{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,20]],"date-time":"2026-10-20T18:39:32Z","timestamp":1792521572172,"version":"4.5.0"},"reference-count":62,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"8","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,20]],"date-time":"2026-10-20T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1792454400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,20]],"date-time":"2026-10-20T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1792454400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Trop Anim Health Prod"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,11]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>This study investigated South African consumers\u2019, farmers\u2019, and industry stakeholders\u2019 perceptions of ostrich welfare using a questionnaire distributed nationwide between September 2018 and September 2019. The survey included demographic questions and assessed knowledge of ostrich husbandry, welfare priorities, and purchasing behaviors. A total of 302 participants completed the questionnaire. A Principal Component Analysis identified three principal components that explained 49.5% of the total variance: ostrich welfare priorities, knowledge of ostrich production and management, and health and ethical considerations in ostrich farming. Welfare priorities and knowledge levels were influenced by demographic factors, with farmers consistently scoring the highest on knowledge and consumers the lowest. All participants reported a modest understanding of husbandry practices but placed a high importance on welfare-related factors such as feeding, housing, health, and minimizing pain and stress. Although most participants preferred welfare-conscious products, their willingness to pay a premium was low. These findings highlight a strong welfare orientation across groups but reveal knowledge gaps and an attitude\u2013behavior gap, suggesting opportunities for targeted education, improved industry awareness and transparency, and welfare-focused product communication.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1007\/s11250-026-05422-x","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,20]],"date-time":"2026-10-20T17:49:38Z","timestamp":1792518578000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Perceptions of ostrich welfare and ethical practices: insights from consumers, farmers and stakeholders"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"58","author":[{"given":"Maud","family":"Bonato","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Monique","family":"Dawson","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Anel","family":"Engelbrecht","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Schalk W.P.","family":"Cloete","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,20]]},"reference":[{"issue":"3","key":"5422_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"385","DOI":"10.3390\/ani10030385","volume":"10","author":"ME Alonso","year":"2020","unstructured":"Alonso ME, Gonz\u00e1lez-Monta\u00f1a JR, Lomillos JM (2020) Consumers\u2019 concerns and perceptions of farm animal welfare. Animals 10(3):385. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/ani10030385","journal-title":"Animals"},{"issue":"1","key":"5422_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"211","DOI":"10.1111\/joca.12092","volume":"51","author":"J Aschemann-Witzel","year":"2017","unstructured":"Aschemann-Witzel J, Zielke S (2017) Can\u2019t buy me green? A review of consumer perceptions of and behavior toward the price of organic food. J Consum Aff 51(1):211\u2013251. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/joca.12092","journal-title":"J Consum Aff"},{"key":"5422_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"296","DOI":"10.3382\/ps.2013-03417","volume":"93","author":"M Bejaei","year":"2014","unstructured":"Bejaei M, Cheng KM (2014) A survey of current ostrich handling and transport practices in North America with reference to ostrich welfare and transportation guidelines set up in other countries. Poult Sci 93:296\u2013306","journal-title":"Poult Sci"},{"key":"5422_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"413","DOI":"10.3389\/fvets.2019.00413","volume":"6","author":"C Bir","year":"2019","unstructured":"Bir C, Davis M, Widmar N, Zuelly S, Erasmus M (2019) Perceptions of animal welfare with a special focus on turkeys. Front Veterinary Sci 6:413. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fvets.2019.00413","journal-title":"Front Veterinary Sci"},{"key":"5422_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"13","DOI":"10.1016\/j.livsci.2006.02.010","volume":"104","author":"BK Boogaard","year":"2006","unstructured":"Boogaard BK, Oosting SJ, Bock BB (2006) Elements of societal perception of farm animal welfare: a quantitative study in the Netherlands. Livest Sci 104:13\u201322","journal-title":"Livest Sci"},{"issue":"9","key":"5422_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1458","DOI":"10.1017\/S1751731111000371","volume":"5","author":"BK Boogaard","year":"2011","unstructured":"Boogaard BK, Oosting SJ, Bock BB, Wiskerke JSC (2011) The sociocultural sustainability of livestock farming: an inquiry into social perceptions of dairy farming. Animal 5(9):1458\u20131466","journal-title":"Animal"},{"issue":"4","key":"5422_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"363","DOI":"10.1017\/S0962728600000762","volume":"18","author":"R Botreau","year":"2009","unstructured":"Botreau R, Veissier I, Perny P (2009) Overall assessment of animal welfare: strategy adopted in Welfare Quality\u00ae. Anim Welf 18(4):363\u2013370. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/S0962728600000762","journal-title":"Anim Welf"},{"key":"5422_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"198","DOI":"10.1016\/j.appet.2024.107331","volume":"1","author":"EP Bouwman","year":"2024","unstructured":"Bouwman EP, Galama J, Onwezen MC (2024) Unravelling consumer acceptance of local food: Physical versus social distance and the important role of social identification. Appetite 1:198. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.appet.2024.107331","journal-title":"Appetite"},{"key":"5422_CR9","volume-title":"Report of the Technical Committee to enquire into the welfare of animals kept under intensive livestock husbandry systems. Cmnd. 2836","author":"FWR Brambell","year":"1965","unstructured":"Brambell FWR (1965) Report of the Technical Committee to enquire into the welfare of animals kept under intensive livestock husbandry systems. Cmnd. 2836. Her Majesty\u2019s Stationery Office, London"},{"key":"5422_CR10","first-page":"1","volume":"4","author":"TS Brand","year":"2011","unstructured":"Brand TS, Jordaan JW (2011) The contribution of the South African ostrich industry to the national economy. Appl Anim Husb Rural Dev 4:1\u20137","journal-title":"Appl Anim Husb Rural Dev"},{"key":"5422_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"121","DOI":"10.1007\/s10441-011-9123-3","volume":"59","author":"DM Broom","year":"2011","unstructured":"Broom DM (2011) A history of animal welfare science. Acta Biotheor 59:121\u2013137","journal-title":"Acta Biotheor"},{"key":"5422_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Chen M, Lee H, Liu Y, Weary DM (2024) Suppliers\u2019 perspectives on cage-free eggs in China. Animals 30(11). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/ani14111625","DOI":"10.3390\/ani14111625"},{"key":"5422_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"455","DOI":"10.1007\/s10806-016-9615-x","volume":"29","author":"B Clark","year":"2016","unstructured":"Clark B, Stewart GB, Panzone LA, Kyriazakis I, Frewer LJ (2016) A systematic review of public attitudes, perceptions and behaviours towards production diseases associated with farm animal welfare. J Agric Environ Ethics 29:455\u2013478","journal-title":"J Agric Environ Ethics"},{"key":"5422_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1238852","DOI":"10.3389\/fvets.2023.1238852","volume":"10","author":"N \u010cobanovi\u0107","year":"2023","unstructured":"\u010cobanovi\u0107 N, Magrin L (2023) Health and welfare problems of farm animals: prevalence, risk factors, consequences and possible prevention solutions. Front Veterinary Sci 10:1238852. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fvets.2023.1238852","journal-title":"Front Veterinary Sci"},{"key":"5422_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1017\/S0022029925101398","volume":"24","author":"M C\u00f3rdoba","year":"2025","unstructured":"C\u00f3rdoba M, Alesso A, Lazzarini B, Demarchi E, Vargas-Bello-P\u00e9rez E, Baudracco J (2025) Consumer perceptions, knowledge and preferences on animal welfare in grazing and confined dairy systems. J Dairy Res 24:1\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/S0022029925101398","journal-title":"J Dairy Res"},{"key":"5422_CR44","volume-title":"R: A language and environment for statistical computing","author":"R Core Team","year":"2025","unstructured":"Core Team R (2025) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria"},{"key":"5422_CR16","unstructured":"Department of Agriculture, Land Reform and Rural Development (DALRRD) (2021) A profile of the South African ostrich market value chain. Pretoria, South Africa. Available on: http:\/\/webapps1.daff.gov.za\/AmisAdmin\/upload\/Ostrich%20Market%20Value%20Chain%20Profile%202021.pdf, [Accessed 5 March 2026]"},{"key":"5422_CR17","volume-title":"Ostrich protocol, edition 01","author":"Department of Agriculture, Republic of South Africa (DoA)","year":"2006","unstructured":"Department of Agriculture, Republic of South Africa (DoA) (2006) Ostrich protocol, edition 01. Animal Health, Pretoria, Directorate"},{"issue":"3","key":"5422_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"537","DOI":"10.1017\/S1074070800027061","volume":"37","author":"DL Dickinson","year":"2005","unstructured":"Dickinson DL, Von Bailey D (2005) Experimental evidence on willingness to pay for red meat traceability in the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, and Japan. J Agric Appl Econ 37(3):537\u2013548. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/S1074070800027061","journal-title":"J Agric Appl Econ"},{"key":"5422_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Erian I, Phillips CJC (2017) Public understanding and attitudes towards meat: chicken production and relations to consumption. Animals (Basel). 7(3):20","DOI":"10.3390\/ani7030020"},{"key":"5422_CR100","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Erian I, Sinclair M, Phillips CJC (2019) Knowledge of stakeholders in the livestock industries of east and southeast asia about welfare during transport and slaughter and its relation to their attitudes to improving animal welfare. Animals 9(3):99. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/ani9030099","DOI":"10.3390\/ani9030099"},{"key":"5422_CR21","unstructured":"Press Farm Animal Welfare Council (FAWC), Statement (1979) December 5, 1979. Available on: https:\/\/webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk\/ukgwa\/20121007104210\/http:\/www.fawc.org.uk\/pdf\/fivefreedoms1979.pdf [Accessed 7 July 2026]"},{"issue":"23","key":"5422_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"16372","DOI":"10.3390\/ijerph192316372","volume":"19","author":"RP Fonseca","year":"2022","unstructured":"Fonseca RP, Sanchez-Sabate R (2022) Consumers\u2019 attitudes towards animal suffering: a systematic review on awareness, willingness and dietary change. Int J Environ Res Public Health 19(23):16372. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/ijerph192316372","journal-title":"Int J Environ Res Public Health"},{"key":"5422_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"171","DOI":"10.1016\/S0168-1591(99)00090-8","volume":"65","author":"D Fraser","year":"1999","unstructured":"Fraser D (1999) Animal ethics and animal welfare science: Bridging the two cultures. Appl Anim Behav Sci 65:171\u2013189","journal-title":"Appl Anim Behav Sci"},{"key":"5422_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"13581","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-023-40348-6","volume":"13","author":"J Gao","year":"2023","unstructured":"Gao J, Wei H (2023) Supply chain management with uncertainty in consumer perception of product greenness under an eco-label policy. Sci Rep 13:13581. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41598-023-40348-6","journal-title":"Sci Rep"},{"issue":"23","key":"5422_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"4201","DOI":"10.3390\/foods12234201","volume":"12","author":"C Giannetto","year":"2023","unstructured":"Giannetto C, Biondi V, Previti A, De Pascale A, Monti S, Alibrandi A, Zirilli A, Lanfranchi M, Pugliese M, Passantino A (2023) Willingness to pay a higher price for pork obtained using animal-friendly raising techniques: a consumers\u2019 opinion survey. Foods 12(23):4201. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/foods12234201","journal-title":"Foods"},{"key":"5422_CR26","unstructured":"Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE (2019) Multivariate data analysis, 8th edn. Cengage Learning"},{"key":"5422_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"107533","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ecolecon.2022.107533","volume":"200","author":"V Hasanzade","year":"2022","unstructured":"Hasanzade V, Elshiewy O, Toporowski W (2022) Is it just the distance? Consumer preference for geographical and social proximity of food production. Ecol Econ 200:107533. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ecolecon.2022.107533","journal-title":"Ecol Econ"},{"key":"5422_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"252","DOI":"10.1017\/S0029665120007971","volume":"80","author":"M Henchion","year":"2021","unstructured":"Henchion M, Zimmermann J (2021) Animal food products: policy, market and social issues and their influence on demand and supply of meat. Proc Nutr Soc 80:252\u2013263. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/S0029665120007971","journal-title":"Proc Nutr Soc"},{"key":"5422_CR29","first-page":"496","volume":"44","author":"CJ Hewson","year":"2003","unstructured":"Hewson CJ (2003) What is animal welfare? Common definitions and their practical consequences. Can Vet J 44:496\u2013499","journal-title":"Can Vet J"},{"issue":"6","key":"5422_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1869","DOI":"10.1016\/j.csda.2011.11.012","volume":"56","author":"J Josse","year":"2012","unstructured":"Josse J, Husson F (2012) Selecting the number of components in principal component analysis using cross-validation approximations. Comput Stat Data Anal 56(6):1869\u20131879","journal-title":"Comput Stat Data Anal"},{"issue":"1","key":"5422_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.18637\/jss.v070.i01","volume":"70","author":"J Josse","year":"2016","unstructured":"Josse J, Husson F (2016) missMDA: A package for handling missing values in multivariate data analysis. J Stat Softw 70(1):1\u201331","journal-title":"J Stat Softw"},{"key":"5422_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.32614\/CRAN.package.rstatix","author":"A Kassambara","year":"2019","unstructured":"Kassambara A (2019) rstatix: Pipe-Friendly Framework for Basic Statistical Tests. R package version 0 7 3. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.32614\/CRAN.package.rstatix","journal-title":"R package version 0 7 3"},{"key":"5422_CR33","unstructured":"Kassambara A, Mundt F, Erdey L (2026) factoextra: extract and visualise the results of multivariate data analyses (R package version 2.0.0). CRAN. https:\/\/CRAN.R-project.org\/package=factoextra"},{"issue":"1","key":"5422_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.18637\/jss.v025.i01","volume":"25","author":"S L\u00ea","year":"2008","unstructured":"L\u00ea S, Josse J, Husson F (2008) FactoMineR: An R package for multivariate analysis. J Stat Softw 25(1):1\u201318","journal-title":"J Stat Softw"},{"key":"5422_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"105239","DOI":"10.1016\/j.appet.2021.105239","volume":"163","author":"S Li","year":"2021","unstructured":"Li S, Kallas Z (2021) Meta-analysis of consumers\u2019 willingness to pay for sustainable food products. Appetite 163:105239. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.appet.2021.105239","journal-title":"Appetite"},{"issue":"18","key":"5422_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"7270","DOI":"10.3390\/su12187270","volume":"12","author":"O Meixner","year":"2020","unstructured":"Meixner O, Katt F (2020) Assessing the Impact of COVID-19 on Consumer Food Safety Perceptions\u2014A Choice-Based Willingness to Pay Study. Sustainability 12(18):7270. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/su12187270","journal-title":"Sustainability"},{"issue":"3","key":"5422_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"241","DOI":"10.7120\/09627286.24.3.241","volume":"24","author":"DJ Mellor","year":"2015","unstructured":"Mellor DJ, Beausoleil N (2015) Extending the \u2018Five Domains\u2019 model for animal welfare assessment to incorporate positive welfare states. Anim Welf 24(3):241\u2013253. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7120\/09627286.24.3.241","journal-title":"Anim Welf"},{"key":"5422_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Miranda-de la Lama GC, Est\u00e9vez-Moreno LX, Sep\u00falveda WS, Estrada-Chavero MR, Rayas-Amor AA, Villarroel M, et al. (2017) Mexican consumers' perceptions and attitudes towards farm animal welfare and willingness to pay for welfare-friendly meat products. Meat Sci. 125:106\u2013113","DOI":"10.1016\/j.meatsci.2016.12.001"},{"issue":"1","key":"5422_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"131","DOI":"10.51415\/ajims.v3i1.915","volume":"3","author":"A Naicker","year":"2021","unstructured":"Naicker A, Palmer K, Makanjana O, Nzama PF (2021) The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on food consumption habits, food purchasing behaviours, and food security status among South Africans. Afr J Inter\/Multidisciplinary Stud 3(1):131\u2013143","journal-title":"Afr J Inter\/Multidisciplinary Stud"},{"key":"5422_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"625","DOI":"10.1007\/s10459-010-9222-y","volume":"15","author":"G Norman","year":"2010","unstructured":"Norman G (2010) Likert scales, levels of measurement and the laws of statistics. Adv Health Sci Educ 15:625\u2013632","journal-title":"Adv Health Sci Educ"},{"key":"5422_CR42","unstructured":"NSF, New Research Finds 84% of South Africans Demand Animal Wellness From Food Companies (2024). NSF Global. Available on: https:\/\/www.nsf.org\/za\/en\/news\/new-research-finds-84-of-south-africans-demand-animal-wellness-from-food-companies [Accessed 5 March 2026]"},{"key":"5422_CR43","unstructured":"Ogle DH, Doll JC, Wheeler AP, Dinno