{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,17]],"date-time":"2025-12-17T08:58:10Z","timestamp":1765961890323,"version":"3.44.0"},"reference-count":43,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"9","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,14]],"date-time":"2025-06-14T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1749859200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,14]],"date-time":"2025-06-14T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1749859200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100006356","name":"University of Southern Denmark","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100006356","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"crossref"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Qual Life Res"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,9]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n          <jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>Background<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>Worldwide, there is growing interest in using Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROM) in palliative care. The Danish Health Data Authority has developed a new PROM called PRO-Pall, which was launched for nationwide use in patients with heart, lung, and kidney diseases, as well as cancer.<\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>\n          <jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>Aim<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>To explore patients\u2019 experiences of responding to the PRO-Pall and using it in a consultation about palliative care needs in non-specialised palliative care settings.<\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>\n          <jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>This is a multicentre, mixed-methods study combining a quantitative approach using structured questionnaires (<jats:italic>n<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u2009270) and a qualitative analysis based on semi-structured interviews (<jats:italic>n<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u200917). The quantitative survey included items assessing relevance, ease of use, and perceived benefits of PRO-Pall in preparing for consultations. Qualitative data collection involved interviews focusing on patients\u2019 experiences with PRO-Pall and its integration into clinical discussions. Quantitative data were analysed descriptively as numbers (n) and proportions (%), while qualitative data were analysed using thematically using to identify key themes.<\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>\n          <jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>A total of 270 patients completed the survey, and 17 patients participated in interviews. The analysis revealed that the patients evaluated the PRO-Pall positively. The patients strongly agreed or agreed that the PRO-Pall was relevant (85%), easy to fill out (85%), helped to become aware of symptoms (61%) and a good way to prepare for the consultation (70%). The qualitative findings further supported these results, highlighting that patients found PRO-Pall relevant, appropriate, and convenient. Participants emphasized that PRO-Pall responses should be actively discussed during consultations with healthcare professionals to enhance its impact. Additionally, they noted that the timing of completing PRO-Pall was crucial, as patients\u2019 conditions fluctuate over time, potentially influencing their responses.<\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>\n          <jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>Most patients found the PRO-Pall relevant, appropriate, and easy to fill out. However, its effectiveness depends on healthcare professionals actively integrating patient responses into consultations. Otherwise, it would serve merely as documentation rather than an avenue for patients to discuss their concerns.<\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1007\/s11136-025-04006-w","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,14]],"date-time":"2025-06-14T07:03:53Z","timestamp":1749884633000},"page":"2651-2662","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["Patients\u2019 experiences of responding to a Patient-Reported Outcome Measure for palliative care: a mixed method study"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"34","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-0183-6216","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Jahan","family":"Shabnam","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Mette","family":"Raunki\u00e6r","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Maiken Bang","family":"Hansen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Mogens","family":"Gr\u00f8nvold","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Anders","family":"L\u00f8kke","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Edina Nikolett","family":"Barna","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Camilla","family":"Lykke","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Tina Broby","family":"Mikkelsen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Cecilie Lindst\u00f6m","family":"Egholm","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,14]]},"reference":[{"issue":"5","key":"4006_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"507","DOI":"10.2217\/cer-2015-0014","volume":"5","author":"I Porter","year":"2016","unstructured":"Porter, I., et al. (2016). Framework and guidance for implementing patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice: Evidence, challenges and opportunities. Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research, 5(5), 507\u2013519.","journal-title":"Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research"},{"key":"4006_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1125","DOI":"10.1007\/s11136-008-9396-4","volume":"17","author":"JM Valderas","year":"2008","unstructured":"Valderas, J. M., & Alonso, J. (2008). Patient reported outcome measures: A model-based classification system for research and clinical practice. Quality of Life Research, 17, 1125\u20131135.","journal-title":"Quality of Life Research"},{"key":"4006_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1186\/1477-7525-9-27","volume":"9","author":"C Bausewein","year":"2011","unstructured":"Bausewein, C., et al. (2011). Implementing patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) in palliative care-users\u2019 cry for help. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 9, 1\u201311.","journal-title":"Health and Quality of Life Outcomes"},{"issue":"2","key":"4006_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"158","DOI":"10.1177\/0269216313491619","volume":"28","author":"B Antunes","year":"2014","unstructured":"Antunes, B., et al. (2014). Implementing patient-reported outcome measures in palliative care clinical practice: A systematic review of facilitators and barriers. Palliative Medicine, 28(2), 158\u2013175.","journal-title":"Palliative Medicine"},{"issue":"2","key":"4006_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"397","DOI":"10.1177\/0269216320972049","volume":"35","author":"A Bradshaw","year":"2021","unstructured":"Bradshaw, A., et al. (2021). Implementing person-centred outcome measures in palliative care: An exploratory qualitative study using normalisation process theory to understand processes And context. Palliative Medicine, 35(2), 397\u2013407.","journal-title":"Palliative Medicine"},{"issue":"1","key":"4006_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"6","DOI":"10.1177\/0269216315589898","volume":"30","author":"C Bausewein","year":"2016","unstructured":"Bausewein, C., et al. (2016). EAPC white paper on outcome measurement in palliative care: Improving practice, attaining outcomes and delivering quality services\u2013Recommendations from the European association for palliative care (EAPC) task force on outcome measurement. Palliative Medicine, 30(1), 6\u201322.","journal-title":"Palliative Medicine"},{"issue":"Suppl 3","key":"4006_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"S137","DOI":"10.21037\/apm.2018.09.02","volume":"7","author":"C Pinto","year":"2018","unstructured":"Pinto, C., et al. (2018). Perspectives of patients, family caregivers and health professionals on the use of outcome measures in palliative care and lessons for implementation: A multi-method qualitative study. Ann Palliat Med, 7(Suppl 3), S137\u2013S150.","journal-title":"Ann Palliat Med"},{"issue":"3","key":"4006_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"611","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jpainsymman.2014.07.010","volume":"49","author":"SN Etkind","year":"2015","unstructured":"Etkind, S. N., et al. (2015). Capture, transfer, and feedback of patient-centered outcomes data in palliative care populations: Does it make a difference? A systematic review. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 49(3), 611\u2013624.","journal-title":"Journal of Pain and Symptom Management"},{"issue":"1","key":"4006_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1186\/s41687-018-0072-3","volume":"2","author":"A Foster","year":"2018","unstructured":"Foster, A., et al. (2018). The facilitators and barriers to implementing patient reported outcome measures in organisations delivering health related services: A systematic review of reviews. Journal of patient-reported Outcomes, 2(1), 1\u201316.","journal-title":"Journal of patient-reported Outcomes"},{"key":"4006_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1186\/s12904-020-00554-9","volume":"19","author":"N Radionova","year":"2020","unstructured":"Radionova, N., et al. (2020). The views of physicians and nurses on the potentials of an electronic assessment system for recognizing the needs of patients in palliative care. BMC Palliative Care, 19, 1\u20139.","journal-title":"BMC Palliative Care"},{"issue":"1","key":"4006_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"111","DOI":"10.1186\/s12904-023-01234-0","volume":"22","author":"L Consolo","year":"2023","unstructured":"Consolo, L., et al. (2023). Barriers and facilitators of electronic patient-reported outcome measures (e-PROMs) for patients in home palliative cancer care: A qualitative study of healthcare professionals\u2019 perceptions. BMC Palliative Care, 22(1), 111.","journal-title":"BMC Palliative Care"},{"issue":"10","key":"4006_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1796","DOI":"10.1016\/j.apmr.2020.04.007","volume":"101","author":"MS Briggs","year":"2020","unstructured":"Briggs, M. S., et al. (2020). Implementing patient-reported outcome measures in outpatient rehabilitation settings: A systematic review of facilitators and barriers using the consolidated framework for implementation research. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 101(10), 1796\u20131812.","journal-title":"Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation"},{"issue":"1","key":"4006_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1186\/s12913-017-2031-8","volume":"17","author":"M Sekhon","year":"2017","unstructured":"Sekhon, M., Cartwright, M., & Francis, J. J. (2017). Acceptability of healthcare interventions: An overview of reviews And development of a theoretical framework. BMC Health Services Research, 17(1), 1\u201313.","journal-title":"BMC Health Services Research"},{"unstructured":"Palliation, P. Opsamlingsrapport fra workshopforl\u00f8b for udvikling af PRO til Palliaton [Summary report from the workshop course for the development of PRO for Palliation]. 