{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,19]],"date-time":"2025-10-19T00:39:04Z","timestamp":1760834344640,"version":"build-2065373602"},"reference-count":28,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"10","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,18]],"date-time":"2025-07-18T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1752796800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,18]],"date-time":"2025-07-18T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1752796800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"name":"Universit\u00e4tsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE)"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Qual Life Res"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,10]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n          <jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>Purpose<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>The Quality of Recovery-15 questionnaire (QoR-15) has been developed to assess patient-reported recovery 24\u00a0h after non-cardiac surgery. This prospective cohort study sought to analyze patient-reported recovery throughout day five after open radical retropubic prostatectomy (ORP) and robot-assisted radical retropubic prostatectomy (RARP).<\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>\n          <jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>Between June 2022 and February 2023 adult patients, who were scheduled for elective radical prostatectomy, completed the German version of the QoR-15 (QoR-15GE) preoperatively to establish a baseline value. Between postoperative day one and day five, patients completed the QoR-15GE daily until the day of discharge.<\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>\n          <jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>A total of 523 patients completed the questionnaires. On postoperative day one QoR-15GE scores were significantly lower after RARP compared with ORP (ORP: 113\u2009\u00b1\u200922 vs. RARP: 107\u2009\u00b1\u200924; <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u20090.006) with a higher decline in postoperative QoR-15GE scores in RARP compared with ORP patients (ORP: 27\u2009\u00b1\u200920 vs. RARP: 32\u2009\u00b1\u200923; <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u20090.006). The multivariable analysis confirmed an influence of surgical technique (Estimate: 4.39; 95% CI [0.27; 8.50], <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u20090.037) on postoperative quality of recovery after adjusting for clinically relevant variables. Irrespective of surgical technique, we observed a consistent increase in QoR-15GE scores with similar recovery scores on postoperative days three, four, and five.<\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>\n          <jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>Patients who undergo RARP experience poorer postoperative recovery at postoperative days one and two compared to those undergoing ORP. However, recovery scores align from postoperative day three, indicating a similar level of patient-reported recovery before hospital discharge. These findings suggest that the QoR-15GE may be appropriate for serial assessments.<\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1007\/s11136-025-04026-6","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,18]],"date-time":"2025-07-18T10:29:56Z","timestamp":1752834596000},"page":"2911-2919","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Self-reported quality of recovery after radical prostatectomy\u2014a prospective cohort study"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"34","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-7530-8155","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Marlene","family":"Fischer","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Josephine","family":"K\u00fcllmei","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Linda","family":"Krause","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Peipei","family":"Wei","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Ursula","family":"Kahl","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Elena","family":"Kainz","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Caspar","family":"Mewes","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Markus","family":"Graefen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Alexander","family":"Haese","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Christian","family":"Z\u00f6llner","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Lili","family":"Pl\u00fcmer","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,18]]},"reference":[{"issue":"4","key":"4026_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"705","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bja.2017.12.037","volume":"120","author":"PS Myles","year":"2018","unstructured":"Myles, P. S., Boney, O., Botti, M., Cyna, A. M., Gan, T. J., Jensen, M. P., & Wijeysundera, D. (2018). Systematic review and consensus definitions for the standardised endpoints in perioperative medicine (StEP) initiative: Patient comfort. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 120(4), 705\u2013711. