{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,17]],"date-time":"2026-09-17T12:02:02Z","timestamp":1789646522942,"version":"4.0.0"},"reference-count":41,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"9","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,22]],"date-time":"2026-08-22T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1787356800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,22]],"date-time":"2026-08-22T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1787356800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"name":"European Commision","award":["101132847"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["101132847"]}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Qual Life Res"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,9]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Purpose<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are increasingly used in oncology to support patient-centered care, yet their implementation in routine practice remains inconsistent. Using a communication-centered perspective which conceptualizes PROMs implementation as a process of meaning exchange between patients, clinicians, and implementation staff, this study examined PROMs implementation as a multi-stage process and explored how it unfolds in real-life oncology care, drawing on both patient and healthcare professional perspectives.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      A qualitative interview study was conducted in the Netherlands with patients with cancer (\n                      <jats:italic>n<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009=\u200910) and healthcare professionals and implementation staff in oncology care (\n                      <jats:italic>n<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009=\u20097). Semi-structured interviews were informed by a communication-centered framework conceptualizing PROMs implementation as a multi-stage process. Data were analyzed using hybrid inductive-deductive thematic analysis.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Six interrelated stages of PROMs implementation were identified: (1) selecting and organizing PROMs use, (2) establishing purpose and motivation, (3) experiencing PROMs as a task, (4) making sense of results together, (5) applying PROMs information in care, and (6) evaluating and improving PROMs implementation. Findings showed that experiences at different stages were interconnected: processes occurring earlier in the implementation influence how PROMs were later understood, discussed, and used in care. Across roles, participants recognized PROMs\u2019 potential to support communication beyond clinical indicators, while also describing frustration when PROMs were collected but not meaningfully used. Patient and clinician engagement influenced one another across stages, reflecting the reciprocal nature of PROMs as a communication tool.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>PROMs implementation should be viewed as an interdependent, sequential process. Improving connections between stages is essential to realizing PROMs\u2019 communicative and patient-centered potential in oncology care. Practical strategies such as personalizing PROMs invitations, completing the feedback loop between PROMs results and patients, and integrating supportive tools for clinicians can help translate PROMs data into meaningful patient-centered dialogue.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1007\/s11136-026-04378-7","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,22]],"date-time":"2026-08-22T14:09:17Z","timestamp":1787407757000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Implementation of patient-reported outcome measures in oncology practice: a communication-centered qualitative study on patient and healthcare professional perspectives"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"35","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-6593-1661","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Linwei","family":"He","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0003-1603-2568","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Anouk E. W.","family":"Teunissen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-6895-9512","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Nadine","family":"Bol","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-9218-617X","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Kelly M.","family":"de Ligt","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-6304-7549","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Emiel","family":"Krahmer","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,22]]},"reference":[{"key":"4378_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"967","DOI":"10.1111\/sms.13892","volume":"31","author":"MR Krogsgaard","year":"2021","unstructured":"Krogsgaard, M. R., Brodersen, J., Christensen, K. B., Siersma, V., Kreiner, S., Jensen, J., Hansen, C. F., & Comins, J. D. (2021). What is a PROM and why do we need it? Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports, 31, 967\u2013971.","journal-title":"Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports"},{"key":"4378_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"146","DOI":"10.12968\/bjcn.2011.16.3.146","volume":"16","author":"KA Meadows","year":"2011","unstructured":"Meadows, K. A. (2011). Patient-reported outcome measures: An overview. British Journal of Community Nursing, 16, 146\u2013151.","journal-title":"British Journal Of Community Nursing"},{"key":"4378_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"233","DOI":"10.2147\/PROM.S156291","volume":"10","author":"J Field","year":"2019","unstructured":"Field, J., Holmes, M. M., & Newell, D. (2019). PROMs data: Can it be used to make decisions for individual patients? A narrative review. Patient Related Outcome Measures, 10, 233\u2013241.","journal-title":"Patient Related Outcome Measures"},{"key":"4378_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"001","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjspcare-2016-001137","volume":"7","author":"R Adam","year":"2017","unstructured":"Adam, R., Burton, C. D., Bond, C. M., De Bruin, M., & Murchie, P. (2017). Can patient-reported measurements of pain be used to improve cancer pain management? A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care, 7, 001\u2013000.","journal-title":"BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care"},{"key":"4378_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"559","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2753.2006.00650.x","volume":"12","author":"S Marshall","year":"2006","unstructured":"Marshall, S., Haywood, K., & Fitzpatrick, R. (2006). Impact of patient-reported outcome measures on routine practice: A structured review. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 12, 559\u2013568.","journal-title":"Journal Of Evaluation In Clinical Practice"},{"key":"4378_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"S73","DOI":"10.1097\/MLR.0b013e31829b1d84","volume":"51","author":"CF Snyder","year":"2013","unstructured":"Snyder, C. F., Jensen, R. E., Segal, J. B., & Wu, A. W. (2013). Patient-reported outcomes (PROs): Putting the patient perspective in patient-centered outcomes research. Medical Care, 51, S73.","journal-title":"Medical Care"},{"key":"4378_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"127","DOI":"10.1111\/tbj.12707","volume":"23","author":"SH Javid","year":"2017","unstructured":"Javid, S. H., Lawrence, S. O., & Lavallee, D. C. (2017). Prioritizing patient-reported outcomes in breast cancer surgery quality improvement. The Breast Journal, 23, 127\u2013137.","journal-title":"The Breast Journal"},{"issue":"1","key":"4378_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"87","DOI":"10.1186\/s12913-018-2898-z","volume":"18","author":"B Prodinger","year":"2018","unstructured":"Prodinger, B., & Taylor, P. (2018). Improving quality of care through patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs): Expert interviews using the NHS PROMs programme and the Swedish quality registers for knee and hip arthroplasty as examples. BMC Health Services Research, 18, 87.","journal-title":"BMC Health Services Research"},{"key":"4378_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s41687-018-0061-6","volume":"2","author":"J Greenhalgh","year":"2018","unstructured":"Greenhalgh, J., Gooding, K., Gibbons, E., Dalkin, S., Wright, J., Valderas, J., & Black, N. (2018). How do patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) support clinician-patient communication and patient care? A realist synthesis. Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, 2, Article 42.","journal-title":"Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes"},{"key":"4378_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"ii28","DOI":"10.1093\/intqhc\/mzz084","volume":"34","author":"D Roe","year":"2022","unstructured":"Roe, D., Mazor, Y., & Gelkopf, M. (2022). Patient-reported outcome measurements (PROMs) and provider assessment in mental health: A systematic review of the context of implementation. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 34, ii28\u2013ii39.","journal-title":"International Journal for Quality in Health Care"},{"key":"4378_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"85","DOI":"10.1097\/SLA.0000000000005029","volume":"275","author":"C Sokas","year":"2022","unstructured":"Sokas, C., Hu, F., Edelen, M., Sisodia, R., Pusic, A., & Cooper, Z. (2022). A review of PROM implementation in surgical practice. Annals of Surgery, 275, 85.","journal-title":"Annals of Surgery"},{"key":"4378_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"281","DOI":"10.1007\/s11136-023-03505-y","volume":"33","author":"E Unni","year":"2024","unstructured":"Unni, E., Coles, T., Lavallee, D. C., Freel, J., Roberts, N., & Absolom, K. (2024). Patient adherence to patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) completion in clinical care: Current understanding and future recommendations. Quality of Life Research, 33, 281\u2013290.","journal-title":"Quality of Life Research"},{"key":"4378_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"74","DOI":"10.1186\/s41687-019-0166-6","volume":"3","author":"S Thestrup Hansen","year":"2019","unstructured":"Thestrup Hansen, S., Kjerholt, M., Friis Christensen, S., H\u00f8lge-Hazelton, B., & Brodersen, J. (2019). Haematologists\u2019 experiences implementing patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) in an outpatient clinic: A qualitative study for applied practice. Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, 3, 74.","journal-title":"Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes"},{"key":"4378_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3027","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.288.23.3027","volume":"288","author":"SB Detmar","year":"2002","unstructured":"Detmar, S. B., Muller, M. J., Schornagel, J. H., Wever, L. D., & Aaronson, N. K. (2002). Health-related quality-of-life assessments and patient-physician communicationa randomized controlled trial. Journal of the American Medical Association, 288, 3027\u20133034.","journal-title":"Journal of the American Medical Association"},{"key":"4378_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"186","DOI":"10.1002\/jmrs.421","volume":"68","author":"H Nguyen","year":"2021","unstructured":"Nguyen, H., Butow, P., Dhillon, H., & Sundaresan, P. (2021). A review of the barriers to using patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in routine cancer care. Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences, 68, 186\u2013195.","journal-title":"Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences"},{"key":"4378_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1305","DOI":"10.1007\/s11136-011-0054-x","volume":"21","author":"CF Snyder","year":"2012","unstructured":"Snyder, C. F., Aaronson, N. K., Choucair, A. K., Elliott, T. E., Greenhalgh, J., Halyard, M. Y., Hess, R., Miller, D. M., Reeve, B. B., & Santana, M. (2012). Implementing patient-reported outcomes assessment in clinical practice: A review of the options and considerations. Quality of Life Research, 21, 1305\u20131314.","journal-title":"Quality of Life Research"},{"key":"4378_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e602","DOI":"10.1200\/JOP.18.00088","volume":"14","author":"B Zhang","year":"2018","unstructured":"Zhang, B., Lloyd, W., Jahanzeb, M., & Hassett, M. J. (2018). Use of patient-reported outcome measures in Quality Oncology Practice Initiative\u2013registered practices: Results of a national survey. Journal of Oncology Practice, 14, e602\u2013e611.","journal-title":"Journal of Oncology Practice"},{"issue":"24","key":"4378_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e97","DOI":"10.2106\/jbjs.20.02072","volume":"103","author":"PD Franklin","year":"2021","unstructured":"Franklin, P. D., Bond, C. P., Rothrock, N. E., & Cella, D. (2021). Strategies for effective implementation of patient-reported outcome measures in arthroplasty practice. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 103, e97.","journal-title":"Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery"},{"key":"4378_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2196\/60777","volume":"27","author":"KM De Ligt","year":"2025","unstructured":"de Ligt, K. M., Hommes, S., Vromans, R. D., Boomstra, E., van de Poll, L. V., & Krahmer, E. J. (2025). Improving the implementation of patient-reported outcome measure in clinical practice: Tackling current challenges with innovative digital communication technologies. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 27, Article e60777.","journal-title":"Journal of Medical Internet Research"},{"key":"4378_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"133","DOI":"10.2147\/PROM.S129012","volume":"8","author":"SN Rogers","year":"2017","unstructured":"Rogers, S. N., & Barber, B. (2017). Using PROMs to guide patients and practitioners through the head and neck cancer journey. Patient Relat Outcome Meas, 8, 133\u2013142.","journal-title":"Patient Relat Outcome Meas"},{"issue":"9","key":"4378_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2265","DOI":"10.1007\/s11136-013-0390-0","volume":"22","author":"MB Boyce","year":"2013","unstructured":"Boyce, M. B., & Browne, J. P. (2013). Does providing feedback on patient-reported outcomes to healthcare professionals result in better outcomes for patients? A systematic review. Quality of Life Research, 22(9), 2265\u20132278.","journal-title":"Quality of Life Research"},{"issue":"4","key":"4378_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"714","DOI":"10.1200\/JCO.2004.06.078","volume":"22","author":"G Velikova","year":"2004","unstructured":"Velikova, G., Booth, L., Smith, A. B., Brown, P. M., Lynch, P., Brown, J. M., & Selby, P. J. (2004). Measuring quality of life in routine oncology practice improves communication and patient well-being: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 22(4), 714\u2013724.","journal-title":"Journal of clinical oncology"},{"key":"4378_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1245","DOI":"10.1097\/ACM.0000000000000388","volume":"89","author":"BC O\u2019Brien","year":"2014","unstructured":"O\u2019brien, B. C., Harris, I. B., Beckman, T. J., Reed, D. A., & Cook, D. A. (2014). Standards for reporting qualitative research: A synthesis of recommendations. Academic Medicine, 89, 1245.","journal-title":"Academic Medicine"},{"key":"4378_CR24","volume-title":"The structure and function of communication in society","author":"HD Lasswell","year":"1948","unstructured":"Lasswell, H. D. (1948). The structure and function of communication in society. Harper."