{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,26]],"date-time":"2026-10-26T21:26:30Z","timestamp":1793049990457,"version":"4.5.0"},"reference-count":87,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"6","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,11,26]],"date-time":"2019-11-26T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1574726400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Theor Med Bioeth"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,12]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s11017-019-09512-w","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2019,11,25]],"date-time":"2019-11-25T21:02:30Z","timestamp":1574715750000},"page":"565-581","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":33,"title":["Protecting reasonable conscientious refusals in health care"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"40","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-0442-6992","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Jason T.","family":"Eberl","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2019,11,26]]},"reference":[{"key":"9512_CR1","unstructured":"Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973)."},{"key":"9512_CR2","unstructured":"Doe v. Bolton, 410 U.S. 179 (1973)."},{"key":"9512_CR3","unstructured":"Health\u00a0Programs\u00a0Extension\u00a0Act\u00a0of\u00a01973\u00a0(Church Amendment), Pub. L. No. 93-45, \u00a7 401, 87 Stat. 91, 95\u201396 (codified as amended at\u00a042\u00a0U.S.C. \u00a7\u00a0300a-7 (2018))."},{"issue":"6","key":"9512_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"8","DOI":"10.1080\/15265160701347239","volume":"7","author":"Robert F Card","year":"2007","unstructured":"Card, Robert F. 2007. Conscientious objection and emergency contraception. Target article,\u00a0American Journal of Bioethics\u00a07(6): 8\u201314.","journal-title":"American Journal of Bioethics"},{"issue":"12","key":"9512_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"10","DOI":"10.1080\/15265160701709859","volume":"7","author":"Ryan E Lawrence","year":"2007","unstructured":"Lawrence, Ryan E., and Farr A. Curlin. 2007. Clash of definitions: Controversies about conscience in medicine. Target article,\u00a0American Journal of Bioethics 7(12): 10\u201314.","journal-title":"American Journal of Bioethics"},{"issue":"7","key":"9512_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"43","DOI":"10.1080\/15265161.2018.1478017","volume":"18","author":"Lawrence Nelson","year":"2018","unstructured":"Nelson, Lawrence. 2018. Provider conscientious refusal of abortion, obstetrical emergencies, and criminal homicide law. Target article,\u00a0American Journal of Bioethics 18(7): 43\u201350.","journal-title":"American Journal of Bioethics"},{"issue":"3","key":"9512_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"129","DOI":"10.1007\/s11017-008-9071-3","volume":"29","author":"Farr A Curlin","year":"2008","unstructured":"Curlin, Farr A. (ed.). 2008. Conscience and clinical practice: Medical ethics in the face of moral controversy. Special issue, Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 29(3): 129\u2013212.","journal-title":"Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics"},{"issue":"1","key":"9512_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1111\/bioe.12056","volume":"28","author":"Carolyn McLeod","year":"2014","unstructured":"McLeod, Carolyn, and Jocelyn Downie (eds.). 2014. Let conscience be their guide? Conscientious refusals in health care. Special issue, Bioethics 28(1): 1\u201348.","journal-title":"Bioethics"},{"issue":"3","key":"9512_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"219","DOI":"10.1086\/JCE2016273219","volume":"27","author":"Edmund G Howe","year":"2016","unstructured":"Howe, Edmund G. (ed.). 2016. Physicians\u2019 exercise of conscience: Commentaries on the AMA\u2019s Code of Medical Ethics. Special section, Journal of Clinical Ethics 27(3): 219\u2013253.","journal-title":"Journal of Clinical Ethics"},{"issue":"1","key":"9512_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3","DOI":"10.1017\/S096318011600075X","volume":"26","author":"Alberto Giubilini","year":"2017","unstructured":"Giubilini, Alberto, and Julian Savulescu (eds.). 2017. Conscientious objection in healthcare: Problems and perspectives. Special section, Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 26(1): 3\u2013158.","journal-title":"Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics"},{"issue":"4","key":"9512_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"191","DOI":"10.1136\/medethics-2017-104200","volume":"43","author":"Steve Clarke","year":"2017","unstructured":"Clarke, Steve (ed.). 