansour R, et al. International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technologies world report: Assisted Reproductive Technology 2008, 2009 and 2010. Hum Reprod. 2016;31(7):1588\u2013609. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/humrep\/dew082.","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"2564_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Wyns C Bergh C Calhaz-Jorge C De Geyter C Kupka MS Motrenko T et al. ART in Europe 2016: results generated from European registries by ESHRE Human reproduction open. 2020;2020(3):hoaa032. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/hropen\/hoaa032","DOI":"10.1093\/hropen\/hoaa032"},{"issue":"1","key":"2564_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"118","DOI":"10.1093\/humupd\/dmz037","volume":"26","author":"Y Mizrachi","year":"2020","unstructured":"Mizrachi Y, Horowitz E, Farhi J, Raziel A, Weissman A. Ovarian stimulation for freeze-all IVF cycles: a systematic review. Human Reprod Update. 2020;26(1):118\u201335. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/humupd\/dmz037.","journal-title":"Human Reprod Update"},{"issue":"3","key":"2564_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"616","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2006.12.006","volume":"88","author":"G Griesinger","year":"2007","unstructured":"Griesinger G, Kolibianakis EM, Papanikolaou EG, Diedrich K, Van Steirteghem A, Devroey P, et al. Triggering of final oocyte maturation with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist or human chorionic gonadotropin Live birth after frozen-thawed embryo replacement cycles. Fertil Steril. 2007;88(3):616\u201321. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2006.12.006.","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"issue":"3","key":"2564_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"491","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dey388","volume":"34","author":"JK Bosdou","year":"2019","unstructured":"Bosdou JK, Venetis CA, Tarlatzis BC, Grimbizis GF, Kolibianakis EM. Higher probability of live-birth in high, but not normal, responders after first frozen-embryo transfer in a freeze-only cycle strategy compared to fresh-embryo transfer: a meta-analysis. Hum Reprod. 2019;34(3):491\u2013505. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/humrep\/dey388.","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"issue":"2","key":"2564_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"344","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2011.05.050","volume":"96","author":"BS Shapiro","year":"2011","unstructured":"Shapiro BS, Daneshmand ST, Garner FC, Aguirre M, Hudson C, Thomas S. Evidence of impaired endometrial receptivity after ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: a prospective randomized trial comparing fresh and frozen-thawed embryo transfer in normal responders. Fertil Steril. 2011;96(2):344\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2011.05.050.","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"issue":"6","key":"2564_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"523","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa1513873","volume":"375","author":"ZJ Chen","year":"2019","unstructured":"Chen ZJ, Shi Y, Sun Y, Zhang B, Liang X, Cao Y, et al. Fresh versus frozen embryos for infertility in the polycystic ovary syndrome. N Eng J Med. 2019;375(6):523\u201333. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1056\/NEJMoa1513873.","journal-title":"N Eng J Med"},{"issue":"10178","key":"2564_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1310","DOI":"10.1016\/s0140-6736(18)32843-5","volume":"393","author":"D Wei","year":"2019","unstructured":"Wei D, Liu JY, Sun Y, Shi Y, Zhang B, Liu JQ, et al. Frozen versus fresh single blastocyst transfer in ovulatory women: a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2019;393(10178):1310\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/s0140-6736(18)32843-5.","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"issue":"4","key":"2564_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"998","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deaa305","volume":"36","author":"KM Wong","year":"2021","unstructured":"Wong KM, van Wely M, Verhoeve HR, Kaaijk EM, Mol F, van der Veen F, et al. Transfer of fresh or frozen embryos: a randomised controlled trial. Hum Reprod. 2021;36(4):998\u20131006. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/humrep\/deaa305.","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"issue":"2","key":"2564_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"126","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa1705334","volume":"378","author":"Y Shi","year":"2018","unstructured":"Shi Y, Sun Y, Hao C, Zhang H, Wei D, Zhang Y, et al. Transfer of fresh versus frozen embryos in ovulatory women. N Eng J M. 2018;378(2):126\u201336. