{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,27]],"date-time":"2026-03-27T23:21:48Z","timestamp":1774653708666,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":57,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"6","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,11,10]],"date-time":"2024-11-10T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1731196800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,11,10]],"date-time":"2024-11-10T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1731196800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Theor Med Bioeth"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024,12]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s11017-024-09693-z","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,11,10]],"date-time":"2024-11-10T15:12:43Z","timestamp":1731251563000},"page":"461-479","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":2,"title":["The ethical inadequacy of uninformed surrogate consent: advancing respect for persons in clinical research"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"45","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0009-0784-9449","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Robert R.","family":"Harrison","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,11,10]]},"reference":[{"key":"9693_CR1","unstructured":"Osler, William. 1907. The Evolution of the Idea of Experiment in Medicine. in Transactions of the Congress of American Physicians and Surgeons 7: 7-8, quoted in, Sydney A. Halpern. 2006. Lesser Harms: The Morality of Risk in Medical Research, at 3. Chicago: University of Chicago Press"},{"key":"9693_CR2","unstructured":"Bateman-House, Alison. 2015. Even without written codes, ethical standards for human research existed before World War II. The Conversation. Available at: https:\/\/theconversation.com\/even-without-written-codes-ethical-standards-for-human-research-existed-before-world-war-ii-41219. (Accessed 30 April 2023)."},{"key":"9693_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"99","DOI":"10.1093\/jmp\/8.2.99","volume":"8","author":"Hans-Martin Sass","year":"1983","unstructured":"Sass, Hans-Martin. 1983. Reichsrundschreiben 1931: pre-nuremberg German regulations concerning new therapy and human experimentation. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 8: 99\u2013111. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/jmp\/8.2.99.","journal-title":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy"},{"key":"9693_CR4","unstructured":"Nuremberg Code, available at https:\/\/history.nih.gov\/display\/history\/Nuremberg%2BCode. (Accessed 2 May 2023)."},{"key":"9693_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Gelinas, Luke, Alan Wertheimer, and Franklin G. Miller. When and Why is research without consent permissible? Hastings Center Report 46: 35\u201343.","DOI":"10.1002\/hast.548"},{"key":"9693_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"O\u2019Neil, Collin. 2018. Consent in clinical research. In The Routledge Handbook of the Ethics of Consent. Eds. Andreas Muller and Peter Schaber: 297\u2013310. New York: Routledge.","DOI":"10.4324\/9781351028264-27"},{"key":"9693_CR7","unstructured":"National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research, (1979) 2005. The Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research. Available at: Read the Belmont Report | HHS.gov. (Accessed 30 April 2023)."},{"key":"9693_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"14","DOI":"10.1002\/eahr.500158","volume":"45","author":"Robert Harrison","year":"2023","unstructured":"Harrison, Robert. 2023. Legally effective but ethically inadequate: institutional review board policies for consent from legally authorized representatives. Ethics & Human Research 45: 14\u201325. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/eahr.500158.","journal-title":"Ethics & Human Research"},{"key":"9693_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2243","DOI":"10.1111\/jgs.15525","volume":"66","author":"Timothy R Holden","year":"2018","unstructured":"Holden, Timothy R., Sarah Keller, Alice Kim, Michael Gehring, Emily Schmitz, Carol Hermann, Andrea Gilmore-Bykovskyi, and Amy J.H.. Kind. 2018. A procedural framework to facilitate hospital-based informed consent for dementia research. Journal of the American Geriatric Society 66: 2243\u20132248. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/jgs.15525.","journal-title":"Journal of the American Geriatric Society"},{"key":"9693_CR10","first-page":"79","volume-title":"The ethics of consent","author":"Franklin Miller","year":"2010","unstructured":"Miller, Franklin, and Alan Wertheimer. 2010. Preface to a theory of consent transactions: beyond valid consent. In The ethics of consent, ed. Franklin Miller and Alan Wertheimer, 79\u2013105. New York: Oxford University Press."