2017. Conscientious objection in healthcare: New directions. Special issue, Journal of Medical Ethics 43(4): 191\u2013278.","journal-title":"Journal of Medical Ethics"},{"key":"9512_CR12","unstructured":"Miles, Steven H., and Arthur Caplan. 2018. Confusion and conscientious objection in Arizona. Bioethics.net (blog). July 1, 2018. http:\/\/www.bioethics.net\/2018\/07\/confusion-and-conscientious-objection-in-arizona ."},{"key":"9512_CR13","unstructured":"Redinger, Michael. 2018. Catholic pharmacist didn\u2019t get Catholic medical ethics right. Detroit Free Press, October 19. https:\/\/www.freep.com\/story\/opinion\/contributors\/2018\/10\/19\/catholic-pharmacist-medical-ethics\/1697138002 ."},{"key":"9512_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"272","DOI":"10.1111\/bioe.12430","volume":"32","author":"Abram Brummett","year":"2018","unstructured":"Brummett, Abram. 2018. Conscience claims, metaphysics, and avoiding an LGBT eugenic. Bioethics 32: 272\u2013280.","journal-title":"Bioethics"},{"key":"9512_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1380","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMsb1612472","volume":"376","author":"Ronit Y Stahl","year":"2017","unstructured":"Stahl, Ronit Y., and Ezekiel J. Emanuel. 2017. Physicians, not conscripts\u2014conscientious objection in health care. New England Journal of Medicine 376: 1380\u20131385.","journal-title":"New England Journal of Medicine"},{"key":"9512_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"255","DOI":"10.5840\/ncbq201616223","volume":"16","author":"Elliott L Bedford","year":"2016","unstructured":"Bedford, Elliott L. 2016. The reality of institutional conscience. National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 16: 255\u2013272.","journal-title":"National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly"},{"key":"9512_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"162","DOI":"10.1111\/bioe.12288","volume":"31","author":"Julian Savulescu","year":"2017","unstructured":"Savulescu, Julian, and Udo Schuklenk. 2017. Doctors have no right to refuse medical assistance in dying, abortion or contraception. Bioethics 31: 162\u2013170.","journal-title":"Bioethics"},{"key":"9512_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"294","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.332.7536.294","volume":"332","author":"Julian Savulescu","year":"2006","unstructured":"Savulescu, Julian. 2006. Conscientious objection in medicine. BMJ 332: 294\u2013297.","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"9512_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"151","DOI":"10.1007\/s11017-008-9073-1","volume":"29","author":"John J Hardt","year":"2008","unstructured":"Hardt, John J. 2008. The conscience debate: Resources for rapprochement from the problem\u2019s perceived source. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 29: 151\u2013160.","journal-title":"Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics"},{"key":"9512_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1017\/9781316816967","volume-title":"Ethics in the conflicts of modernity: An essay on desire, practical reasoning, and narrative","author":"Alasdair MacIntyre","year":"2016","unstructured":"MacIntyre, Alasdair. 2016. Ethics in the conflicts of modernity: An essay on desire, practical reasoning, and narrative. New York: Cambridge University Press."},{"key":"9512_CR21","unstructured":"Aquinas, Thomas. 1947. Summa theologica. Trans. Fathers of the English Dominican Province. New York: Benziger."},{"key":"9512_CR22","unstructured":"Aquinas, Thomas. 1953. Quaestiones disputatae de veritate, vol. 2. Trans. James V. McGlynn. Chicago: Henry Regnery."},{"key":"9512_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Eberl, Jason T., and Christopher Ostertag. Forthcoming. Conscience, compromise, and complicity. In Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 92.","DOI":"10.5840\/acpaproc2020911106"},{"key":"9512_CR24","first-page":"45","volume-title":"In search of the modern Hippocrates","author":"Edmund D Pellegrino","year":"1987","unstructured":"Pellegrino, Edmund D. 1987. Toward an expanded medical ethics: The Hippocratic ethic revisited. In In search of the modern Hippocrates, ed. Roger J. Bulger, 45\u201364. Iowa City: University of Iowa Press."},{"key":"9512_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1093\/oso\/9780195082890.001.0001","volume-title":"The virtues in medical practice","author":"Edmund D Pellegrino","year":"1993","unstructured":"Pellegrino, Edmund D., and David C. Thomasma. 1993. The virtues in medical practice. New York: Oxford University Press."