{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,29]],"date-time":"2026-09-29T02:59:17Z","timestamp":1790650757401,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":21,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,29]],"date-time":"2026-09-29T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1790640000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-nd\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,29]],"date-time":"2026-09-29T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1790640000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-nd\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["J Assist Reprod Genet"],"DOI":"10.1007\/s10815-026-04034-6","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,29]],"date-time":"2026-09-29T02:25:48Z","timestamp":1790648748000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Intracytoplasmic sperm injection utilization relative to reported male factor infertility prevalence and its association with preimplantation genetic testing use: a national clinic-level study"],"prefix":"10.1007","author":[{"given":"Jonathan","family":"Desposorio","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Nicholas M.","family":"Stansbury","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,29]]},"reference":[{"issue":"2","key":"4034_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"239","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2020.05.032","volume":"114","author":"American Society for Reproductive Medicine, Practice Committee","year":"2020","unstructured":"American Society for Reproductive Medicine, Practice Committee. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) for non-male factor indications: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2020;114(2):239\u201345. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2020.05.032.","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"4034_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) for non-male factor infertility: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2012;98(6):1395\u20131399. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2012.08.026","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2012.08.026"},{"issue":"12","key":"4034_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3390\/jcm10122616","volume":"10","author":"TL Glenn","year":"2021","unstructured":"Glenn TL, Kotlyar AM, Seifer DB. The impact of intracytoplasmic sperm injection in non-male factor infertility\u2014a critical review. J Clin Med. 2021;10(12):2616. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/jcm10122616.","journal-title":"J Clin Med"},{"issue":"2","key":"4034_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"310","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000002730","volume":"132","author":"P Zagadailov","year":"2018","unstructured":"Zagadailov P, Hsu A, Stern JE, Seifer DB. Temporal differences in utilization of intracytoplasmic sperm injection among U.S. regions. Obstet Gynecol. 2018;132(2):310\u201320. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/AOG.0000000000002730.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"10284","key":"4034_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1554","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(21)00535-3","volume":"397","author":"VQ Dang","year":"2021","unstructured":"Dang VQ, Vuong LN, Luu TM, Pham TD, Ho TM, Ha AN, et al. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection versus conventional in-vitro fertilisation in couples with infertility in whom the male partner has normal total sperm count and motility: an open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2021;397(10284):1554\u201363. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S0140-6736(21)00535-3.","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"issue":"7","key":"4034_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1322","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dey118","volume":"33","author":"Z Li","year":"2018","unstructured":"Li Z, Wang AY, Bowman M, Hammarberg K, Farquhar C, Johnson L, et al. ICSI does not increase the cumulative live birth rate in non-male factor infertility. Hum Reprod. 2018;33(7):1322\u201330. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/humrep\/dey118.","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"issue":"4","key":"4034_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"792","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2020.04.058","volume":"114","author":"L Liu","year":"2020","unstructured":"Liu L, Wang H, Li Z, Niu J, Tang R. Obstetric and perinatal outcomes of intracytoplasmic sperm injection versus conventional in vitro fertilization in couples with nonsevere male infertility. Fertil Steril. 2020;114(4):792\u2013800. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2020.04.058.","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"issue":"10","key":"4034_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3390\/jcm8101694","volume":"8","author":"G Gennarelli","year":"2019","unstructured":"Gennarelli G, Carosso A, Canosa S, Filippini C, Cesarano S, Scarafia C, et al. ICSI versus conventional IVF in women aged 40 years or more and unexplained infertility: a retrospective evaluation of 685 cycles with propensity score model. J Clin Med. 2019;8(10):1694. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/jcm8101694.","journal-title":"J Clin Med"},{"issue":"12","key":"4034_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2750","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dew247","volume":"31","author":"FW Grimstad","year":"2016","unstructured":"Grimstad FW, Nangia AK, Luke B, Stern JE, Mak W. Use of ICSI in IVF cycles in women with tubal ligation does not improve pregnancy or live birth rates. Hum Reprod. 2016;31(12):2750\u20135. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/humrep\/dew247.","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"4034_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Cutting E, Horta F, Dang V, van Rumste MME, Mol BWJ. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection versus conventional in vitro fertilisation in couples with males presenting with normal total sperm count and motility. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023;8:CD001301. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/14651858.CD001301.pub2","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD001301.pub2"},{"issue":"5","key":"4034_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"958","DOI":"10.1080\/14647273.2022.2026498","volume":"26","author":"C Lynch","year":"2022","unstructured":"Lynch C, Armstrong E, Charitou M, Gordon T, Griffin D. Investigation of the risk of paternal cell contamination in PGT and the necessity of intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Fertil (Camb). 2022;26(5):958\u201363. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/14647273.2022.2026498.","journal-title":"Hum Fertil (Camb)"},{"issue":"10","key":"4034_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2333","DOI":"10.1007\/s10815-023-02916-7","volume":"40","author":"S Zhang","year":"2023","unstructured":"Zhang S, Xie P, Lan F, Yao Y, Ma S, Hu L, et al. Conventional IVF is feasible in preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2023;40(10):2333\u201342. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10815-023-02916-7.","journal-title":"J Assist Reprod Genet"},{"issue":"1","key":"4034_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s12967-022-03596-0","volume":"20","author":"P Xie","year":"2022","unstructured":"Xie P, Zhang S, Gu Y, Jiang B, Hu L, Tan YQ, et al. Non-invasive preimplantation genetic testing for conventional IVF blastocysts. J Transl Med. 2022;20(1):396. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12967-022-03596-0.","journal-title":"J Transl Med"},{"issue":"3","key":"4034_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"277","DOI":"10.1016\/j.xfre.2020.07.006","volume":"1","author":"J Deng","year":"2020","unstructured":"Deng J, Kuyoro O, Zhao Q, Behr B, Lathi RB. Comparison of aneuploidy rates between conventional in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection in in vitro fertilization\u2013intracytoplasmic sperm injection split insemination cycles. F S Rep. 2020;1(3):277\u201381. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.xfre.2020.07.006.","journal-title":"F S Rep"},{"issue":"2","key":"4034_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"317","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deaa002","volume":"35","author":"N De Munck","year":"2020","unstructured":"De Munck N, El Khatib I, Abdala A, El-Damen A, Bayram A, Arnanz A, et al. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection is not superior to conventional IVF in couples with non-male factor infertility and preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A). Hum Reprod. 2020;35(2):317\u201327. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/humrep\/deaa002.","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"4034_CR16","unstructured":"Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2021 assisted reproductive technology fertility clinic and national summary report. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services; 2023. https:\/\/www.cdc.gov\/art\/reports\/2021\/. Accessed 18 July 2026."},{"key":"4034_CR17","unstructured":"Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2022 final assisted reproductive technology (ART) success rates. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services; 2024. https:\/\/data.cdc.gov\/Assisted-Reproductive-Technology-ART-\/2022-Final-Assisted-Reproductive-Technology-ART-Su\/cchw-gdwa. Accessed 18 July 2026."},{"issue":"1","key":"4034_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"153","DOI":"10.1007\/s10815-018-1347-6","volume":"36","author":"KL Palmerola","year":"2019","unstructured":"Palmerola KL, Vitez SF, Amrane S, Fischer CP, Forman EJ. Minimizing mosaicism: assessing the impact of fertilization method on rate of mosaicism after next-generation sequencing preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A). J Assist Reprod Genet. 2019;36(1):153\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10815-018-1347-6.","journal-title":"J Assist Reprod Genet"},{"key":"4034_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"799","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2023.12.041","volume":"121","author":"JN Tozour","year":"2024","unstructured":"Tozour JN, Arnott A, Akerman M, Sung L, Vintzileos A, Fritz R. Comparison of outcomes between intracytoplasmic sperm injection and in vitro fertilization inseminations with preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy, analysis of Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System data. Fertil Steril. 2024;121:799\u2013805. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2023.12.041.","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"4034_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1939","DOI":"10.1038\/s41591-025-03621-x","volume":"31","author":"S Berntsen","year":"2025","unstructured":"Berntsen S, Zedeler A, N\u00f8hr B, Petersen MR, Gr\u00f8ndahl ML, Andersen LF, et al. IVF versus ICSI in patients without severe male factor infertility: a randomized clinical trial. Nat Med. 2025;31:1939\u201348. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41591-025-03621-x.","journal-title":"Nat Med"},{"key":"4034_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"49","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2026.03.032","volume":"126","author":"Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine","year":"2026","unstructured":"Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, Practice Committee of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection for nonmale factor indications: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2026;126:49\u201356. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2026.03.032.","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"}],"container-title":["Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10815-026-04034-6.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s10815-026-04034-6","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10815-026-04034-6.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,29]],"date-time":"2026-09-29T02:25:50Z","timestamp":1790648750000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s10815-026-04034-6"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,29]]},"references-count":21,"alternative-id":["4034"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10815-026-04034-6","relation":{},"ISSN":["1058-0468","1573-7330"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1058-0468","type":"print"},{"value":"1573-7330","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,29]]},"assertion":[{"value":"19 July 2026","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"14 September 2026","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"29 September 2026","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"This study used exclusively publicly available, aggregate clinic-level data and did not involve identifiable private information, direct interaction with human participants, human specimens, or animal subjects. Institutional review board approval was therefore not required.This study used exclusively publicly available, aggregate clinic-level data and did not involve identifiable private information, direct interaction with human participants, human specimens, or animal subjects. Institutional review board approval was therefore not required.","order":1,"name":"Ethics","label":"Ethics approval and consent to participate","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing interests.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","label":"Competing interests","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}}]}}