},{"key":"9693_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1111\/ajag.13023","volume":"00","author":"Claire M.C. O\u2019Connor","year":"2021","unstructured":"O\u2019Connor, Claire M.C.., Jacki Liddle, Maria O\u2019Reilly, Claudia Meyer, Jade Cartwright, Marita Chisholm, Erin Conway, Elaine Fieldling, Amanda Fox, Margaret MacAndrew, Linda Schnitker, Catherine Travers, Karen Watson, Christine While, and Kasia Bail. 2021. Advocating the rights of people with dementia to contribute to research: considerations for researchers and ethics committees. Australasian Journal on Aging 00: 1\u20135. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/ajag.13023.","journal-title":"Australasian Journal on Aging"},{"key":"9693_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"37","DOI":"10.1525\/jer.2012.7.2.37","volume":"7","author":"E Abdoler","year":"2012","unstructured":"Abdoler, E., and David Wendler. 2012. Using data to improve surrogate consent for clinical research with incapacitated adults. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics 7: 37\u201350. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1525\/jer.2012.7.2.37.","journal-title":"Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics"},{"key":"9693_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"149","DOI":"10.1007\/s11017-016-9363-y","volume":"37","author":"M Johansson","year":"2016","unstructured":"Johansson, M., and L. Brostrom. 2016. Surrogate consent to non-beneficial research: erring on the right side when substituted judgments may be inaccurate. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 37: 149\u2013160. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11017-016-9363-y.","journal-title":"Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics"},{"key":"9693_CR14","unstructured":"Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects (The Common Rule). Available at: https:\/\/www.govinfo.gov\/content\/pkg\/FR-2017-01-19\/pdf\/2017-01058.pdf. (Accessed 2 May 2023)."},{"key":"9693_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Alex John London. 2022. For the Common Good: Philosophical Foundations of Research Ethics. New York: Oxford University Press","DOI":"10.1093\/oso\/9780197534830.001.0001"},{"key":"9693_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511814600","volume-title":"Rethinking informed consent in bioethics","author":"Neil C Manson","year":"2007","unstructured":"Manson, Neil C., and Onora O\u2019Neill. 2007. Rethinking informed consent in bioethics. New York: Cambridge University Press."},{"key":"9693_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511625206","volume-title":"The theory and practice of autonomy","author":"Gerald Dworkin","year":"1988","unstructured":"Dworkin, Gerald. 1988. The theory and practice of autonomy. New York: Cambridge University Press."},{"key":"9693_CR18","volume-title":"Kantian ethics","author":"Allen Wood","year":"2008","unstructured":"Wood, Allen. 2008. Kantian ethics. New York: Cambridge University Press."},{"key":"9693_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-017-0821-0","volume-title":"Autonomy and clinical medicine: renewing the health professional relation with the patient","author":"Jurrit Bergsma","year":"2000","unstructured":"Bergsma, Jurrit, and David Thomasma. 2000. Autonomy and clinical medicine: renewing the health professional relation with the patient. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers."},{"key":"9693_CR20","volume-title":"Unprincipled virtue: an inquiry into moral agency","author":"Nomy Arpaly","year":"2003","unstructured":"Arpaly, Nomy. 2003. Unprincipled virtue: an inquiry into moral agency. New York: Oxford University Press."},{"key":"9693_CR21","volume-title":"Two concepts of liberty","author":"Isiah Berlin","year":"1969","unstructured":"Berlin, Isiah. 1969. Two concepts of liberty. Oxford: Clarendon Press."},{"key":"9693_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"217","DOI":"10.1007\/s11017-011-9180-2","volume":"32","author":"Daniel Brudney","year":"2011","unstructured":"Brudney, Daniel, and John Lantos. 2011. Agency and authenticity: Which value grounds patient choice? Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 32: 217\u2013227. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11017-011-9180-2.","journal-title":"Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics"},{"key":"9693_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Beauchamp, T. L. 2005. Who deserves autonomy, and whose autonomy deserves respect? In Personal Autonomy: New Essays on Personal Autonomy and Its Role in Contemporary Moral Philosophy, Ed. James Stacey Taylor. 310\u2013329. New York: Cambridge University Press.","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511614194.015"},{"key":"9693_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"63","DOI":"10.1080\/01947648.2022.2162171","volume":"42","author":"Jacob M Appel","year":"2020","unstructured":"Appel, Jacob M. 2020. A values based approach to capacity assessment. Journal of Legal Medicine 42: 63. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/01947648.2022.2162171.","journal-title":"Journal of Legal Medicine"},{"key":"9693_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"447","DOI":"10.1163\/17455243-20213610","volume":"19","author":"Ben Schwan","year":"2022","unstructured":"Schwan, Ben. 2022. Why decision-making capacity matters. Journal of Moral Philosophy 19: 447\u2013473. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1163\/17455243-20213610.","journal-title":"Journal of Moral Philosophy"},{"key":"9693_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Beauchamp, T. L. 2005. Who deserves autonomy, and whose autonomy deserves respect? In Personal Autonomy: New Essays on Personal Autonomy and Its Role in Contemporary Moral Philosophy. Ed. James Stacey Taylor. 310\u2013329. New York: Cambridge University Press.","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511614194.015"},{"key":"9693_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"4","DOI":"10.1136\/jme.29.1.4","volume":"29","author":"Onora O\u2019Neill","year":"2003","unstructured":"O\u2019Neill, Onora. 2003. Some limits of informed consent. Journal of Medical Ethics 29: 4\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/jme.29.1.4.","journal-title":"Journal of Medical Ethics"},{"key":"9693_CR28","first-page":"131","volume-title":"The ethics of consent","author":"Arthur Kuflik","year":"2010","unstructured":"Kuflik, Arthur. 2010. Hypothetical consent. In The ethics of consent, ed. Franklin Miller and Alan Wertheimer, 131\u2013161. New York: Oxford University Press."},{"key":"9693_CR29","volume-title":"A theory of medical ethics","author":"Robert Veatch","year":"1981","unstructured":"Veatch, Robert. 1981. A theory of medical ethics. New York: Basic Books Inc."},{"key":"9693_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Laura Waddell Eckstrom, 2005. Autonomy and Personal Integration. In Personal Autonomy: New Essays on Personal Autonomy and Its Role in Contemporary Moral Philosophy. Ed. James Stacey Taylor. 143\u2013161. New York: Cambridge University Press.","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511614194.007"},{"key":"9693_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"267","DOI":"10.1080\/23294515.2018.1513097","volume":"9","author":"Victoria Shepherd","year":"2018","unstructured":"Shepherd, Victoria, K. Hood, R. Griffith, A. Jordan, and F. Wood. 2018. Ethical understandings of proxy decision making for research involving adults lacking capacity: A systematic review (framework synthesis) of empirical research. AJOB Empirical Bioethics 9: 267\u2013286. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/23294515.2018.1513097.","journal-title":"AJOB Empirical Bioethics"},{"key":"9693_CR32","first-page":"329","volume-title":"The ethics of consent","author":"Phillip J Candilis","year":"2010","unstructured":"Candilis, Phillip J., and Charles W. Lidz. 2010. Advances in informed consent research. In The ethics of consent, ed. Franklin Miller and Alan Wertheimer, 329\u2013346. New York: Oxford University Press."},{"key":"9693_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1060","DOI":"10.1089\/jpm\/2018.0105","volume":"21","author":"Sharon Mathew","year":"2018","unstructured":"Mathew, Sharon, Haley B. Gershengom, and May Hua. 2018. Terminology for surrogate decision making varies widely by state. letters to the editor. Journal of Palliative Medicine 21: 1060\u20131061. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1089\/jpm\/2018.0105.","journal-title":"Journal of Palliative Medicine"},{"key":"9693_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1478","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMms1611497","volume":"376","author":"Erin S DeMartino","year":"2017","unstructured":"DeMartino, Erin S., David M. Dudzinski, Cavan K. Doyle, Beau P. Sperry, Sarah Gregory, Mark Siegler, Daniel P. Sulmasy, Paul S. Mueller, and Daniel B. Kramer. 2017. Who decides when a patient can\u2019t? Statutes on alternate decision makers. New England Journal of Medicine 376: 1478\u20131482. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1056\/NEJMms1611497.","journal-title":"New England Journal of Medicine"},{"key":"9693_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"45 Code of Federal Regulations \u00a7 46.102(i). https:\/\/www.ecfr.gov\/current\/title-45\/part-46\/section-46.102. (Accessed 21 October 2024).","DOI":"10.1016\/S0009-739X(24)00186-6"},{"key":"9693_CR36","unstructured":"National Bioethics Advisory Commission. 1998. Recommendation 13. In 1 Research Involving Persons With Mental Disorders That May Affect Decisionmaking Capacity 61. Available at: https:\/\/govinfo.library.unt.edu\/nbac\/capacity\/TOC.htm. (Accessed 21 October 2024)."},{"key":"9693_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2389","DOI":"10.1176\/appi.ajp.162.12.2389","volume":"162","author":"Palaniappan Muthappan","year":"2005","unstructured":"Muthappan, Palaniappan, Heidi Forster, and David Wendler. 2005. Research advance directives: protection or obstacle? American Journal of Psychiatry 162: 2389\u20132391. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1176\/appi.ajp.162.12.2389.","journal-title":"American Journal of Psychiatry"},{"key":"9693_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"364","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jagp.2012.11.010","volume":"21","author":"De Vries","year":"2013","unstructured":"Vries, De., Kerry A. Raymond, Aimee Stanczyk Ryan, Paul Appelbaum, Laura Damschroder, David S. Knopman, and Scott Y.H.. Kim. 2013. Public\u2019s approach to surrogate consent for dementia research: cautious pragmatism. American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 21: 364\u2013372. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jagp.2012.11.010.","journal-title":"American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry"},{"key":"9693_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"322","DOI":"10.4324\/9781351028264-29","volume-title":"The Routledge handbook of the ethics of consent","author":"Anthony Wrigley","year":"2018","unstructured":"Wrigley, Anthony. 2018. Consent for others. In The Routledge handbook of the ethics of consent, ed. Andreas Muller and Peter Schaber, 322\u2013333. New York: Routledge."},{"key":"9693_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2","DOI":"10.1002\/eahr.500171","volume":"45","author":"Nola M Ries","year":"2023","unstructured":"Ries, Nola M., and Briony Johnston. 2023. Making an advance research directive: an interview study with adults aged 55 and older with interests in dementia research. Ethics and Human Research 45: 2\u201317. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/eahr.500171.","journal-title":"Ethics and Human Research"},{"key":"9693_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"430","DOI":"10.1002\/gps.5262","volume":"35","author":"James M Wilkins","year":"2020","unstructured":"Wilkins, James M., and Brent P. Forester. 2020. Informed consent, therapeutic misconception, and clinical trials for Alzheimer\u2019s disease. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 35: 430\u2013435. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/gps.5262.","journal-title":"International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry"},{"key":"9693_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"493","DOI":"10.1001\/archinte.166.5.493","volume":"166","author":"David I Shalowitz","year":"2006","unstructured":"Shalowitz, David I., Elizabeth Garret-Mayer, and David Wendler. 2006. The accuracy of surrogate decision makers: a systematic review. Archives of Internal Medicine 166: 493\u2013497. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/archinte.166.5.493.","journal-title":"Archives of Internal Medicine"},{"key":"9693_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0054790","author":"Scott Y.H. Kim","year":"2013","unstructured":"Kim, Scott Y.H.., H. Myra Kim, Kerry A. Ryan, Paul D. Appelbaum, David S. Knopman, Laura Damschroder, and Raymond De Vries. 2013. How important is \u2018accuracy\u2019 of surrogate decision-making for research participation? PLoS ONE. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0054790.","journal-title":"PLoS ONE"},{"key":"9693_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"135","DOI":"10.3233\/ADR-220103","volume":"7","author":"Jessica Mozersky","year":"2023","unstructured":"Mozersky, Jessica, Erin D. Solomon, Kari Baldwin, Matthew Wroblewski, Merdith Parsons, Melody Goodman, and James M. DuBois. 2023. Barriers to using legally authorized representatives in clinical research with older adults. Journal of Alzheimer\u2019s Disease Reports 7: 135\u2013149. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3233\/ADR-220103.","journal-title":"Journal of Alzheimer\u2019s Disease Reports"},{"key":"9693_CR45","unstructured":"Coleman, Carl H., Jerry A. Menikoff, Jesse A. Goldner and Efthimos Parasidis. 2015. The Ethics and Regulation of Human Subjects, Second Edition. 654. New Providence: LexisNexis."},{"key":"9693_CR46","unstructured":"Federal Policy for the Protection if Human Subjects. 82 Federal Register 12, January 19, 2017, at 7170."},{"key":"9693_CR47","first-page":"37","volume":"8","author":"Elyn R Saks","year":"2008","unstructured":"Saks, Elyn R., Laura B. Dunn, Jessica Wimer, Michael Gonzales, and Scott Kim. 2008. Proxy consent to research: the legal landscape. Yale Journal of Health Policy Law and Ethics 8: 37\u201392.","journal-title":"Yale Journal of Health Policy Law and Ethics"},{"key":"9693_CR48","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"621","DOI":"10.7326\/0003-4819-128-8-199804150-00002","volume":"128","author":"Daniel P Sulmasy","year":"1998","unstructured":"Sulmasy, Daniel P., P.B. Terry, C.S. Weisman, D.J. Miller, R.Y. Stallings, M.A. Vettese, and K.B. Haller. 1998. The accuracy of substituted judgments in patients with terminal diagnoses. Annals of Internal Medicine 128: 621\u2013629. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7326\/0003-4819-128-8-199804150-00002.","journal-title":"Annals of Internal Medicine"},{"key":"9693_CR49","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"17","DOI":"10.1007\/s11017-008-9059-z","volume":"29","author":"Mats Johansson","year":"2008","unstructured":"Johansson, Mats, and Linus Brostrom. 2008. Turning failures into success: a methodological shortcoming in empirical research on surrogate accuracy. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 29: 17\u201326. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11017-008-9059-z.","journal-title":"Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics"},{"key":"9693_CR50","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"395","DOI":"10.1016\/j.psc.2009.03.007","volume":"32","author":"Laura B Dunn","year":"2009","unstructured":"Dunn, Laura B., and Sahana Misra. 2009. Research ethics issues in geriatric psychiatry. Psychiatric Clinics of North America 32: 395\u2013411. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.psc.2009.03.007.","journal-title":"Psychiatric Clinics of North America"},{"key":"9693_CR51","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"337","DOI":"10.1016\/jagp.2012.11.014","volume":"21","author":"Laura B Dunn","year":"2013","unstructured":"Dunn, Laura B., Stephanies Reyes Fisher, Melinda Hantke, Paul Appelbaum, Daniel Dohan, Jenifer P. Young, and Laura Weiss Roberts. 2013. \u201cThinking about it for somebody else:\u201d Alzheimer\u2019s disease research and proxy decision makers\u2019 translation of ethical principles into practice. American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 21: 337\u2013345. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/jagp.2012.11.014.","journal-title":"American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry"},{"key":"9693_CR52","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"310","DOI":"10.1111\/1467-8519.00200","volume":"14","author":"David Wendler","year":"2000","unstructured":"Wendler, David. 2000. Informed consent, exploitation, and whether it is possible to conduct human subjects research without either one. Bioethics 14: 310\u2013339. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/1467-8519.00200.","journal-title":"Bioethics"},{"key":"9693_CR53","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"160","DOI":"10.1017\/s0963180102112096","volume":"11","author":"Mark A Yarborough","year":"2002","unstructured":"Yarborough, Mark A. 2002. Adults are not big children: examining surrogate consent to research using adults with dementia. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 11: 160\u2013168. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/s0963180102112096.","journal-title":"Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics"},{"key":"9693_CR54","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"45","DOI":"10.1136\/jme.2010.037515","volume":"37","author":"JT Berger","year":"2011","unstructured":"Berger, J.T. 2011. Is best interests a relevant decision making standard for enrolling non-capacitated subjects into clinical research? Journal of Medical Ethics 37: 45\u201349. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/jme.2010.037515.","journal-title":"Journal of Medical Ethics"},{"key":"9693_CR55","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1566","DOI":"10.1212\/01.wnl.0000316196.63704.f5","volume":"71","author":"ML Flaherty","year":"2008","unstructured":"Flaherty, M.L., J.C. Karlawish, D. Khoury, D. Kleindorfer, D. Woo, and J.P. Broderick. 2008. How important is surrogate consent for stroke research? Neurology 71: 1566\u20131571. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1212\/01.wnl.0000316196.63704.f5.","journal-title":"Neurology"},{"key":"9693_CR56","unstructured":"Jonas, Hans. 1969. Philosophical Reflections on Experimenting with Human Subjects. Originally published in Deadalus 98 (Spring, 1969), reprinted in Jonas, Hans, Philosophical Essays. New York: Atropos Press."},{"key":"9693_CR57","volume-title":"[2002]. The Patient as Person","author":"Paul Ramsey","year":"1970","unstructured":"Ramsey, Paul. 1970. [2002]. The Patient as Person, 2d ed. New Haven: Yale University Press.","edition":"2d"}],"container-title":["Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11017-024-09693-z.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s11017-024-09693-z\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11017-024-09693-z.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,11,27]],"date-time":"2024-11-27T11:19:26Z","timestamp":1732706366000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s11017-024-09693-z"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024,11,10]]},"references-count":57,"journal-issue":{"issue":"6","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024,12]]}},"alternative-id":["9693"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11017-024-09693-z","relation":{},"ISSN":["1386-7415","1573-1200"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1386-7415","type":"print"},{"value":"1573-1200","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2024,11,10]]},"assertion":[{"value":"24 October 2024","order":1,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"10 November 2024","order":2,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"I have no conflict of interest in any aspect of this paper.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}},{"value":"The writing of this paper involved no human subjects or animal research.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Animal and human rights"}}]}}