},{"key":"9512_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1353\/book.468","volume-title":"Three generations, no imbeciles: Eugenics, the Supreme Court, and Buck v. Bell","author":"Paul A Lombardo","year":"2008","unstructured":"Lombardo, Paul A. 2008. Three generations, no imbeciles: Eugenics, the Supreme Court, and Buck v. Bell. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press."},{"key":"9512_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511973727","volume-title":"Conscientious objection in health care: An ethical analysis","author":"Mark R Wicclair","year":"2011","unstructured":"Wicclair, Mark R. 2011. Conscientious objection in health care: An ethical analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press."},{"key":"9512_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"265","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1651-2227.2008.00674.x","volume":"97","author":"John D Lantos","year":"2008","unstructured":"Lantos, John D., and Farr A. Curlin. 2008. Religion, conscience and clinical decisions. Acta Paediatrica 97: 265\u2013266.","journal-title":"Acta Paediatrica"},{"key":"9512_CR29","volume-title":"Principles of biomedical ethics","author":"Tom L Beauchamp","year":"2013","unstructured":"Beauchamp, Tom L., and James F. Childress. 2013. Principles of biomedical ethics, 7th ed. New York: Oxford University Press.","edition":"7"},{"key":"9512_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"171","DOI":"10.1007\/s11017-008-9075-z","volume":"29","author":"Mark R Wicclair","year":"2008","unstructured":"Wicclair, Mark R. 2008. Is conscientious objection incompatible with a physician\u2019s professional obligations? Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 29: 171\u2013185.","journal-title":"Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics"},{"key":"9512_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1515\/9781400821204","volume-title":"Children of choice: Freedom and the new reproductive technologies","author":"John A Robertson","year":"1994","unstructured":"Robertson, John A. 1994. Children of choice: Freedom and the new reproductive technologies. Princeton: Princeton University Press."},{"key":"9512_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"219","DOI":"10.1086\/JCE2016273219","volume":"27","author":"BJ Crigger","year":"2016","unstructured":"Crigger, B.J., Patrick W. McCormick, Stephen L. Brotherton, and Valarie Blake. 2016. Report by the American Medical Association\u2019s Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs on physicians\u2019 exercise of conscience. Journal of Clinical Ethics 27: 219\u2013226.","journal-title":"Journal of Clinical Ethics"},{"key":"9512_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1203","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000291561.48203.27","volume":"110","author":"American College of Obstetrics and Gynecologists","year":"2007","unstructured":"American College of Obstetrics and Gynecologists. 2007. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 385 November 2007: The limits of conscientious refusal in reproductive medicine. Obstetrics and Gynecology 110: 1203\u20131208.","journal-title":"Obstetrics and Gynecology"},{"key":"9512_CR34","unstructured":"Ballantyne, Angela, Robert Card, Steve Clarke, Katrien Devolder, Thomas Douglas, Alberto Giubilini, Jeanette Kennett, et al. 2016. Consensus statement on conscientious objection in healthcare. Practical Ethics (blog). August 29, 2016. http:\/\/blog.practicalethics.ox.ac.uk\/2016\/08\/consensus-statement-on-conscientious-objection-in-healthcare ."},{"key":"9512_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"473","DOI":"10.1111\/bioe.12459","volume":"32","author":"Julian Savulescu","year":"2018","unstructured":"Savulescu, Julian, and Udo Schuklenk. 2018. Conscientious objection and compromising the patient: Response to Hughes. Bioethics 32: 473\u2013476.","journal-title":"Bioethics"},{"issue":"5","key":"9512_CR36","first-page":"ii\u2013iii","volume":"29","author":"Udo Schuklenk","year":"2015","unstructured":"Schuklenk, Udo. 2015. Conscientious objection in medicine: Private ideological convictions must not supercede public service obligations. Bioethics 29(5): ii\u2013iii.","journal-title":"Bioethics"},{"key":"9512_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"234","DOI":"10.1136\/medethics-2016-103560","volume":"43","author":"Udo Schuklenk","year":"2017","unstructured":"Schuklenk, Udo, and Ricardo Smalling. 