{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,9]],"date-time":"2026-10-09T01:18:08Z","timestamp":1791508688471,"version":"4.3.4"},"reference-count":32,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"5","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,12,28]],"date-time":"2024-12-28T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1735344000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,12,28]],"date-time":"2024-12-28T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1735344000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Int Urol Nephrol"],"DOI":"10.1007\/s11255-024-04343-8","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,12,28]],"date-time":"2024-12-28T15:48:35Z","timestamp":1735400915000},"page":"1473-1480","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":5,"title":["Stone-event-free survival after retrograde intrarenal surgery: is the stone-free-status so relevant for the future outcomes?"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"57","author":[{"given":"Sofia","family":"Mesquita","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Gon\u00e7alo","family":"Mendes","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Miguel","family":"Marques-Monteiro","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Maria Alexandra","family":"Rocha","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Mariana","family":"Madanelo","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Avelino","family":"Fraga","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"V\u00edtor","family":"Cavadas","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,12,28]]},"reference":[{"issue":"1","key":"4343_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"125","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eururo.2014.07.003","volume":"67","author":"S De","year":"2015","unstructured":"De S, Autorino R, Kim FJ, Zargar H, Laydner H, Balsamo R et al (2015) Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol 67(1):125\u2013137","journal-title":"Eur Urol"},{"issue":"1","key":"4343_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"46","DOI":"10.1016\/S0022-5347(05)64829-X","volume":"168","author":"AZ Weizer","year":"2002","unstructured":"Weizer AZ, Auge BK, Silverstein AD, Delvecchio FC, Brizuela RM, Dahm P et al (2002) Routine postoperative imaging is important after ureteroscopic stone manipulation. J Urol 168(1):46\u201350","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"issue":"1","key":"4343_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"18","DOI":"10.1159\/000020093","volume":"37","author":"C Candau","year":"2000","unstructured":"Candau C, Saussine C, Lang H, Roy C, Faure F, Jacqmin D (2000) Natural history of residual renal stone fragments after ESWL. Eur Urol 37(1):18\u201322","journal-title":"Eur Urol"},{"issue":"3","key":"4343_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"564","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2010.06.056","volume":"77","author":"DA Rebuck","year":"2011","unstructured":"Rebuck DA, Macejko A, Bhalani V, Ramos P, Nadler RB (2011) The natural history of renal stone fragments following ureteroscopy. Urology 77(3):564\u2013568","journal-title":"Urology"},{"issue":"4","key":"4343_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"442","DOI":"10.1111\/bju.15522","volume":"129","author":"CE Lovegrove","year":"2022","unstructured":"Lovegrove CE, Geraghty RM, Yang B, Brain E, Howles S, Turney B et al (2022) Natural history of small asymptomatic kidney and residual stones over a long-term follow-up: systematic review over 25 years. BJU Int 129(4):442\u2013456","journal-title":"BJU Int"},{"issue":"8","key":"4343_CR6","first-page":"35","volume":"15","author":"DM Newman","year":"1989","unstructured":"Newman DM, Lingeman JE (1989) Management of upper urinary tract calculi with extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy. Compr Ther 15(8):35\u201340","journal-title":"Compr Ther"},{"issue":"1","key":"4343_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"20","DOI":"10.1016\/S0090-4295(01)01494-7","volume":"59","author":"A Khaitan","year":"2002","unstructured":"Khaitan A, Gupta NP, Hemal AK, Dogra PN, Seth A, Aron M (2002) Post-ESWL, clinically insignificant residual stones: reality or myth? Urology 59(1):20\u201324","journal-title":"Urology"},{"issue":"6","key":"4343_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"860","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eururo.2005.01.005","volume":"47","author":"MM Osman","year":"2005","unstructured":"Osman MM, Alfano Y, Kamp S, Haecker A, Alken P, Michel MS et al (2005) 5-year-follow-up of patients with clinically insignificant residual fragments after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy. Eur Urol 47(6):860\u2013864","journal-title":"Eur Urol"},{"issue":"1","key":"4343_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"412","DOI":"10.1007\/s00345-024-05103-0","volume":"42","author":"S Moretto","year":"2024","unstructured":"Moretto S, Saita A, Scoffone CM, Talso M, Somani BK, Traxer O et al (2024) An international delphi survey and consensus meeting to define the risk factors for ureteral stricture after endoscopic treatment for urolithiasis. World J Urol 42(1):412","journal-title":"World J Urol"},{"issue":"12","key":"4343_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1108","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2018.0529","volume":"32","author":"A Danilovic","year":"2018","unstructured":"Danilovic A, Cavalanti A, Rocha BA, Traxer O, Torricelli FCM, Marchini GS et al (2018) Assessment of residual stone fragments after retrograde