{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,21]],"date-time":"2025-02-21T07:51:13Z","timestamp":1740124273367,"version":"3.37.3"},"reference-count":30,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,12,24]],"date-time":"2022-12-24T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1671840000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,12,24]],"date-time":"2022-12-24T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1671840000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100002666","name":"Aalto University","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100002666","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"crossref"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Theor Med Bioeth"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,4]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:p>The article examines five controversial views, expressed in Jonathan Swift\u2019s <jats:italic>A Modest Proposal<\/jats:italic>, Helga Kuhse and Peter Singer\u2019s <jats:italic>Should the Baby Live? The Problem of Handicapped Infants<\/jats:italic>, Alberto Giubilini and Francesca Minerva\u2019s \u201cAfter-birth abortion: why should the baby live?\u201d, Julian Savulescu\u2019s \u201cProcreative beneficence: why we should select the best children\u201d, and the author\u2019s \u201cA rational cure for prereproductive stress syndrome\u201d. These views have similarities and differences on five levels: the grievances they raise, the proposals they make, the justifications they explicitly use, the justifications they implicitly rely on, and the criticisms that they have encountered. A comparison of these similarities and differences produces two findings. First, some controversial views based on utilitarian considerations would probably fare better flipped upside down and presented as Juvenalian satires. Secondly, a modicum of humor or modesty could help presenters of controversial views to stir polite critical discussion on the themes that they put forward.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1007\/s11017-022-09604-0","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,12,24]],"date-time":"2022-12-24T17:02:33Z","timestamp":1671901353000},"page":"177-189","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":2,"title":["Are some controversial views in bioethics Juvenalian satire without irony?"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"44","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-4276-4757","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Matti","family":"H\u00e4yry","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,12,24]]},"reference":[{"key":"9604_CR1","unstructured":"Swift, Jonathan. 1730. A Modest Proposal for Preventing the Children of Poor People from Being a Burthen to their Parents, or the Country, and for Making them Beneficial to the Publick. Third edition (original 1729). London: Weaver Pickerton. https:\/\/books.google.fi\/books?id=t1MJAAAAQAAJ&pg=PA3#v=onepage&q&f=false"},{"key":"9604_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"561","DOI":"10.2307\/3043246","volume":"73","author":"James William Johnson","year":"1958","unstructured":"Johnson, James William. 1958. Tertullian and a modest proposal. Modern Language Notes 73: 561\u2013563. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2307\/3043246.","journal-title":"Modern Language Notes"},{"key":"9604_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"135","DOI":"10.2307\/374449","volume":"30","author":"Charles Kay Smith","year":"1968","unstructured":"Smith, Charles Kay. 1968. Toward a participatory rhetoric: Teaching Swift\u2019s modest proposal. College English 30: 135\u2013149. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2307\/374449.","journal-title":"College English"},{"key":"9604_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"75","DOI":"10.2307\/2707237","volume":"4","author":"George Wittkowsky","year":"1943","unstructured":"Wittkowsky, George. 1943. Swift\u2019s modest proposal: The biography of an early georgian pamphlet. Journal of the History of Ideas 4: 75\u2013104. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2307\/2707237.","journal-title":"Journal of the History of Ideas"},{"key":"9604_CR5","volume-title":"Should the baby live? The problem of handicapped infants","author":"Helga Kuhse","year":"1985","unstructured":"Kuhse, Helga, and Peter Singer. 1985. Should the baby live? the problem of handicapped infants. Oxford: Oxford University Press."},{"key":"9604_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"890","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM197310252891705","volume":"279","author":"Raymond S Duff","year":"1973","unstructured":"Duff, Raymond S., and A.G.M. Campbell. 1973. Moral and ethical dilemmas in the special-care nursery. New England Journal of Medicine 279: 890\u2013894. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1056\/NEJM197310252891705.","journal-title":"New England Journal of Medicine"},{"key":"9604_CR7","first-page":"47","volume":"10","author":"John Lorber","year":"1975","unstructured":"Lorber, John. 1975. Ethical issues in the management of myelomeningocele and hydrocephalus. Journal of the Royal College of Physicians 10: 47\u201360.","journal-title":"Journal of the Royal College of Physicians"},{"key":"9604_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"261","DOI":"10.1136\/medethics-2011-100411","volume":"39","author":"Alberto Giubilini","year":"2013","unstructured":"Giubilini, Alberto, and Francesca Minerva. 2013. After-birth abortion: Why should the baby live? Journal of Medical Ethics 39: 261\u2013263. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/medethics-2011-100411.","journal-title":"Journal of Medical Ethics"},{"key":"9604_CR9","volume-title":"Practical ethics","author":"Peter Singer","year":"1979","unstructured":"Singer, Peter. 1979. Practical ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press."},{"key":"9604_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/0195079981.001.0001","volume-title":"The ethics of killing: Problems at the margins of life","author":"Jeff McMahan","year":"2002","unstructured":"McMahan, Jeff. 2002. The ethics of killing: Problems at the margins of life. New York, NY: Oxford University Press."},{"key":"9604_CR11","volume-title":"Abortion and infanticide","author":"Michael Tooley","year":"1983","unstructured":"Tooley, Michael. 1983. Abortion and infanticide. Oxford: Clarendon Press."},{"key":"9604_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"157","DOI":"10.1111\/bioe.12066","volume":"28","author":"Francesca Minerva","year":"2014","unstructured":"Minerva, Francesca. 2014. New threats to academic freedom. Bioethics 28: 157\u2013162. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/bioe.12066.","journal-title":"Bioethics"},{"key":"9604_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"170","DOI":"10.1111\/bioe.12094","volume":"28","author":"Matti H\u00e4yry","year":"2014","unstructured":"H\u00e4yry, Matti. 