2017. Why medical professionals have no moral claim to conscientious objection accommodation in liberal democracies. Journal of Medical Ethics 43: 234\u2013240.","journal-title":"Journal of Medical Ethics"},{"key":"9512_CR38","volume-title":"Liberty of conscience: In defense of America\u2019s tradition of religious equality","author":"Martha Nussbaum","year":"2008","unstructured":"Nussbaum, Martha. 2008. Liberty of conscience: In defense of America\u2019s tradition of religious equality. New York: Basic Books."},{"key":"9512_CR39","volume-title":"Political liberalism","author":"John Rawls","year":"2005","unstructured":"Rawls, John. 2005. Political liberalism, exp. ed. New York: Columbia University Press.","edition":"exp"},{"key":"9512_CR40","unstructured":"John Paul II. 1995. Encyclical letter Evangelium vitae on the value and inviolability of human life (March 25, 1995). Acta Apostolicae Sedis 87: 401\u2013522. http:\/\/w2.vatican.va\/content\/john-paul-ii\/en\/encyclicals\/documents\/hf_jp-ii_enc_25031995_evangelium-vitae.html ."},{"key":"9512_CR41","volume-title":"Embryo: A defense of human life","author":"Robert P George","year":"2008","unstructured":"George, Robert P., and Christopher Tollefsen. 2008. Embryo: A defense of human life. New York: Doubleday."},{"key":"9512_CR42","volume-title":"Abortion and unborn human life","author":"Patrick Lee","year":"2010","unstructured":"Lee, Patrick. 2010. Abortion and unborn human life, 2nd ed. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press.","edition":"2"},{"key":"9512_CR43","first-page":"15","volume-title":"Bioethics: An anthology","author":"John Finnis","year":"2015","unstructured":"Finnis, John. 2015. Abortion and health care ethics. In Bioethics: An anthology, 3rd ed, ed. Helga Kuhse, Udo Schuklenk, and Peter Singer, 15\u201322. Oxford: Blackwell.","edition":"3"},{"key":"9512_CR44","volume-title":"The ethics of abortion: Women\u2019s rights, human life, and the question of justice","author":"Christopher Kaczor","year":"2015","unstructured":"Kaczor, Christopher. 2015. The ethics of abortion: Women\u2019s rights, human life, and the question of justice, 2nd ed. New York: Routledge.","edition":"2"},{"key":"9512_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.2307\/j.ctv1ntfm7","volume-title":"Human embryos, human beings: A scientific and philosophical approach","author":"Samuel B Condic","year":"2018","unstructured":"Condic, Samuel B., and Maureen L. Condic. 2018. Human embryos, human beings: A scientific and philosophical approach. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press."},{"key":"9512_CR46","unstructured":"Kant, Immanuel. 1963. Duties towards the body in regard to life. In Lectures on ethics, trans. Louis Infield, 147\u2013148. New York: Harper and Row."},{"key":"9512_CR47","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Aristotle. 1999. Nicomachean ethics, 2nd ed. Trans. Terence Irwin. Indianapolis: Hackett.","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511802058"},{"key":"9512_CR48","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"331","DOI":"10.5840\/ncbq20033257","volume":"3","author":"Jason T Eberl","year":"2003","unstructured":"Eberl, Jason T. 2003. Aquinas on euthanasia, suffering, and palliative care. National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 3: 331\u2013354.","journal-title":"National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly"},{"issue":"2","key":"9512_CR49","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"52","DOI":"10.2307\/3562566","volume":"22","author":"Daniel Callahan","year":"1992","unstructured":"Callahan, Daniel. 1992. When self-determination runs amok. Hastings Center Report 22(2): 52\u201355.","journal-title":"Hastings Center Report"},{"key":"9512_CR50","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"246","DOI":"10.1080\/00243639.2016.1201375","volume":"83","author":"Daniel P Sulmasy","year":"2016","unstructured":"Sulmasy, Daniel P., John M. Travaline, Louise A. Mitchell, and E. Wesley Ely. 2016. Non-faith-based arguments against physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia. Linacre Quarterly 83: 246\u2013257.","journal-title":"Linacre Quarterly"},{"key":"9512_CR51","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1017\/S0031819100037943","volume":"33","author":"GEM Anscombe","year":"1958","unstructured":"Anscombe, G.E.M. 1958. Modern moral philosophy. Philosophy 33: 1\u201319.","journal-title":"Philosophy"},{"key":"9512_CR52","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511840852","volume-title":"Utilitarianism: For and against","author":"JJC Smart","year":"1973","unstructured":"Smart, J.J.C., and Bernard Williams. 1973. Utilitarianism: For and against. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press."