2021 30th October 2023]; Available from: file:\/\/\/C:\/Users\/dam6es\/AppData\/Local\/Temp\/MicrosoftEdgeDownloads\/28d7b2da-f76d-476b-a2ef-69af69f456a3\/Opsamlingsrapport%20fra%20workshopforloeb%20for%20udvikling%20af%20PRO%20til%20Palliation%20(PDF).pdf.","key":"4006_CR14"},{"unstructured":"Basic palliative care [Basal palliation]. (2023); Available from: https:\/\/pro-danmark.dk\/da\/pro-emner\/basal-palliation","key":"4006_CR15"},{"doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Egholm, C.L., et al., The implementation of the 2017 national policy on patient-reported outcomes in Denmark: An overview of developments after six years. Health policy, 2023: p. 104755.","key":"4006_CR16","DOI":"10.1016\/j.healthpol.2023.104755"},{"issue":"1","key":"4006_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"55","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejca.2005.06.022","volume":"42","author":"M Groenvold","year":"2006","unstructured":"Groenvold, M., et al. (2006). The development of the EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL: A shortened questionnaire for cancer patients in palliative care. European Journal of cancer, 42(1), 55\u201364.","journal-title":"European Journal of cancer"},{"unstructured":"Hansen, M. B., Adsersen, M., & Gr\u00f8nvold, M. (2022). Dansk Palliativ Database (DPD):: \u00c5rsrapport 2021.","key":"4006_CR18"},{"unstructured":"Refer, I. F. (2022). Evaluering af pilotafpr\u00f8vning af PRO til basal palliation: Rapport udarbejdet for PRO-sekretariatet, Sundhedsdatastyrelsen.","key":"4006_CR19"},{"unstructured":"Final report for development of PRO for palliation [Afslutningsrapport for udvikling af PRO til palliation]. (2023).","key":"4006_CR20"},{"unstructured":"Authority], S. T. D. H. D. (2023). PRO-emner - Basal palliation [PRO topics - Basic palliation]. PRO-sekretariatet, Sundhedsdatastyrelsen [The Danish Health Data Authority].","key":"4006_CR21"},{"unstructured":"Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage.","key":"4006_CR22"},{"issue":"8","key":"4006_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e51","DOI":"10.1097\/MLR.0b013e31824642fd","volume":"51","author":"W Zhang","year":"2013","unstructured":"Zhang, W., & Creswell, J. (2013). The use of mixing procedure of mixed methods in health services research. Medical Care, 51(8), e51\u2013e57.","journal-title":"Medical Care"},{"unstructured":"EORTC The EORTC Quality of life in palliative cancer care patients. 06.05.2025]; Available from: https:\/\/qol.eortc.org\/questionnaire\/qlq-c15-pal\/","key":"4006_CR24"},{"unstructured":"EORTC Item library. European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer.","key":"4006_CR25"},{"issue":"20","key":"4006_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"6200","DOI":"10.3390\/jcm13206200","volume":"13","author":"H Darum S\u00f8rensen","year":"2024","unstructured":"Darum S\u00f8rensen, H., et al. (2024). Using a Patient-Reported outcome measure to assess physical, psychosocial, and existential issues in COPD. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 13(20), 6200.","journal-title":"Journal of Clinical Medicine"},{"unstructured":"Authority], S. T. D. H. D. (2022). Indholds- og brugertest rapport vedr. PRO til palliation [Content and user test report on PRO for palliation]. [cited 2025 20.02.2025]; Available from: https:\/\/sundhedsdatastyrelsen.dk\/Media\/638653702346233236\/Indholds-%20og%20brugertest%20om%20PRO%20til%20palliation.pdf","key":"4006_CR27"},{"issue":"2","key":"4006_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"77","DOI":"10.1191\/1478088706qp063oa","volume":"3","author":"V Braun","year":"2006","unstructured":"Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77\u2013101.","journal-title":"Qualitative Research in Psychology"},{"unstructured":"OPEN. Open Patient data Explorative Network (2023); Available from: https:\/\/en.ouh.dk\/research\/open-odense-patient-data-explorative-network\/","key":"4006_CR29"},{"issue":"1","key":"4006_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"6","DOI":"10.1186\/s12904-022-01123-y","volume":"22","author":"E M\u00fcller","year":"2023","unstructured":"M\u00fcller, E., et al. (2023). Feasibility, use and benefits of patient-reported outcome measures in palliative care units: A multicentre observational study. BMC Palliative Care, 22(1), 6.","journal-title":"BMC Palliative Care"},{"issue":"4","key":"4006_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e12297","DOI":"10.1111\/nin.12297","volume":"26","author":"C H\u00f6gberg","year":"2019","unstructured":"H\u00f6gberg, C., Alvariza, A., & Beck, I. (2019). Patients\u2019 experiences of using the integrated palliative care outcome scale for a person-centered care: A qualitative study in the specialized palliative home\u2010care context. Nursing Inquiry, 26(4), e12297.","journal-title":"Nursing Inquiry"},{"issue":"1","key":"4006_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"143","DOI":"10.1177\/0269216317738161","volume":"32","author":"PM Kane","year":"2018","unstructured":"Kane, P. M., et al. (2018). Understanding how A palliative-specific patient-reported outcome intervention works to facilitate patient-centred care in advanced heart failure: A qualitative study. Palliative Medicine, 32(1), 143\u2013155.","journal-title":"Palliative Medicine"},{"doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Gibbons, C. Routine provision of feedback from patient-reported outcome measurements to healthcare providers and patients in clinical practice. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2021(10).","key":"4006_CR33","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD011589.pub2"},{"key":"4006_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3157","DOI":"10.1007\/s11136-018-1968-3","volume":"27","author":"TL Talib","year":"2018","unstructured":"Talib, T. L., et al. (2018). A qualitative study of patients\u2019 perceptions of the utility of patient-reported outcome measures of symptoms in primary care clinics. Quality of Life Research, 27, 3157\u20133166.","journal-title":"Quality of Life Research"},{"key":"4006_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1186\/s41687-019-0170-x","volume":"4","author":"CT Mejdahl","year":"2020","unstructured":"Mejdahl, C. T., et al. (2020). Patient-reported outcome measures in the interaction between patient and clinician\u2013a multi-perspective qualitative study. Journal of patient-reported Outcomes, 4, 1\u201310.","journal-title":"Journal of patient-reported Outcomes"},{"issue":"1","key":"4006_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1186\/s12955-020-01438-5","volume":"18","author":"OL Aiyegbusi","year":"2020","unstructured":"Aiyegbusi, O. L., et al. (2020). Patient and clinician opinions of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) in the management of patients with rare diseases: A qualitative study. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 18(1), 1\u201312.","journal-title":"Health and Quality of Life Outcomes"},{"issue":"2","key":"4006_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"167","DOI":"10.1053\/j.ajkd.2019.02.011","volume":"74","author":"OL Aiyegbusi","year":"2019","unstructured":"Aiyegbusi, O. L., et al. (2019). Patient and clinician perspectives on electronic patient-reported outcome measures in the management of advanced CKD: A qualitative study. American Journal of Kidney Diseases, 74(2), 167\u2013178.","journal-title":"American Journal of Kidney Diseases"},{"key":"4006_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"263235242311868","DOI":"10.1177\/26323524231186827","volume":"17","author":"I Burner-Fritsch","year":"2023","unstructured":"Burner-Fritsch, I., et al. (2023). Implementing ePROM in specialist palliative home care: The professionals\u2019 perspective\u2013a mixed-methods study. Palliative Care and Social Practice, 17, 26323524231186827.","journal-title":"Palliative Care and Social Practice"},{"issue":"1","key":"4006_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"25","DOI":"10.1186\/s41687-023-00565-z","volume":"7","author":"N Ito","year":"2023","unstructured":"Ito, N., et al. (2023). Routine patient assessment and the use of patient-reported outcomes in specialized palliative care in Japan. Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, 7(1), 25.","journal-title":"Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes"},{"issue":"5","key":"4006_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"561","DOI":"10.1017\/S1478951518001104","volume":"17","author":"S Lind","year":"2019","unstructured":"Lind, S., et al. (2019). The integrated palliative care outcome scale for patients with palliative care needs: Factors related to and experiences of the use in acute care settings. Palliative & Supportive Care, 17(5), 561\u2013568.","journal-title":"Palliative & Supportive Care"},{"issue":"1","key":"4006_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1186\/s12875-019-1077-6","volume":"21","author":"GM Turner","year":"2020","unstructured":"Turner, G. M., et al. (2020). General practitioners\u2019 views on use of patient reported outcome measures in primary care: A cross-sectional survey and qualitative study. BMC Family Practice, 21(1), 1\u201310.","journal-title":"BMC Family Practice"},{"key":"4006_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"462","DOI":"10.1007\/s10464-012-9522-x","volume":"50","author":"DC Meyers","year":"2012","unstructured":"Meyers, D. C., Durlak, J. A., & Wandersman, A. (2012). The quality implementation framework: A synthesis of critical steps in the implementation process. American Journal of Community Psychology, 50, 462\u2013480.","journal-title":"American Journal of Community Psychology"},{"issue":"e1","key":"4006_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e1085","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjspcare-2021-003340","volume":"14","author":"C Zimmermann","year":"2021","unstructured":"Zimmermann, C., et al. (2021). Public knowledge and attitudes concerning palliative care. BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care, 14(e1), e1085\u2013e1095.","journal-title":"BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care"}],"container-title":["Quality of Life Research"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11136-025-04006-w.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s11136-025-04006-w\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11136-025-04006-w.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,12]],"date-time":"2025-09-12T11:28:06Z","timestamp":1757676486000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s11136-025-04006-w"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,14]]},"references-count":43,"journal-issue":{"issue":"9","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,9]]}},"alternative-id":["4006"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11136-025-04006-w","relation":{},"ISSN":["0962-9343","1573-2649"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0962-9343"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1573-2649"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,14]]},"assertion":[{"value":"1 June 2025","order":1,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"14 June 2025","order":2,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"No conflicts of Interest.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}}]}}