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1056\/NEJMoa1705334.","journal-title":"N Eng J M"},{"issue":"2","key":"2564_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"137","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa1703768","volume":"378","author":"LN Vuong","year":"2018","unstructured":"Vuong LN, Dang VQ, Ho TM, Huynh BG, Ha DT, Pham TD, et al. IVF Transfer of fresh or frozen embryos in women without polycystic ovaries. N EngJ M. 2018;378(2):137\u201347. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1056\/NEJMoa1703768.","journal-title":"N EngJ M"},{"key":"2564_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Stormlund S Sopa N Zedeler A Bogstad J Pr\u00e6torius L Nielsen HS, et al. Freeze-all versus fresh blastocyst transfer strategy during in vitro fertilisation in women with regular menstrual cycles: multicentre randomised controlled trial Bmj 2020;370:m2519 https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmj.m2519; www.icmje.org\/coi_disclosure.pdf and declare: support from the Reprounion collaborative study, cofinanced by the European Union, Interreg V \u00d6KS for the submitted work; PH has received grants and personal fees from Merck, Gedeon Richter, and IBSA, and grants from MSD and Ferring outside the submitted work; NPP reports grants and personal fees from MSD, Merck Serono, Ferring, Theramex, and BESINS International, and personal fees from IBSA and Gedeon Richter outside the submitted work; ANA reports personal fees from Merck and Ferring, and grants from Roche Diagnostics, outside the submitted work; no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work. All other authors declare no competing interests.","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.m2519"},{"issue":"12","key":"2564_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2319","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dez233","volume":"34","author":"C Blockeel","year":"2019","unstructured":"Blockeel C, Campbell A, Coticchio G, Esler J, Garcia-Velasco JA, Santulli P, et al. Should we still perform fresh embryo transfers in ART? Hum Reprod. 2019;34(12):2319\u201329. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/humrep\/dez233.","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"issue":"10","key":"2564_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2179","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deaa204","volume":"35","author":"Z Ben Rafael","year":"2020","unstructured":"Ben Rafael Z. Should we still offer elective freezing of all embryos in all IVF cycles? Hum Reprod. 2020;35(10):2179\u201384. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/humrep\/deaa204.","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"2564_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hingorani AD, Windt DAvd, Riley RD, Abrams K, Moons KGM, Steyerberg EW, et al. Prognosis research strategy (PROGRESS) 4: stratified medicine research. BMJ. 2013","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.e5793"},{"issue":"3","key":"2564_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"370","DOI":"10.1093\/humupd\/dmt062","volume":"20","author":"D Dewailly","year":"2014","unstructured":"Dewailly D, Andersen CY, Balen A, Broekmans F, Dilaver N, Fanchin R, et al. The physiology and clinical utility of anti-Mullerian hormone in women. Hum Reprod Update. 2014;20(3):370\u201385. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/humupd\/dmt062.","journal-title":"Hum Reprod Update"},{"issue":"4","key":"2564_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"486","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2015.06.015","volume":"31","author":"R Fleming","year":"2015","unstructured":"Fleming R, Seifer DB, Frattarelli JL, Ruman J. Assessing ovarian response: antral follicle count versus anti-Mullerian hormone. Reprod Biomed Online. 2015;31(4):486\u201396. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.rbmo.2015.06.015.","journal-title":"Reprod Biomed Online"},{"issue":"3","key":"2564_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"763","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-016-4274-8","volume":"295","author":"H Xu","year":"2017","unstructured":"Xu H, Zeng L, Yang R, Feng Y, Li R, Qiao J. Retrospective cohort study: AMH is the best ovarian reserve markers in predicting ovarian response but has unfavorable value in predicting clinical pregnancy in GnRH antagonist protocol. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017;295(3):763\u201370. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00404-016-4274-8.","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"issue":"5","key":"2564_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"880","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2018.05.024","volume":"110","author":"KS Acharya","year":"2018","unstructured":"Acharya KS, Acharya CR, Bishop K, Harris B, Raburn D, Muasher SJ. Freezing of all embryos in in\u00a0vitro fertilization is beneficial in high responders, but not intermediate and low responders: an analysis of 82,935 cycles from the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology registry. Fertility and sterility. 2018;110(5):880\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2018.05.024.","journal-title":"Fertility and sterility"},{"issue":"9","key":"2564_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1602","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dey256","volume":"33","author":"HJ Teede","year":"2018","unstructured":"Teede HJ, Misso ML, Costello MF, Dokras A, Laven J, Moran L, et al. Recommendations from the international evidence-based guideline for the assessment and management of polycystic ovary syndrome. Hum Reprod. 2018;33(9):1602\u201318. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/humrep\/dey256.","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"issue":"6","key":"2564_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"627","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2017.08.016","volume":"35","author":"X Zheng","year":"2017","unstructured":"Zheng X, Chen Y, Yan J, Wu Y, Zhuang X, Lin S, et al. Effect of repeated cryopreservation on human embryo developmental potential. Reprod Biomed Online. 2017;35(6):627\u201332. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.rbmo.2017.08.016.","journal-title":"Reprod Biomed Online"},{"issue":"4","key":"2564_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"504","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2010.01.005","volume":"20","author":"H Chi","year":"2010","unstructured":"Chi H, Qiao J, Li H, Liu P, Ma C. Double measurements of serum HCG concentration and its ratio may predict IVF outcome. Reprod Biomed Online. 2010;20(4):504\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.rbmo.2010.01.005.","journal-title":"Reprod Biomed Online"},{"key":"2564_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Hu KL, Liu FT, Xu H, Li R, Qiao J. Association of serum anti-M\u00fcllerian hormone and other factors with cumulative live birth rate following IVF. Reprod Biomed Online. 2020.https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.rbmo.2020.01.024.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2020.01.024"},{"issue":"6","key":"2564_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1270","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/der037","volume":"26","author":"Embryology ASiRMaESIGo","year":"2011","unstructured":"Embryology ASiRMaESIGo. The Istanbul consensus workshop on embryo assessment: proceedings of an expert meeting. Hum Reprod. 2011;26(6):1270\u201383. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/humrep\/der037.","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"issue":"4","key":"2564_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"hoab036","DOI":"10.1093\/hropen\/hoab036","volume":"2021","author":"KL Hu","year":"2021","unstructured":"Hu KL, Zheng X, Hunt S, Li X, Li R, Mol BW. Blastocyst quality and perinatal outcomes in women undergoing single blastocyst transfer in frozen cycles. Hum Reprod Open. 2021;2021(4):hoab036. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/hropen\/hoab036.","journal-title":"Hum Reprod Open"},{"issue":"5","key":"2564_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1013","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deaa051","volume":"35","author":"KF Correia","year":"2020","unstructured":"Correia KF, Dodge LE, Farland LV, Hacker MR, Ginsburg E, Whitcomb BW, et al. Confounding and effect measure modification in reproductive medicine research. Hum Reprod. 2020;35(5):1013\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/humrep\/deaa051.","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"issue":"16","key":"2564_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2509","DOI":"10.1002\/sim.1815","volume":"23","author":"P Royston","year":"2004","unstructured":"Royston P, Sauerbrei W. A new approach to modelling interactions between treatment and continuous covariates in clinical trials by using fractional polynomials. Stat Med. 2004;23(16):2509\u201325. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/sim.1815.","journal-title":"Stat Med"},{"key":"2564_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Royston P, Sauerbrei W. Two techniques for investigating interactions between treatment and continuous covariates in clinical trials. 2009;9(2):230-51. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1536867x0900900204.","DOI":"10.1177\/1536867x0900900204"},{"key":"2564_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bartlett JW, Morris TP. Multiple imputation of covariates by substantive-model compatible fully conditional specification. Stata Journal. 