},{"key":"9512_CR53","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"38","DOI":"10.1177\/10442073050160010601","volume":"16","author":"Paul K Longmore","year":"2005","unstructured":"Longmore, Paul K. 2005. Policy, prejudice, and reality: Two case studies of physician-assisted suicide. Journal of Disability Policy Studies 16: 38\u201345.","journal-title":"Journal of Disability Policy Studies"},{"key":"9512_CR54","unstructured":"Francis. 2015. Encyclical letter Laudato Si\u2019 on care for our common home (May 24, 2015). Acta Apostolicae Sedis 107: 847\u2013945. http:\/\/w2.vatican.va\/content\/francesco\/en\/encyclicals\/documents\/papa-francesco_20150524_enciclica-laudato-si.html ."},{"key":"9512_CR55","unstructured":"Francis. 2018. Apostolic exhortation Gaudete et exsultate on the call to holiness in today\u2019s world (March 9, 2018). http:\/\/w2.vatican.va\/content\/francesco\/en\/apost_exhortations\/documents\/papa-francesco_esortazione-ap_20180319_gaudete-et-exsultate.html ."},{"key":"9512_CR56","unstructured":"Paul VI. 1968. Encyclical letter Humanae vitae on the regulation of birth (July 25, 1968). Acta Apostolicae Sedis 60: 481\u2013503. http:\/\/w2.vatican.va\/content\/paul-vi\/en\/encyclicals\/documents\/hf_p-vi_enc_25071968_humanae-vitae.html ."},{"key":"9512_CR57","unstructured":"United States Conference of Catholic Bishops. 2018. Ethical and religious directives for Catholic health care services, 6th ed. Washington, DC: United States Conference of Catholic Bishops. http:\/\/www.usccb.org\/about\/doctrine\/ethical-and-religious-directives ."},{"key":"9512_CR58","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1093\/0199272190.001.0001","volume-title":"Double-effect reasoning: Doing good and avoiding evil","author":"Thomas A Cavanaugh","year":"2006","unstructured":"Cavanaugh, Thomas A. 2006. Double-effect reasoning: Doing good and avoiding evil. New York: Oxford University Press."},{"key":"9512_CR59","volume-title":"The doctrine of double effect: Philosophers debate a controversial moral principle","year":"2001","unstructured":"Woodward, Paul A. (ed.). 2001. The doctrine of double effect: Philosophers debate a controversial moral principle. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press."},{"key":"9512_CR60","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"197","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-55766-3_15","volume-title":"Contemporary controversies in Catholic bioethics","author":"Peter J Cataldo","year":"2017","unstructured":"Cataldo, Peter J. 2017. Moral certitude in the use of levonorgestrel for the treatment of sexual assault survivors. In Contemporary controversies in Catholic bioethics, ed. Jason T. Eberl, 197\u2013222. Dordrecht: Springer."},{"key":"9512_CR61","first-page":"223","volume-title":"Contemporary controversies in Catholic bioethics","author":"Thomas J Davis Jr","year":"2017","unstructured":"Davis, Thomas J.,\u00a0Jr. 2017. Evaluation of the mechanism of action of anti-fertility treatment in cases of sexual assault: Moral certitude and human acts. In Contemporary controversies in Catholic bioethics, ed. Jason T. Eberl, 223\u2013254. Dordrecht: Springer."},{"key":"9512_CR62","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"123","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-55766-3_10","volume-title":"Contemporary controversies in Catholic bioethics","author":"Christopher Kaczor","year":"2017","unstructured":"Kaczor, Christopher. 2017. Is it ethically permissible to separate conjoined twins? Murder, mutilation, and consent. In Contemporary controversies in Catholic bioethics, ed. Jason T. Eberl, 123\u2013133. Dordrecht: Springer."},{"key":"9512_CR63","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"135","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-55766-3_11","volume-title":"Contemporary controversies in Catholic bioethics","author":"Helen Watt","year":"2017","unstructured":"Watt, Helen. 2017. Vital conflicts, bodily respect, and conjoined twins: Are we asking the right questions? In Contemporary controversies in Catholic bioethics, ed. Jason T. Eberl, 135\u2013145. Dordrecht: Springer."},{"key":"9512_CR64","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"405","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-55766-3_27","volume-title":"Contemporary controversies in Catholic bioethics","author":"J\u0101nis T Ozolin\u0327\u0161","year":"2017","unstructured":"Ozolin\u0327\u0161, J\u0101nis T. 2017. On the provision of medical nutrition and hydration. In Contemporary controversies in Catholic bioethics, ed. Jason T. Eberl, 405\u2013424. Dordrecht: Springer."