{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,25]],"date-time":"2026-09-25T21:21:02Z","timestamp":1790371262017,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":35,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,5,25]],"date-time":"2020-05-25T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1590364800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,5,25]],"date-time":"2020-05-25T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1590364800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100001665","name":"Agence Nationale de la Recherche","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["ANR-18-CE19-0015-01"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["ANR-18-CE19-0015-01"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100001665","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["J Clin Monit Comput"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,8]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s10877-020-00535-6","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2020,5,25]],"date-time":"2020-05-25T20:03:07Z","timestamp":1590436987000},"page":"771-777","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":17,"title":["Fetal heart rate variability analysis for neonatal acidosis prediction"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"35","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-2344-3694","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"M.-A.","family":"Gatellier","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"J.","family":"De Jonckheere","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"L.","family":"Storme","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"V.","family":"Houfflin-Debarge","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"L.","family":"Ghesquiere","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"C.","family":"Garabedian","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2020,5,25]]},"reference":[{"key":"535_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"79","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2015.04.011","volume":"30","author":"M Rei","year":"2016","unstructured":"Rei M, Ayres-de-Campos D, Bernardes J. Neurological damage arising from intrapartum hypoxia\/acidosis. Best Pr Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2016;30:79\u201386.","journal-title":"Best Pr Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"535_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"533","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(84)90742-7","volume":"148","author":"JA Low","year":"1984","unstructured":"Low JA, Galbraith RS, Muir DW, Killen HL, Pater EA, Karchmar EJ. Factors associated with motor and cognitive deficits in children after intrapartum fetal hypoxia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1984;148:533\u20139.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"535_CR3","first-page":"159","volume":"162","author":"N Paneth","year":"1993","unstructured":"Paneth N, et al. Electronic fetal monitoring and later outcome. Clin Invest Med. 1993;162:159\u201365.","journal-title":"Clin Invest Med"},{"key":"535_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"4","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1993.tb10626.x","volume":"100","author":"JA Spencer","year":"1993","unstructured":"Spencer JA. Clinical overview of cardiotocography. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 1993;100:4\u20137.","journal-title":"BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"535_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"378.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.06.086","volume":"205","author":"SC Blackwell","year":"2011","unstructured":"Blackwell SC, Grobman WA, Antoniewicz L, Hutchinson M, Bannerman CG. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the NICHD 3-Tier Fetal Heart Rate Interpretation System. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;205:378.e1\u2013.e5. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.06.086.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"535_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"13","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2015.06.020","volume":"131","author":"D Ayres-de-Campos","year":"2015","unstructured":"Ayres-de-Campos D, Spong CY, Chandraharan E. FIGO intrapartum fetal monitoring expert consensus panel. FIGO consensus guidelines on intrapartum fetal monitoring: cardiotocography. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2015;131:13\u201324. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ijgo.2015.06.020.","journal-title":"Int J Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"535_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1056","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.12614","volume":"121","author":"E Chandraharan","year":"2014","unstructured":"Chandraharan E. Fetal scalp blood sampling during labour: is it a useful diagnostic test or a historical test that no longer has a place in modern clinical obstetrics? BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2014;121:1056\u201362. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/1471-0528.12614.","journal-title":"BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"535_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"632","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa1500600","volume":"373","author":"MA Belfort","year":"2015","unstructured":"Belfort MA, Saade GR, Thom E, Blackwell SC, Reddy UM, Thorp JM, et al. A randomized trial of intrapartum fetal ECG ST-segment analysis. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:632\u201341. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1056\/NEJMoa1500600.","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"535_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"33","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2015.03.022","volume":"30","author":"A Pinas","year":"2016","unstructured":"Pinas A, Chandraharan E. Continuous cardiotocography during labour: analysis, classification and management. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2016;30:33\u201347. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.bpobgyn.2015.03.022.","journal-title":"Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"535_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"4711","DOI":"10.1113\/JP271205","volume":"594","author":"CA Lear","year":"2016","unstructured":"Lear CA, Galinsky R, Wassink G, Yamaguchi K, Davidson JO, Westgate JA, et al. The myths and physiology surrounding intrapartum decelerations: the critical role of the peripheral chemoreflex. J Physiol. 2016;594:4711\u201325. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1113\/JP271205.","journal-title":"J Physiol"},{"key":"535_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"429","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2009.02456.x","volume":"117","author":"J Van Laar","year":"2010","unstructured":"Van Laar J, Peters C, Vullings R, Houterman S, Bergmans J, Oei S. Fetal autonomic response to severe acidaemia during labour: fetal autonomic stress response during labour. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2010;117:429\u201337. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2009.02456.x.","journal-title":"BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"535_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"436","DOI":"10.7326\/0003-4819-118-6-199303150-00008","volume":"118","author":"CM Van Ravenswaaij-Arts","year":"1993","unstructured":"Van Ravenswaaij-Arts CM, Koll\u00e9e LA, Hopman JC, Stoelinga GB, van Geijn HP. Heart rate variability. Ann Intern Med. 1993;118:436\u201347.","journal-title":"Ann Intern Med"},{"key":"535_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"9585431","DOI":"10.1155\/2016\/9585431","volume":"2016","author":"M Romano","year":"2016","unstructured":"Romano M, Iuppariello L, Ponsiglione AM, Improta G, Bifulco P, Cesarelli M. Frequency and time domain analysis of foetal heart rate variability with traditional indexes: a critical survey. Comput Math Methods Med. 2016;2016:9585431. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1155\/2016\/9585431.","journal-title":"Comput Math Methods Med"},{"key":"535_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"354","DOI":"10.1093\/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a014868","volume":"17","author":"Heart rate variability","year":"1996","unstructured":"Heart rate variability. Standards of measurement, physiological interpretation, and clinical use Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology. Eur Heart J. 1996;17:354\u201381.","journal-title":"Eur Heart J"},{"key":"535_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1425","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(91)90384-4","volume":"165","author":"DG Chaffin","year":"1991","unstructured":"Chaffin DG, Goldberg CC, Reed KL. The dimension of chaos in the fetal heart rate. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991;165:1425\u20139.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"535_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"515","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(91)90277-X","volume":"165","author":"P Street","year":"1991","unstructured":"Street P, Dawes GS, Moulden M, Redman CWG. Short-term variation in abnormal antenatal fetal heart rate records. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991;165:515\u201323. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/0002-9378(91)90277-X.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"535_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1274","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.13390","volume":"97","author":"K Lu","year":"2018","unstructured":"Lu K, Holzmann M, Abtahi F, Lindecrantz K, Lindqvist PG, Nordstrom L. Fetal heart rate short term variation during labor in relation to scalp blood lactate concentration. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2018;97:1274\u201380. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/aogs.13390.","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"535_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"55","DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-016-0845-8","volume":"16","author":"S Wretler","year":"2016","unstructured":"Wretler S, Holzmann M, Graner S, Lindqvist P, Falck S, Nordstr\u00f6m L. Fetal heart rate monitoring of short term variation (STV): a methodological observational study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016;16:55. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12884-016-0845-8.","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"key":"535_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1265","DOI":"10.1113\/JP270125","volume":"594","author":"CA Lear","year":"2016","unstructured":"Lear CA, Galinsky R, Wassink G, Mitchell CJ, Davidson JO, Westgate JA, et al. Sympathetic neural activation does not mediate heart rate variability during repeated brief umbilical cord occlusions in near-term fetal sheep. J Physiol. 2016;594:1265\u201377. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1113\/JP270125.","journal-title":"J Physiol"},{"key":"535_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e0180653","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0180653","volume":"12","author":"C Garabedian","year":"2017","unstructured":"Garabedian C, Champion C, Servan-Schreiber E, Butruille L, Aubry E, Sharma D, et al. A new analysis of heart rate variability in the assessment of fetal parasympathetic activity: an experimental study in a fetal sheep model. PLoS ONE. 2017;12:e0180653. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0180653.","journal-title":"PLoS ONE"},{"key":"535_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.13515","author":"L Ghesqui\u00e8re","year":"2018","unstructured":"Ghesqui\u00e8re L, De Jonckheere J, Drumez E, Sharma D, Aubry E, Deruelle P, et al. Parasympathetic nervous system response to acidosis: evaluation in an experimental fetal sheep model. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2018. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/aogs.13515.","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"535_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"16","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2393-14-16","volume":"14","author":"V Chud\u00e1\u010dek","year":"2014","unstructured":"Chud\u00e1\u010dek V, Spilka J, Bur\u0161a M, Jank\u016f P, Hruban L, Huptych M, et al. Open access intrapartum CTG database. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014;14:16. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/1471-2393-14-16.","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"key":"535_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e0190463","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0190463","volume":"13","author":"C Garabedian","year":"2018","unstructured":"Garabedian C, Clermont-Hama Y, Sharma D, Aubry E, Butruille L, Deruelle P, et al. Correlation of a new index reflecting the fluctuation of parasympathetic tone and fetal acidosis in an experimental study in a sheep model. PLoS ONE. 2018;13:e0190463.","journal-title":"PLoS ONE"},{"key":"535_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1197","DOI":"10.1007\/s10877-016-9957-y","volume":"31","author":"L Butruille","year":"2017","unstructured":"Butruille L, De Jonckheere J, Flocteil M, Garabedian C, Houfflin-Debarge V, Storme L, et al. Parasympathetic tone variations according to umbilical cord pH at birth: a computerized fetal heart rate variability analysis. J Clin Monit Comput. 2017;31:1197\u2013202. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10877-016-9957-y.","journal-title":"J Clin Monit Comput"},{"key":"535_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"500","DOI":"10.1159\/000452668","volume":"82","author":"C Garabedian","year":"2017","unstructured":"Garabedian C, Butruille L, Servan-Schreiber E, Ficheur G, Storme L, Deruelle P, et al. Fetal heart-rate variability: validation of a new continuous. Noninvas Comput Anal Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2017;82:500\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1159\/000452668.","journal-title":"Noninvas Comput Anal Gynecol Obstet Invest"},{"key":"535_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"47","DOI":"10.1515\/jpme.1991.19.1-2.47","volume":"19","author":"GS Dawes","year":"1991","unstructured":"Dawes GS, Moulden M, Redman CW. System 8000: computerized antenatal FHR analysis. J Perinat Med. 1991;19:47\u201351.","journal-title":"J Perinat Med"},{"key":"535_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"106","DOI":"10.1016\/j.compbiomed.2008.11.010","volume":"39","author":"M Cesarelli","year":"2009","unstructured":"Cesarelli M, Romano M, Bifulco P. Comparison of short term variability indexes in cardiotocographic foetal monitoring. Comput Biol Med. 2009;39:106\u201318. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.compbiomed.2008.11.010.","journal-title":"Comput Biol Med"},{"key":"535_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"441","DOI":"10.1088\/0967-3334\/35\/3\/441","volume":"35","author":"P Van Leeuwen","year":"2014","unstructured":"Van Leeuwen P, Werner L, Hilal Z, Schiermeier S, Hatzmann W, Gr\u00f6nemeyer D. Fetal electrocardiographic measurements in the assessment of fetal heart rate variability in the antepartum period. Physiol Meas. 2014;35:441\u201354. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1088\/0967-3334\/35\/3\/441.","journal-title":"Physiol Meas"},{"key":"535_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2121","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1460-9592.2003.00330.x","volume":"26","author":"B Grimm","year":"2003","unstructured":"Grimm B, Haueisen J, Huotilainen M, Lange S, Van Leeuwen P, Menendez T, et al. Recommended standards for fetal magnetocardiography. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol PACE. 2003;26:2121\u20136.","journal-title":"Pacing Clin Electrophysiol PACE"},{"key":"535_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"300","DOI":"10.1080\/00016340801898950","volume":"87","author":"JOEH Van Laar","year":"2008","unstructured":"Van Laar JOEH, Porath MM, Peters CHL, Oei SG. Spectral analysis of fetal heart rate variability for fetal surveillance: review of the literature. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2008;87:300\u20136. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/00016340801898950.","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"535_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"529","DOI":"10.1515\/JPM.2009.089","volume":"37","author":"S Schiermeier","year":"2009","unstructured":"Schiermeier S, Reinhard J, Hatzmann H, Zimmermann RC, Westhof G. Fetal short time variation during labor: a non-invasive alternative to fetal scalp pH measurements? J Perinat Med. 2009;37:529\u201333. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1515\/JPM.2009.089.","journal-title":"J Perinat Med"},{"key":"535_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"365","DOI":"10.1109\/TBME.2003.808824","volume":"50","author":"MG Signorini","year":"2003","unstructured":"Signorini MG, Magenes G, Cerutti S, Arduini D. Linear and nonlinear parameters for the analysis of fetal heart rate signal from cardiotocographic recordings. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2003;50:365\u201374. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/TBME.2003.808824.","journal-title":"IEEE Trans Biomed Eng"},{"key":"535_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"978","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2011.03003.x","volume":"118","author":"D Ayres-de-Campos","year":"2011","unstructured":"Ayres-de-Campos D, Arteiro D, Costa-Santos C, Bernardes J. Knowledge of adverse neonatal outcome alters clinicians\u2019 interpretation of the intrapartum cardiotocograph. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2011;118:978\u201384. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2011.03003.x.","journal-title":"BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"535_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"207","DOI":"10.1016\/S1701-2163(15)30306-6","volume":"37","author":"K Jenniskens","year":"2015","unstructured":"Jenniskens K, Janssen PA. Newborn outcomes in british columbia after caesarean section for non-reassuring fetal status. J Obstet Gynaecol Can JOGC. 2015;37:207\u201313. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S1701-2163(15)30306-6.","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Can JOGC"},{"issue":"47","key":"535_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.02.066","volume":"205","author":"G Clifford","year":"2011","unstructured":"Clifford G, Sameni R, Ward J, Robinson J, Wolfberg AJ. Clinically accurate fetal ECG parameters acquired from maternal abdominal sensors. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;205(47):e1\u20135. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.02.066.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"}],"container-title":["Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10877-020-00535-6.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s10877-020-00535-6\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10877-020-00535-6.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,8,31]],"date-time":"2023-08-31T21:55:38Z","timestamp":1693518938000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s10877-020-00535-6"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2020,5,25]]},"references-count":35,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,8]]}},"alternative-id":["535"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10877-020-00535-6","relation":{},"ISSN":["1387-1307","1573-2614"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1387-1307","type":"print"},{"value":"1573-2614","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2020,5,25]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2 August 2019","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"19 May 2020","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"25 May 2020","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Compliance with ethical standards"}},{"value":"The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflicts of interest"}},{"value":"The ethics statement is explained in the paper by Chud\u00e1\u010dek et al. []. The CTG recordings and clinical data were matched using anonymized unique identifiers generated by the hospital information system. The timings of the CTG records were matched to the stages of labor (first and second stage) and were made relative to the time of birth, and were also deidentified. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of University Hospital Brno, and all women signed an informed consent form.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethical approval"}}]}}