{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,1]],"date-time":"2026-10-01T05:35:41Z","timestamp":1790832941449,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":71,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,1]],"date-time":"2025-02-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1738368000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,1]],"date-time":"2025-02-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1738368000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["J Assist Reprod Genet"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,4]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s10815-025-03398-5","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,1]],"date-time":"2025-02-01T18:15:50Z","timestamp":1738433750000},"page":"1053-1066","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":6,"title":["Does double cryopreservation as well as double biopsy affect embryo viability and clinical outcomes? Evidence from a systematic review of the literature"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"42","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-5698-5513","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Alessandro","family":"Bartolacci","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Carmine","family":"Vitiello","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Sofia","family":"de Girolamo","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Enrico","family":"Papaleo","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Luca","family":"Pagliardini","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,1]]},"reference":[{"issue":"3","key":"3398_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"695","DOI":"10.1093\/oxfordjournals.bmb.a072425","volume":"46","author":"AO Trounson","year":"1990","unstructured":"Trounson AO. Cryopreservation. Br Med Bull. 1990;46(3):695\u2013708.","journal-title":"Br Med Bull"},{"issue":"8","key":"3398_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1685","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dew127","volume":"31","author":"B Wirleitner","year":"2016","unstructured":"Wirleitner B, Schuff M, Stecher A, Murtinger M, Vanderzwalmen P. Pregnancy and birth outcomes following fresh or vitrified embryo transfer according to blastocyst morphology and expansion stage, and culturing strategy for delayed development. Hum Reprod. 2016;31(8):1685\u201395.","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"issue":"2","key":"3398_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"344","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2011.05.050","volume":"96","author":"BS Shapiro","year":"2011","unstructured":"Shapiro BS, Daneshmand ST, Garner FC, Aguirre M, Hudson C, Thomas S. Evidence of impaired endometrial receptivity after ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: a prospective randomized trial comparing fresh and frozen-thawed embryo transfer in normal responders. Fertil Steril. 2011;96(2):344\u20138.","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"issue":"3","key":"3398_CR4","first-page":"450","volume":"26","author":"TMC Le","year":"2022","unstructured":"Le TMC, Ong PT, Nguyen QA, Roque M. Fresh versus elective frozen embryo transfer: cumulative live birth rates of 7,236 IVF cycles. JBRA Assist Reprod. 2022;26(3):450\u20139.","journal-title":"JBRA Assist Reprod"},{"issue":"7","key":"3398_CR5","first-page":"551","volume":"21","author":"R Baradaran Bagheri","year":"2023","unstructured":"Baradaran Bagheri R, Bazrafkan M, Sabour A, Ataei M, Badehnoosh B, Mashak B, et al. The comparison of pregnancy outcomes in fresh and frozen embryo transfer: a cross-sectional study. Int J Reprod Biomed. 2023;21(7):551\u20136.","journal-title":"Int J Reprod Biomed"},{"issue":"3","key":"3398_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"491","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dey388","volume":"34","author":"JK Bosdou","year":"2019","unstructured":"Bosdou JK, Venetis CA, Tarlatzis BC, Grimbizis GF, Kolibianakis EM. Higher probability of live-birth in high, but not normal, responders after first frozen-embryo transfer in a freeze-only cycle strategy compared to fresh-embryo transfer: a meta-analysis. Hum Reprod. 2019;34(3):491\u2013505.","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"issue":"2","key":"3398_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"hox012","DOI":"10.1093\/hropen\/hox012","volume":"2017","author":"AP Ferraretti","year":"2017","unstructured":"Ferraretti AP, Nygren K, Andersen AN, de Mouzon J, Kupka M, Calhaz-Jorge C, et al. Trends over 15 years in ART in Europe: an analysis of 6 million cycles. Hum Reprod Open. 2017;2017(2):hox012.","journal-title":"Hum Reprod Open."},{"issue":"5","key":"3398_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"536","DOI":"10.1093\/humupd\/dms016","volume":"18","author":"DH Edgar","year":"2012","unstructured":"Edgar DH, Gook DA. A critical appraisal of cryopreservation (slow cooling versus vitrification) of human oocytes and embryos. Hum Reprod Update. 