2014. Academic freedom, public reactions, and anonymity. Bioethics 28: 170\u2013173. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/bioe.12094.","journal-title":"Bioethics"},{"key":"9604_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"107","DOI":"10.1017\/S0963180114000358","volume":"24","author":"Matti H\u00e4yry","year":"2015","unstructured":"H\u00e4yry, Matti. 2015. What exactly did you claim? A call for clarity in the presentation of premises and conclusions in philosophical contributions to ethics. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 24: 107\u2013112. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/S0963180114000358.","journal-title":"Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics"},{"key":"9604_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"656","DOI":"10.1111\/bioe.12281","volume":"30","author":"Joona R\u00e4s\u00e4nen","year":"2016","unstructured":"R\u00e4s\u00e4nen, Joona. 2016. Pro-life arguments against infanticide and why they are not convincing. Bioethics 30: 656\u2013662. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/bioe.12281.","journal-title":"Bioethics"},{"key":"9604_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"413","DOI":"10.1111\/1467-8519.00251","volume":"15","author":"Julian Savulescu","year":"2001","unstructured":"Savulescu, Julian. 2001. Procreative beneficence: Why we should select the best children. Bioethics 15: 413\u2013426. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/1467-8519.00251.","journal-title":"Bioethics"},{"key":"9604_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"105","DOI":"10.1080\/14647270410001699063","volume":"7","author":"Matti H\u00e4yry","year":"2004","unstructured":"H\u00e4yry, Matti. 2004. If you must make babies, then at least make the best babies you can? Human Fertility 7: 105\u2013112. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/14647270410001699063.","journal-title":"Human Fertility"},{"key":"9604_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"377","DOI":"10.1136\/jme.2003.004424","volume":"30","author":"Matti H\u00e4yry","year":"2004","unstructured":"H\u00e4yry, Matti. 2004. A rational cure for prereproductive stress syndrome. Journal of Medical Ethics 30: 377\u2013378. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/jme.2003.004424.","journal-title":"Journal of Medical Ethics"},{"key":"9604_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.4159\/9780674042605","volume-title":"A theory of justice","author":"John Rawls","year":"1971","unstructured":"Rawls, John. 1971. A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press."},{"key":"9604_CR20","volume-title":"Liberal utilitarianism and applied ethics","author":"Matti H\u00e4yry","year":"1994","unstructured":"H\u00e4yry, Matti. 1994. Liberal utilitarianism and applied ethics. London and New York, NY: Routledge.\u00a0https:\/\/www.utilitarianism.com\/liberal-utilitarianism.pdf.\u00a0"},{"key":"9604_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780199296422.001.0001","volume-title":"Better never to have been","author":"David Benatar","year":"2006","unstructured":"Benatar, David. 2006. Better never to have been. Oxford: Clarendon Press."},{"key":"9604_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ashcroft, Richard. 2009. Is it irrational to have children? In Cutting Through the Surface: Philosophical Approaches to Bioethics, ed. Tuija Takala, Peter Herissone-Kelly, and S\u00f8ren Holm, 183\u2013195. Amsterdam and New York, NY: Rodopi.","DOI":"10.1163\/9789042027404_020"},{"key":"9604_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"343","DOI":"10.1017\/S0963180120000882","volume":"30","author":"Matti H\u00e4yry","year":"2021","unstructured":"H\u00e4yry, Matti. 2021. Just better utilitarianism. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 30: 343\u2013367. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/S0963180120000882.","journal-title":"Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics"},{"key":"9604_CR24","unstructured":"Popper, Karl. 1966. The Open Society and Its Enemies Vol II. Fifth edition (original 1945). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul."},{"key":"9604_CR25","unstructured":"Sidgwick, Henry. 1922. The Methods of Ethics (original 1874). Seventh edition (original 1907). London: Macmillan."},{"key":"9604_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.4324\/9780203640098","volume-title":"Disability rights and wrongs","author":"Tom Shakespeare","year":"2006","unstructured":"Shakespeare, Tom. 2006. Disability rights and wrongs. London and New York, NY: Routledge."},{"key":"9604_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"15","DOI":"10.1017\/S0963180104131046","volume":"13","author":"Tuija Takala","year":"2004","unstructured":"Takala, Tuija. 2004. The (im)morality of (un)naturalness. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 13: 15\u201319. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/S0963180104131046.","journal-title":"Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics"},{"key":"9604_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"473","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1013067003439","volume":"22","author":"Simo Vehmas","year":"2001","unstructured":"Vehmas, Simo. 2001. Just ignore it? Parents and genetic information. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 22: 473\u2013484. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1023\/A:1013067003439.","journal-title":"Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics"},{"key":"9604_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"H\u00e4yry, Matti. 2008. The historical idea of a better race. Studies in Ethics, Law, and Technology 2, Article 11. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2202\/1941-6008.1035","DOI":"10.2202\/1941-6008.1035"},{"key":"9604_CR30","unstructured":"Gross, Daniel A. 2021. Peter Singer is committed to controversial ideas. The New Yorker 25 April."}],"container-title":["Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11017-022-09604-0.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s11017-022-09604-0\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11017-022-09604-0.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,3,22]],"date-time":"2023-03-22T03:46:50Z","timestamp":1679456810000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s11017-022-09604-0"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,12,24]]},"references-count":30,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,4]]}},"alternative-id":["9604"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11017-022-09604-0","relation":{},"ISSN":["1386-7415","1573-1200"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"1386-7415"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1573-1200"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,12,24]]},"assertion":[{"value":"10 December 2022","order":1,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"24 December 2022","order":2,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}}]}}