{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,21]],"date-time":"2025-02-21T07:30:12Z","timestamp":1740123012003,"version":"3.37.3"},"reference-count":18,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,3,16]],"date-time":"2021-03-16T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1615852800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,3,16]],"date-time":"2021-03-16T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1615852800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["J Clin Monit Comput"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,4]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s10877-021-00684-2","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,3,16]],"date-time":"2021-03-16T09:08:53Z","timestamp":1615885733000},"page":"529-535","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["To compare clinical versus ultrasound assessment of correct placement of ProSeal Laryngeal mask airway (PLMA): a prospective randomized study"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"36","author":[{"given":"Kanika","family":"Rustagi","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-5842-8024","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Rakesh","family":"Garg","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Sachidanand Jee","family":"Bharti","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Vinod","family":"Kumar","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Nishkarsh","family":"Gupta","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Seema","family":"Mishra","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Sushma","family":"Bhatnagar","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,3,16]]},"reference":[{"key":"684_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"739","DOI":"10.1007\/BF03016565","volume":"52","author":"TM Cook","year":"2005","unstructured":"Cook TM, Lee G, Nolan JP. The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: a review of the literature. Can J Anaesth. 2005;52:739\u201360.","journal-title":"Can J Anaesth"},{"key":"684_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"199","DOI":"10.1007\/BF03027729","volume":"52","author":"CJ O\u2019Connor","year":"2005","unstructured":"O\u2019Connor CJ, Stix MS, Valade DR. Glottic insertion of the ProSeal LMA occurs in 6% of cases: a review of 627 patients. Can J Anaesth. 2005;52:199\u2013204.","journal-title":"Can J Anaesth"},{"key":"684_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"95","DOI":"10.1007\/s12663-009-0025-8","volume":"8","author":"SN Chandan","year":"2009","unstructured":"Chandan SN, Sharma SM, Raveendra US, Rajendra PB. Fiberoptic assessment of laryngeal mask airway placement: a comparison of blind insertion and insertion with the use of a laryngoscope. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2009;8:95\u20138.","journal-title":"J Maxillofac Oral Surg"},{"key":"684_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"456","DOI":"10.4103\/0019-5049.89868","volume":"55","author":"P Kundra","year":"2011","unstructured":"Kundra P, Mishra SK, Ramesh A. Ultrasound of the airway. Indian J Anaesth. 2011;55:456\u201362.","journal-title":"Indian J Anaesth"},{"key":"684_CR5","first-page":"283","volume":"21","author":"D Gupta","year":"2011","unstructured":"Gupta D, Srirajakalidindi A, Habli N, Haber H. Ultrasound confirmation of laryngeal mask airway placement correlates with fiberoptic laryngoscope findings. Middle East J Anaesthesiol. 2011;21:283\u20137.","journal-title":"Middle East J Anaesthesiol"},{"key":"684_CR6","first-page":"427","volume":"120","author":"J Kim","year":"2015","unstructured":"Kim J, Kim JY, Kim WO, Kil HK. An ultrasound evaluation of laryngeal mask airway position in pediatric patients: an observational study. AnesthAnalg. 2015;120:427\u201332.","journal-title":"AnesthAnalg"},{"key":"684_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1212","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ultrasmedbio.2014.12.002","volume":"41","author":"Z Zhou","year":"2015","unstructured":"Zhou Z, Xia C, Wu M, Yu L, Yan G, Ren Q, et al. Comparison of three methods for the confirmation of laryngeal mask airway placement in female patients undergoing gynecologic surgery. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2015;41:1212\u201320.","journal-title":"Ultrasound Med Biol"},{"key":"684_CR8","first-page":"638","volume":"34","author":"K Song","year":"2016","unstructured":"Song K, Yi J, Liu W, Huang S, Huang Y. Confirmation of laryngeal mask airway placement by ultrasound examination: a pilot study. J ClinAnesth. 2016;34:638\u201346.","journal-title":"J ClinAnesth"},{"key":"684_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"289","DOI":"10.1097\/00000542-200202000-00011","volume":"96","author":"J Brimacombe","year":"2002","unstructured":"Brimacombe J, Keller C, Fullekrug B, Agr\u00f2 F, Rosenblatt W, Dierdorf SF, et al. A Multicentre study comparing the ProSeal with the Classic laryngeal mask airway in anesthetized, nonparalyzed patients. Anesthesiology. 