},{"key":"9512_CR65","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"425","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-55766-3_28","volume-title":"Contemporary controversies in Catholic bioethics","author":"Joseph Boyle","year":"2017","unstructured":"Boyle, Joseph. 2017. A Catholic approach to withholding medically provided food and water. In Contemporary controversies in Catholic bioethics, ed. Jason T. Eberl, 425\u2013441. Dordrecht: Springer."},{"key":"9512_CR66","volume-title":"Contemporary controversies in Catholic bioethics","year":"2017","unstructured":"Eberl, Jason T. (ed.). 2017. Contemporary controversies in Catholic bioethics. Dordrecht: Springer."},{"issue":"6","key":"9512_CR67","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"19","DOI":"10.1080\/15265160701347270","volume":"7","author":"Meyers Christopher","year":"2007","unstructured":"Christopher, Meyers, and Robert D. Woods. 2007. Conscientious objection? Yes, but make sure it is genuine. American Journal of Bioethics 7(6): 19\u201320.","journal-title":"American Journal of Bioethics"},{"key":"9512_CR68","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"218","DOI":"10.1136\/medethics-2016-103777","volume":"43","author":"Steve Clarke","year":"2017","unstructured":"Clarke, Steve. 2017. Conscientious objection in healthcare, referral and the military analogy. Journal of Medical Ethics 43: 218\u2013221.","journal-title":"Journal of Medical Ethics"},{"key":"9512_CR69","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"73","DOI":"10.1136\/medethics-2015-103037","volume":"42","author":"Robert F Card","year":"2016","unstructured":"Card, Robert F. 2016. In defence of medical tribunals and the reasonability standard for conscientious objection in medicine. Journal of Medical Ethics 42: 73\u201375.","journal-title":"Journal of Medical Ethics"},{"key":"9512_CR70","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"213","DOI":"10.1136\/medethics-2015-102970","volume":"43","author":"Jonathan A Hughes","year":"2017","unstructured":"Hughes, Jonathan A. 2017. Conscientious objection in healthcare: Why tribunals might be the answer. Journal of Medical Ethics 43: 213\u2013217.","journal-title":"Journal of Medical Ethics"},{"key":"9512_CR71","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"69","DOI":"10.1136\/medethics-2015-102692","volume":"42","author":"Christopher Cowley","year":"2016","unstructured":"Cowley, Christopher. 2016. Conscientious objection and healthcare in the UK: Why tribunals are not the answer. Journal of Medical Ethics 42: 69\u201372.","journal-title":"Journal of Medical Ethics"},{"key":"9512_CR72","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"82","DOI":"10.1186\/s12910-018-0323-0","volume":"19","author":"Bj\u00f8rn K Myskja","year":"2018","unstructured":"Myskja, Bj\u00f8rn K., and Morten Magelssen. 2018. Conscientious objection to intentional killing: An argument for toleration. BMC Medical Ethics 19: 82. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12910-018-0323-0 .","journal-title":"BMC Medical Ethics"},{"key":"9512_CR73","first-page":"4","volume":"50","author":"Lawrence S Mayer","year":"2016","unstructured":"Mayer, Lawrence S., and Paul R. McHugh. 2016. Sexuality and gender: Findings from the biological, psychological, and social sciences. New Atlantis 50: 4\u2013143.","journal-title":"New Atlantis"},{"issue":"2","key":"9512_CR74","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e16885","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0016885","volume":"6","author":"Cecilia Dhejne","year":"2011","unstructured":"Dhejne, Cecilia, Paul Lichtenstein, Marcus Boman, Anna L.V. Johansson, Niklas L\u00e5ngstr\u00f6m, and Mikael Land\u00e9n. 2011. Long-term follow-up of transsexual persons undergoing sex reassignment surgery: Cohort study in Sweden. PLOS ONE 6(2): e16885. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0016885 .","journal-title":"PLoS ONE"},{"key":"9512_CR75","first-page":"2516","volume":"124","author":"Douglas NeJaime","year":"2015","unstructured":"NeJaime, Douglas, and Reva B. Siegel. 2015. Conscience wars: Complicity-based conscience claims in religion and politics. Yale Law Journal 124: 2516\u20132591.","journal-title":"Yale Law Journal"},{"key":"9512_CR76","unstructured":"Liguori, Alphonsus. 1905\u20131912. Theologia moralis, 4 vols. Ed. Leonardi Gaud\u00e9. Rome: Typographia Vaticana."},{"key":"9512_CR77","volume-title":"Encyclopedia of Catholic social thought, social science, and social policy","author":"Thomas A Cavanaugh","year":"2007","unstructured":"Flannery, Kevin L. 2019. Cooperation with evil: Thomistic tools of analysis. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press."