A (2026) FSA: simple fisheries stock assessment methods [R package version 0.10.1]. CRAN"},{"key":"5422_CR62","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Prickett RW, Norwood FB, Lusk JL (2010) Consumer preferences for farm animal welfare: results from a telephone survey of US households. Anim Welf. 19(3):335\u2013347","DOI":"10.1017\/S0962728600001731"},{"key":"5422_CR45","unstructured":"Revelle W (2026) psych: procedures for Psychological, Psychometric, and Personality Research (Version 2.6.4) [Computer software]. Northwestern University. CRAN"},{"issue":"3","key":"5422_CR46","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"354","DOI":"10.1037\/a0029315","volume":"17","author":"M Rhemtulla","year":"2012","unstructured":"Rhemtulla M, Brosseau-Liard P\u00c9, Savalei V (2012) When can categorical variables be treated as continuous? A comparison of robust continuous and categorical SEM estimation methods under suboptimal conditions. Psychol Methods 17(3):354\u2013373","journal-title":"Psychol Methods"},{"issue":"4","key":"5422_CR47","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"619","DOI":"10.3390\/ani10040619","volume":"10","author":"M Rice","year":"2020","unstructured":"Rice M, Hemsworth LM, Hemsworth PH, Coleman GJ (2020) The impact of a negative media event on public attitudes towards animal welfare in the red meat industry. Animals 10(4):619. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/ani10040619","journal-title":"Animals"},{"issue":"3","key":"5422_CR48","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"499","DOI":"10.1007\/s11747-019-00666-6","volume":"48","author":"J Schmidt","year":"2020","unstructured":"Schmidt J, Bijmolt THA (2020) Accurately measuring willingness to pay for consumer goods: A meta-analysis of the hypothetical bias. J Acad Mark Sci 48(3):499\u2013518","journal-title":"J Acad Mark Sci"},{"key":"5422_CR49","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"960379","DOI":"10.3389\/fanim.2022.960379","volume":"3","author":"M Sinclair","year":"2022","unstructured":"Sinclair M, Lee NYP, H\u00f6tzel MJ, de Luna MC, Sharma A et al (2022) International perceptions of animals and the importance of their welfare. Front Anim Sci 3:960379. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fanim.2022.960379","journal-title":"Front Anim Sci"},{"issue":"8","key":"5422_CR50","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"128","DOI":"10.3390\/ani8080128","volume":"8","author":"CV Spain","year":"2018","unstructured":"Spain CV, Freund D, Mohan-Gibbons H, Meadow RG, Beacham L (2018) Are they buying it? United States consumers\u2019 changing attitudes toward more humanely raised meat, eggs, and dairy. Animals 8(8):128. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/ani8080128","journal-title":"Animals"},{"issue":"2","key":"5422_CR51","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"185","DOI":"10.3390\/ani12020185","volume":"12","author":"S Sweeney","year":"2022","unstructured":"Sweeney S, Regan \u00c1, McKernan C, Benson T, Hanlon A, Dean M (2022) Current consumer perceptions of animal welfare across different farming sectors on the island of Ireland. Animals 12(2):185. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/ani12020185","journal-title":"Animals"},{"key":"5422_CR52","unstructured":"Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS (2019) Using multivariate statistics, 7th edn. Pearson"},{"issue":"1","key":"5422_CR53","first-page":"19","volume":"21","author":"M Tomczak","year":"2014","unstructured":"Tomczak M, Tomczak E (2014) The need to report effect size estimates revisited. An overview of some recommended measures of effect size. Trends Sport Sci 21(1):19\u201325","journal-title":"Trends Sport Sci"},{"key":"5422_CR54","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"126","DOI":"10.1016\/j.livsci.2007.09.017","volume":"116","author":"F Vanhonacker","year":"2008","unstructured":"Vanhonacker F, Verbeke W, Van Poucke E, Tuyttens FAM (2008) Do citizens and farmers interpret the concept of farm animal welfare differently? Livest Sci 116:126\u2013136","journal-title":"Livest Sci"},{"key":"5422_CR55","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3423","DOI":"10.3390\/su13063423","volume":"13","author":"P Warsaw","year":"2021","unstructured":"Warsaw P, Archambault S, He A, Miller S (2021) The economic, social, and environmental impacts of farmers markets: recent evidence from the US. Sustainability 13:3423. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/su13063423","journal-title":"Sustainability"},{"key":"5422_CR57","unstructured":"Wickham H, Fran\u00e7ois R, Henry L, M\u00fcller K, Vaughan D (2023) dplyr: a grammar of data manipulation. https:\/\/dplyr.tidyverse.org"},{"key":"5422_CR56","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Wickham H, Chang W, Henry L, Pedersen TL, Takahashi K, Wilke C, Woo K, Yutani H, Dunnington D, van den Brand T (2024) Ggplot2: create elegant data visualisations using the grammar of graphics. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.32614\/CRAN.package.ggplot2","DOI":"10.32614\/CRAN.package.ggplot2"},{"key":"5422_CR58","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"World Organisation for Animal Health (WOAH) (2025) Terrestrial Animal health code. 33rd ed. Paris: WOAH. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.20506\/woah.3723","DOI":"10.20506\/woah.3723"},{"key":"5422_CR63","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Xu L, Yang X, Wu L, Chen X, Chen L, Tsai FS (2019) Consumers\u2019 willingness to pay for food with information on animal welfare, lean meat essence detection, and traceability. Int J Environ Res Public Health.16(19):3616. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/ijerph16193616","DOI":"10.3390\/ijerph16193616"},{"issue":"2","key":"5422_CR59","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"455","DOI":"10.1108\/BFJ-04-2020-0332","volume":"123","author":"X Yang","year":"2021","unstructured":"Yang X (2021) Potential consequences of COVID-19 for sustainable meat consumption: the role of food safety concerns and responsibility attributions. Br Food J 123(2):455\u2013474. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1108\/BFJ-04-2020-0332","journal-title":"Br Food J"},{"issue":"10","key":"5422_CR60","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e109177","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0109177","volume":"9","author":"X You","year":"2014","unstructured":"You X, Li Y, Zhang M, Yan H, Zhao R (2014) A survey of Chinese citizens\u2019 perceptions on farm animal welfare. PLoS ONE 9(10):e109177. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0109177","journal-title":"PLoS ONE"},{"issue":"18","key":"5422_CR61","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"7388","DOI":"10.3390\/su12187388","volume":"12","author":"C Yue","year":"2020","unstructured":"Yue C, Lai Y, Wang J, Mitchell P (2020) Consumer preferences for sustainable product attributes and farm program features. Sustainability 12(18):7388. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/su12187388","journal-title":"Sustainability"}],"container-title":["Tropical Animal Health and Production"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11250-026-05422-x.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s11250-026-05422-x","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11250-026-05422-x.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,20]],"date-time":"2026-10-20T17:49:41Z","timestamp":1792518581000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s11250-026-05422-x"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,20]]},"references-count":62,"journal-issue":{"issue":"8","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,11]]}},"alternative-id":["5422"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11250-026-05422-x","relation":{},"ISSN":["0049-4747","1573-7438"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0049-4747","type":"print"},{"value":"1573-7438","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,20]]},"assertion":[{"value":"27 March 2026","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"8 October 2026","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"20 October 2026","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"Ethical clearance to distribute this questionnaire was obtained from the Research Ethics Committee (Humanities) of Stellenbosch University (reference number: 7699).","order":1,"name":"Ethics","label":"Ethical approval","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"All human participants entered this study voluntarily, with full information about what participation entailed, and gave their consent before participating.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","label":"Compliance with ethical standards","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"During the preparation of this work, the authors used the generative AI tool Grammarly to enhance readability. After utilizing this tool, the authors reviewed and edited the content and assumed full responsibility for its publication.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","label":"Generative AI","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The authors declare no conflict of interest.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","label":"Conflict of interest","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}}],"article-number":"630"}}