2015;15(2):437\u201356.","DOI":"10.1177\/1536867X1501500206"},{"issue":"8","key":"2564_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"897","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2010.1205","volume":"304","author":"BM Psaty","year":"2010","unstructured":"Psaty BM, Siscovick DS. Minimizing bias due to confounding by indication in comparative effectiveness research: the importance of restriction. Jama. 2010;304(8):897\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/jama.2010.1205.","journal-title":"Jama"},{"issue":"4","key":"2564_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"101707","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2020.101707","volume":"49","author":"A Sik","year":"2020","unstructured":"Sik A, Oral S, Aba YA, Ozolcay O, Koc M, Sismanoglu A. Pregnancy results after fresh embryo transfer and selective frozen-thawed embryo transfer: Single-center experience. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2020;49(4):101707. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jogoh.2020.101707.","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod"},{"issue":"6","key":"2564_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1484","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2016.02.027","volume":"105","author":"MS Shah","year":"2016","unstructured":"Shah MS, Caballes M, Lathi RB, Baker VL, Westphal LM, Milki AA. In\u00a0vitro fertilization outcomes after fresh and frozen blastocyst transfer in\u00a0South Asian compared with Caucasian women. Fertil Steril. 2016;105(6):1484\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2016.02.027.","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"issue":"1","key":"2564_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"93","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.09.015","volume":"105","author":"MW Healy","year":"2016","unstructured":"Healy MW, Patounakis G, Connell MT, Devine K, DeCherney AH, Levy MJ, et al. Does a frozen embryo transfer ameliorate the effect of elevated progesterone seen in fresh transfer cycles? Fertil Steril. 2016;105(1):93-9.e1. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.09.015.","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"2564_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"50","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.05.023","volume":"215","author":"B Xu","year":"2017","unstructured":"Xu B, He YQ, Wang Y, Lu Y, Hong Y, Wang Y, et al. Frozen embryo transfer or fresh embryo transfer: clinical outcomes depend on the number of oocytes retrieved. Euro J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017;215:50\u20134. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.05.023.","journal-title":"Euro J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"2","key":"2564_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"254","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2017.05.007","volume":"108","author":"A Wang","year":"2017","unstructured":"Wang A, Santistevan A, Hunter Cohn K, Copperman A, Nulsen J, Miller BT, et al. Freeze-only versus fresh embryo transfer in a multicenter matched cohort study: contribution of progesterone and maternal age to success rates. Fertil Steril. 2017;108(2):254-61.e4. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2017.05.007.","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"issue":"3","key":"2564_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"387","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2018.12.012","volume":"38","author":"LN Vuong","year":"2019","unstructured":"Vuong LN, Pham TD, Dang VQ, Ho TM, Ho VNA, Norman RJ, et al. Live birth rates with a freeze-only strategy versus fresh embryo transfer: secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial. Reprod Biomed Online. 2019;38(3):387\u201396. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.rbmo.2018.12.012.","journal-title":"Reprod Biomed Online"},{"issue":"3","key":"2564_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"395","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2020.04.021","volume":"41","author":"Y Yu","year":"2020","unstructured":"Yu Y, Zhao S, Li Y, Niu Y, Wei D, Zhang S, et al. Live birth after a freeze-only strategy versus fresh embryo transfer in three randomized trials considering progesterone concentration. Reprod Biomed Online. 2020;41(3):395\u2013401. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.rbmo.2020.04.021.","journal-title":"Reprod Biomed Online"},{"issue":"5","key":"2564_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"433","DOI":"10.1093\/humupd\/dmt014","volume":"19","author":"CA Venetis","year":"2013","unstructured":"Venetis CA, Kolibianakis EM, Bosdou JK, Tarlatzis BC. Progesterone elevation and probability of pregnancy after IVF: a systematic review and meta-analysis of over 60 000 cycles. Hum Reprod Update. 