},{"key":"9512_CR78","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.2307\/j.ctv19m61nf","volume-title":"A defense of dignity: Creating life, destroying life, and protecting rights of conscience","author":"Christopher Kaczor","year":"2013","unstructured":"Kaczor, Christopher. 2013. A defense of dignity: Creating life, destroying life, and protecting rights of conscience. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press."},{"key":"9512_CR79","unstructured":"Medical Assistance in Dying Statute Law Amendment Act, S.O. 2017, c. 7, Bill 84. https:\/\/www.ontario.ca\/laws\/statute\/s17007 ."},{"key":"9512_CR80","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"255","DOI":"10.5840\/ncbq201818226","volume":"18","author":"Carter Anne McGowan","year":"2018","unstructured":"McGowan, Carter Anne. 2018. Conscience rights and \u201ceffective referral\u201d in Ontario. National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 18: 255\u2013268.","journal-title":"National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly"},{"issue":"2","key":"9512_CR81","first-page":"73","volume":"16","author":"Luisa Cabal","year":"2014","unstructured":"Cabal, Luisa, Monica Arango Olaya, and Valentino Montoya Robledo. 2014. Striking a balance: Conscientious objection and reproductive health care from the Colombian perspective. Health and Human Rights 16(2): 73\u201383.","journal-title":"Health and Human Rights"},{"key":"9512_CR82","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"71","DOI":"10.1016\/S0020-7292(00)00330-1","volume":"71","author":"BM Dickens","year":"2000","unstructured":"Dickens, B.M., and R.J. Cook. 2000. The scope and limits of conscientious objection. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics 71: 71\u201377.","journal-title":"International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics"},{"key":"9512_CR83","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"143","DOI":"10.1007\/s11017-018-9443-2","volume":"39","author":"Stephen Buetow","year":"2018","unstructured":"Buetow, Stephen, and Natalie Gauld. 2018. Conscientious objection and person-centered care. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 39: 143\u2013155.","journal-title":"Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics"},{"key":"9512_CR84","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"217","DOI":"10.5840\/ncbq201818222","volume":"18","author":"Charles C Camosy","year":"2018","unstructured":"Camosy, Charles C. 2018. Defending against formally innocent material mortal threats: A response to Joshua Evans. National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 18: 217\u2013225.","journal-title":"National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly"},{"key":"9512_CR85","volume-title":"Beyond the abortion wars: A way forward for a new generation","author":"Charles C Camosy","year":"2015","unstructured":"Camosy, Charles C. 2015. Beyond the abortion wars: A way forward for a new generation. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans."},{"key":"9512_CR86","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780199673964.001.0001","volume-title":"Ethics at the beginning of life: A phenomenological critique","author":"James Mumford","year":"2013","unstructured":"Mumford, James. 2013. Ethics at the beginning of life: A phenomenological critique. New York: Oxford University Press."},{"key":"9512_CR87","volume-title":"Vital conflicts in medical ethics: A virtue approach to craniotomy and tubal pregnancies","author":"Martin Rhonheimer","year":"2009","unstructured":"Rhonheimer, Martin. 2009. Vital conflicts in medical ethics: A virtue approach to craniotomy and tubal pregnancies. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press."}],"container-title":["Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11017-019-09512-w.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s11017-019-09512-w\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11017-019-09512-w.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,7,27]],"date-time":"2024-07-27T14:36:23Z","timestamp":1722090983000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s11017-019-09512-w"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2019,11,26]]},"references-count":87,"journal-issue":{"issue":"6","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,12]]}},"alternative-id":["9512"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11017-019-09512-w","relation":{},"ISSN":["1386-7415","1573-1200"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1386-7415","type":"print"},{"value":"1573-1200","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2019,11,26]]},"assertion":[{"value":"26 November 2019","order":1,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}}]}}