2012;18(5):536\u201354.","journal-title":"Hum Reprod Update"},{"issue":"5","key":"3398_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"645","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(16)48981-8","volume":"44","author":"B Lassalle","year":"1985","unstructured":"Lassalle B, Testart J, Renard JP. Human embryo features that influence the success of cryopreservation with the use of 1,2 propanediol. Fertil Steril. 1985;44(5):645\u201351.","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"issue":"3","key":"3398_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"300","DOI":"10.1016\/S1472-6483(10)60837-1","volume":"11","author":"M Kuwayama","year":"2005","unstructured":"Kuwayama M, Vajta G, Kato O, Leibo SP. Highly efficient vitrification method for cryopreservation of human oocytes. Reprod Biomed Online. 2005;11(3):300\u20138.","journal-title":"Reprod Biomed Online"},{"issue":"2","key":"3398_CR11","first-page":"139","volume":"23","author":"L Rienzi","year":"2017","unstructured":"Rienzi L, Gracia C, Maggiulli R, LaBarbera AR, Kaser DJ, Ubaldi FM, et al. Oocyte, embryo and blastocyst cryopreservation in ART: systematic review and meta-analysis comparing slow-freezing versus vitrification to produce evidence for the development of global guidance. Hum Reprod Update. 2017;23(2):139\u201355.","journal-title":"Hum Reprod Update"},{"key":"3398_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"501","DOI":"10.1007\/978-1-0716-0783-1_24","volume":"2180","author":"J Liebermann","year":"2021","unstructured":"Liebermann J. Vitrification: a simple and successful method for cryostorage of human blastocysts. Methods Mol Biol. 2021;2180:501\u201315.","journal-title":"Methods Mol Biol"},{"issue":"10","key":"3398_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1974","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dex265","volume":"32","author":"M De Rycke","year":"2017","unstructured":"De Rycke M, Goossens V, Kokkali G, Meijer-Hoogeveen M, Coonen E, Moutou C. ESHRE PGD Consortium data collection XIV-XV: cycles from January 2011 to December 2012 with pregnancy follow-up to October 2013. Hum Reprod. 2017;32(10):1974\u201394.","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"3398_CR14","unstructured":"International Federation of Fertility Societies Surveillance. 2016. https:\/\/journals.lww.com\/grh\/Fulltext\/2016\/09000\/IFFS_Surveillance_2016.1. Accessed\u00a010\/09\/2024"},{"issue":"5","key":"3398_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"813","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2022.08.016","volume":"118","author":"D Strom","year":"2022","unstructured":"Strom D, Feinberg EC. Embryo transfer-the who, what, when, how, and why does it matter? Fertil Steril. 2022;118(5):813\u20134.","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"issue":"2","key":"3398_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"129","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2022.02.005","volume":"227","author":"QS Katler","year":"2022","unstructured":"Katler QS, Kawwass JF, Hurst BS, Sparks AE, McCulloh DH, Wantman E, et al. Vanquishing multiple pregnancy in in vitro fertilization in the United States-a 25-year endeavor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022;227(2):129\u201335.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"3398_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"671","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2020.08.1404","volume":"114","author":"C Farquhar","year":"2020","unstructured":"Farquhar C. Avoiding multiple pregnancies in assisted reproductive technologies: transferring one embryo at a time should be the norm. Fertil Steril. 2020;114(4):671\u20132.","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"issue":"4","key":"3398_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"hoad037","DOI":"10.1093\/hropen\/hoad037","volume":"2023","author":"S Makieva","year":"2023","unstructured":"Makieva S, Sachs MK, Xie M, Velasco A, El-Hadad S, Kalaitzopoulos DR, et al. Double vitrification and warming does not compromise the chance of live birth after single unbiopsied blastocyst transfer. Hum Reprod Open. 2023;2023(4):hoad037.","journal-title":"Hum Reprod Open."},{"issue":"2","key":"3398_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"176","DOI":"10.1002\/rmb2.12365","volume":"20","author":"Y Mizobe","year":"2021","unstructured":"Mizobe Y, Kuwatsuru Y, Kuroki Y, Fukumoto Y, Tokudome M, Moewaki H, et al. The effect of repeated cryopreservation and thawing using cryotip on the clinical outcomes of embryos. Reprod Med Biol. 2021;20(2):176\u201381.","journal-title":"Reprod Med Biol"},{"key":"3398_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.5935\/1518-0557.20240014","author":"C Oraiopoulou","year":"2024","unstructured":"Oraiopoulou C, Karagianni M, Papatheodorou A, Toumpa O, Papadopoulou M, Christophoridis N, et al. Double vitrification of embryos adversely affects clinical outcomes. JBRA Assist Reprod. 2024. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5935\/1518-0557.20240014.","journal-title":"JBRA Assist Reprod."},{"issue":"4","key":"3398_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"607","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2021.06.028","volume":"43","author":"M Hallamaa","year":"2021","unstructured":"Hallamaa M, Seikkula J, Willman S, Ollila H, Jokimaa V. Pregnancy potential and perinatal outcomes of embryos cryopreserved twice: a case-control study. Reprod Biomed Online. 2021;43(4):607\u201313.","journal-title":"Reprod Biomed Online"},{"issue":"4","key":"3398_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"517","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2018.11.010","volume":"38","author":"J Farhi","year":"2019","unstructured":"Farhi J, Elizur S, Yonish M, Seidman DS, Shulman A, Schiff E, et al. Assessment of a double freezing approach in the management of surplus embryos in IVF. Reprod Biomed Online. 2019;38(4):517\u20139.","journal-title":"Reprod Biomed Online"},{"issue":"1","key":"3398_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"75","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2020.11.007","volume":"42","author":"M Wang","year":"2021","unstructured":"Wang M, Jiang J, Xi Q, Li D, Ren X, Li Z, et al. Repeated cryopreservation process impairs embryo implantation potential but does not affect neonatal outcomes. Reprod Biomed Online. 2021;42(1):75\u201382.","journal-title":"Reprod Biomed Online"},{"issue":"1","key":"3398_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"58","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2011.04.034","volume":"96","author":"J Koch","year":"2011","unstructured":"Koch J, Costello MF, Chapman MG, Kilani S. Twice-frozen embryos are no detriment to pregnancy success: a retrospective comparative study. Fertil Steril. 2011;96(1):58\u201362.","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"issue":"8","key":"3398_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2648","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2010.12.038","volume":"95","author":"M Murakami","year":"2011","unstructured":"Murakami M, Egashira A, Murakami K, Araki Y, Kuramoto T. Perinatal outcome of twice-frozen-thawed embryo transfers: a clinical follow-up study. Fertil Steril. 2011;95(8):2648\u201350.","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"issue":"1","key":"3398_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"39","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2021.09.022","volume":"44","author":"D Cimadomo","year":"2022","unstructured":"Cimadomo D, Sosa Fernandez L, Soscia D, Fabozzi G, Benini F, Cesana A, et al. Inter-centre reliability in embryo grading across several IVF clinics is limited: implications for embryo selection. Reprod Biomed Online. 2022;44(1):39\u201348.","journal-title":"Reprod Biomed Online"},{"issue":"1","key":"3398_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"59","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2014.03.001","volume":"29","author":"TH Taylor","year":"2014","unstructured":"Taylor TH, Patrick JL, Gitlin SA, Michael Wilson J, Crain JL, Griffin DK. Outcomes of blastocysts biopsied and vitrified once versus those cryopreserved twice for euploid blastocyst transfer. Reprod Biomed Online. 2014;29(1):59\u201364.","journal-title":"Reprod Biomed Online"},{"issue":"6","key":"3398_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"999","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2017.09.013","volume":"108","author":"CK Bradley","year":"2017","unstructured":"Bradley CK, Livingstone M, Traversa MV, McArthur SJ. Impact of multiple blastocyst biopsy and vitrification-warming procedures on pregnancy outcomes. Fertil Steril. 2017;108(6):999\u20131006.","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"issue":"3","key":"3398_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"572","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2020.11.019","volume":"42","author":"A Aluko","year":"2021","unstructured":"Aluko A, Vaughan DA, Modest AM, Penzias AS, Hacker MR, Thornton K, et al. Multiple cryopreservation-warming cycles, coupled with blastocyst biopsy, negatively affect IVF outcomes. Reprod Biomed Online. 2021;42(3):572\u20138.","journal-title":"Reprod Biomed Online"},{"issue":"1","key":"3398_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1186\/2046-4053-4-1","volume":"4","author":"D Moher","year":"2015","unstructured":"Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst Rev. 2015;4(1):1.","journal-title":"Syst Rev"},{"issue":"6","key":"3398_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1623","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2013.01.106","volume":"99","author":"A Cobo","year":"2013","unstructured":"Cobo A, Castell\u00f2 D, Vallejo B, Albert C, de los Santos JM, Remoh\u00ed J. Outcome of cryotransfer of embryos developed from vitrified oocytes: double vitrification has no impact on delivery rates. Fertil Steril. 2013;99(6):1623\u201330.","journal-title":"Fertil Steril."