{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,23]],"date-time":"2026-10-23T19:17:59Z","timestamp":1792783079526,"version":"4.5.0"},"reference-count":13,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"5","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,6]],"date-time":"2026-07-06T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1783296000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,6]],"date-time":"2026-07-06T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1783296000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"name":"Maternal-Pediatric Precision in Therapeutics (MPRINT) Knowledge and Research Coordination Center (KRCC), Indiana University","award":["P30 1P30HD106451-02"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["P30 1P30HD106451-02"]}],"id":[{"id":"https:\/\/ror.org\/01kg8sb98","id-type":"ROR","asserted-by":"crossref"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,10]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>We introduced an estimation technique for mixed effect models that stems from non-parametric methods of estimation and fully parametric mixture models with cohort population as a central concept. The cohort population partitions data variability into between-cohorts and residual variabilities. This permits maximum likelihood estimates of model parameters from sparse data such as one observation per subject. Our second objective was to test robustness of cohort population estimation technique using previously published pharmacokinetic data on dexamethasone in parturient women. We performed two studies. In Study I we generated 100 dense and sparse datasets and refitted the data to quantify the difference between parameter estimates obtained by the cohort population model and the standard estimation methods. In Study II we evaluated robustness of cohort population model using dexamethasone maternal and fetal plasma concentrations obtained at childbirth after intramuscular injection of two 8\u00a0mg antenatal doses of dexamethasone phosphate in pregnant women. We implemented in NONMEM 7.6 the 3-cohort population as a mixture population model and applied first order conditional estimation, stochastic approximation, and importance sampling methods for parameter estimation. We showed that cohort estimation can quantify the variability in (log)normal populations where between-cohort variability is a substitute for between-subject variability. The cohort estimates of structural model parameters were equally accurate than the standard estimates and the accuracy and precision of estimates of inter-individual variability parameters for sparse data were better than for the standard maximum likelihood methods. Finally, we showed that the cohort population estimates provided meaningful quantification of one compartment model parameters for dexamethasone in parturient women where data were limited only to one blood sample per subject drawn after childbirth.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1007\/s10928-026-10048-5","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,6]],"date-time":"2026-07-06T12:45:20Z","timestamp":1783341920000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Cohort population analysis of sparse data: Dexamethasone pharmacokinetics in mother and fetus based on blood sampling at birth"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"53","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-9773-1739","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Wojciech","family":"Krzyzanski","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,6]]},"reference":[{"key":"10048_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1026","DOI":"10.1002\/cpt.1887","volume":"108","author":"F Foissac","year":"2020","unstructured":"Foissac F, Zheng Y, Hirt D, Liu G, Bauazza N, Ville Y, Goffinet F, Rozenberg P, Kayem G, Mandelbrot L, Benaboud S, Jarreau PH, Treluyer JM (2020) Maternal betamethasone for prevention of respiratory distress syndrome in neonates: population pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic approach. Clin Pharmacol Ther 108:1026\u20131035","journal-title":"Clin Pharmacol Ther"},{"key":"10048_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"642","DOI":"10.1016\/j.csda.2008.08.021","volume":"53","author":"J Antic","year":"2009","unstructured":"Antic J, Laffont CM, Chafa\u00ef D, Concordet D (2009) Comparison of nonparametric methods in nonlinear mixed effects models. Comput Stat Data Anal 53:642\u2013656","journal-title":"Comput Stat Data Anal"},{"key":"10048_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"142","DOI":"10.1002\/jcph.1650","volume":"62","author":"S Goutelle","year":"2022","unstructured":"Goutelle S, Woillard JB, Neely M, Yamada W, Bourguignon L (2022) Nonparametric methods in population pharmacokinetics. J Clin Pharmacol 62:142\u2013157","journal-title":"J Clin Pharmacol"},{"key":"10048_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bauer RJ, Guzy S, Ng C (2007) A survey of population analysis methods and software for complex pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic models with examples. AAPS J 9 (1) Article 7.","DOI":"10.1208\/aapsj0901007"},{"key":"10048_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"31","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1365-2125.2002.01589.x","volume":"54","author":"HS Lee","year":"2002","unstructured":"Lee HS, Khoo YM, Chirino-Barcelo Y, Tan KL, Ong D (2002) Caffeine in apnoeic Asian neonates: a sparse data analysis. Br J Clin Pharmacol 54:31\u201337","journal-title":"Br J Clin Pharmacol"},{"key":"10048_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"271","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1020206907668","volume":"29","author":"DJ Lunn","year":"2002","unstructured":"Lunn DJ, Best N, Thomas A, Wakefield J, Spiegelhalter D (2002) Bayesian analysis of population PK\/PD models: general concepts and software. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn 29:271\u2013307","journal-title":"J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn"},{"key":"10048_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"765","DOI":"10.1211\/002235703765951366","volume":"55","author":"M Bolon","year":"2003","unstructured":"Bolon M, Bastien B, Flamens C, Paulus S, Salord F, Boulieu R (2003) Evaluation of the estimation of midazolam concentrations and pharmacokinetic parameters in intensive care patients using a bayesian pharmacokinetic software (PKS) according to sparse sampling approach. J Pharm Pharmacol 55:765\u2013771","journal-title":"J Pharm Pharmacol"},{"key":"10048_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"12","DOI":"10.1080\/10618600.1995.10474663","volume":"4","author":"JC Pinheiro","year":"1995","unstructured":"Pinheiro JC, Bates DM (1995) Approximations to the log-likelihood function in the nonlinear mixed-effects model. J Comput Graph Statist 4:12\u201335","journal-title":"J Comput Graph Statist"},{"key":"10048_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Davis PJ, Rabinowitz P (1984) Methods of numerical integration. Second Edition. Academic Press Inc., San Diego, p. 224","DOI":"10.1016\/B978-0-12-206360-2.50012-1"},{"key":"10048_CR10","first-page":"924","volume-title":"Handbook of mathematical functions with formulas, graphs, and mathematical tables","author":"PJ Davis","year":"1972","unstructured":"Davis PJ, Polonsky I (1972) Numerical interpolation, differentiation, and integration. In: Abramowitz M, Stegun IE (eds) Handbook of mathematical functions with formulas, graphs, and mathematical tables. Dover Publications Inc., New York, p 924"},{"key":"10048_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"420","DOI":"10.1208\/s12248-012-9349-2","volume":"14","author":"EL Plan","year":"2012","unstructured":"Plan EL, Maloney A, Mentr\u00e9 F, Karlsson MO, Bertrand J (2012) Performance comparison of various maximum likelihood nonlinear mixed-effects estimation methods for dose\u2013response models. AAPS J 14:420\u2013432","journal-title":"AAPS J"},{"key":"10048_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"88","DOI":"10.1038\/clpt.1980.136","volume":"28","author":"SE Tsuei","year":"1980","unstructured":"Tsuei SE, Petersen MC, Ashley JJ, McBride WG, Moore RG (1980) Disposition of synthetic glucocorticoids II. Dexamethasone in parturient women. Clin Pharmacol Ther 28:88\u201398","journal-title":"Clin Pharmacol Ther"},{"key":"10048_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"668","DOI":"10.1002\/psp4.12899","volume":"12","author":"W Krzyzanski","year":"2023","unstructured":"Krzyzanski W, Milad MA, Jobe AH, Jusko WJ (2023) Minimal physiologically-based hybrid model of pharmacokinetics in pregnant women: Application to antenatal corticosteroids. CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol 12:668\u2013680","journal-title":"CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol"}],"container-title":["Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10928-026-10048-5.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s10928-026-10048-5","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10928-026-10048-5.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,15]],"date-time":"2026-10-15T23:21:37Z","timestamp":1792106497000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s10928-026-10048-5"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,6]]},"references-count":13,"journal-issue":{"issue":"5","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,10]]}},"alternative-id":["10048"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10928-026-10048-5","relation":{},"ISSN":["1567-567X","1573-8744"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1567-567X","type":"print"},{"value":"1573-8744","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,6]]},"assertion":[{"value":"9 October 2025","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"15 June 2026","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"6 July 2026","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing interests.","order":1,"name":"Ethics","label":"Competing interests","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}}],"article-number":"36"}}