{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,22]],"date-time":"2026-04-22T22:09:48Z","timestamp":1776895788664,"version":"3.51.2"},"reference-count":58,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"11","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,10]],"date-time":"2025-10-10T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1760054400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,10]],"date-time":"2025-10-10T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1760054400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100001809","name":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["72274045"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["72274045"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100001809","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100001809","name":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["71974048"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["71974048"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100001809","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Qual Life Res"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,11]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s11136-025-04073-z","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,10]],"date-time":"2025-10-10T14:15:37Z","timestamp":1760105737000},"page":"3167-3180","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["Developing a patient-based utility value set for the EORTC QLU-C10D using the OPUF method in Chinese cancer patients"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"34","author":[{"given":"Yiyin","family":"Cao","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Ye","family":"Zhou","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Paul","family":"Schneider","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Will","family":"King","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Xu","family":"Jin","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Haofei","family":"Li","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Runhong","family":"Li","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Hongjuan","family":"Yu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Chunzi","family":"Gao","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-8156-5537","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Weidong","family":"Huang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Nan","family":"Luo","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,10]]},"reference":[{"issue":"2","key":"4073_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"145","DOI":"10.1007\/s40271-019-00408-4","volume":"13","author":"JC Bouvy","year":"2020","unstructured":"Bouvy, J. C., Cowie, L., Lovett, R., Morrison, D., Livingstone, H., & Crabb, N. (2020). Use of patient preference studies in HTA decision making: A NICE perspective. Patient, 13(2), 145\u2013149. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s40271-019-00408-4","journal-title":"Patient"},{"issue":"Suppl 1","key":"4073_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"11","DOI":"10.1007\/s40273-017-0544-y","volume":"35","author":"D Rowen","year":"2017","unstructured":"Rowen, D., Azzabi Zouraq, I., Chevrou-Severac, H., & van Hout, B. (2017). International regulations and recommendations for utility data for health technology assessment. PharmacoEconomics, 35(Suppl 1), 11\u201319. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s40273-017-0544-y","journal-title":"PharmacoEconomics"},{"issue":"6","key":"4073_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"591","DOI":"10.1007\/s40273-014-0151-0","volume":"32","author":"K Matter-Walstra","year":"2014","unstructured":"Matter-Walstra, K., Klingbiel, D., Szucs, T., Pestalozzi, B. C., & Schwenkglenks, M. (2014). Using the EuroQol EQ-5D in Swiss cancer patients, which value set should be applied? PharmacoEconomics, 32(6), 591\u2013599. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s40273-014-0151-0","journal-title":"PharmacoEconomics"},{"issue":"11","key":"4073_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"673","DOI":"10.34172\/ijhpm.2020.244","volume":"10","author":"MY Bertram","year":"2021","unstructured":"Bertram, M. Y., Lauer, J. A., Stenberg, K., & Edejer, T. T. T. (2021). Methods for the economic evaluation of health care interventions for priority setting in the health system: An update from WHO CHOICE. International Journal of Health Policy and Management, 10(11), 673\u2013677. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.34172\/ijhpm.2020.244","journal-title":"International Journal of Health Policy and Management"},{"key":"4073_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine. (2016). Oxford University Press. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780190492939.001.0001.","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780190492939.001.0001"},{"issue":"6","key":"4073_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"687","DOI":"10.2165\/00019053-199813060-00005","volume":"13","author":"X Badia","year":"1998","unstructured":"Badia, X., Herdman, M., & Kind, P. (1998). The influence of ill-health experience on the valuation of health. PharmacoEconomics, 13(6), 687\u2013696. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2165\/00019053-199813060-00005","journal-title":"PharmacoEconomics"},{"issue":"4","key":"4073_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"201","DOI":"10.2165\/00148365-200504040-00002","volume":"4","author":"J Brazier","year":"2005","unstructured":"Brazier, J., Akehurst, R., Brennan, A., Dolan, P., Claxton, K., McCabe, C., Sculpher, M., & Tsuchyia, A. (2005). Should patients have a greater role in valuing health states? Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, 4(4), 201\u2013208. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2165\/00148365-200504040-00002","journal-title":"Applied Health Economics and Health Policy"},{"key":"4073_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2","DOI":"10.1016\/j.pharp.2025.03.004","volume":"1","author":"S Hu","year":"2025","unstructured":"Hu, S., Yang, S., & Cai, W. (2025). Keeping up with international frontier and promoting research and development of pharmacoeconomics in China. Pharmacoeconomics and Policy, 1, 2\u20134.","journal-title":"Pharmacoeconomics and Policy"},{"issue":"8","key":"4073_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"696","DOI":"10.1001\/jamaoto.2015.1314","volume":"141","author":"CW Noel","year":"2015","unstructured":"Noel, C. W., Lee, D. J., Kong, Q., Xu, W., Simpson, C., Brown, D., Gilbert, R. W., Gullane, P. J., Irish, J. C., Huang, S. H., O\u2019Sullivan, B., Goldstein, D. P., & de Almeida, J. R. (2015). Comparison of health state utility measures in patients with head and neck cancer. JAMA Otolaryngology\u2013Head & Neck Surgery, 141(8), 696\u2013703. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/jamaoto.2015.1314","journal-title":"JAMA Otolaryngology\u2013Head & Neck Surgery"},{"issue":"2","key":"4073_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"218","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jval.2015.11.012","volume":"19","author":"KS Gries","year":"2016","unstructured":"Gries, K. S., Regier, D. A., Ramsey, S. D., & Patrick, D. L. (2016). Preferences for prostate cancer outcomes: A comparison of the patient perspective, the general population perspective, and a population at risk for prostate cancer. Value in Health, 19(2), 218\u2013225. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jval.2015.11.012","journal-title":"Value in Health"},{"issue":"2","key":"4073_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"306","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1524-4733.2009.00610.x","volume":"13","author":"Y Peeters","year":"2010","unstructured":"Peeters, Y., & Stiggelbout, A. M. (2010). Health state valuations of patients and the general public analytically compared: A meta-analytical comparison of patient and population health state utilities. Value in Health, 13(2), 306\u2013309. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1524-4733.2009.00610.x","journal-title":"Value in Health"},{"issue":"6","key":"4073_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"915","DOI":"10.1007\/s10198-023-01635-1","volume":"25","author":"Q Chai","year":"2024","unstructured":"Chai, Q., Yang, Z., Liu, X., An, D., Du, J., Ma, X., Rand, K., Wu, B., Luo, N., & Schulenburg, J. M. G. V. D. (2024). Valuation of EQ-5D-5L health states from cancer patients\u9225perspective: A feasibility study. European Journal of Health Economics, 25(6), 915\u2013924.","journal-title":"European Journal of Health Economics"},{"issue":"12","key":"4073_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3353","DOI":"10.1007\/s11136-017-1683-5","volume":"26","author":"M Gandhi","year":"2017","unstructured":"Gandhi, M., Tan, R. S., Ng, R., & Choo, S. P. (2017). Comparison of health state values derived from patients and individuals from the general population. Quality of Life Research., 26(12), 3353\u20133363.","journal-title":"Quality of Life Research."},{"issue":"9","key":"4073_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1343","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jval.2021.02.012","volume":"24","author":"K Ludwig","year":"2021","unstructured":"Ludwig, K., Ramos-Go\u00f1i, J. M., Oppe, M., Kreimeier, S., & Greiner, W. (2021). To what extent do patient preferences differ from general population preferences? Value in Health, 24(9), 1343\u20131349. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jval.2021.02.012","journal-title":"Value in Health"},{"issue":"12","key":"4073_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2149","DOI":"10.1016\/s0277-9536(01)00358-6","volume":"55","author":"P Menzel","year":"2002","unstructured":"Menzel, P., Dolan, P., Richardson, J., & Olsen, J. A. (2002). The role of adaptation to disability and disease in health state valuation: A preliminary normative analysis. Social Science & Medicine, 55(12), 2149\u20132158. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/s0277-9536(01)00358-6","journal-title":"Social Science & Medicine"},{"key":"4073_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"66","DOI":"10.1016\/j.socscimed.2016.07.043","volume":"165","author":"MM Versteegh","year":"2016","unstructured":"Versteegh, M. M., & Brouwer, W. B. F. (2016). Patient and general public preferences for health states: A call to reconsider current guidelines. Social Science & Medicine, 165, 66\u201374. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.socscimed.2016.07.043","journal-title":"Social Science & Medicine"},{"issue":"1","key":"4073_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"7","DOI":"10.3322\/caac.21654","volume":"71","author":"RL Siegel","year":"2021","unstructured":"Siegel, R. L., Miller, K. D., Fuchs, H. E., & Jemal, A. (2021). Cancer statistics, 2021. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 71(1), 7\u201333. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3322\/caac.21654","journal-title":"CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians"},{"issue":"3","key":"4073_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"209","DOI":"10.3322\/caac.21660","volume":"71","author":"H Sung","year":"2021","unstructured":"Sung, H., Ferlay, J., Siegel, R. L., Laversanne, M., Soerjomataram, I., Jemal, A., & Bray, F. (2021). Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 71(3), 209\u2013249. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3322\/caac.21660","journal-title":"CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians"},{"issue":"5","key":"4073_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"365","DOI":"10.1093\/jnci\/85.5.365","volume":"85","author":"NK Aaronson","year":"1993","unstructured":"Aaronson, N. K., Ahmedzai, S., Bergman, B., Bullinger, M., Cull, A., Duez, N. J., Filiberti, A., Flechtner, H., Fleishman, S. B., de Haes, J. C., et al. (1993). The European organization for research and treatment of cancer QLQ-C30: A quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 85(5), 365\u2013376. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/jnci\/85.5.365","journal-title":"Journal of the National Cancer Institute"},{"issue":"3","key":"4073_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"625","DOI":"10.1007\/s11136-015-1217-y","volume":"25","author":"MT King","year":"2016","unstructured":"King, M. T., Costa, D. S., Aaronson, N. K., Brazier, J. E., Cella, D. F., Fayers, P. M., Grimison, P., Janda, M., Kemmler, G., Norman, R., Pickard, A. S., Rowen, D., Velikova, G., Young, T. A., & Viney, R. (2016). QLU-C10D: A health state classification system for a multi-attribute utility measure based on the EORTC QLQ-C30. Quality of Life Research, 25(3), 625\u2013636. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11136-015-1217-y","journal-title":"Quality of Life Research"},{"key":"4073_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"King, M. T., Viney, R., Simon Pickard, A., Rowen, D., Aaronson, N. K., Brazier, J. E., Cella, D., Costa, D. S. J., Fayers, P. M., Kemmler, G., McTaggart-Cowen, H., Mercieca-Bebber, R., Peacock, S., Street, D. J., Young, T. A., Norman, R., & Consortium, M. A. (2018). Australian Utility Weights for the EORTC QLU-C10D, a Multi-Attribute Utility Instrument Derived from the Cancer-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire, EORTC QLQ-C30. Pharmacoeconomics, 36(2), 225-238. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s40273-017-0582-5","DOI":"10.1007\/s40273-017-0582-5"},{"issue":"12","key":"4073_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3197","DOI":"10.1007\/s11136-019-02283-w","volume":"28","author":"G Kemmler","year":"2019","unstructured":"Kemmler, G., Gamper, E., Nerich, V., Norman, R., Viney, R., Holzner, B., King, M., European Organisation for, R., & Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life, G. (2019). German value sets for the EORTC QLU-C10D, a cancer-specific utility instrument based on the EORTC QLQ-C30. Quality of Life Research, 28(12), 3197\u20133211. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11136-019-02283-w","journal-title":"Quality of Life Research"},{"issue":"1","key":"4073_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/2381468319842532","volume":"4","author":"H McTaggart-Cowan","year":"2019","unstructured":"McTaggart-Cowan, H., King, M. T., Norman, R., Costa, D. S. J., Pickard, A. S., Regier, D. A., Viney, R., & Peacock, S. J. (2019). The EORTC QLU-C10D: The Canadian valuation study and algorithm to derive cancer-specific utilities from the EORTC QLQ-C30. MDM Policy & Practice, 4(1), Article 2381468319842532. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/2381468319842532","journal-title":"MDM Policy & Practice"},{"key":"4073_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Finch, A. P., Gamper, E., Norman, R., Viney, R., Holzner, B., King, M., Kemmler, G., & Group, E. Q. o. L. (2021). Estimation of an EORTC QLU-C10 Value Set for Spain Using a Discrete Choice Experiment. Pharmacoeconomics, 39(9), 1085-1098. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s40273-021-01058-x","DOI":"10.1007\/s40273-021-01058-x"},{"issue":"7","key":"4073_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2009","DOI":"10.1007\/s11136-021-02767-8","volume":"30","author":"F Jansen","year":"2021","unstructured":"Jansen, F., Verdonck-de Leeuw, I. M., Gamper, E., Norman, R., Holzner, B., King, M., European Organisation for, R., & Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life, G. (2021). Dutch utility weights for the EORTC cancer-specific utility instrument: the Dutch EORTC QLU-C10D. Quality of Life Research, 30(7), 2009\u20132019. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11136-021-02767-8","journal-title":"Quality of Life Research"},{"issue":"2","key":"4073_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"191","DOI":"10.1007\/s40258-020-00598-1","volume":"19","author":"V Nerich","year":"2021","unstructured":"Nerich, V., Gamper, E. M., Norman, R., King, M., Holzner, B., Viney, R., & Kemmler, G. (2021). French value-set of the QLU-C10D, a cancer-specific utility measure derived from the QLQ-C30. Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, 19(2), 191\u2013202. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s40258-020-00598-1","journal-title":"Applied Health Economics and Health Policy"},{"issue":"4","key":"4073_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"485","DOI":"10.1177\/0272989X211003569","volume":"41","author":"DA Revicki","year":"2021","unstructured":"Revicki, D. A., King, M. T., Viney, R., Pickard, A. S., Mercieca-Bebber, R., Shaw, J. W., Muller, F., & Norman, R. (2021). United States utility algorithm for the EORTC QLU-C10D, a multiattribute utility instrument based on a cancer-specific quality-of-life instrument. Medical Decision Making\u202f: An International Journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making, 41(4), 485\u2013501. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0272989X211003569","journal-title":"Medical Decision Making : An International Journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making"},{"key":"4073_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Lehmann, J., Rojas-Concha, L., Petersen, M. A., Holzner, B., Norman, R., King, M. T., Kemmler, G., & Group, E. Q. o. L. (2024). Danish value sets for the EORTC QLU-C10D utility instrument. Qual Life Res, 33(3), 831-841. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11136-023-03569-w.","DOI":"10.1007\/s11136-023-03569-w"},{"issue":"7","key":"4073_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1865","DOI":"10.1007\/s11136-024-03655-7","volume":"33","author":"T Shiroiwa","year":"2024","unstructured":"Shiroiwa, T., King, M. T., Norman, R., Muller, F., Campbell, R., Kemmler, G., Murata, T., Shimozuma, K., & Fukuda, T. (2024). Japanese value set for the EORTC QLU-C10D: A multi-attribute utility instrument based on the EORTC QLQ-C30 cancer-specific quality-of-life questionnaire. Quality of Life Research, 33(7), 1865\u20131879. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11136-024-03655-7","journal-title":"Quality of Life Research"},{"key":"4073_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s11136-024-03824-8","author":"G Rohde","year":"2024","unstructured":"Rohde, G., Lehmann, J., Pilz, M. J., Rojas-Concha, L., Holzner, B., King, M. T., Norman, R., & Kemmler, G. (2024). Norwegian and Swedish value sets for the EORTC QLU-C10D utility instrument. Quality of Life Research. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11136-024-03824-8","journal-title":"Quality of Life Research"},{"issue":"12","key":"4073_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1385","DOI":"10.1002\/hec.3950","volume":"28","author":"R Norman","year":"2019","unstructured":"Norman, R., Mercieca-Bebber, R., Rowen, D., Brazier, J. E., Cella, D., Pickard, A. S., Street, D. J., Viney, R., Revicki, D., & King, M. T. (2019). U.K. utility weights for the EORTC QLU-C10D. Health Economics, 28(12), 1385\u20131401. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/hec.3950","journal-title":"Health Economics"},{"issue":"9","key":"4073_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2485","DOI":"10.1007\/s11136-020-02536-z","volume":"29","author":"EM Gamper","year":"2020","unstructured":"Gamper, E. M., King, M. T., Norman, R., Efficace, F., Cottone, F., Holzner, B., & Kemmler, G. (2020). EORTC QLU-C10D value sets for Austria, Italy, and Poland. Quality of Life Research, 29(9), 2485\u20132495. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11136-020-02536-z","journal-title":"Quality of Life Research"},{"issue":"12","key":"4073_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3335","DOI":"10.1007\/s11136-024-03776-z","volume":"33","author":"Y Cao","year":"2024","unstructured":"Cao, Y., Xu, J., Norman, R., King, M. T., Kemmler, G., Huang, W., & Luo, N. (2024). Chinese utility weights for the EORTC cancer-specific utility instrument QLU-C10D. Quality of Life Research, 33(12), 3335\u20133349. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11136-024-03776-z","journal-title":"Quality of Life Research"},{"issue":"2","key":"4073_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"429","DOI":"10.1007\/s11136-024-03824-8","volume":"34","author":"G Rohde","year":"2025","unstructured":"Rohde, G., Lehmann, J., Pilz, M. J., Rojas-Concha, L., Holzner, B., King, M. T., Norman, R., & Kemmler, G. (2025). Norwegian and Swedish value sets for the EORTC QLU-C10D utility instrument. Quality of Life Research, 34(2), 429\u2013443. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11136-024-03824-8","journal-title":"Quality of Life Research"},{"issue":"12","key":"4073_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1413","DOI":"10.1007\/s40273-024-01432-5","volume":"42","author":"M Gandhi","year":"2024","unstructured":"Gandhi, M., Kanesvaran, R., Rashid, M., Chong, D. Q., Chay, W. Y., Tan, R. L., Norman, R., King, M. T., & Luo, N. (2024). Valuation of the EORTC quality of life utility core 10 dimensions (QLU-C10D) in a multi-ethnic Asian setting: How does having cancer matter? PharmacoEconomics, 42(12), 1413\u20131425. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s40273-024-01432-5","journal-title":"PharmacoEconomics"},{"issue":"5","key":"4073_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"373","DOI":"10.1007\/s40271-015-0118-z","volume":"8","author":"EW de Bekker-Grob","year":"2015","unstructured":"de Bekker-Grob, E. W., Donkers, B., Jonker, M. F., & Stolk, E. A. (2015). Sample size requirements for discrete-choice experiments in healthcare: A practical guide. Patient, 8(5), 373\u2013384. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s40271-015-0118-z","journal-title":"Patient"},{"issue":"1","key":"4073_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"66","DOI":"10.1186\/s12955-023-02150-w","volume":"21","author":"L Dou","year":"2023","unstructured":"Dou, L., Xu, Y., Chen, G., & Li, S. (2023). Psychometric properties and comparison of four health utility approaches among myopia patients in China. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 21(1), 66. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12955-023-02150-w","journal-title":"Health and Quality of Life Outcomes"},{"key":"4073_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.12688\/wellcomeopenres.17518.1","volume":"7","author":"PP Schneider","year":"2022","unstructured":"Schneider, P. P., van Hout, B., Heisen, M., Brazier, J., & Devlin, N. (2022). The online elicitation of personal utility functions (OPUF) tool: A new method for valuing health states. Wellcome Open Research, 7, Article 14. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.12688\/wellcomeopenres.17518.1","journal-title":"Wellcome Open Research"},{"issue":"6","key":"4073_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"503","DOI":"10.2165\/00019053-199507060-00005","volume":"7","author":"GW Torrance","year":"1995","unstructured":"Torrance, G. W., Furlong, W., Feeny, D., & Boyle, M. (1995). Multi-attribute preference functions. Health utilities index. PharmacoEconomics, 7(6), 503\u2013520. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2165\/00019053-199507060-00005","journal-title":"PharmacoEconomics"},{"key":"4073_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3390\/foods10020394","author":"CH Li","year":"2021","unstructured":"Li, C. H., Hsieh, C. H., Hung, C. C., & Cheng, C. W. (2021). Nondestructive detection of the gel state of preserved eggs based on dielectric impedance. Foods. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/foods10020394"},{"issue":"5","key":"4073_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"806","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jval.2013.03.1633","volume":"16","author":"S Robinson","year":"2013","unstructured":"Robinson, S., & Bryan, S. (2013). Does the process of deliberation change individuals\u2019 health state valuations? An exploratory study using the person trade-off technique. Value in Health, 16(5), 806\u2013813. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jval.2013.03.1633","journal-title":"Value in Health"},{"issue":"11","key":"4073_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1311","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jval.2019.07.013","volume":"22","author":"M Karimi","year":"2019","unstructured":"Karimi, M., Brazier, J., & Paisley, S. (2019). Effect of reflection and deliberation on health state values: A mixed-methods study. Value in Health, 22(11), 1311\u20131317. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jval.2019.07.013","journal-title":"Value in Health"},{"issue":"5","key":"4073_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"894","DOI":"10.1002\/hec.4805","volume":"33","author":"P Schneider","year":"2024","unstructured":"Schneider, P., Devlin, N., van Hout, B., & Brazier, J. (2024). Exploring health preference heterogeneity in the UK: Using the online elicitation of personal utility functions approach to construct EQ-5D-5L value functions on societal, group and individual level. Health Economics, 33(5), 894\u2013910. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/hec.4805","journal-title":"Health Economics"},{"issue":"22","key":"4073_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"5345","DOI":"10.1080\/09638288.2023.2297929","volume":"46","author":"N Bray","year":"2024","unstructured":"Bray, N., Tudor Edwards, R., & Schneider, P. (2024). Development of a value-based scoring system for the MobQoL-7D: A novel tool for measuring quality-adjusted life years in the context of mobility impairment. Disability and Rehabilitation, 46(22), 5345\u20135356. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/09638288.2023.2297929","journal-title":"Disability and Rehabilitation"},{"issue":"1","key":"4073_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"15","DOI":"10.2165\/11536960-000000000-00000","volume":"9","author":"J Ratcliffe","year":"2011","unstructured":"Ratcliffe, J., Couzner, L., Flynn, T., Sawyer, M., Stevens, K., Brazier, J., & Burgess, L. (2011). Valuing child health utility 9D health states with a young adolescent sample: A feasibility study to compare best-worst scaling discrete-choice experiment, standard gamble and time trade-off methods. Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, 9(1), 15\u201327. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2165\/11536960-000000000-00000","journal-title":"Applied Health Economics and Health Policy"},{"issue":"8","key":"4073_CR46","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"573","DOI":"10.7326\/0003-4819-147-8-200710160-00010","volume":"147","author":"E von Elm","year":"2007","unstructured":"von Elm, E., Altman, D. G., Egger, M., Pocock, S. J., G\u00f8tzsche, P. C., & Vandenbroucke, J. P. (2007). The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies. Annals of Internal Medicine, 147(8), 573\u2013577. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7326\/0003-4819-147-8-200710160-00010","journal-title":"Annals of Internal Medicine"},{"issue":"2","key":"4073_CR47","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"257","DOI":"10.1007\/s10198-018-0993-z","volume":"20","author":"NJ Devlin","year":"2019","unstructured":"Devlin, N. J., Shah, K. K., Mulhern, B. J., Pantiri, K., & van Hout, B. (2019). A new method for valuing health: Directly eliciting personal utility functions. European Journal of Health Economics, 20(2), 257\u2013270. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10198-018-0993-z","journal-title":"European Journal of Health Economics"},{"issue":"1","key":"4073_CR48","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"79","DOI":"10.1186\/s13561-024-00560-0","volume":"14","author":"Y Cao","year":"2024","unstructured":"Cao, Y., Li, H., Cheng, L. J., King, M. T., Kemmler, G., Cella, D., Yu, H., Huang, W., & Luo, N. (2024). A comparison of measurement properties between EORTC QLU-C10D and FACT-8D in patients with hematological malignances. Health Economics Review, 14(1), 79. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s13561-024-00560-0","journal-title":"Health Economics Review"},{"key":"4073_CR49","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.a752","volume":"337","author":"S Audrey","year":"2008","unstructured":"Audrey, S., Abel, J., Blazeby, J. M., Falk, S., & Campbell, R. (2008). What oncologists tell patients about survival benefits of palliative chemotherapy and implications for informed consent: Qualitative study. BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 337, Article a752. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmj.a752","journal-title":"BMJ (Clinical research ed.)"},{"issue":"9","key":"4073_CR50","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/s1470-2045(13)70290-0","volume":"14","author":"X Li","year":"2013","unstructured":"Li, X., Xing, Y. F., Chen, Z. H., Dong, M., & Wu, X. Y. (2013). Palliative care in urban areas of China. The Lancet Oncology, 14(9), Article e339. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/s1470-2045(13)70290-0","journal-title":"The Lancet Oncology"},{"issue":"9","key":"4073_CR51","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"4949","DOI":"10.1007\/s00520-021-06037-8","volume":"29","author":"X Liu","year":"2021","unstructured":"Liu, X., Liu, Z., Zheng, R., Li, W., Chen, Q., Cao, W., Li, R., & Ying, W. (2021). Exploring the needs and experiences of palliative home care from the perspectives of patients with advanced cancer in China: A qualitative study. Supportive Care In Cancer, 29(9), 4949\u20134956. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00520-021-06037-8","journal-title":"Supportive Care In Cancer"},{"issue":"3","key":"4073_CR52","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"376","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jval.2023.12.009","volume":"27","author":"P Schneider","year":"2024","unstructured":"Schneider, P., Blankart, K., Brazier, J., van Hout, B., & Devlin, N. (2024). Using the online elicitation of personal utility functions approach to derive a patient-based 5-level version of EQ-5D value set: A study in 122 patients with rheumatic diseases from Germany. Value in Health, 27(3), 376\u2013382. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jval.2023.12.009","journal-title":"Value in Health"},{"issue":"4","key":"4073_CR53","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"370","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1440-1673.2002.t01-1-01085.x","volume":"46","author":"KJ Ong","year":"2002","unstructured":"Ong, K. J., Back, M. F., Lu, J. J., Shakespeare, T. S., & Wynne, C. J. (2002). Cultural attitudes to cancer management in traditional South-East Asian patients. Australasian Radiology, 46(4), 370\u2013374. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1046\/j.1440-1673.2002.t01-1-01085.x","journal-title":"Australasian Radiology"},{"issue":"1","key":"4073_CR54","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"30","DOI":"10.1007\/s11013-012-9290-y","volume":"37","author":"V Scheid","year":"2013","unstructured":"Scheid, V. (2013). Depression, constraint, and the liver: (Dis)assembling the treatment of emotion-related disorders in Chinese medicine. Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry, 37(1), 30\u201358. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11013-012-9290-y","journal-title":"Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry"},{"issue":"10","key":"4073_CR55","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3390\/healthcare12101042","volume":"12","author":"C Wang","year":"2024","unstructured":"Wang, C., Qiu, X., Yang, X., Mao, J., & Li, Q. (2024). Factors influencing social isolation among cancer patients: A systematic review. Healthcare (Basel), 12(10), Article 1042. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/healthcare12101042","journal-title":"Healthcare (Basel)"},{"issue":"6","key":"4073_CR56","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"719","DOI":"10.1089\/jpm.2009.0337","volume":"13","author":"JD Parr","year":"2010","unstructured":"Parr, J. D., Zhang, B., Nilsson, M. E., Wright, A., Balboni, T., Duthie, E., Paulk, E., & Prigerson, H. G. (2010). The influence of age on the likelihood of receiving end-of-life care consistent with patient treatment preferences. Journal of Palliative Medicine, 13(6), 719\u2013726. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1089\/jpm.2009.0337","journal-title":"Journal of Palliative Medicine"},{"key":"4073_CR57","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eclinm.2022.101405","volume":"47","author":"SA Alessy","year":"2022","unstructured":"Alessy, S. A., Alhajji, M., Rawlinson, J., Baker, M., & Davies, E. A. (2022). Factors influencing cancer patients\u2019 experiences of care in the USA, United Kingdom, and Canada: A systematic review. EClinicalMedicine, 47, Article 101405. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.eclinm.2022.101405","journal-title":"EClinicalMedicine"},{"issue":"1","key":"4073_CR58","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"43","DOI":"10.1007\/s40273-022-01198-8","volume":"41","author":"S Jiang","year":"2023","unstructured":"Jiang, S., Ren, R., Gu, Y., Jeet, V., Liu, P., & Li, S. (2023). Patient preferences in targeted pharmacotherapy for cancers: A systematic review of discrete choice experiments. PharmacoEconomics, 41(1), 43\u201357. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s40273-022-01198-8","journal-title":"PharmacoEconomics"}],"container-title":["Quality of Life Research"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11136-025-04073-z.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s11136-025-04073-z\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11136-025-04073-z.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,6]],"date-time":"2025-12-06T12:41:55Z","timestamp":1765024915000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s11136-025-04073-z"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,10]]},"references-count":58,"journal-issue":{"issue":"11","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,11]]}},"alternative-id":["4073"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11136-025-04073-z","relation":{"references":[{"id-type":"doi","id":"10.3390\/foods10020394","asserted-by":"subject"}]},"ISSN":["0962-9343","1573-2649"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0962-9343","type":"print"},{"value":"1573-2649","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,10]]},"assertion":[{"value":"21 May 2025","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"11 September 2025","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"10 October 2025","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}},{"value":"The protocol of this cohort study received approval from the Ethics Committee of Harbin Medical University (HMUIRB2023005) and was conducted in accordance with the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethical approval"}},{"value":"All individuals provided the informed consent in current study.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent to participate"}},{"value":"Not applicable.","order":5,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent for publication"}}]}}