},{"issue":"3","key":"3398_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"314","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2011.11.013","volume":"24","author":"J Stanger","year":"2012","unstructured":"Stanger J, Wong J, Conceicao J, Yovich J. Vitrification of human embryos previously cryostored by either slow freezing or vitrification results in high pregnancy rates. Reprod Biomed Online. 2012;24(3):314\u201320.","journal-title":"Reprod Biomed Online"},{"issue":"3","key":"3398_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"104103","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2024.104103","volume":"49","author":"B Al Hashimi","year":"2024","unstructured":"Al Hashimi B, Linara-Demakakou E, Harvey SC, Harvey KE, Griffin DK, Ahuja K, et al. Double vitrification and warming of blastocysts does not affect pregnancy, miscarriage or live birth rates. Reprod Biomed Online. 2024;49(3):104103.","journal-title":"Reprod Biomed Online"},{"issue":"2","key":"3398_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"383","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2007.11.079","volume":"91","author":"Y Kumasako","year":"2009","unstructured":"Kumasako Y, Otsu E, Utsunomiya T, Araki Y. The efficacy of the transfer of twice frozen-thawed embryos with the vitrification method. Fertil Steril. 2009;91(2):383\u20136.","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"3398_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Zheng X, Chen Y, Yan J, Wu Y, Zhuang X, Lin S, et al. Effect of repeated cryopreservation on human embryo developmental potential. Reprod Biomed Online. 2017;0(0). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.rbmo.2017.08.016.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2017.08.016"},{"issue":"10","key":"3398_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2357","DOI":"10.1007\/s10815-023-02909-6","volume":"40","author":"L Nanassy","year":"2023","unstructured":"Nanassy L, Schoepper B, Schultze-Mosgau A, Depenbusch M, Eggersmann TK, Hiller RAF, et al. Evaluation of live birth rates and perinatal outcomes following two sequential vitrification\/warming events at the zygote and blastocyst stages. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2023;40(10):2357\u201365.","journal-title":"J Assist Reprod Genet"},{"issue":"1","key":"3398_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"30","DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-023-05369-z","volume":"23","author":"X Shen","year":"2023","unstructured":"Shen X, Ding M, Yan Y, Huang C, Wang S, Zhou J, et al. Perinatal outcomes of singletons following double vitrification-warming procedures: a retrospective study using propensity score analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023;23(1):30.","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"issue":"6","key":"3398_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"779","DOI":"10.1007\/s10815-013-0017-y","volume":"30","author":"SM Kang","year":"2013","unstructured":"Kang SM, Lee SW, Yoon SH, Kim JC, Lim JH, Lee SG. Comparison of clinical outcomes between single and double vitrified-warmed blastocyst embryo transfer according to the day of vitrification. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2013;30(6):779\u201385.","journal-title":"J Assist Reprod Genet"},{"issue":"1","key":"3398_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"14","DOI":"10.12891\/ceog2166.2016","volume":"28","author":"JH Check","year":"2001","unstructured":"Check JH, Brittingham D, Swenson K, Wilson C, Lurie D. Transfer of refrozen twice-thawed embryos do not decrease the implantation rate. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2001;28(1):14\u20136.","journal-title":"Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"3398_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"806","DOI":"10.1002\/ijgo.14355","volume":"160","author":"X Li","year":"2023","unstructured":"Li X, Li W, Jia H, Gao Y, Shi W, Bai H. Double vitrification-warming cycles, coupled with blastocyst biopsy, impair live birth but do not affect neonatal outcomes. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2023;160(3):806\u201313.","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"issue":"4","key":"3398_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"987","DOI":"10.1007\/s10815-022-02440-0","volume":"39","author":"E Theodorou","year":"2022","unstructured":"Theodorou E, Jones BP, Cardenas Armas DF, Heath C, Serhal P, Ben-Nagi J. Live birth rate following a euploid blastocyst transfer is not affected by double vitrification and warming at cleavage or blastocyst stage. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2022;39(4):987\u201393.","journal-title":"J Assist Reprod Genet"},{"key":"3398_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"35","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2024.04.033","volume":"298","author":"E Theodorou","year":"2024","unstructured":"Theodorou E, Chronopoulou E, Ozturk O, Brunetti X, Serhal P, Ben-Nagi J. Impact of double trophectoderm biopsy on reproductive outcomes following single euploid blastocyst transfer. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2024;298:35\u201340.","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"7","key":"3398_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2302","DOI":"10.1007\/s43032-023-01177-0","volume":"30","author":"Q Zhang","year":"2023","unstructured":"Zhang Q, Yu W, Jin C, Ni T, Zhou T, Zhao Q, et al. Impact of multiple vitrification-warming procedures and insemination methods on pregnancy and neonatal outcomes in preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy. Reprod Sci. 2023;30(7):2302\u201312.","journal-title":"Reprod Sci"},{"issue":"10","key":"3398_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1839","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dey282","volume":"33","author":"D Cimadomo","year":"2018","unstructured":"Cimadomo D, Rienzi L, Romanelli V, Alviggi E, Levi-Setti PE, Albani E, et al. Inconclusive chromosomal assessment after blastocyst biopsy: prevalence, causative factors and outcomes after re-biopsy and re-vitrification. A multicenter experience. Hum Reprod. 2018;33(10):1839\u201346.","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"issue":"11","key":"3398_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2488","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deaa236","volume":"35","author":"A De Vos","year":"2020","unstructured":"De Vos A, Van Landuyt L, De Rycke M, Verdyck P, Verheyen G, Buysse A, et al. Multiple vitrification-warming and biopsy procedures on human embryos: clinical outcome and neonatal follow-up of children. Hum Reprod. 2020;35(11):2488\u201396.","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"issue":"1","key":"3398_CR46","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"159","DOI":"10.1007\/s10815-018-1359-2","volume":"36","author":"S Priner","year":"2019","unstructured":"Priner S, Altarescu G, Schonberger O, Holzer H, Rubinstein E, Dekel N, et al. The effect of repeated biopsy on pre-implantation genetic testing for monogenic diseases (PGT-M) treatment outcome. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2019;36(1):159\u201364.","journal-title":"J Assist Reprod Genet"},{"issue":"2","key":"3398_CR47","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"215","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2021.04.006","volume":"43","author":"S Zhou","year":"2021","unstructured":"Zhou S, Xie P, Zhang S, Hu L, Luo K, Gong F, et al. Complex mosaic blastocysts after preimplantation genetic testing: prevalence and outcomes after re-biopsy and re-vitrification. Reprod Biomed Online. 2021;43(2):215\u201322.","journal-title":"Reprod Biomed Online"},{"issue":"5","key":"3398_CR48","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1173","DOI":"10.1007\/s10815-024-03078-w","volume":"41","author":"C Guarneri","year":"2024","unstructured":"Guarneri C, Reschini M, Pinna M, Perego L, Sanzani E, Somigliana E, et al. The impact of a second embryo biopsy for preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic diseases (PGT-M) with inconclusive results on pregnancy potential: results from a matched case-control study. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2024;41(5):1173\u20139.","journal-title":"J Assist Reprod Genet"},{"issue":"8","key":"3398_CR49","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1905","DOI":"10.1007\/s10815-023-02875-z","volume":"40","author":"M Nohales","year":"2023","unstructured":"Nohales M, Coello A, Martin A, Insua F, Meseguer M, de Los Santos MJ. Should embryo rebiopsy be considered a regular strategy to increase the number of embryos available for transfer? J Assist Reprod Genet. 2023;40(8):1905\u201313.","journal-title":"J Assist Reprod Genet"},{"issue":"10","key":"3398_CR50","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2671","DOI":"10.1007\/s10815-021-02284-0","volume":"38","author":"M Oliva","year":"2021","unstructured":"Oliva M, Briton-Jones C, Gounko D, Lee JA, Copperman AB, Sekhon L. Factors associated with vitrification-warming survival in 6167 euploid blastocysts. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2021;38(10):2671\u20138.","journal-title":"J Assist Reprod Genet"},{"issue":"2","key":"3398_CR51","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"103619","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2023.103619","volume":"48","author":"A Vanderhoff","year":"2024","unstructured":"Vanderhoff A, Lanes A, Go K, Dobson L, Ginsburg E, Patel J, et al. Multiple embryo manipulations in PGT-A cycles may result in inferior clinical outcomes. Reprod Biomed Online. 2024;48(2):103619.","journal-title":"Reprod Biomed Online"},{"issue":"6","key":"3398_CR52","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"623","DOI":"10.1016\/S1472-6483(10)62084-6","volume":"7","author":"J Liebermann","year":"2003","unstructured":"Liebermann J, Dietl J, Vanderzwalmen P, Tucker MJ. Recent developments in human oocyte, embryo and blastocyst vitrification: where are we now? Reprod Biomed Online. 