},{"key":"4378_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1753","DOI":"10.1177\/1049732315617444","volume":"26","author":"K Malterud","year":"2016","unstructured":"Malterud, K., Siersma, V. D., & Guassora, A. D. (2016). Sample size in qualitative interview studies: Guided by information power. Qualitative Health Research, 26, 1753\u20131760.","journal-title":"Qualitative Health Research"},{"key":"4378_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"77","DOI":"10.1191\/1478088706qp063oa","volume":"3","author":"V Braun","year":"2006","unstructured":"Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77\u2013101.","journal-title":"Qualitative Research in Psychology"},{"key":"4378_CR27","first-page":"65","volume-title":"APA handbook of research methods in psychology: Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological","author":"V Braun","year":"2023","unstructured":"Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2023). Thematic analysis. In H. Cooper, M. N. Coutanche, L. M. McMullen, A. T. Panter, D. Rindskopf, & K. J. Sher (Eds.), APA handbook of research methods in psychology: Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological (2nd ed., pp. 65\u201381). American Psychological Association.","edition":"2nd ed."},{"key":"4378_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"80","DOI":"10.1177\/160940690600500107","volume":"5","author":"J Fereday","year":"2006","unstructured":"Fereday, J., & Muir-Cochrane, E. (2006). Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5, 80\u201392.","journal-title":"International Journal of Qualitative Methods"},{"key":"4378_CR29","unstructured":"ATLAS.ti Scientific Software Development (2024). ATLAS.ti (Version 26) [Computer software]. https:\/\/atlasti.com"},{"key":"4378_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"E268","DOI":"10.1097\/NCC.0000000000001120","volume":"46","author":"TS Sk\u00e5re","year":"2023","unstructured":"Sk\u00e5re, T. S., Midtbust, M. H., Lund, J. \u00c5., Kaasa, S., & Dreyer, A. (2023). Barriers and facilitators when implementing electronic patient-reported outcome measures at a municipal cancer care unit: A qualitative study. Cancer Nursing, 46, E268\u2013E275.","journal-title":"Cancer Nursing"},{"key":"4378_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2196\/15856","volume":"21","author":"NHI Hjollund","year":"2019","unstructured":"Hjollund, N. H. I. (2019). Fifteen years\u2019 use of patient-reported outcome measures at the group and patient levels: Trend analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 21, Article e15856.","journal-title":"Journal of Medical Internet Research"},{"key":"4378_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"41","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jhsg.2024.09.009","volume":"7","author":"S Choo","year":"2025","unstructured":"Choo, S., Parola, R., Kirby, B., & London, D. A. (2025). The use of patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice: A national survey of hand surgeons. Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online, 7, 41\u201347.","journal-title":"Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online"},{"key":"4378_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s41687-018-0061-6","volume":"2","author":"J Greenhalgh","year":"2018","unstructured":"Greenhalgh, J., Gooding, K., Gibbons, E., Dalkin, S., Wright, J., Valderas, J., & Black, N. (2018). How do patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) support clinician-patient communication and patient care? A realist synthesis. Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, 2, Article 42.","journal-title":"Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes"},{"key":"4378_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"S23","DOI":"10.1017\/S0317167100001906","volume":"29","author":"SM Kurtz","year":"2002","unstructured":"Kurtz, S. M. (2002). Doctor-patient communication: Principles and practices. Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences, 29, S23\u2013S29.","journal-title":"Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences"},{"key":"4378_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"358","DOI":"10.1080\/10401334.2013.827981","volume":"25","author":"P Duke","year":"2013","unstructured":"Duke, P., Frankel, R. M., & Reis, S. (2013). How to integrate the electronic health record and patient-centered communication into the medical visit: A skills-based approach. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 25, 358\u2013365.","journal-title":"Teaching and Learning in Medicine"},{"key":"4378_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0267030","volume":"17","author":"L Carfora","year":"2022","unstructured":"Carfora, L., Foley, C. M., Hagi-Diakou, P., Lesty, P. J., Sandstrom, M. L., Ramsey, I., & Kumar, S. (2022). Patients\u2019 experiences and perspectives of patient-reported outcome measures in clinical care: A systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis. PLoS One, 17, Article e0267030.","journal-title":"PLoS One"},{"key":"4378_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1822","DOI":"10.3899\/jrheum.200232","volume":"47","author":"S Kasturi","year":"2020","unstructured":"Kasturi, S., Wong, J. B., Mandl, L. A., McAlindon, T. E., & LeClair, A. (2020). \u201cUnspoken questions\u201d: A qualitative study of rheumatologists\u2019 perspectives on the clinical implementation of patient-reported outcome measures. Journal of Rheumatology, 47, 1822\u20131830.","journal-title":"Journal of Rheumatology"},{"key":"4378_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"15","DOI":"10.1186\/s12955-025-02333-7","volume":"23","author":"C Amat-Fernandez","year":"2025","unstructured":"Amat-Fernandez, C., Pardo, Y., Ferrer, M., Bosch, G., Lizano-Barrantes, C., Brise\u00f1o-Diaz, R., Vernet-Tomas, M., Fumad\u00f3, L., Beisani, M., Redondo-Pach\u00f3n, D., & Bach-Pascual, A. (2025). Evaluating the implementation of PROMs and PREMs in routine clinical care: Co-design of tools from the perspective of patients and healthcare professionals. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 23, 15.","journal-title":"Health and Quality of Life Outcomes"},{"key":"4378_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2013-003968","volume":"4","author":"M Peters","year":"2014","unstructured":"Peters, M., Crocker, H., Jenkinson, C., Doll, H., & Fitzpatrick, R. (2014). The routine collection of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for long-term conditions in primary care: A cohort survey. BMJ Open, 4, Article e003968.","journal-title":"BMJ Open"},{"key":"4378_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"619","DOI":"10.1007\/s11136-023-03552-5","volume":"33","author":"K Naude","year":"2024","unstructured":"Naude, K., Andrew, N. E., Srikanth, V., Parker, E., Marsh, L., Beare, R., McNaney, R., & Snowdon, D. A. (2024). Using a multi-stakeholder co-design process to develop a health service organisation-wide patient reported outcome measure collection system. Quality of Life Research, 33, 619\u2013636.","journal-title":"Quality of Life Research"},{"key":"4378_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"37","DOI":"10.1186\/s12955-025-02365-z","volume":"23","author":"Z W\u00f3jcik","year":"2025","unstructured":"W\u00f3jcik, Z., Dimitrova, V., Warrington, L., Velikova, G., & Absolom, K. (2025). Using artificial intelligence to predict patient outcomes from patient-reported outcome measures: A scoping review. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 23, 37.","journal-title":"Health and Quality of Life Outcomes"}],"container-title":["Quality of Life Research"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11136-026-04378-7.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s11136-026-04378-7","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11136-026-04378-7.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,17]],"date-time":"2026-09-17T11:05:14Z","timestamp":1789643114000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s11136-026-04378-7"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,22]]},"references-count":41,"journal-issue":{"issue":"9","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,9]]}},"alternative-id":["4378"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11136-026-04378-7","relation":{},"ISSN":["0962-9343","1573-2649"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0962-9343","type":"print"},{"value":"1573-2649","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,22]]},"assertion":[{"value":"20 February 2026","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"12 August 2026","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"22 August 2026","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"Ethics approval was obtained from the Research Ethics and Data Management Committee of the Tilburg School of Humanities and Digital Sciences (identification code REDC 2024.83), and the study was conducted in compliance with the ethical and data management regulations of the school. Written consent was obtained from individual participants included in this study.","order":1,"name":"Ethics","label":"Ethics approval and consent to participate","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"Participants provided informed consent for publication of the pseudonymized interview data.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","label":"Consent for publication","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing interests.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","label":"Competing interests","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}}],"article-number":"267"}}