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.bja.2017.12.037","journal-title":"British Journal of Anaesthesia"},{"issue":"6","key":"4026_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1029","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bja.2022.03.009","volume":"128","author":"PS Myles","year":"2022","unstructured":"Myles, P. S., Shulman, M. A., Reilly, J., Kasza, J., & Romero, L. (2022). Measurement of quality of recovery after surgery using the 15-item quality of recovery scale: A systematic review and meta-analysis. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 128(6), 1029\u20131039. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.bja.2022.03.009","journal-title":"British Journal of Anaesthesia"},{"key":"4026_CR3","unstructured":"Krebsgesellschaft, L. O. (Deutsche, Krebshilfe, D., & AWMF). (n.d.). S3-Leitlinie Prostatakarzinom, Langversion 7.0. S3-Leitlinie Prostatakarzinom, Langversion 7.0, 2024, AWMF-Registernummer: 043-022OL. Retrieved July 18, 2024, from https:\/\/www.leitlinienprogrammonkologie.de\/leitlinien\/prostatakarzinom\/"},{"key":"4026_CR4","unstructured":"Organization, W. H. (n.d.). Global cancer burden growing, amidst mounting need for services. Retrieved July 18, 2024, from https:\/\/www.who.int\/news\/item\/01-02-2024-global-cancer-burden-growing--amidst-mounting-need-for-services"},{"key":"4026_CR5","unstructured":"Urology, E. (n.d.). EAU guideline: Prostate cancer."},{"issue":"8","key":"4026_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1051","DOI":"10.1016\/s1470-2045(18)30357-7","volume":"19","author":"GD Coughlin","year":"2018","unstructured":"Coughlin, G. D., Yaxley, J. W., Chambers, S. K., Occhipinti, S., Samaratunga, H., Zajdlewicz, L., & Gardiner, R. A. (2018). Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus open radical retropubic prostatectomy: 24-month outcomes from a randomised controlled study. The Lancet Oncology, 19(8), 1051\u20131060. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/s1470-2045(18)30357-7","journal-title":"The Lancet Oncology"},{"issue":"6","key":"4026_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1031","DOI":"10.1111\/bju.14760","volume":"123","author":"A Haese","year":"2019","unstructured":"Haese, A., Knipper, S., Isbarn, H., Heinzer, H., Tilki, D., Salomon, G., & Graefen, M. (2019). A comparative study of robot-assisted and open radical prostatectomy in 10\u2013790 men treated by highly trained surgeons for both procedures. BJU International, 123(6), 1031\u20131040.","journal-title":"BJU International"},{"issue":"2","key":"4026_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"216","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eururo.2015.02.029","volume":"68","author":"E Haglind","year":"2015","unstructured":"Haglind, E., Carlsson, S., Stranne, J., Wallerstedt, A., Wilder\u00e4ng, U., Thorsteinsdottir, T., on behalf of the LAPPRO steering committee. (2015). Urinary incontinence and erectile dysfunction after robotic versus open radical prostatectomy: A prospective, controlled, nonrandomised trial. European Urology, 68(2), 216\u2013225. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.eururo.2015.02.029","journal-title":"European Urology"},{"issue":"9","key":"4026_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"CD009625","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.cd009625.pub2","volume":"2017","author":"D Ilic","year":"2017","unstructured":"Ilic, D., Evans, S. M., Allan, C. A., Jung, J. H., Murphy, D., & Frydenberg, M. (2017). Laparoscopic and robotic-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy for the treatment of localised prostate cancer. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2017(9), CD009625. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/14651858.cd009625.pub2","journal-title":"Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews"},{"issue":"41","key":"4026_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.3310\/hta16410","volume":"16","author":"C Ramsay","year":"2012","unstructured":"Ramsay, C., Pickard, R., Robertson, C., Close, A., Vale, L., Armstrong, N., & Soomro, N. (2012). Systematic review and economic modelling of the relative clinical benefit and cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic surgery and robotic surgery for removal of the prostate in men with localised prostate cancer. Health Technology Assessment, 16(41), 1\u2013313. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3310\/hta16410","journal-title":"Health Technology Assessment"},{"issue":"8","key":"4026_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1001\/jamanetworkopen.2021.20156","volume":"4","author":"S-Y Wu","year":"2021","unstructured":"Wu, S.-Y., Chang, C.-L., Chen, C.-I., & Huang, C.-C. (2021). Comparison of acute and chronic surgical complications following robot-assisted, laparoscopic, and traditional open radical prostatectomy among men in Taiwan. JAMA Network Open, 4(8), Article e2120156. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/jamanetworkopen.2021.20156","journal-title":"JAMA Network Open"},{"issue":"1","key":"4026_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"8","DOI":"10.1159\/000496980","volume":"103","author":"A Antonelli","year":"2019","unstructured":"Antonelli, A., Palumbo, C., Noale, M., Porreca, A., Maggi, S., Simeone, C., Pros-IT\u00a0CNR\u00a0study\u00a0group. (2019). Impact of surgical approach on patient-reported outcomes after radical prostatectomy: A propensity score-weighted analysis from a multicenter, prospective, observational study (The Pros-IT CNR Study). Urologia Internationalis, 103(1), 8\u201318. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1159\/000496980","journal-title":"Urologia Internationalis"},{"issue":"5","key":"4026_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"361","DOI":"10.1016\/j.euo.2018.08.021","volume":"1","author":"S Knipper","year":"2018","unstructured":"Knipper, S., & Graefen, M. (2018). Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy\u2014So successful because it is better or better because it is so successful? European Urology Oncology, 1(5), 361\u2013363. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.euo.2018.08.021","journal-title":"European Urology Oncology"},{"issue":"3","key":"4026_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"389","DOI":"10.1016\/j.euf.2017.12.010","volume":"5","author":"A Wallerstedt","year":"2019","unstructured":"Wallerstedt, A., Nyberg, T., Carlsson, S., Thorsteinsdottir, T., Stranne, J., Tyritzis, S. I., & Haglind, E. (2019). Quality of life after open radical prostatectomy compared with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. European Urology Focus, 5(3), 389\u2013398. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.euf.2017.12.010","journal-title":"European Urology Focus"},{"issue":"1","key":"4026_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"83","DOI":"10.1097\/00000539-199901000-00016","volume":"88","author":"PS Myles","year":"1999","unstructured":"Myles, P. S., Hunt, J. O., Nightingale, C. E., Fletcher, H., Beh, T., Tanil, D., & Ponsford, J. L. (1999). Development and psychometric testing of a quality of recovery score after general anesthesia and surgery in adults. Anesthesia and Analgesia, 88(1), 83\u201390. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/00000539-199901000-00016","journal-title":"Anesthesia and Analgesia"},{"issue":"6","key":"4026_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1332","DOI":"10.1097\/aln.0b013e318289b84b","volume":"118","author":"PA Stark","year":"2013","unstructured":"Stark, P. A., Myles, P. S., & Burke, J. A. (2013). Development and psychometric evaluation of a postoperative quality of recovery score. Anesthesiology, 118(6), 1332\u20131340. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/aln.0b013e318289b84b","journal-title":"Anesthesiology"},{"issue":"5","key":"4026_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"934","DOI":"10.1097\/aln.0000000000003977","volume":"135","author":"PS Myles","year":"2021","unstructured":"Myles, P. S., & Myles, D. B. (2021). An updated minimal clinically important difference for the QoR-15 scale. Anesthesiology, 135(5), 934\u2013935. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/aln.0000000000003977","journal-title":"Anesthesiology"},{"issue":"5","key":"4026_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e161","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bja.2021.07.026","volume":"127","author":"U Kahl","year":"2021","unstructured":"Kahl, U., Gebhardt, N., Brodersen, K., Kainz, E., Schirren, L., Yu, Y., & Fischer, M. (2021). Validation of a translated quality of recovery-15 questionnaire in German patients undergoing elective noncardiac surgery. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 127(5), e161\u2013e163. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.bja.2021.07.026","journal-title":"British Journal of Anaesthesia"},{"issue":"1","key":"4026_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"179","DOI":"10.1007\/s11701-024-01951-5","volume":"18","author":"N Kimura","year":"2024","unstructured":"Kimura, N., Yamada, Y., Hakozaki, Y., Kaneko, J., Kamei, J., Taguchi, S., & Kume, H. (2024). Upper extremity contact pressure measurement in robot-assisted pelvic surgery. Journal of Robotic Surgery, 18(1), 179. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11701-024-01951-5","journal-title":"Journal of Robotic Surgery"},{"issue":"3","key":"4026_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"369","DOI":"10.1093\/bja\/79.3.369","volume":"79","author":"JI Alexander","year":"1997","unstructured":"Alexander, J. I. (1997). Pain after laparoscopy. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 79(3), 369\u2013378. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/bja\/79.3.369","journal-title":"British Journal of Anaesthesia"},{"issue":"3","key":"4026_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"262","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1987.tb02365.x","volume":"94","author":"FF Dobbs","year":"1987","unstructured":"Dobbs, F. F., Kumar, V., Alexander, J. I., & Hull, M. G. R. (1987). Pain after laparoscopy related to posture and ring versus clip sterilization. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 94(3), 262\u2013266. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1987.tb02365.x","journal-title":"BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology"},{"issue":"5","key":"4026_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"276","DOI":"10.4174\/astr.2021.100.5.276","volume":"100","author":"W Chang","year":"2021","unstructured":"Chang, W., Yoo, T., Cho, W. T., & Cho, G. (2021). Comparing postoperative pain in various pressure pneumoperitoneum of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A double-blind randomized controlled study. Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research, 100(5), 276\u2013281. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4174\/astr.2021.100.5.276","journal-title":"Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research"},{"issue":"2","key":"4026_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"379","DOI":"10.1097\/00000539-199508000-00029","volume":"81","author":"J Joris","year":"1995","unstructured":"Joris, J., Thiry, E., Paris, P., Weerts, J., & Lamy, M. (1995). Pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Anesthesia & Analgesia, 81(2), 379\u2013384. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/00000539-199508000-00029","journal-title":"Anesthesia & Analgesia"},{"issue":"3","key":"4026_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"295","DOI":"10.1002\/bjs.5252","volume":"93","author":"CV Feo","year":"2006","unstructured":"Feo, C. V., Sortini, D., Ragazzi, R., Palma, M. D., & Liboni, A. (2006). Randomized clinical trial of the effect of preoperative dexamethasone on nausea and vomiting after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. British Journal of Surgery, 93(3), 295\u2013299. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/bjs.5252","journal-title":"British Journal of Surgery"},{"issue":"4","key":"4026_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"607","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-006-9122-7","volume":"21","author":"V Nesek-Adam","year":"2007","unstructured":"Nesek-Adam, V., Grizelj-Stoj\u010di\u0107, E., Ra\u0161i\u0107, \u017d, \u010cala, Z., Mr\u0161i\u0107, V., & Smiljani\u0107, A. (2007). Comparison of dexamethasone, metoclopramide, and their combination in the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surgical Endoscopy, 21(4), 607\u2013612. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00464-006-9122-7","journal-title":"Surgical Endoscopy"},{"key":"4026_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"899","DOI":"10.2147\/cmar.s189893","volume":"11","author":"W Huang","year":"2019","unstructured":"Huang, W., Zhang, Y., Shen, B.-H., Wang, S., Meng, H.-Z., & Jin, X.-D. (2019). Outcomes of health-related quality of life after open, laparoscopic, or robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in China. Cancer Management and Research, 11, 899\u2013907. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2147\/cmar.s189893","journal-title":"Cancer Management and Research"},{"issue":"1","key":"4026_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"32","DOI":"10.1097\/ju.0000000000003967","volume":"212","author":"WC Nahas","year":"2024","unstructured":"Nahas, W. C., Rodrigues, G. J., Gon\u00e7alves, F. A. R., Sawczyn, G. V., Barros, G. G., Cardili, L., & Coelho, R. F. (2024). Perioperative, oncological, and functional outcomes between robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy and open radical retropubic prostatectomy: A randomized clinical trial. The Journal of Urology, 212(1), 32\u201340. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/ju.0000000000003967","journal-title":"The Journal of Urology"},{"issue":"7","key":"4026_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"893","DOI":"10.1111\/aas.13086","volume":"62","author":"S Lyckner","year":"2018","unstructured":"Lyckner, S., B\u00f6reg\u00e5rd, I.-L., Zetterlund, E.-L., & Chew, M. S. (2018). Validation of the Swedish version of quality of recovery score -15: A multicentre, cohort study. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 62(7), 893\u2013902. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/aas.13086","journal-title":"Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica"}],"container-title":["Quality of Life Research"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11136-025-04026-6.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s11136-025-04026-6\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11136-025-04026-6.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,18]],"date-time":"2025-10-18T21:01:52Z","timestamp":1760821312000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s11136-025-04026-6"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,18]]},"references-count":28,"journal-issue":{"issue":"10","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,10]]}},"alternative-id":["4026"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11136-025-04026-6","relation":{},"ISSN":["0962-9343","1573-2649"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0962-9343"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1573-2649"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,18]]},"assertion":[{"value":"9 July 2025","order":1,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"18 July 2025","order":2,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"MF and CZ participated in translating the QoR-15 to create a German version of the questionnaire (QoR-15GE). The Department of Anesthesiology at the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, represented by CZ and MF, transferred the rights for commercial distribution of the QoR-15GE to Thieme Compliance GmbH. In return, the Department of Anesthesiology at the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf receives payment for each copy of the QoR-15GE sold.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}},{"value":"This study was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical approval for this study (reference number: 2022\u2013100812-BO-ff) was obtained from the Ethics Committee at the Hamburg Chamber of Physicians on May 03, 2022.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethical approval"}},{"value":"All study participants provided their written informed consent before the initiation of study-related procedures.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent to participate"}},{"value":"Not applicable.","order":5,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent for publication"}}]}}