2003;7(6):623\u201333.","journal-title":"Reprod Biomed Online"},{"issue":"2","key":"3398_CR53","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"164","DOI":"10.1016\/S1472-6483(10)62125-6","volume":"9","author":"J Liebermann","year":"2004","unstructured":"Liebermann J, Dietl J, Vanderzwalmen P, Tucker MJ. Cryopreservation of animal and human embryos by vitrification. Reprod Biomed Online. 2004;9(2):164\u201370.","journal-title":"Reprod Biomed Online"},{"issue":"6","key":"3398_CR54","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"789","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2012.07.001","volume":"26","author":"T Mukaida","year":"2012","unstructured":"Mukaida T, Oka C. Vitrification of oocytes, embryos and blastocysts. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2012;26(6):789\u2013803.","journal-title":"Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"3398_CR55","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"647","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deae010","volume":"39","author":"A Alteri","year":"2024","unstructured":"ESHRE Guideline Group on the Number of Embryos to Transfer, Alteri A, Arroyo G, Baccino G, Craciunas L, De Geyter C, et al. ESHRE guideline: number of embryos to transfer during IVF\/ICSI\u2020. Hum Reprod. 2024;39(4):647\u201357.","journal-title":"Hum Reprod."},{"issue":"2","key":"3398_CR56","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"321","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2023.03.001","volume":"120","author":"X Wang","year":"2023","unstructured":"Wang X, Mao R, Wang M, Long R, Jin L, Zhu L. The effect of recryopreservation on embryo viability and outcomes of in vitro fertilization: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2023;120(2):321\u201332.","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"issue":"6","key":"3398_CR57","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"701","DOI":"10.1111\/evj.12341","volume":"47","author":"WK Hendriks","year":"2015","unstructured":"Hendriks WK, Roelen BA, Colenbrander B, Stout TA. Cellular damage suffered by equine embryos after exposure to cryoprotectants or cryopreservation by slow-freezing or vitrification. Equine Vet J. 2015;47(6):701\u20137.","journal-title":"Equine Vet J"},{"issue":"5 suppl","key":"3398_CR58","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2087","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2008.04.049","volume":"91","author":"A Kader","year":"2009","unstructured":"Kader A, Agarwal A, Abdelrazik H, Sharma RK, Ahmady A, Falcone T. Evaluation of post-thaw DNA integrity of mouse blastocysts after ultrarapid and slow freezing. Fertil Steril. 2009;91(5 suppl):2087\u201394.","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"issue":"5","key":"3398_CR59","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"569","DOI":"10.1530\/REP-12-0047","volume":"144","author":"L Shaw","year":"2012","unstructured":"Shaw L, Sneddon SF, Brison DR, Kimber SJ. Comparison of gene expression in fresh and frozen-thawed human preimplantation embryos. Reproduction. 2012;144(5):569\u201382.","journal-title":"Reproduction"},{"issue":"22","key":"3398_CR60","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2096","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMsb2101718","volume":"385","author":"S Mastenbroek","year":"2021","unstructured":"Mastenbroek S, de Wert G, Adashi EY. The imperative of responsible innovation in reproductive medicine. N Engl J Med. 2021;385(22):2096\u2013100.","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"issue":"3","key":"3398_CR61","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"669","DOI":"10.1007\/s10815-020-01705-w","volume":"37","author":"R Orvieto","year":"2020","unstructured":"Orvieto R, Gleicher N. Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A)-finally revealed. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2020;37(3):669\u201372.","journal-title":"J Assist Reprod Genet"},{"issue":"12","key":"3398_CR62","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2730","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deac052","volume":"37","author":"N Gleicher","year":"2022","unstructured":"Gleicher N, Barad DH, Patrizio P, Orvieto R. We have reached a dead end for preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy. Hum Reprod. 2022;37(12):2730\u20134.","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"issue":"10","key":"3398_CR63","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2325","DOI":"10.1007\/s10815-023-02913-w","volume":"40","author":"RF Casper","year":"2023","unstructured":"Casper RF. PGT-A: Houston, we have a problem. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2023;40(10):2325\u201332.","journal-title":"J Assist Reprod Genet"},{"issue":"4","key":"3398_CR64","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"475","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2020.01.015","volume":"40","author":"L Pagliardini","year":"2020","unstructured":"Pagliardini L, Vigan\u00f2 P, Alteri A, Corti L, Somigliana E, Papaleo E. Shooting STAR: reinterpreting the data from the \u201cSingle Embryo TrAnsfeR of Euploid Embryo\u201d randomized clinical trial. Reprod Biomed Online. 