2002;96:289\u201395.","journal-title":"Anesthesiology"},{"key":"684_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"353","DOI":"10.4103\/0259-1162.159771","volume":"9","author":"SK Mishra","year":"2015","unstructured":"Mishra SK, Sivaraman B, Balachander H, Nagappa M, Parida S, Bhat RR, et al. Effect of pneumoperitoneum and Trendelenburg position on oropharyngeal sealing pressure of I-gelTM and ProSeal LMATM in laparoscopic gynaecological surgery: A randomized controlled trial. Anesth Essays Res. 2015;9:353\u20138.","journal-title":"Anesth Essays Res"},{"key":"684_CR11","first-page":"414","volume":"53","author":"B Sharma","year":"2009","unstructured":"Sharma B, Sood J, Sahai C, Kumra VP. Troubleshooting ProSeal LMA. Indian J Anaesth. 2009;53:414\u201324.","journal-title":"Indian J Anaesth"},{"key":"684_CR12","first-page":"280","volume":"97","author":"S Kihara","year":"2003","unstructured":"Kihara S, Brimacombe J. Sex-based ProSealTM laryngeal mask airway size selection: a randomized crossover study of anesthetized, paralyzed male and female adult patients. AnesthAnalg. 2003;97:280\u20134.","journal-title":"AnesthAnalg"},{"key":"684_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"262","DOI":"10.1093\/bja\/85.2.262","volume":"85","author":"C Keller","year":"2000","unstructured":"Keller C, Brimacombe J. Mucosal pressure and oropharyngeal leak pressure with the ProSeal versus laryngeal mask air way in anaesthetized paralysed patients. Br J Anaesth. 2000;85:262\u20136.","journal-title":"Br J Anaesth"},{"key":"684_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"527","DOI":"10.1093\/bja\/88.4.527","volume":"88","author":"TM Cook","year":"2002","unstructured":"Cook TM, Nolan JP, Verghese C, Strube PJ, Lees M, Millar JM, et al. Randomized crossover comparison of the ProSeal with the classic laryngeal mask air way in unparalysed anaesthetized patients. Br J Anaesth. 2002;88:527\u201333.","journal-title":"Br J Anaesth"},{"key":"684_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"50","DOI":"10.1177\/0310057X1003800110","volume":"38","author":"BS Von Ungern-Sternberg","year":"2010","unstructured":"Von Ungern-Sternberg BS, Wallace CJ, Sticks S, Erb TO, Chambers NA. Fibreoptic assessment of paediatric sized laryngeal mask airways. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2010;38:50\u20134.","journal-title":"Anaesth Intensive Care"},{"key":"684_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"757","DOI":"10.1007\/s10877-019-00315-x","volume":"33","author":"D Cattano","year":"2019","unstructured":"Cattano D, VanZundert TCRV, Wojtczak J. Laryngeal mask airway and the enigma of anatomical sizing. J Clin Monitor Comp. 2019;33:757\u20138.","journal-title":"J Clin Monitor Comp"},{"key":"684_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"229","DOI":"10.15557\/JoU.2017.0033","volume":"17","author":"SM Lee","year":"2017","unstructured":"Lee SM, Wojtczak JA, Cattano D. Ultrasound comparison of external and internal neck anatomy with the LMA Unique. J Ultrason. 2017;17:229\u201334.","journal-title":"J Ultrason"},{"key":"684_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"362","DOI":"10.15557\/JoU.2014.0037","volume":"14","author":"JA Wojtczak","year":"2014","unstructured":"Wojtczak JA, Cattano D. Laryngotracheal ultrasonography to confirm correct endotracheal tube and laryngeal mask airway placement. J Ultrason. 2014;14:362\u20136.","journal-title":"J Ultrason"}],"container-title":["Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10877-021-00684-2.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s10877-021-00684-2\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10877-021-00684-2.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,8,31]],"date-time":"2023-08-31T21:55:41Z","timestamp":1693518941000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s10877-021-00684-2"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,3,16]]},"references-count":18,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,4]]}},"alternative-id":["684"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10877-021-00684-2","relation":{},"ISSN":["1387-1307","1573-2614"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"1387-1307"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1573-2614"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,3,16]]},"assertion":[{"value":"17 October 2020","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"26 February 2021","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"16 March 2021","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Compliance with ethical standards"}},{"value":"None.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}},{"value":"Ethical approval from the Institutional ethics committee (IECPG-323\/07.09.2017 dated 7th September 2017) was obtained before the start of the study. The study protocol was registered at Clinical Trials Registry-India (CTRI) vide number CTRI\/2017\/11\/010359 dated 3rd November 2017.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethical approval"}},{"value":"Written informed consent was taken from all patients in this trial on human being.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Informed consent"}},{"value":"This prospective randomized blinded study was conducted at a tertiary care Institute and in compliance with the declaration of Helsinki and its amendments and according to the principles of Good Clinical Practice.","order":5,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Research involving animal rights"}}]}}