intrarenal surgery. J Endourol 32(12):1108\u20131113","journal-title":"J Endourol"},{"issue":"6","key":"4343_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1274","DOI":"10.2214\/AJR.11.6434","volume":"196","author":"BH Eisner","year":"2011","unstructured":"Eisner BH, McQuaid JW, Hyams E, Matlaga BR (2011) Nephrolithiasis: what surgeons need to know. Am J Roentgenol 196(6):1274\u20131278","journal-title":"Am J Roentgenol"},{"issue":"3","key":"4343_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"280","DOI":"10.1067\/mem.2002.126170","volume":"40","author":"A Worster","year":"2002","unstructured":"Worster A, Preyra I, Weaver B, Haines T (2002) The accuracy of noncontrast helical computed tomography versus intravenous pyelography in the diagnosis of suspected acute urolithiasis: a meta-analysis. Ann Emerg Med 40(3):280\u2013286","journal-title":"Ann Emerg Med"},{"issue":"6","key":"4343_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2246","DOI":"10.1016\/j.juro.2012.08.040","volume":"188","author":"CA Rippel","year":"2012","unstructured":"Rippel CA, Nikkel L, Lin YK, Danawala Z, Olorunnisomo V, Youssef RF et al (2012) Residual fragments following ureteroscopic lithotripsy: incidence and predictors on postoperative computerized tomography. J Urol 188(6):2246\u20132251","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"issue":"6","key":"4343_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"533","DOI":"10.1007\/s00240-014-0691-y","volume":"42","author":"F Ozgor","year":"2014","unstructured":"Ozgor F, Simsek A, Binbay M, Akman T, Kucuktopcu O, Sarilar O et al (2014) Clinically insignificant residual fragments after flexible ureterorenoscopy: medium-term follow-up results. Urolithiasis 42(6):533\u2013538","journal-title":"Urolithiasis"},{"issue":"9","key":"4343_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1411","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2009.0645","volume":"24","author":"ES Hyams","year":"2010","unstructured":"Hyams ES, Bruhn A, Lipkin M, Shah O (2010) Heterogeneity in the reporting of disease characteristics and treatment outcomes in studies evaluating treatments for nephrolithiasis. J Endourol 24(9):1411\u20131414","journal-title":"J Endourol"},{"issue":"2","key":"4343_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"282","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2010.12.009","volume":"78","author":"SR Patel","year":"2011","unstructured":"Patel SR, Nakada SY (2011) Quantification of preoperative stone burden for ureteroscopy and shock wave lithotripsy: current state and future recommendations. Urology 78(2):282\u2013285","journal-title":"Urology"},{"issue":"3","key":"4343_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"275","DOI":"10.1016\/S0302-2838(03)00006-X","volume":"43","author":"H Tiselius","year":"2003","unstructured":"Tiselius H (2003) Stone burden in an average swedish population of stone formers requiring active stone removal: how can the stone size be estimated in the clinical routine? Eur Urol 43(3):275\u2013281","journal-title":"Eur Urol"},{"issue":"1","key":"4343_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"6","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2011.0145","volume":"26","author":"S Mishra","year":"2012","unstructured":"Mishra S, Sabnis RB, Desai M (2012) Second prize: staghorn morphometry: a new tool for clinical classification and prediction model for percutaneous nephrolithotomy monotherapy. J Endourol 26(1):6\u201314","journal-title":"J Endourol"},{"issue":"3","key":"4343_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"265","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2017.0886","volume":"32","author":"V De Coninck","year":"2018","unstructured":"De Coninck V, Traxer O (2018) The time has come to report stone burden in terms of volume instead of largest diameter. J Endourol 32(3):265\u2013266","journal-title":"J Endourol"},{"issue":"3","key":"4343_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"477","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2015.06.018","volume":"86","author":"O Merigot de Treigny","year":"2015","unstructured":"Merigot de Treigny O, Bou Nasr E, Almont T, Tack I, Rischmann P, Souli\u00e9 M et al (2015) The cumulated stone diameter: a limited tool for stone burden estimation. Urology 86(3):477\u2013481","journal-title":"Urology"},{"issue":"6","key":"4343_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2275","DOI":"10.1016\/j.juro.2011.07.091","volume":"186","author":"SR Patel","year":"2011","unstructured":"Patel SR, Stanton P, Zelinski N, Borman EJ, Pozniak MA, Nakada SY et al (2011) Automated renal stone volume measurement by noncontrast computerized tomography is more reproducible than manual linear size measurement. J Urol 186(6):2275\u20132279","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"issue":"4","key":"4343_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"610","DOI":"10.1111\/bju.12456","volume":"113","author":"W Finch","year":"2014","unstructured":"Finch W, Johnston R, Shaida N, Winterbottom A, Wiseman O (2014) Measuring stone volume\u2014three-dimensional software reconstruction or an ellipsoid algebra formula? BJU Int 113(4):610\u2013614","journal-title":"BJU Int"},{"issue":"4","key":"4343_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1139","DOI":"10.1016\/S0022-5347(01)63531-6","volume":"159","author":"MD Fabrizio","year":"1998","unstructured":"Fabrizio MD, Behari A, Bagley DH (1998) Ureteroscopic management of intrarenal calculi. J Urol 159(4):1139\u20131143","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"issue":"1","key":"4343_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"31","DOI":"10.1016\/S0022-5347(05)65376-1","volume":"167","author":"M