2020;40(4):475\u20138.","journal-title":"Reprod Biomed Online"},{"issue":"2","key":"3398_CR65","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"228","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2017.06.023","volume":"108","author":"RJ Paulson","year":"2017","unstructured":"Paulson RJ. Preimplantation genetic screening: what is the clinical efficiency? Fertil Steril. 2017;108(2):228\u201330.","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"issue":"6","key":"3398_CR66","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1169","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2019.01.025","volume":"111","author":"E Somigliana","year":"2019","unstructured":"Somigliana E, Busnelli A, Paffoni A, Vigano P, Riccaboni A, Rubio C, et al. Cost-effectiveness of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies. Fertil Steril. 2019;111(6):1169\u201376.","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"3398_CR67","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Bickendorf K, Qi F, Peirce K, Wang R, Natalwala J, Chapple V, Liu Y. Impacts of double biopsy and double vitrification on the clinical outcomes following euploid blastocyst transfer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod. 2024;deae235. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/humrep\/deae235.","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deae235"},{"key":"3398_CR68","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Li Piani L, Petrone P, Brutto M, De Vos A, Van Der Kelen A, Vaiarelli A, Rienzi L, Conforti A, Cimadomo D, Verpoest W. A systematic review and meta-analysis of double trophectoderm biopsy and\/or cryopreservation in PGT: balancing the need for a diagnosis against the risk of harm. Hum Reprod Update. 2024; dmae031. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/humupd\/dmae031.","DOI":"10.1093\/humupd\/dmae031"},{"issue":"3","key":"3398_CR69","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"501","DOI":"10.1093\/humupd\/dmaa054","volume":"27","author":"S Ojosnegros","year":"2021","unstructured":"Ojosnegros S, Seriola A, Godeau AL, Veiga A. Embryo implantation in the laboratory: an update on current techniques. Hum Reprod Update. 2021;27(3):501\u201330.","journal-title":"Hum Reprod Update"},{"issue":"10","key":"3398_CR70","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2103","DOI":"10.1007\/s10815-019-01550-6","volume":"36","author":"SA Neal","year":"2019","unstructured":"Neal SA, Sun L, Jalas C, Morin S, Molinaro T, Scott R. When next-generation sequencing-based preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) yields an inconclusive report: diagnostic results and clinical outcomes after re biopsy. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2019;36(10):2103\u20139.","journal-title":"J Assist Reprod Genet"},{"issue":"11","key":"3398_CR71","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1992","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dey291","volume":"33","author":"D Cimadomo","year":"2018","unstructured":"Cimadomo D, Capalbo A, Levi-Setti PE, Soscia D, Orlando G, Albani E, Parini V, Stoppa M, Dovere L, Tacconi L, Ievoli E, Maggiulli R, Ubaldi FM, Rienzi L. Associations of blastocyst features, trophectoderm biopsy and other laboratory practice with post-warming behavior and implantation. Hum Reprod. 2018;33(11):1992\u20132001.","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"}],"container-title":["Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10815-025-03398-5.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s10815-025-03398-5\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10815-025-03398-5.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,5,6]],"date-time":"2025-05-06T09:37:00Z","timestamp":1746524220000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s10815-025-03398-5"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,1]]},"references-count":71,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,4]]}},"alternative-id":["3398"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10815-025-03398-5","relation":{},"ISSN":["1058-0468","1573-7330"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1058-0468","type":"print"},{"value":"1573-7330","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,1]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2 October 2024","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"8 January 2025","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"1 February 2025","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"E.P. reported grants and personal fees from MSD; grants from Ferring, IBSA, TEVA, and Gedeon Richter; and grants and personal fees from Merck. The other authors declare no conflict of interest.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}},{"value":"Data regarding any of the subjects in the study has not been previously published unless specified.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Attestation statement"}}]}}