{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,11,3]],"date-time":"2026-11-03T09:27:18Z","timestamp":1793698038735,"version":"4.5.1"},"reference-count":28,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"6","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,18]],"date-time":"2026-09-18T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1789689600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,18]],"date-time":"2026-09-18T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1789689600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"name":"Dalhousie University Research Establishment Grant","id":[{"id":"https:\/\/ror.org\/01e6qks80","id-type":"ROR","asserted-by":"crossref"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Int J Clin Pharm"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Introduction<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Models of therapeutic reasoning conceptualize how pharmacists apply knowledge to weigh the benefits and risks of treatment options for patients but provide limited detail on the specific factors considered during the process.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Aim<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>To explore the factors that prescribing pharmacists consider during therapeutic reasoning when making treatment decisions and how those factors are structured hierarchically.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Method<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>This qualitative study explored the therapeutic reasoning of eight prescribing pharmacists as they worked through three primary care cases selected from hypertension, diabetes, heart failure and pediatric fever. Participants completed a think-aloud protocol to verbalize their thoughts in real time, a post-encounter form to promote reflection, and a semi-structured interview to clarify and elicit additional reasoning considerations. Data were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using template analysis. Each template iteration was critically reviewed by the research team with a detailed audit trail. Information power was reached at 18 cases (six pharmacists), with the remainder used for confirmation.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>We identified 35 factors across five themes: treatment planning, evidence and experience, drug-related factors, patient-centered factors, and setting influences. Therapeutic reasoning typically started with treatment planning to list broad options available in context and rule out options based on contraindications, cost and coverage. The remaining tailored list of options were evaluated using a non-linear process informed by evidence and experience, drug-related factors, and patient-centered factors. Setting influences, such as external pressures, access to clinical decision support systems, or the preferences of other clinicians influenced how the pharmacist considered treatment options. In total, 11 factors were associated with ruling out options, while the remaining factors informed the relative ranking of viable alternatives. Two levels of reasoning were observed: generic reasoning (case-independent) which\u00a0relied on knowledge alone and patient-specific reasoning where relevant knowledge was applied to the patient case. Dynamic prioritization was observed as factor importance varied by case.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>This study advances the conceptualization of therapeutic reasoning by specifying the factors and their functional roles within decision-making. These findings provide a practical foundation for teaching, assessing, and supporting structured clinical decision-making in pharmacy practice.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1007\/s11096-026-02216-x","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,18]],"date-time":"2026-09-18T12:22:02Z","timestamp":1789734122000},"page":"2383-2393","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Exploring the factors influencing pharmacists' therapeutic reasoning in decision-making: a concurrent think aloud and semi-structured interview study"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"48","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-9744-1069","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Daniel","family":"Rainkie","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-4104-4221","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Zachariah","family":"Nazar","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-0930-0048","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Pim","family":"Teunissen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-0063-8218","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Karen","family":"K\u00f6nings","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,18]]},"reference":[{"key":"2216_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1289","DOI":"10.1007\/s10459-022-10187-7","volume":"28","author":"QH Duong","year":"2023","unstructured":"Duong QH, Pham TN, Reynolds L, et al. A scoping review of therapeutic reasoning process research. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2023;28:1289\u2013310. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10459-022-10187-7.","journal-title":"Adv Health Sci Educ"},{"key":"2216_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1360","DOI":"10.1186\/s12909-024-06310-4","volume":"24","author":"MG Hartjes","year":"2024","unstructured":"Hartjes MG, Richir MC, Cazaubon Y, et al. Enhancing therapeutic reasoning: key insights and recommendations for education in prescribing. BMC Med Educ. 2024;24:1360. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12909-024-06310-4.","journal-title":"BMC Med Educ"},{"key":"2216_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"116","DOI":"10.1016\/j.sapharm.2025.08.012","volume":"22","author":"D Rainkie","year":"2026","unstructured":"Rainkie D, Nazar Z, Teunissen P, et al. Mapping the processes of pharmacist therapeutic reasoning: a scoping review and development of the Pharmacist Therapeutic Reasoning Model. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2026;22:116\u201327. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.sapharm.2025.08.012.","journal-title":"Res Social Adm Pharm"},{"key":"2216_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"101449","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajpe.2025.101449","volume":"89","author":"MS El Hajj","year":"2025","unstructured":"El Hajj MS, Mahdi I, Mohamed N, et al. Pharmacy students\u2019 clinical reasoning and decision-making to detect and resolve medication errors. Am J Pharm Educ. 2025;89:101449. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajpe.2025.101449.","journal-title":"Am J Pharm Educ"},{"key":"2216_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"467","DOI":"10.1186\/s12909-022-03542-0","volume":"22","author":"ZG Nasr","year":"2022","unstructured":"Nasr ZG, Alhaj Moustafa D, Dahmani S, et al. Investigating pharmacy students\u2019 therapeutic decision-making with respect to antimicrobial stewardship cases. BMC Med Educ. 2022;22:467. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12909-022-03542-0.","journal-title":"BMC Med Educ"},{"key":"2216_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"398","DOI":"10.1002\/jac5.1580","volume":"5","author":"K Gruenberg","year":"2022","unstructured":"Gruenberg K, Abdoler E, O\u2019Brien BC, et al. How do pharmacists select antimicrobials? A model of pharmacists\u2019 therapeutic reasoning processes. J Am Coll Clin Pharm. 2022;5:398\u2013405. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/jac5.1580.","journal-title":"J Am Coll Clin Pharm"},{"key":"2216_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"390","DOI":"10.1097\/ACM.0b013e31827fc58d","volume":"88","author":"M Goldszmidt","year":"2013","unstructured":"Goldszmidt M, Minda JP, Bordage G. Developing a unified list of physicians\u2019 reasoning tasks during clinical encounters. Acad Med. 2013;88:390\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/ACM.0b013e31827fc58d.","journal-title":"Acad Med"},{"key":"2216_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1022","DOI":"10.1097\/ACM.0000000000001024","volume":"91","author":"E McBee","year":"2016","unstructured":"McBee E, Ratcliffe T, Goldszmidt M, et al. Clinical reasoning tasks and resident physicians: what do they reason about? Acad Med. 2016;91:1022\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/ACM.0000000000001024.","journal-title":"Acad Med"},{"key":"2216_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"281","DOI":"10.1515\/dx-2019-0095","volume":"7","author":"M Soh","year":"2020","unstructured":"Soh M, Konopasky A, Durning SJ, et al. Sequence matters: patterns in task-based clinical reasoning. Diagnosis (Berl). 2020;7:281\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1515\/dx-2019-0095.","journal-title":"Diagnosis (Berl)"},{"key":"2216_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"937","DOI":"10.1080\/0142159X.2022.2155123","volume":"45","author":"WR Johnson","year":"2023","unstructured":"Johnson WR, Artino AR Jr, Durning SJ. Using the think aloud protocol in health professions education: an interview method for exploring thought processes: AMEE guide no. 151. Med Teach. 2023;45:937\u201348. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/0142159X.2022.2155123.","journal-title":"Med Teach"},{"key":"2216_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"720","DOI":"10.3109\/0142159X.2013.801938","volume":"35","author":"SJ Durning","year":"2013","unstructured":"Durning SJ, Artino AR Jr, Beckman TJ, et al. Does the think-aloud protocol reflect thinking? Exploring functional neuroimaging differences with thinking versus thinking aloud. Med Teach. 2013;35:720\u20136. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3109\/0142159X.2013.801938.","journal-title":"Med Teach"},{"key":"2216_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Ericsson KA. Protocol analysis and expert thought: concurrent verbalizations of thinking during experts\u2019 performance on representative tasks. In: Ericsson KA, Charness N, Feltovich PJ, et al., editors. The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2006. p. 223\u2013242. ISBN: 9780521840972. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/CBO9780511816796.013","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511816796.013"},{"key":"2216_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"196","DOI":"10.1007\/s40037-022-00714-y","volume":"11","author":"DA Cook","year":"2022","unstructured":"Cook DA, Stephenson CR, Gruppen LD, et al. Management reasoning scripts: qualitative exploration using simulated physician-patient encounters. Perspect Med Educ. 2022;11:196\u2013206. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s40037-022-00714-y.","journal-title":"Perspect Med Educ"},{"key":"2216_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"892","DOI":"10.1080\/0142159X.2023.2289847","volume":"46","author":"B Noushad","year":"2024","unstructured":"Noushad B, Van Gerven PWM, de Bruin ABH. Twelve tips for applying the think-aloud method to capture cognitive processes. Med Teach. 2024;46:892\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/0142159X.2023.2289847.","journal-title":"Med Teach"},{"key":"2216_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"927","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2923.2011.04053.x","volume":"45","author":"S Durning","year":"2011","unstructured":"Durning S, Artino JAR, Pangaro L, et al. Context and clinical reasoning: understanding the perspective of the expert\u2019s voice. Med Educ. 2011;45:927\u201338. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1365-2923.2011.04053.x.","journal-title":"Med Educ"},{"key":"2216_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2606","DOI":"10.1016\/j.sapharm.2021.05.002","volume":"18","author":"A Mallinder","year":"2022","unstructured":"Mallinder A, Martini N. Exploring community pharmacists\u2019 clinical decision-making using think aloud and protocol analysis. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2022;18:2606\u201314. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.sapharm.2021.05.002.","journal-title":"Res Social Adm Pharm"},{"key":"2216_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1471","DOI":"10.1007\/s11096-019-00906-3","volume":"41","author":"MB Nusair","year":"2019","unstructured":"Nusair MB, Cor MK, Roduta Roberts M, et al. Community pharmacists\u2019 clinical reasoning: a protocol analysis. Int J Clin Pharm. 2019;41:1471\u201382. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11096-019-00906-3.","journal-title":"Int J Clin Pharm"},{"key":"2216_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"349","DOI":"10.1093\/intqhc\/mzm042","volume":"19","author":"A Tong","year":"2007","unstructured":"Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research: a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19:349\u201357. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/intqhc\/mzm042.","journal-title":"Int J Qual Health Care"},{"key":"2216_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Mann K, MacLeod A. Constructivism: learning theories and approaches to research. In: Cleland J, Durning SJ, editors. Researching medical education. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell; 2015. p. 49\u201366. ISBN: 9781118839201. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/9781118838983.ch6","DOI":"10.1002\/9781118838983.ch6"},{"key":"2216_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1070","DOI":"10.1016\/j.sapharm.2024.08.002","volume":"20","author":"M Witry","year":"2024","unstructured":"Witry M, Guirguis L. Is it time to stop counting on saturation in pharmacy research? Ideas for a new way forward. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2024;20:1070\u20134. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.sapharm.2024.08.002.","journal-title":"Res Social Adm Pharm"},{"key":"2216_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1238","DOI":"10.1097\/ACM.0000000000003498","volume":"95","author":"EA Abdoler","year":"2020","unstructured":"Abdoler EA, O\u2019Brien BC, Schwartz BS. Following the script: an exploratory study of the therapeutic reasoning underlying physicians\u2019 choice of antimicrobial therapy. Acad Med. 2020;95:1238\u201347. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/ACM.0000000000003498.","journal-title":"Acad Med"},{"key":"2216_CR22","unstructured":"King N. Technique: Template Analysis. University of Huddersfield. https:\/\/research.hud.ac.uk\/research-subjects\/human-health\/template-analysis\/technique\/. Accessed 08.03.2026."},{"key":"2216_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1672","DOI":"10.1007\/s11096-026-02150-y","volume":"48","author":"KL Klerk-Bos","year":"2026","unstructured":"Klerk-Bos KL, Hennus MP, Ehlert M, et al. Learning, adopting, and sustaining the pharmacist-clinician role in clinical practice: a qualitative study among early adopters in the Netherlands. Int J Clin Pharm. 2026;48:1672\u201381. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11096-026-02150-y.","journal-title":"Int J Clin Pharm"},{"key":"2216_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"655","DOI":"10.1111\/medu.70123","volume":"60","author":"AS Parsons","year":"2026","unstructured":"Parsons AS, Morris C, Bryan K, et al. How postgraduate medical trainees conceptualise management reasoning: a qualitative study. Med Educ. 2026;60:655\u201363. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/medu.70123.","journal-title":"Med Educ"},{"key":"2216_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"101876","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajpe.2025.101876","volume":"89","author":"A van der Westhuizen","year":"2025","unstructured":"van der Westhuizen A, Ram SS, Scahill S. Oral assessment of clinical reasoning in student pharmacists: a scoping review. Am J Pharm Educ. 2025;89:101876. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajpe.2025.101876.","journal-title":"Am J Pharm Educ"},{"key":"2216_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"ajpe8817","DOI":"10.5688\/ajpe8817","volume":"87","author":"S Walker","year":"2023","unstructured":"Walker S, Pham TN, Duong QH, et al. Cognitive and metacognitive processes demonstrated by pharmacy students when making therapeutic decisions. Am J Pharm Educ. 2023;87:ajpe8817. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5688\/ajpe8817.","journal-title":"Am J Pharm Educ"},{"key":"2216_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"918","DOI":"10.1016\/j.sapharm.2024.06.006","volume":"20","author":"GF Rushworth","year":"2024","unstructured":"Rushworth GF, Forsyth P, Radley A, et al. A pharmacist clinician model as part of a collaborative clinical workforce: a philosophical critique. Res Soc Adm Pharm. 2024;20:918\u201325. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.sapharm.2024.06.006.","journal-title":"Res Soc Adm Pharm"},{"key":"2216_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"105","DOI":"10.1016\/j.sapharm.2023.10.007","volume":"20","author":"JF Mertens","year":"2024","unstructured":"Mertens JF, Kempen TGH, Koster ES, et al. Cognitive processes in pharmacists\u2019 clinical decision-making. Res Soc Adm Pharm. 2024;20:105\u201314. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.sapharm.2023.10.007.","journal-title":"Res Soc Adm Pharm"}],"container-title":["International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11096-026-02216-x.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s11096-026-02216-x","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11096-026-02216-x.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,11,3]],"date-time":"2026-11-03T08:39:25Z","timestamp":1793695165000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s11096-026-02216-x"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,18]]},"references-count":28,"journal-issue":{"issue":"6","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,12]]}},"alternative-id":["2216"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11096-026-02216-x","relation":{},"ISSN":["2210-7711"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2210-7711","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,18]]},"assertion":[{"value":"16 June 2026","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"17 August 2026","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"18 September 2026","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"Zachariah Nazar is an Associate editor of the International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy. He had no role in handling the manuscript, specifically the processes of editorial review, peer review and decision making. The other authors declare that they have no competing interests. Daniel Rainkie, Pim Teunissen, and Karen K\u00f6nings declare they have no financial or non-financial interests to disclose.","order":1,"name":"Ethics","label":"Competing interests","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"This study was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Approval was granted by Dalhousie University (REB# 2024\u20137024).","order":2,"name":"Ethics","label":"Ethics approval","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","label":"Consent to participate","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}}]}}