Sofer","year":"2002","unstructured":"Sofer M, Watterson JD, Wollin TA, Nott l, Razvi H, Denstedt JD (2002) Holmium: YAG laser lithotripsy for upper urinary tract calculi in 598 patients. J Urol 167(1):31\u201334","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"issue":"6","key":"4343_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1102","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2004.07.040","volume":"64","author":"BD Parker","year":"2004","unstructured":"Parker BD, Frederick RW, Reilly TP, Lowry PS, Bird ET (2004) Efficiency and cost of treating proximal ureteral stones: Shock wave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy plus holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser. Urology 64(6):1102\u20131106","journal-title":"Urology"},{"issue":"5","key":"4343_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"473","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2006.0364","volume":"21","author":"S Halachmi","year":"2007","unstructured":"Halachmi S, Ghersin E, Ginesin Y, Meretyk S (2007) Antegrade pyelography versus unenhanced multidetector CT in the assessment of urinary-tract stones after percutaneous nephrostomy insertion: a prospective blinded study. J Endourol 21(5):473\u2013477","journal-title":"J Endourol"},{"issue":"3","key":"4343_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"379","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2008.0240","volume":"23","author":"A Macejko","year":"2009","unstructured":"Macejko A, Okotie OT, Zhao LC, Liu J, Perry K, Nadler RB (2009) Computed tomography-determined stone-free rates for ureteroscopy of upper-tract stones. J Endourol 23(3):379\u2013382","journal-title":"J Endourol"},{"issue":"1","key":"4343_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"188","DOI":"10.1016\/j.euf.2022.06.016","volume":"9","author":"L Tzelves","year":"2023","unstructured":"Tzelves L, Geraghty R, Lombardo R, Davis NF, Pet\u0159\u00edk A, Neisius A et al (2023) Duration of follow-up and timing of discharge from imaging follow-up, in adult patients with urolithiasis after surgical or medical intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis from the European Association of Urology Guideline Panel on Urolithiasis. Eur Urol Focus 9(1):188\u2013198","journal-title":"Eur Urol Focus"},{"issue":"4 Part 1","key":"4343_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"982","DOI":"10.1016\/j.juro.2015.11.009","volume":"195","author":"BH Chew","year":"2016","unstructured":"Chew BH, Brotherhood HL, Sur RL, Wang AQ, Knudsen BE, Yong C et al (2016) Natural history, complications and re-intervention rates of asymptomatic residual stone fragments after ureteroscopy: a report from the EDGE Research Consortium. J Urol 195(4 Part 1):982\u2013986","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"issue":"1","key":"4343_CR30","first-page":"1","volume":"16","author":"G Atis","year":"2019","unstructured":"Atis G, Pelit ES, Culpan M, Gunaydin B, Turan T, Danacioglu YO et al (2019) The fate of residual fragments after retrograde intrarenal surgery in long-term follow-up. Urol J 16(1):1\u20135","journal-title":"Urol J"},{"issue":"4","key":"4343_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1186","DOI":"10.1016\/S0022-5347(01)66208-6","volume":"155","author":"SB Streem","year":"1996","unstructured":"Streem SB, Yost A, Mascha E (1996) Clinical implications of clinically insignificant store fragments after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. J Urol 155(4):1186\u20131190","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"issue":"6","key":"4343_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"506","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa2204253","volume":"387","author":"MD Sorensen","year":"2022","unstructured":"Sorensen MD, Harper JD, Borofsky MS, Hameed TA, Smoot KJ, Burke BH et al (2022) Removal of small, asymptomatic kidney stones and incidence of relapse. N Engl J Med 387(6):506\u2013513","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"}],"container-title":["International Urology and Nephrology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11255-024-04343-8.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s11255-024-04343-8\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11255-024-04343-8.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,16]],"date-time":"2025-04-16T13:59:14Z","timestamp":1744811954000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s11255-024-04343-8"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024,12,28]]},"references-count":32,"journal-issue":{"issue":"5","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,5]]}},"alternative-id":["4343"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11255-024-04343-8","relation":{},"ISSN":["1573-2584"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1573-2584","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2024,12,28]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2 December 2024","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"19 December 2024","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"28 December 2024","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing interests.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}},{"value":"This retrospective chart review study involving human participants was in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The institutional Human Investigation Committee (IRB) approved this study.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethical approval"}}]}}