2013;19(5):433\u201357. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/humupd\/dmt014.","journal-title":"Hum Reprod Update"},{"issue":"1","key":"2564_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2","DOI":"10.1093\/humupd\/dmy033","volume":"25","author":"M Roque","year":"2019","unstructured":"Roque M, Haahr T, Geber S, Esteves SC, Humaidan P. Fresh versus elective frozen embryo transfer in IVF\/ICSI cycles: a systematic review and meta-analysis of reproductive outcomes. Hum Reprod Update. 2019;25(1):2\u201314. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/humupd\/dmy033.","journal-title":"Hum Reprod Update"},{"issue":"12","key":"2564_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2808","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deaa226","volume":"35","author":"S Santos-Ribeiro","year":"2020","unstructured":"Santos-Ribeiro S, Mackens S, Popovic-Todorovic B, Racca A, Polyzos NP, Van Landuyt L, et al. The freeze-all strategy versus agonist triggering with low-dose hCG for luteal phase support in IVF\/ICSI for high responders: a randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod. 2020;35(12):2808\u201318. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/humrep\/deaa226.","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"2564_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Wang S, Zhang Y, Mensah V, Huber WJ, 3rd, Huang YT, Alvero R. Discordant anti-m\u00fcllerian hormone (AMH) and follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) among women undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF): which one is the better predictor for live birth? J Ovarian Res. 2018;11(1):60. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s13048-018-0430-z. research by The Care New England \u2013 Women & Infants Hospital IRB (IRBNet ID: 948046\u20131). CONSENT FOR PUBLICATION: Not applicable. COMPETING INTERESTS: The authors declare that they have no competing interests. PUBLISHER\u2019S NOTE: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.","DOI":"10.1186\/s13048-018-0430-z"},{"issue":"3","key":"2564_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"176","DOI":"10.1016\/j.repbio.2014.03.004","volume":"14","author":"K Lukaszuk","year":"2014","unstructured":"Lukaszuk K, Liss J, Kunicki M, Jakiel G, Wasniewski T, Woclawek-Potocka I, et al. Anti-M\u00fcllerian hormone (AMH) is a strong predictor of live birth in women undergoing assisted reproductive technology. Reprod Biol. 2014;14(3):176\u201381. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.repbio.2014.03.004.","journal-title":"Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"6","key":"2564_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1065","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2018.01.039","volume":"109","author":"BM Lyttle Schumacher","year":"2018","unstructured":"Lyttle Schumacher BM, Jukic AMZ, Steiner AZ. Antim\u00fcllerian hormone as a risk factor for miscarriage in naturally conceived pregnancies. Fertil Steril. 2018;109(6):1065-71.e1. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2018.01.039.","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"}],"container-title":["Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10815-022-02564-3.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s10815-022-02564-3\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10815-022-02564-3.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,10,25]],"date-time":"2022-10-25T19:24:12Z","timestamp":1666725852000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s10815-022-02564-3"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,7,23]]},"references-count":44,"journal-issue":{"issue":"10","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,10]]}},"alternative-id":["2564"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10815-022-02564-3","relation":{},"ISSN":["1058-0468","1573-7330"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1058-0468","type":"print"},{"value":"1573-7330","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,7,23]]},"assertion":[{"value":"21 March 2022","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"4 July 2022","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"23 July 2022","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval for this retrospective cohort study was obtained from the Ethics Committee of Peking University Third Hospital (reference: 2018S2-002).","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethics approval"}},{"value":"BWM is supported by a NHMRC Investigator grant (GNT1176437), and BWM reports consultancy for ObsEva, Merck Merck KGaA, iGenomix, and Guerbet. The other authors have no conflict of interest to declare.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}}]}}